ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06999096GenoDYTUpdated May 20, 2026

Long-read Genome Sequencing for the Molecular Diagnosis of Dystonia

An interventional study of Long-read whole genome sequencing in Dystonia, Movement Disorders and Combined Dystonia, sponsored by University Hospital, Strasbourg, France. Recruiting at 4 sites in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-20.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Strasbourg, France · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Dystonia is a motor disorder caused by involuntary, intermittent, or sustained muscle contractions, leading to abnormal movements or postures. It can affect any body region and often results in significant functional disability and healthcare burden. Although its familial nature was recognized early on, the advent of high-throughput DNA sequencing has dramatically increased the identification of dystonia-associated genes. Dystonia now encompasses all modes of inheritance-autosomal dominant (e.g., TOR1A, KMT2B), autosomal recessive, X-linked, and mitochondrial-and over 100 genes have been implicated. Many forms involve structural variants (SVs) or copy number variations (CNVs), which are challenging to detect using standard short-read sequencing (srWGS).

Molecular diagnosis is essential, ending the diagnostic odyssey and enabling genetic counseling, prognosis, reproductive planning, and-in some cases-targeted therapies. For instance, GNAO1-related dystonia may respond to deep brain stimulation, while dopa-responsive dystonia benefits from levodopa.

Despite advances, srWGS has key limitations, especially for detecting repeat expansions, SVs, and phasing alleles. This likely explains the low diagnostic yield in dystonia compared to other neurological disorders, with over 70% of cases remaining unsolved.

Long-read sequencing (lrWGS), such as Oxford Nanopore technology, overcomes many of these challenges by reading native DNA fragments thousands of bases long. It enables comprehensive detection of SNVs, indels, SVs, CNVs, methylation changes, and repeat expansions-including known and newly discovered pathogenic expansions (e.g., in NOTCH2NLC). It also allows phasing without parental samples, which is crucial in recessive cases.

The investigators propose that lrWGS could significantly increase the diagnostic yield in dystonia, improving patient care, enabling appropriate genetic counseling, and paving the way for personalized treatment strategies.

Read the detailed description

Dystonia is a motor disorder characterized by abnormal movements and/or postures. It is caused by involuntary, intermittent, or sustained muscle contractions. Dystonia can affect all body segments, leading to highly variable and often severe functional impairment with a significant burden on healthcare systems.

The familial nature of some generalized dystonias was recognized as early as the 1940s. With the development and increased availability of high-throughput DNA sequencing technologies since the early 2010s, there has been an exponential rise in the discovery of genes associated with neurological phenotypes in which dystonia is either the main manifestation or part of a broader clinical picture. Dystonia is now known to be associated with all modes of inheritance, including autosomal dominant forms (e.g., TOR1A, KMT2B), autosomal recessive forms often presenting with complex phenotypes, X-linked dominant (e.g., WDR45) and recessive (e.g., TAF1) forms, and even mitochondrial inheritance.

To date, over 100 genes have been linked to dystonic phenotypes, highlighting the significant genetic heterogeneity of this condition. Many genetically determined dystonic syndromes are associated with structural variants (SVs) or copy number variations (CNVs), which are difficult to detect using routine short-read sequencing technologies.

Molecular diagnosis is crucial in the management of dystonia. It provides a definitive and precise diagnosis, bringing an end to the diagnostic odyssey for patients and their families. It also enables accurate genetic counseling, offering information on inheritance risks and the potential for other family members to be affected. In some cases, a molecular diagnosis directly influences therapeutic decisions. For example, pathogenic variants in GNAO1 are associated with early-onset dystonic syndromes that respond well to deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus. Specific symptomatic treatments have been proposed for certain dystonias, such as levodopa in dopa-responsive dystonia. At the population level, identifying new genes or molecular causes can reveal novel pathogenic mechanisms and facilitate the development of animal or cellular models, paving the way for future gene therapies.

Over the past decade, the growing availability of short-read DNA sequencing technologies has enabled the simultaneous analysis of numerous dystonia-associated genes. In routine diagnostics, short-read sequencing involves fragmenting DNA into small pieces (usually a few hundred base pairs), which are then sequenced from both ends.

This approach has limitations, particularly for detecting repeat expansions that exceed the size of the sequenced fragments. These limitations may partly explain why a relatively small proportion of dystonia cases receive a molecular diagnosis compared to other neurological disorders like cerebellar ataxias or hereditary spastic paraplegias. Overall, more than 70% of dystonia patients sequenced via short-read WGS remain without a molecular diagnosis, despite strong clinical indicators of a genetic etiology.

To overcome these limitations, long-read DNA sequencing technologies have been developed. Unlike short-read methods, long-read sequencing preserves native DNA fragment sizes, which can span thousands of bases. One such approach (Oxford Nanopore) sequences DNA based on ionic current changes as the molecule passes through a nanometer-scale pore. Long-read sequencing offers several advantages. Like short-read methods, it detects small variants (SNVs and indels). However, it also excels at identifying structural variants, CNVs, methylation changes, and especially repeat expansions-key elements often missed by standard methods.

In neurogenetics, long-read sequencing has enabled the accurate detection and quantification of known repeat disorders (e.g., C9orf72 hexanucleotide expansions, RFC1), as well as the discovery of new disease-causing repeat expansions (e.g., GGC repeats in NOTCH2NLC).

It also allows phasing of alleles (cis or trans configurations) without requiring family segregation studies, which is particularly useful in recessive conditions.

Given the current diagnostic limitations of short-read sequencing, the emergence of newly identified repeat expansions, and the demonstrated advantages of long-read sequencing, the investigators hypothesize that a significant proportion of patients with undiagnosed dystonia could benefit from whole-genome long-read sequencing (lrWGS).

Such an approach could, in a single test, overcome many of the key diagnostic blind spots of short-read methods, particularly for detecting repeat expansions and structural variants. This would not only end the diagnostic odyssey for many patients, but also enable appropriate genetic counseling, access to reproductive options such as prenatal or preimplantation diagnosis, and even influence treatment strategies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dystonia
  • Movement Disorders
  • Combined Dystonia
  • Complex Dystonia

Keywords

  • Dystonia
  • Genome Sequencing
  • Long-read Sequencing
  • Molecular diagnosis
  • Neurogenetics
03

In context

Dystonia

213 studies on the registry are indexed under Dystonia; 54 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 28 across 114 interventional studies indexed under Dystonia.

Browse Dystonia studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Strasbourg, France is the lead sponsor of 999 studies on the registry; 358 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria - Index case:

  • Index case affected by familial dystonia (≥1 first-degree relative affected) and/or sporadic early-onset dystonia (symptom onset before age 50), meeting the criteria of the PFMG-2025 program.
  • Index case who has undergone short-read genome sequencing, which did not lead to a molecular diagnosis.
  • Ability to understand and sign by the index case and/or their parents or legal guardians for patients under 18 years of age.
  • Availability of a blood sample from the index case and at least two relatives, either affected or unaffected.

Inclusion criteria - Relatives:

  • Symptomatic or asymptomatic relative of an index case, who has also undergone short-read genome sequencing without a conclusive molecular diagnosis.
  • Ability to understand and sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Index case or relatives who are not affiliated with or not beneficiaries of a social security scheme.
  • Index case and their parents presenting with a condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would contraindicate participation in the study.
  • Suspected non-genetic etiology (e.g., perinatal hypoxic-ischemic injury, kernicterus, history of severe head trauma or central nervous system infection).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dystonia patients without molecular diagnosis

    Long-read genome sequencing for identification of genetic causes in dystonia patients without molecular diagnosis

    Diagnostic Test: Long-read whole genome sequencing

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testLong-read whole genome sequencing

    Pseudonymized blood samples will undergo high-molecular-weight DNA extraction, followed by long-read whole-genome sequencing (lrWGS) using Oxford Nanopore technology. Index cases will be sequenced at high depth (\>30X), while relatives will be multiplexed (\>15X). Sequencing data will be analyzed through a dedicated bioinformatics pipeline to detect SNVs, indels, structural variants, and repeat expansions. Results will be interpreted by expert teams and discussed in monthly clinical-genetic meetings. Variants of interest will be validated by appropriate molecular techniques, and family segregation will be assessed when relevant.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Long-read genome sequencing diagnostic rate

    Proportion (expressed as a percentage) of families in which a causal genetic variant (classified as class 4 or 5 according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics) explaining the patients' symptoms was identified through long-read genome sequencing, after no diagnosis had been reached using prior short-read genome analysis.

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Technical issues rate

    Proportion (expressed as a percentage) of families for whom technical difficulties were encountered during long-read genome sequencing and analysis, the proportion for whom solutions were identified, and the proportion for whom it was not possible to obtain a result

    Time frame: 18 months

  2. Proportion of activable disorders

    Proportion (percentage) of families for whom the molecular diagnosis led to a change in clinical management, including therapeutic modification; genetic counseling, prenatal or preimplantation diagnosis for the index case or relatives; detection of a disease-specific complication in the index case or relatives.

    Time frame: 24 months

  3. New molecular causes of dystonia

    Proportion (percentage) of families whose molecular diagnosis revealed a previously unreported genetic cause of dystonia.

    Time frame: 18 months

  4. Resolution following reanalysis of short-read whole genome sequencing data

    Proportion (percentage) of families in which a causal genetic variant was identified using dedicated bioinformatic tools during retrospective reanalysis of the short-read genome.

    Time frame: 18 months

  5. Medico-economic impact of molecular diagnosis

    Assessment of the cost of illness by detailing cost components per patient from a collective perspective, and evaluating the cost invested per additional diagnosis enabled by long-read technology.

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 of 4 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Apr 2026; primary completion for Aug 2030, 52 months later.

Of 48 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Dystonia, half reached primary completion within 50 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 75. This study's planned 52 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 49 studies reached it within 50 months; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 75.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 22, 2025
First posted
May 31, 2025
StartEst.
Apr 22, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2030
CompletionEst.
Aug 2030
Last update
May 20, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06999096
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 31, 2025
Start date
Apr 22, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2030 (estimated)
Last update
May 20, 2026

Study contacts

Thomas WIRTH, Doctor
Contact
thomas.wirth@chru-strasbourg.fr
+33 3 88 12 89 19

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion