CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06988332Updated Nov 20, 2025

Problem Management Plus (PM+) in Chile: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Psychological Transdiagnostic Intervention Delivered in Primary Health Care

An interventional study of Problem Management Plus (PM+) in Anxiety Disorders and Depressive Disorder, sponsored by University of Chile. Completed at 1 site in Chile. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-20.

Sponsored by University of Chile · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the implementation outcomes of a pilot randomized controlled trial and to assess the preliminary efficacy of Problem Management Plus (PM+) in reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety among users at a Primary Health Care center in Chile.

Two intervention groups will be compared: PM+ versus care as usual (CAU). The process will include an evaluation of the feasibility of the study procedures, as well as the acceptability and fidelity of the PM+ intervention.

Read the detailed description

In Chile, only 19% of the population with mental health conditions has access to primary care services, highlighting the urgent need to expand mental health care availability. Training more healthcare professionals to deliver low-intensity psychological interventions could be a valuable approach to addressing this disparity.

The World Health Organization's Problem Management Plus (PM+) is a low-intensity, transdiagnostic, peer-delivered intervention designed for implementation in resource-limited settings to address common mental health disorders. In this context, PM+ serves as an evidence-based strategy that can help reduce gaps in healthcare services, particularly regarding availability and accessibility.

This study aims to evaluate the implementation outcomes of a pilot randomized clinical trial, including feasibility, acceptability and fidelity and to assess the preliminary efficacy of PM+ in reducing mental health symptoms among users at a primary healthcare center in Chile.

The study design is a single-blind pilot randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio, assessing two intervention arms for participants with depressive and/or anxiety symptoms over five weeks.

The study population consists of adults of 18 years or above with mild to moderate depressive and/or anxiety symptoms, living in the selected study region and enrolled in the primary health care center chosen to conduct the trial.

Two groups will be compared. The treatment group will receive five sessions of PM+. The control group will receive care as usual (CAU), which includes the regular mental health services provided at the primary health care center selected for the study.

Implementation outcomes of PM+ will be assessed, focusing mainly on feasibility, acceptability and fidelity. Additionally, preliminary efficacy outcomes of depression, anxiety and self-identified problems will be evaluated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anxiety Disorders
  • Depressive Disorder

Keywords

  • Common mental health disorders
  • Common mental health problems
  • Depressive disorder
  • Anxiety disorders
  • Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial
  • Pilot RCT
  • PM+
  • Problem Management Plus
03

In context

Anxiety Disorders

4,868 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,390 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 56 is below the median of 80 across 4,174 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.

Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Chile is the lead sponsor of 191 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals over 18 years old.
  • Diagnosed with or presenting depressive and/or anxiety symptoms (through screening).
  • Residents of the selected study region.
  • Part of the population enrolled and validated in the pilot primary health care facilities.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suicidal risk requiring immediate or urgent referral to care services.
  • Suffering from severe psychiatric disorders or substance use disorders.
  • Being in situations of declared risk that require protection (e.g., domestic violence).
  • Moderate or severe disability.
  • Incapacitating medical illnesses.
  • Receiving other mental health treatments that could lead to over-intervention.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Problem Management Plus (PM+)

    PM+ is delivered in five individual sessions conducted by trained healthcare professionals without previous expertise in mental health care.

    Behavioral: Problem Management Plus (PM+)

  • No intervention
    Care as Usual (CAU)

    Care as usual comprises the mental health services currently provided to Primary Health Care users in Chile.

Interventions

  • BehavioralProblem Management Plus (PM+)

    Problem Management Plus (PM+) will be delivered according to the Spanish version of the WHO protocol (OMS, 2016). PM+ is a low-intensity, transdiagnostic psychological intervention based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). The protocol incorporates evidence-based strategies, including problem-solving, stress management, behavioral activation, and accessing social support. The intervention consists of five individual 90-minute sessions provided by healthcare professionals without previous expertise in mental health care (WHO, 2018). PM+ helpers will be supervised by master trainers specifically trained for Chile. Two systematic reviews have demonstrated the effectiveness of PM+ in reducing symptoms of common mental disorders, such as depression and anxiety (Schäfer et al., 2023) and specific symptoms of post-traumatic stress (Akhtar et al., 2022).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Implementation outcome: Feasibility

    Measured through components A and B. A. Percentage of participant recruitment: defined as the proportion of participants who consented to enroll in the trial and were subsequently recruited. B. Participant adherence to PM+: defined as the average number of PM+ sessions attended by each participant.

    Time frame: Feasibility outcome component A will be collected once recruitment is completed. Component B will be collected at week 6, starting from the first intervention week.

  2. Implementation outcome: Acceptability

    Indicators of PM+ acceptability among users and trained facilitators, assessed with quantitative scales. For users, an adapted version of the Abbreviated Acceptability Rating Profile (AARP) will be administered. The AARP consists of 8 Likert-scale items, yielding total scores ranging from 8 to 48, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability. For facilitators, an adapted version of the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) will be used. The AIM comprises 5 Likert-scale items, producing scores ranging from 4 to 20, where higher scores reflect greater acceptability. For both measures, descriptive statistics will be reported using median and interquartile range (IQR), as well as mean and standard deviation (x̄ \[SD\]).

    Time frame: Acceptability outcomes will be collected during the post-intervention assessment at week 6, starting from the first intervention week.

  3. Implementation Outcome: Fidelity

    Indicators of PM+ fidelity will be assessed with a study-specific rubric developed based on expert judgement. The rubric consists of 5 items, each reflecting a component of proper PM+ delivery. Items range from 1 ("low fidelity") to 4 ("high fidelity"), with higher scores indicating greater fidelity. The reported statistics will include the median and interquartile range (IQR) for each item, and the mean and standard deviation (x̄ \[SD\]) for the overall fidelity score per assessed PM+ session.

    Time frame: Fidelity outcomes will be collected throughout the intervention period, from the first to the final intervention week (week 5).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Preliminary pre-to-post effect of PM+ on depressive symptoms.

    Measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 items (PHQ-9), with scores ranging from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate increased symptom severity.

    Time frame: Measured through baseline at week 0 and post-intervention assessment at week 6, starting from the first intervention week.

  2. Preliminary pre-to-post effect of PM+ on anxiety symptoms.

    Measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 item (GAD-7), with scores ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate increased symptom severity.

    Time frame: Measured through baseline at week 0 and post-intervention assessment at week 6, starting from the first intervention week.

  3. Preliminary pre-to-post effect of PM+ on self-identified problems.

    Measured using the Psychological Outcome Profiles (PSYCHLOPS), with scores ranging from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate increased self-identified problem severity.

    Time frame: Measured through baseline at week 0 and post-intervention assessment at week 6, starting from the first intervention week.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CESFAM Las Ánimas
    Valdivia, Chile
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schafer SK, Thomas LM, Lindner S, Lieb K. World Health Organization's low-intensity psychosocial interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of Problem Management Plus and Step-by-Step. World Psychiatry. 2023 Oct;22(3):449-462. doi: 10.1002/wps.21129. PubMed 37713578 ↗
  • Akhtar A, Koyiet P, Rahman A, Schafer A, Hamdani SU, Cuijpers P, Sijbrandij M, Bryant RA. Residual posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms after provision of brief behavioral intervention in low- and middle-income countries: An individual-patient data meta-analysis. Depress Anxiety. 2022 Jan;39(1):71-82. doi: 10.1002/da.23221. Epub 2021 Nov 9. PubMed 34752690 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual Participant Data (IPD) will only be shared when required by regulatory institutions. In order to protect privacy and ensure the confidentiality of information, all data shared with research staff members without direct access to the case file will identify participants solely by their enrollment number and will be transmitted using depersonalized forms, such as the CRF. In the case it becomes necessary to share IPD with regulatory institutions, such as ethics committees or governmental agencies, the depersonalized enrollment number will be used to maintain the confidentiality of personal information. Personal information will only be shared with public health care services or as required under Chilean legislation.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06988332
Lead sponsor
University of Chile
Collaborators
Pan American Health Organization
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 23, 2025
Start date
May 9, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 12, 2025
Completion
Oct 12, 2025
Last update
Nov 20, 2025

Study contacts

Camila A. Solís, MSc.
study chair · University of Chile

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion