ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06983587MONIKAUpdated May 21, 2025

Reference Curves for Bone Mineral Density and Body Composition in Women Aged 20-89

An interventional study of Bone densitometry scan in Bone Density, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in France. Open to female participants aged 20 Years to 89 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-21.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
425
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
20 Years to 89 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Up-to-date normalcy curves for bone mineral density and body composition (fat and lean mass), are currently lacking. DMS IMAGING is therefore financing the MONIKA study, with Nîmes University Hospital as sponsor.

Some 425 healthy female volunteers aged 20 to 89 will be recruited from three centers (Nîmes, Montpellier and Lyon). A bone density scan at various bone sites (femur, rachis, radius and whole body) will provide up-to-date normalcy curves for bone mineral density as well as body composition (fat and lean mass). These measurements should help to better understand bone physiology and the links that may exist between bone tissue and muscle and adipose tissue.

This is a prospective multicenter cross-sectional descriptive study of healthy female volunteers. The study population is made up of healthy female volunteers from Europe, the Middle East and North Africa aged between 20 and 89, stratified into 7 age groups.

Read the detailed description

Bone densitometry using dual-photon X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the standard technique for measuring bone mineral density. According to the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF), if a single site is to be preferred, it should be the total hip or femoral neck, using a single NHANES III reference curve. It should be stressed, however, that this curve was obtained from a North American population with anthropometric parameters, notably body mass index (BMI), that differ from those of European populations, and more particularly of European, Middle Eastern and North African origin.

So far, only one reference curve has been obtained in France, from the OFELY study in 1993.

Given the age of this cohort and the possibility of changes in BMI over time in the population of European, Middle Eastern and North African origin, but even more so, the impossibility of transposing this curve onto new DXAs of different brands, new reference curves need to be developed. DMS IMAGING is therefore financing the MONIKA study, with Nîmes University Hospital as sponsor.

As part of this study, some 425 healthy female volunteers aged between 20 and 89 will be recruited from three centers (Nîmes, Montpellier, Lyon). A DXA examination at various bone sites (femur, rachis, radius and whole body) will provide up-to-date normalcy curves for BMD, but also for body composition (fat and lean mass), which are currently lacking. Access to this population could also enable us to better understand bone physiology and the links that may exist between bone tissue and muscle and adipose tissue.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bone Density
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes is the lead sponsor of 594 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Ethnic origin European, Middle Eastern, North African and whose 2 parents are from Europe, Middle East, North Africa only as there is a difference in BMD according to ethnicity
  • Person affiliated to or benefiting from a social security scheme
  • Free, informed consent signed by the participant and the investigator (on the day of inclusion and before any examination required by the research).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients presenting one of the following major risk factors:
  • Fragility fracture defined as a spontaneous or low-kinetic fracture (≤ one fall from height)
  • Hip fracture in a first-degree relative
  • Early menopause (\< age 40), Hysterectomy (complete \< age 40), Primary amenorrhea (absence of menstruation before age 15), Current amenorrhea of more than 3 months without contraceptive if patient is under age 40
  • Treatments : Prolonged corticosteroid therapy > 3 months or > 1 g (cumulative dose)
  • Immobilization of more than 3 months, less than 12 months old
  • Patients presenting one of the following pathologies affecting bone, muscle or adipose tissue:
  • Chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis) and untreated celiac disease
  • Renal insufficiency on dialysis or patients with nephrology follow-up
  • Known hypercalciuria
  • Osteomalacia, rickets, osteogenesis imperfecta
  • Osteopathy (Paget's disease, osteopetrosis, etc.)
  • Chronic inflammatory rheumatism
  • Haemopathy, neoplasia
  • Hepatic insufficiency or chronic hepatitis
  • Endocrinopathy: dysthyroidism, hypogonadism, hypercorticism, untreated acromegaly.
  • Anorexia nervosa
  • Hyperparathyroidism (even if controlled)
  • History of digestive surgery (bariatric, gastrectomy, digestive resection other than appendectomy, etc.)
  • History of organ transplant
  • Chronic infectious disease (HIV, etc.)
  • Weight loss of more than 10 kg in the last 6 months
  • Paresis, marked lameness or unloading of a limb or prolonged immobilisation of more than one month in the last 12 months

All patients on any treatment that may affect bone mass or body composition:

  • Biphosphonates (Alendronate (Fosamax® and generics), Risedronate (Actonel® and generics), Zoledronate (Aclasta® and generics)
  • Teriparatide (Forsteo®)
  • Denosumab (Prolia®)
  • Selective oestrogen receptor modulator (Clomifen, Tamoxifen, Toremifen, Raloxifen)
  • Anabolic steroids.
  • Strontium ranelate
  • Carbamazepine
  • Phenobarbital
  • Immunosuppressants
  • Antiepileptics

All patients with one of the following anomalies in the measurement area:

  • Major deformities of the wrist, hip or vertebrae
  • Compression of the vertebral bodies, cementoplasty
  • Prosthesis, implant (breast, buttock, etc.), foreign body
  • Hip paraosteoarthropathy
  • Injection of radiological contrast product, barium enema, nuclear medicine examination within 10 days

Miscellaneous :

  • Intensive sport (more than 10 h/week).
  • Extreme BMI (BMI \< 18, BMI > 35 kg/m²).
  • Loss of autonomy
  • Pregnant, parturient or breast-feeding woman
  • Participation in an interventional study involving a drug or medical device or a category 1 RIPH in the 3 months prior to inclusion.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
425 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Women aged 20-29

    This group will be used to construct the T-score equation, and thus define the thresholds for osteopenia and osteoporosis. To ensure adequate precision for this T-score, 175 subjects will be included in this age group. With this number of subjects, the following accuracies for two of the sites of interest (hip and L1-L4) are expected: For the hip, the expected bone mineral density value is 0.95 (SD=0.11) according to local data consistent with Arlot et al. Inclusion of 175 subjects would give a ½ width 95% confidence interval (IC95%) of the mean would be around 0.016, and the half width standard deviation of 0.012 For L1-L4, the expected bone mineral density value is 0.99 (SD=0.11) according to local data consistent with Arlot et al. The ½ width of the 95% confidence interval (IC95%) of the mean would be around 0.016, and the half-width standard deviation of 0.012.

    Radiation: Bone densitometry scan

  • Other
    Women aged 30-39

    For the 30-39 age group, only 25 subjects will be included, given the constancy of bone mineral density in this age group compared with the 20-29 age group. In addition, the results of the analyses will take the form of a Z-score equation, estimated using a regression method (i.e. overall and not a z-score per age group). As there will be many subjects under 30 and over 40, this will ensure (by interpolation) an equivalent precision in these age brackets to that of the adjacent age categories.

    Radiation: Bone densitometry scan

  • Other
    Women aged 40-49

    Group including 50 subjects.

    Radiation: Bone densitometry scan

  • Other
    Women aged 50-59

    Group including 50 subjects.

    Radiation: Bone densitometry scan

  • Other
    Women aged 60-69

    Group including 50 subjects.

    Radiation: Bone densitometry scan

  • Other
    Women aged 70-79

    Group including 50 subjects.

    Radiation: Bone densitometry scan

  • Other
    Women aged 80-89

    Only 25 subjects will be included in this age group for reasons of feasibility.

    Radiation: Bone densitometry scan

Interventions

  • RadiationBone densitometry scan

    Each study participant will undergo a bone density measurement scan. The equipment used in this study will be the STRATOS DR X-ray bone densitometer (APELEM, 9 Avenue du Canal Philippe Lamour, 30660 Gallargues-le-Montueux, France). This device is indicated for diagnosing osteoporosis, assessing the risk of fracture in weakened bone areas, monitoring bone density, monitoring body composition and diagnosing vertebral anomalies (vertebral compression, fractures). In general, the time for a scan is less than 1 min for the spine, less than than 1 min for the femur, less than 1 min for the forearm and around 4 min for the whole body. The total duration of the patient's participation in this research will be approximately 2 hours.

    Also known as: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA or DXA)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Bone mineral density of the femoral neck: Left side

    Bone mineral density (BMD in g/cm2) for the construction of Z score and T score

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  2. Bone mineral density of the femoral neck: Right side

    Bone mineral density (BMD in g/cm2) for the construction of Z score and T score

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  3. Bone mineral density of the femoral neck: Lumbar spine (L1 - L4)

    Bone mineral density (BMD in g/cm2) for the construction of Z score and T score

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  4. Bone mineral density of the femoral neck: Forearm

    Bone mineral density (BMD in g/cm2) for the construction of Z score and T score

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  5. Bone mineral density of the femoral neck: Whole body

    Bone mineral density (BMD in g/cm2) for the construction of Z score and T score

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage body fat: left hip

    Measured automatically by the STRATOS DR X-ray bone densitometer in %

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  2. Body fat: left hip

    Measured automatically by the STRATOS DR X-ray bone densitometer in kg

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  3. Percentage body fat: right hip

    Measured automatically by the STRATOS DR X-ray bone densitometer in %

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  4. Body fat: right hip

    Measured automatically by the STRATOS DR X-ray bone densitometer in kg

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  5. Muscle mass: left hip

    Measured automatically by the STRATOS DR X-ray bone densitometer in kg

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  6. Muscle mass: right hip

    Measured automatically by the STRATOS DR X-ray bone densitometer in kg

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  7. Percentage body fat in the region of the lumbar spine (L1 - L4)

    Measured automatically by the STRATOS DR X-ray bone densitometer in %

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  8. Body fat in the region of the lumbar spine (L1 - L4)

    Measured automatically by the STRATOS DR X-ray bone densitometer in kg

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  9. Muscle mass in the region of the lumbar spine (L1 - L4)

    Measured automatically by the STRATOS DR X-ray bone densitometer in kg

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  10. Percentage body fat: forearm

    Measured automatically by the STRATOS DR X-ray bone densitometer in %

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  11. Body fat: forearm

    Measured automatically by the STRATOS DR X-ray bone densitometer in kg

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  12. Muscle mass: forearm

    Measured automatically by the STRATOS DR X-ray bone densitometer in kg

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  13. Percentage body fat: whole body

    Measured automatically by the STRATOS DR X-ray bone densitometer in %

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  14. Body fat: whole body

    Measured automatically by the STRATOS DR X-ray bone densitometer in kg

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  15. Muscle mass: whole body

    Measured automatically by the STRATOS DR X-ray bone densitometer in kg

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

Other outcomes

  1. Weight of participants

    The weight of each participant will be recorded in kg

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  2. Height of participants

    The height of each participant will be recorded in cm

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

  3. Body Mass Index of participants

    The body mass index (BMI) of each participant will be calculated as follows : BMI = weight \[kg\] / height 2 \[m2\]

    Time frame: Day 0, day of inclusion

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • University Hospital
    Montpellier, Hérault 34295, France
  • Hôpital E Herriot UMR_S 1033
    Lyon, 69700, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — All data will be managed by the BESPIM (Biostatistics, Epidemiology, Public Health \& Innovations in Methodology, Nîmes University Hospital). The conditions for the transfer of all or part of the research database are decided by the research sponsor and are the subject of a written contract.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jun 2025; primary completion for Sep 2029, 51 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 14, 2025
First posted
May 21, 2025
StartEst.
Jun 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2029
CompletionEst.
Sep 2029
Last update
May 21, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 21, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06983587
Collaborators
University Hospital, Montpellier, Hôpital Edouard Herriot
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 21, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2029 (estimated)
Last update
May 21, 2025

Study contacts

Vincent BOUDOUSQ, Dr.
Contact
vincent.boudousq@chu-nimes.fr
+334 66 68 32 66
Anissa MEGZARI
Contact
drc@chu-nimes.fr
0466684236

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion