CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT06975969Updated Mar 5, 2026

Single Center Post-Market Study of Thrombolytic Therapy Using the Versus™ Catheter

An observational study in Blood Clots, Vascular Disease and Embolism Thrombosis, sponsored by Liquet Medical Inc.. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-05.

Sponsored by Liquet Medical Inc. · Observational

Why this study was withdrawn
No participants enrolled.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Assess the functionality of the Versus Catheter for catheter-directed thrombolysis of pulmonary blood clots, including advanced imaging assessment. An evaluation of patient outcomes from the cases included in this study will also be conducted.

Read the detailed description

The objective of this study is to assess the functionality of the Versus™ Catheter for the controlled and selective infusion of physician-specified fluids, including thrombolytics, into the pulmonary artery vasculature in adult patients, including advanced Computerized Tomography Angiogram (CTA) imaging assessment. This study will include an evaluation of patient outcomes and physician user experience with the Versus™ Catheter among up to 10 patients meeting the criteria for enrollment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Blood Clots
  • Vascular Disease
  • Embolism Thrombosis
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Lung Diseases

Keywords

  • thrombolysis
  • pulmonary catheter
  • hemodynamic monitoring
  • catheter directed therapy
03

In context

Thrombosis

1,506 studies on the registry are indexed under Thrombosis; 238 are open to participants now.

Browse Thrombosis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Liquet Medical Inc. as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients age 18 - 80 years old who present with symptoms requiring intervention with delivery of physician-specified thrombolytics to the pulmonary vasculature, including patients who present with submassive pulmonary embolism (PE), who receive treatment using the Versus™ Catheter.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients 18 - 80 years, inclusive
  • Patients who present with submassive pulmonary embolism (PE)
  • Patients requiring thrombolytic intervention to the pulmonary vasculature
  • Physician decision to use the Versus™ Catheter during the treatment of the patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrent treatment with thrombectomy
  • Concurrent treatment with a catheter-directed thrombolysis device that is NOT the Versus™ Catheter
  • Massive pulmonary embolism (PE)
  • Active bleeding disorder1
  • Recent cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack1
  • Recent neurosurgery1
  • Recent intracranial trauma1
  • Absolute contraindication to anticoagulation1
  • BMI > 45kg/m2
  • In the opinion of the investigator, the participant is not a suitable candidate for the study
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients who receive treatment using the Versus Catheter

    Patients age 18 - 80 years old who present with symptoms requiring intervention with delivery of physician-specified thrombolytics to the pulmonary vasculature, including patients who present with submassive pulmonary embolism (PE), who receive treatment using the Versus™ Catheter.

    Device: Versus™ Endovascular Pulmonary Artery Drug Delivery Catheter

Interventions

  • DeviceVersus™ Endovascular Pulmonary Artery Drug Delivery Catheter

    The Versus Pulmonary Artery Catheter is a dual-tip, infusion catheter. Two lumens access and deliver physician-specified fluids, including thrombolytics, into the pulmonary arteries of each lung via a single access site. The Secondary Catheter tip telescopes independently to facilitate infusion into the contralateral lung. The device may allow for assessment of a patient's hemodynamic condition through direct intracardiac and pulmonary artery pressure monitoring. Pressure is measured through an interface between the catheter's fluid lumen and an externally located, FDA-cleared, pressure transducer. The device may include an additional lumen that is in communication with a distal flow-directed balloon.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Blood Clot resolution

    Number of patients achieving hemodynamic homeostasis as evidenced by pulmonary artery pressure indicating resolution of a pulmonary blood clot

    Time frame: Within one week of hospital admission

  2. Physician user experience

    Number of physicians who rate use of the Versus Catheter as "Good \& Acceptable" or "Very good \& Acceptable" on a four-point scale

    Time frame: Periprocedural

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Virginia Medical Center
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06975969
Lead sponsor
Liquet Medical Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 16, 2025
Start date
Sep 5, 2025
Primary completion
Feb 20, 2026
Completion
Feb 20, 2026
Last update
Mar 5, 2026

Study contacts

Luke Wilkins, MD
principal investigator · University of Virgina (UVA)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion