CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06971081DENT-DOACUpdated May 14, 2025

LED Application Following Dental Extraction in Patients Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

An interventional study of LED light in Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs), sponsored by University College, London. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-14.

Sponsored by University College, London · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2025, 1 year 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
  • Registered 1 year 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2023, registered Apr 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The DENT-DOAC trial is a single-blinded RCT investigating the effectiveness of LED application following dental extractions in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) . The study aims to address a significant clinical challenge, as bleeding following dental extraction is a well-recognized complication in patients taking anticoagulants, and the number of patients taking DOACs requiring dental procedures has increased substantially in recent years.

The trial will be conducted at the Eastman Dental Hospital (EDH-UCLH) and will recruit 50 participants who will be randomly divided into two groups of 25 each. The test group will receive both LED light application and haemostatic sponge treatment, while the control group will receive only the haemostatic sponge.

The study population will include patients taking DOACs (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, or dabigatran) and are scheduled for dental extraction. Exclusion criteria include patients using concomitant antithrombotic drugs, those with known allergy to tranexamic acid, pregnant or breastfeeding females, and those recently involved in other research studies. The trial's primary objective is to assess bleeding outcomes in these patients, with secondary objectives including evaluation of bleeding events (early/delayed; minor/moderate/severe) and analysis of associations between bleeding complications and various factors such as type of DOACs, surgical factors, and patient demographics.

The statistical design has been carefully calculated to achieve 90% power to detect both a 50% difference in bleeding events and a 142-second difference in mean bleeding time between groups, with considerations made for a 10% drop-out rate. Patient follow-up will include immediate post-procedure assessment and telephone assessments on days 2 and 7 following the extraction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs)
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University College, London is the lead sponsor of 632 studies on the registry; 145 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Taking DOACs (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, or dabigatran)
  • Listed for dental extraction at EDH
  • Willing and able to provide consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Using concomitant antithrombotic drugs
  • Known allergy to tranexamic acid
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding females
  • Recent involvement in other research studies
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    LED+ Haemostatic sponge

    The experimental group will receive both LED light application and haemostatic sponge treatment

    Other: LED light

  • No intervention
    Haemostatic sponge only

    The active comparator group will receive only the haemostatic sponge

Interventions

  • OtherLED light

    (Dental Light Cure), LED light at wavelengths of 420-480nm and will be applied for 30 seconds at a distance of 1cm from the extraction site

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Bleeding time

    Time to achieve bleeding control, measured in seconds or minutes, starting from the application of intervention (LED light) or control (standard local measures) until complete cession of visible bleeding at the site. Timing is recorded by a stopwatch

    Time frame: (Performed intraoperatively) Immediately after intervention (LED) or control (Local Haemostatic Measures) application until bleeding control is achieved (up to 30 minutes)

  2. Number of bleeding events

    number of bleeding events

    Time frame: From the application of intervention (LED) or control up to 7 days post-operatively

07

Study locations

1 site
  • UCL
    London, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06971081
Lead sponsor
University College, London
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 14, 2025
Start date
Aug 17, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
May 14, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion