ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06971068Updated May 14, 2025

Vacuum-assisted Laser Ablation (VALA) for Treatment of Large Saphenous Veins

An interventional study of Procedure: EVLA and Procedure: VALA in Varicose Veins, sponsored by Center Of Phlebology. Recruiting at 9 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-14.

Sponsored by Center Of Phlebology · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 1 month ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
184
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA), including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), is considered the main method for the treatment of symptomatic truncal vein reflux. However, there are controversial data concerning their efficacy and safety in ablating large saphenous veins because of high risk of heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT), incomplete ablation and recanalization.1-5 The use of vacuum evacuation of the remaining intraluminal blood during endovenous laser ablation allows to decrease the risk of intraoperative (carbonization and destruction of the fiber lens) and postoperative complications (EHIT, hyperpigmentation, "string" feeling) and leads to reduction of recovery because of short period of vein resorption. The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of endovenous thermal ablation with or without vacuum evacuation for the treatment of incompetent large saphenous veins (>15 mm).

Read the detailed description

Preoperatively all patients should be examined in a standing position clinically and with duplex ultrasound (DUS) marking of the diameters of the target great saphenous veins (GSV) or small saphenous veins (SSV) at the following levels:

  • great saphenous vein: saphenofemoral junction (SFJ), vein ectasia below the SFJ by 3 cm, upper third of the thigh, middle third of the thigh, lower third of the thigh, upper third of the leg, middle third of the leg, lower third of the leg;
  • small saphenous vein: saphenopopliteal junction (SPJ), ectasia below the SPJ by 3 cm, upper third of the leg, middle third of the leg, lower third of the leg.

It is recommended to calculate the required linear energy density (LEED) per centimeter of vein length using the following formula depending on the level of measurement of the target vein diameter: LEED=d*k, where LEED is the linear energy density (J/cm), "d" is the vein diameter (mm), "k" is the coefficient based on the measurement level: upper half of the thigh - 10, lower half of the thigh - 8, upper half of the leg - 6, lower half of the leg - 4.

Under local anesthesia, the target vein is punctured and the introducer is then installed. For the first group of patients (ELVeS Radial 2ring fiber), there is no need for preliminary preparation of the fiber. For the second group (ELVeS Radial 2ring Pro fiber), it is recommended to fill the ELVes Radial 2ring Pro catheter with a pre-prepared heparin solution (200 ml 0.9% Na Cl + 1 ml (5000) heparin) before use. Passing the fiber and installing it in the orifice of the target vein. Performing tumescent anesthesia (1000 ml 0.9% NaCl, 10 ml 2% lidocaine, 0.25 ml 0.1% adrenaline, 56 ml 4% sodium bicarbonate at room temperature) with recording the volume of the solution used. Performing EVLA with recording the parameters at different levels (power, extraction rate). When performing laser obliteration in patients of the second group, the ELVeS Radial 2ring Pro fiber catheter is connected to a vacuum suction using a high-pressure line to evacuate residual blood from the lumen of the vein during EVLA. Compression underwear of class 2 according to RAL or class 3 according to ASQUAL (23-32 mm Hg).

02

Conditions studied

  • Varicose Veins

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Vacuum-assisted Laser Ablation
  • large saphenous veins
  • varicose veins
  • EVLA
03

In context

Varicose Veins

226 studies on the registry are indexed under Varicose Veins; 30 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 184 is above the median of 101 across 154 interventional studies indexed under Varicose Veins.

Browse Varicose Veins studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Center Of Phlebology as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age over 18 years
  • Varicose veins of the lower extremities with clinical class C2-C6 with a diameter of the GSV or SSV ≥ 15 mm in a standing position

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy or lactation
  • malignant neoplasms
  • inability or unwillingness of any patient to wear compression stockings
  • to lidocaine
  • concomitant diseases: diabetes mellitus, bronchial asthma, severe liver and kidney diseases, acute thrombosis and thrombophlebitis, skin and/or soft tissue infection, infectious diseases, obliterating peripheral arteriosclerosis, diabetic angiopathy, heart defects requiring surgical intervention, fever, toxic hyperthyroidism, obesity, tuberculosis, sepsis, blood cell composition disorder, all diseases requiring bed rest, heart disease with decompensation, known hereditary thrombophilia
  • period after treatment for alcohol addiction
  • sedentary lifestyle
  • history of acute deep vein thrombosis
  • history of superficial thrombophlebitis
  • history of drug or other addiction
  • use of oral or other hormonal drugs
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
184 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Radial 2ring fiber

    Refluxing GSV/SSV treated with endovenous laser ablation using ELVeS Radial 2ring fiber

    Procedure: Procedure: EVLA

  • Active comparator
    Radial 2ring Pro fiber

    Refluxing GSV/SSV treated with endovenous laser ablation using ELVeS Radial 2ring Pro fiber

    Procedure: Procedure: VALA

Interventions

  • ProcedureProcedure: EVLA

    Great or small saphenous vein occlusion with endovenous laser ablation using ELVeS Radial 2ring fiber

  • ProcedureProcedure: VALA

    Great or small saphenous vein occlusion with endovenous laser ablation using ELVeS Radial 2ring Pro fiber

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Occlusion of the treated GSV/SSV

    Obliteration of varicose vein along the treated segment of the GSV/SSV measured using ultrasound (US) examination

    Time frame: One day, 2 weeks, one month, 3 months and 6 months post treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain score and use of painkillers

    A questionnaire including the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain is filled in by the patient. It is a numeric scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

    Time frame: One day, 2 weeks, one month, 3 months and 6 months post treatment

  2. Clinical status

    CEAP classification. The CEAP classification is a common descriptive platform for the reporting of diagnostic information in chronic venous disease, as well as a tool for regular patient documentation and management. The clinical component indicates disease severity, ranging from none (0 points) to active ulcers (6 points). The etiologic component denotes the venous disease as congenital, primary, or secondary in nature. The anatomic classification pinpoints the veins involved as superficial, deep, or perforating. The pathophysiologic classification identifies the presence of reflux in the superficial,communicating, or deep systems, as well as the existence of outflow obstruction.

    Time frame: 2 weeks, one month, 3 months and 6 months post treatment

  3. Severity of chronic venous diseases

    Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS). The VCSS includes 9 hallmarks of venous disease, each scored on a severity scale from 0 to 3.

    Time frame: 2 weeks, one month, 3 months and 6 months post treatment

  4. Health related quality of life

    A questionnaire Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ 20) is filled in by the patient. The CIVIQ comprises 20 questions in four quality-of-life domains: physical, psychological, social, and pain.The result ranges from 0 to 100.

    Time frame: one month, 3 months and 6 months post treatment

  5. Histological picture of the treated vein

    A time period of connective tissue transformation of the vein wall and its lysis assessed by histochemical analysis (Picro-Mallory, Martius-Scarlet-Blue, Fuchsin-Miller)

    Time frame: 2 weeks, one month, 3 months post treatment

  6. Number of patients with adverse events

    Major complications: superficial and deep venous thrombosis including EHIT, nerve injury, skin burns, and subcutaneous infections. Minor complications: ecchymosis and hyperpigmentation

    Time frame: One day, 2 weeks, one month, 3 months and 6 months post treatment

  7. Severity of hyperpigmentation

    Skin tone estimated using the Pantone SkinTone Guide and compared with an unchanged area of skin

    Time frame: 2 weeks, one month, 3 months and 6 months post treatment

07

Study locations

9 of 9 sites recruiting
  • Clinic in Uruchye
    Minsk, Belarus
    Recruiting
  • Merci clinic
    Minsk, Belarus
    Recruiting
  • SANTE clinic
    Minsk, Belarus
    Recruiting
  • Center Of Phlebology
    Bishkek, Chuy 720023, Kyrgyzstan
    Recruiting
  • Laser Surgery Center
    Moscow, Russian Federation
    Recruiting
  • Innovative vascular centre
    St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
    Recruiting
  • Derzhavin Tambov State University
    Tambov, 392002, Russian Federation
    Recruiting
  • Clinic of Modern Phlebology "VarikozOFF"
    Tashkent, Uzbekistan
    Recruiting
  • Clinic of Modern Phlebology "VarikozOFF"
    Tashkent, Uzbekistan
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Van der Velden SK, Lawaetz M, De Maeseneer MG, Hollestein L, Nijsten T, van den Bos RR; Members of the Predictors of Endovenous Thermal Ablation Group. Predictors of Recanalization of the Great Saphenous Vein in Randomized Controlled Trials 1 Year After Endovenous Thermal Ablation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 Aug;52(2):234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.01.021. Epub 2016 Mar 16. PubMed 26994834 ↗
  • Sufian S, Arnez A, Labropoulos N, Lakhanpal S. Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis after ablation with 1470 nm laser: Incidence, progression, and risk factors. Phlebology. 2015 Jun;30(5):325-30. doi: 10.1177/0268355514526588. Epub 2014 Mar 7. PubMed 24609619 ↗
  • Bontinis V, Bontinis A, Koutsoumpelis A, Potouridis A, Giannopoulos A, Rafailidis V, Chorti A, Ktenidis K. Endovenous thermal ablation in the treatment of large great saphenous veins of diameters > 12 mm: A systematic review meta-analysis and meta-regression. Vasc Med. 2023 Oct;28(5):449-457. doi: 10.1177/1358863X231183997. Epub 2023 Jul 17. PubMed 37458188 ↗
  • Elboushi A, Elsherbeni M, Gameel AM, et al. The 1470 radial endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein larger than 12 mm: Is it a good option? A single-center expe-rience? Egyptian J Surg 2019; 38: 136-141.
  • Dabbs EB, Mainsiouw LE, Holdstock JM, Price BA, Whiteley MS. A description of the 'smile sign' and multi-pass technique for endovenous laser ablation of large diameter great saphenous veins. Phlebology. 2018 Sep;33(8):534-539. doi: 10.1177/0268355517734480. Epub 2017 Sep 28. PubMed 28956693 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The study data are available to all investigators in the chronic vein disease registry

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: From 15 March 2025 to 15 February 2026

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06971068
Lead sponsor
Center Of Phlebology
Responsible party
Dmitrii Alekseev (Director, Center Of Phlebology) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 14, 2025
Start date
Mar 15, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 15, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 14, 2025

Study contacts

Dmitrii N Alekseev, PhD
Contact
dm.alekseev81@gmail.com
+996555521274

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion