ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06969417Updated May 14, 2025

Comparative Efficacy of Pregabalin and Lacosamide in Patients With Herpes Zoster and Post Herpetic Neuralgia

An interventional study of Pregabalin and Lacosamide in Herpes Zoster (HZ) and Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN), sponsored by CMH Kharian Medical College. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-14.

Sponsored by CMH Kharian Medical College · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Apr 2025; still recruiting 1 year 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) is the most significant complication of herpes zoster caused by reactivation of latent Varicella-Zoster virus (VZV). PHN is characterized by neuropathic pain lasting beyond the resolution of the rashes. Post herpetic neuralgia (PHN) represents a potentially debilitating and often undertreated form of neuropathic pain that disproportionately affects vulnerable populations, including the elderly and the immunocompromised. PHN pain is typically localized, unilateral and chronic, but may be constant, intermittent, spontaneous and/or evoked. PHN is likely to interfere with sleep and daily activities.

Pregabalin is a gabapentinoid licenced for treatment of neurological disorders. It is one of the earlier drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (2004) for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). Lacosamide (LCM) was approved in 2008 in the European Union and in the United States as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of focal-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization in adults and adolescents with epilepsy. Its efficacy has also been proven in neuropathic pain.

Although Pregabalin and Lacosamide have proven effective in various neuropathic pain disorder, comparative studies specifically for PHN remain scarce. This study aims to compare the efficacy of Pregabalin and Lacosamide in PHN patients, addressing the current gap in literature and providing clinically relevant insights to optimize treatment selection.

02

Conditions studied

  • Herpes Zoster (HZ)
  • Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN)
03

In context

Herpes Zoster

370 studies on the registry are indexed under Herpes Zoster; 63 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 242 across 306 interventional studies indexed under Herpes Zoster.

Browse Herpes Zoster studies →

Lead sponsor

CMH Kharian Medical College is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed cases of herpes zoster suffering from postherpetic neuralgia
  • Ages: 18 to 50
  • Both male and female

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of consent
  • Patient already taking pain killers for post herpetic neuralgia
  • Patients suffering from other systemic illness
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A

    Group A will receive Cap Pregabalin, the first intervention

    Drug: Pregabalin

  • Experimental
    Group B

    Group B will receive Tab Lacosamide

    Drug: Lacosamide

Interventions

  • o Group A will receive Cap Pregabalin 150mg oral OD for 4 weeks

  • o Group B will receive Tab Lacosamide 100mg oral BD for 4 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale

    Pain intensity will be measured before and after treatment with help of Visual Analog Scale.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • CMH Kharian Medical College
    Kharan, Punjab Province 50070, Pakistan
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The decision will be taken after getting consent from each participant.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2025, 3 months after the start.

Of 33 interventional studies with no phase under Herpes Zoster, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 24. This study's planned 3 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 5, 2025
First posted
May 13, 2025
StartActual
Apr 10, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jul 31, 2025
CompletionEst.
Sep 30, 2025
Last update
May 14, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06969417
Lead sponsor
CMH Kharian Medical College
Responsible party
Mushayada Irshad (Dr Mushayada Irshad, CMH Kharian Medical College) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 13, 2025
Start date
Apr 10, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
May 14, 2025

Study contacts

Mushayada Irshad, MBBS, MPhil Pharmacology
Contact
mishy2360@gmail.com
+92537532239
Muhammad Waseem Shahid, MBBS, FCPS Dermatology
Contact
waseem2392@gmail.com
+923347202392
Usman Nawaz, MBBS, Mphil, PhD Pharmacology
study chair · CMH Kharian Medical College

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Lacosamide

Start the discussion