CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06956313Updated May 4, 2025

Hydraulic Pressure Lateral Sinus Lift Approach

An interventional study of Hydraulic Pressure Lifting Technique and Piezo-Surgical Lifting Technique in Sinus Lifting and Piezoelectric Technique, sponsored by Alexandria University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-04.

Sponsored by Alexandria University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2022, registered May 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

the study aims to assess the effectiveness of hydraulic pressure sinus lift via lateral wall approach, versus piezoelectric surgery in patients with deficient posterior maxilla.

Read the detailed description

This study involves a randomized clinical trial of 20 participants with less than 6 mm bone height in the posterior maxilla in need of Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation using the lateral window approach. Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups; the HPLT Group which include 10 patients who will undergo hydraulic pressure for osteotomy preparation for lateral sinus lifting technique, and the PSLT Group which include 10 patients managed using piezoelectric surgery. Clinical and radiographic assessment of bone augmentation, as well as intraoperative biological complications and postoperative complications were recorded.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sinus Lifting
  • Piezoelectric Technique

Keywords

  • advanced intelligence drill
  • Sinus lift
  • hydraulic pressure sinus lift
  • external sinus lift,
  • piezoelectric surgery
  • lateral approach
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Alexandria University is the lead sponsor of 569 studies on the registry; 125 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • The study included patient with deficient posterior maxilla with less than 6mm of bone height confirmed by a pre-operative tomographic scan. All healthy (ASA I, II) non- smoker patients were eligible for the study. The absence of uncontrolled diabetes, systemic illnesses, sinusitis, immune deficiency disorders, were also required for inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with sinus infection, neoplasm or a large cyst of the sinus, or those who previously underwent a Caldwell-Luc surgery for the same surgical site were excluded
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    HPLT Group

    patients with posterior deficient maxilla managed with osteotomy for lateral sinus floor augmentation using the Hydraulic Pressure Lifting Technique with A.I drill and hydraulic-powered Aqua-Lifter (OLA system) were assigned to HPLT Group

    Device: Hydraulic Pressure Lifting Technique

  • Experimental
    PSLT Group

    posterior deficient maxilla managed with osteotomy for lateral sinus floor augmentation using Piezo-Surgical Lifting Technique were assigned to PSLT Group

    Device: Piezo-Surgical Lifting Technique

Interventions

  • DeviceHydraulic Pressure Lifting Technique

    Hydraulic Pressure Lifting Technique

  • DevicePiezo-Surgical Lifting Technique

    Piezo-Surgical Lifting Technique

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. radiographic appraisal of gain in alveolar bone height

    Postoperative radiographic appraisal was conducted by an immediate postoperative CBCT, followed by other one after 6 postoperative month's. Measurements of the bone height was conducted from the alveolar crest to the floor of the maxillary sinus on a cross-section view of the CBCT (Carestream Health, Rochester, NY). Radiographic assessment of the amount of bone height gain in 6 months period was performed by comparing the bone height measurements between the 6 postoperative months' CBCT with the preoperative scan.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. incidence of membrane perforation

    incidence of membrane perforation during the operation was assessed in both groups

    Time frame: Until the end of the operation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
    Alexandria, 21523, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — all data will be de-identified to protect the participant data. patients signed an informed consent for the use of their medical records and data for study

Supporting information: Sap

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 4, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06956313
Lead sponsor
Alexandria University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 4, 2025
Start date
Feb 1, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2024
Completion
Mar 1, 2025
Last update
May 4, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion