CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06954402Updated Jun 23, 2026

Resilience Among Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder

An interventional study of Acute Stress Intervention (MAST-based) and Non-Stress Intervention (NST-based) in Opioid Use Disorder, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-23.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
125
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to develop a human laboratory model of resilience in people with opioid use disorder (OUD). The investigators aim to learn if objective tasks that measure cognitive, emotional, and control aspects of resilience match up with self-reported resilience during stress and non-stress situations.

Read the detailed description

This study is an outpatient, within-subject, randomized controlled trial designed to develop and validate a novel laboratory-based model for assessing resilience in individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). The study employs a dual-condition design where participants complete two experimental sessions administered in a randomized order: one under a stress condition and one under a non-stress condition. In each session, participants will perform a series of standardized laboratory tasks aimed at evaluating cognitive, emotional, and control aspects of resilience. Objective measures (e.g., task performance data and physiological indices) and subjective ratings of stress reactivity will be collected to capture both behavioral and self-perceived responses.

Additionally, this study includes an administrative supplement focused on Natural Language Processing (NLP) phenotyping. A subset of participants who complete the primary human laboratory resilience assessments will participate in a semi-structured qualitative interview probing personal definitions and experiences of resilience and spirituality. The resulting narratives will be analyzed using AI and NLP methods to derive quantitative linguistic indices. These indices will be integrated with the parent study's behavioral and physiological data to determine if narrative markers of spirituality and resilience improve the prediction of stress-induced opioid demand and refine mechanistic models of OUD.

02

Conditions studied

  • Opioid Use Disorder

Keywords

  • opioids
  • opioid use disorder
  • stress
03

In context

Opioid-Related Disorders

1,411 studies on the registry are indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders; 290 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 125 is above the median of 63 across 1,123 interventional studies indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders.

Browse Opioid-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,783 studies on the registry; 313 are open to participants now.

Of its 203 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 140 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Can provide informed consent and can comply with study procedures
  2. Adults aged ≥18 years
  3. Meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5) criteria for current opioid use disorder or are currently receiving pharmacotherapy for the treatment of OUD (e.g. methadone or buprenorphine maintenance treatment [remission])
  4. Urine sample that tests positive for opioids
  5. Test negative for pregnancy at screening (females only)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Being pregnant or breastfeeding
  2. Significant mental health or physical disorder, or life circumstances, that is judged by the investigators to interfere with study participation
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
125 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Stress-First Sequence

    Participants in this arm will first undergo the stress condition using the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST) and then complete the non-stress condition (NST) in a subsequent session.

    Behavioral: Acute Stress Intervention (MAST-based) · Behavioral: Non-Stress Intervention (NST-based)

  • Experimental
    Non-Stress-First Sequence

    Participants in this arm will first complete the non-stress condition (NST) and then undergo the stress condition using the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST) in a subsequent session.

    Behavioral: Acute Stress Intervention (MAST-based) · Behavioral: Non-Stress Intervention (NST-based)

Interventions

  • BehavioralAcute Stress Intervention (MAST-based)

    This intervention uses the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST) to induce an acute stress response. Participants are exposed to standardized stress tasks while performing laboratory-based assessments of cognitive, emotional, and control aspects of resilience.

  • BehavioralNon-Stress Intervention (NST-based)

    In this control intervention, participants complete the same battery of laboratory tasks without exposure to the acute stressor.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Self-Reported Trait Resilience as assessed by Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 25 (CD-RISC-25)

    Instrument: Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 25 Score Range: 0-100 Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater resilience.

    Time frame: Immediately after completing the task

  2. Cognitive Flexibility: Stroop Color-Word Test reaction time

    Instrument: Stroop Color-Word Test Unit: Milliseconds (ms) Interpretation: Higher values = slower performance (worse)

    Time frame: Immediately after completing the task

  3. Emotional Flexibility: Emotional Stroop Task reaction time

    Instrument: Emotional Stroop Task Unit: Milliseconds (ms) Interpretation: Higher values = slower performance (worse).

    Time frame: Immediately after completing the task

  4. Perceived Controllability (Controllable) assessed by Social Controllability Task (SCT)

    Instrument: Social Controllability Task Description: Participants ratings on a 0-100% sliding scale. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater perceived control.

    Time frame: Immediately after completing the task

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subjective Effects of Stress as assessed by the Subjective Effects Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Battery

    Instrument: Subjective Effects Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Battery Instrument: VAS (0-100 mm) Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater intensity of each subjective state.

    Time frame: Immediately after completing the task

  2. Heart Rate

    Unit: Beats per minute (bpm) Interpretation: Higher = increased arousal

    Time frame: Immediately after completing the task

  3. Systolic Blood Pressure

    Unit: mmHg Interpretation: Higher = greater pressure.

    Time frame: Immediately after completing the task

  4. Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Unit: mmHg Interpretation: Higher = greater pressure.

    Time frame: Immediately after completing the task

  5. Opioid Demand Breakpoint as assessed by the Hypothetical Purchase Task

    Instrument: Hypothetical Purchase Task Range: $0-$500 Interpretation: Higher = greater demand.

    Time frame: Immediately after completing the task

  6. Percentage of Resilience-themed Interview Content

    This outcome is defined as the average percentage of narrative content within semi-structured qualitative interviews classified as "resilience-themed" using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA). This measure quantifies the relative focus a participant places on adaptive coping and recovery narratives

    Time frame: Up to 1 year

  7. Percentage of Spirituality-themed Interview Content

    This outcome is defined as the average percentage of narrative content within semi-structured qualitative interviews classified as "spirituality-themed" using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA). This measure quantifies the relative focus a participant places on spiritual or existential frameworks as a component of their recovery.

    Time frame: Up to 1 year

  8. Mean Narrative Sentiment Valence Score

    A quantitative emotional-tone score calculated from participant interview transcripts using a standardized sentiment analysis algorithm. The score range is -1 to +1. A score of -1 represents a highly negative emotional valence, while a score of +1 represents a highly positive emotional valence. Higher scores indicate a more positive emotional narrative.

    Time frame: Up to 1 year

  9. Incremental Variance (∆R2) in Stress-Induced Opioid Demand Predicted by NLP Indices

    This outcome measures the change in R-squared (∆R2) when NLP-derived indices (topic proportions and sentiment) are added to a sequential regression model that already includes self-report and behavioral task scores. This measurement will be performed only on the subset of 45 participants who complete the qualitative interview sub-study. The outcome being predicted is the difference in opioid purchase breakpoints between the stress (MAST) and no-stress conditions.

    Time frame: From baseline up to 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Johns Hopkins University Bayview Medical Campus
    Baltimore, Maryland 21224, United States
    Not yet recruiting
  • Johns Hopkins University Bayview Medical Campus
    Baltimore, Maryland 21224, United States
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06954402
Lead sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 1, 2025
Start date
May 29, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 23, 2026

Study contacts

Suky Martinez, PhD
Contact
smart209@jh.edu
410-550-0007
Suky Martinez, PhD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion