ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06940635c-STEPSUpdated Nov 26, 2025

Exploratory Study on the Potential Cross-System Effects of BCI-FES Hand Therapy on Dysphagia and Aphasia in Chronic Stroke Patients

An interventional study of closed-loop BCI-FES device in Ischaemic Stroke and Hemorrhagic Stroke, sponsored by VASCage GmbH. Recruiting at 1 site in Austria. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-26.

Sponsored by VASCage GmbH · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this neurorehabilitation explorative study is to investigate how a closed-loop Brain-Computer Interface Functional Electrical Stimulation (BCI-FES) therapy, used within the intended purpose for hand rehabilitation, may impact swallowing difficulties (dysphagia) and language disorders (aphasia) in post-stroke patients.

Read the detailed description

Stroke is the leading cause of permanent disability worldwide. Neurorehabilitation (i.e. physical, occupational, and speech/swallowing therapy) is essential for neurological recovery after stroke. According to principles of neuroplasticity and motor learning, key elements are high-intensity training paradigms with task repetition, therapy feedback and cueing modalities. Technical equipment can assist therapists in reaching these aims, for example by facilitating self-training.

One significant technological advancement in this therapeutic field is Brain-Computer Interface (BCI). BCI most commonly uses EEG-signals (i.e. electroencephalography) to capture task related electrical brain activities related to Motor Imagery (MI) translating it for "closed" neurofeedback. Moreover, BCI is frequently coupled with Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES), which stimulates physical movement in the paretic limb while the MI-related tasks are executed. The processed signals are translated into commands to control an external device. The combination of BCI-feedback technology and FES is primarily used to ensure concurrent sensory feedback with motor intention of a goal-based task to restore sensory-motor functions. In the current approach electrical activity related to the MI of upper limb movements is captured and transferred to a corresponding avatar on a computer screen as feedback for the patient.

c-STEPS is designed as a open-label, single-centre, non-controlled, prospective explorative interventional pre-post study. The primary objective of this study is to explore changes in dysphagia or aphasia in stroke patients with arm paresis treated with a closed-loop BCI-FES therapy (used within the intended purpose for hand rehabilitation). Further study objectives are to assess the impact of established treatment protocols on overall independence, disease severity and quality of life related to dysphagia and aphasia, and to investigate simultaneous recovery patterns in hand motor function, dysphagia, and aphasia using a BCI-FES system.

c-STEPS will enroll 10 participants (+2 potential replacements) who are in the chronic post-stroke phase (≥3 months after an ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke). Participants must present with residual arm paresis and either dysphagia (MUCCS-N ≥2) and/or aphasia (AAT ≤3).

Key exclusion criteria include cognitive impairments affecting compliance, brainstem/cerebellar strokes, previous disabling stroke, uncontrolled epilepsy, pacemakers or implanted devices incompatible with FES, severe neglect or anosognosia, and ongoing botulinum toxin treatment. Participants with severe cardiovascular or respiratory conditions (NYHA IV, COPD IV) or other medical risks affecting safety will also be excluded.

The participants will undergo 25 BCI-FES therapy sessions over 13 weeks (twice a week, 45-minute sessions). Throughout the intervention period, interim assessments will be conducted at predefined time points to evaluate treatment progress. A post-treatment assessment will be performed one week after the final therapy session, with additional follow-up assessments at 4 weeks and 26 weeks post-treatment. The overall study duration per participant is 48 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ischaemic Stroke
  • Hemorrhagic Stroke

Keywords

  • neurorehabilitation
  • BCI-FES
  • chronic stroke
  • aphasia
  • dysphagia
03

In context

Ischemic Stroke

2,612 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 971 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 120 across 1,776 interventional studies indexed under Ischemic Stroke.

Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

VASCage GmbH is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: Participants must be aged 18 years or older.
  • Post-Stroke Phase: Participants must be within the chronic post-stroke phase (time since ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke greater than 3 months).
  • Motor Impairment: Participants must exhibit disabling left or right residual arm paresis ("left/right arm motor drift" part of the NIHSS score ≥1).
  • Speech/Swallowing Impairment: Participants must have:

    • Aphasia (AAT-Skala zum Kommunikationsverhalten score ≤3), and/or
    • Dysphagia (MUCCS-N score ≥2).
  • Stable Neurological Status: No relevant changes in neurological status in the past 4 weeks (self-reported).
  • Motor Function: Participants must be able to raise at least 1 block similar to the ones in Box-and-Block-Test.
  • Cognitive Understanding: Participants must be able to understand basic spoken instructions.
  • Sitting Tolerance: Participants must be able to maintain a sitting position for at least 60 minutes.
  • Willingness to Participate: Participants must be willing to participate in the study and able to understand and sign the .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive Impairments: Cognitive impairments that, in the investigator's judgment, could limit understanding of task instructions.
  • Stroke Location: Participants with a brainstem and/or cerebellar stroke.
  • Previous Stroke: Participants with a previous disabling stroke.
  • Hemi-Neglect: Pronounced hemi-neglect at the last documented therapy visit that limits compliance with treatment intervention (investigator's judgment).
  • Anosognosia: Pronounced anosognosia at the last documented therapy visit that limits compliance with treatment intervention (investigator's judgment).
  • Spasticity: Severe spasticity in the affected limb, resulting in complete rigidity in flexion or extension.
  • Seizure Disorders: Participants with uncontrolled epilepsy (investigator's judgement) or epileptic seizure within the last month.
  • Intracranial Pressure: Known ongoing elevated intracranial pressure.
  • Implanted Medical Devices: Participants with implanted medical devices with for FES such as pacemakers.
  • Metallic Fragments: Participants with implanted metallic fragments in the extremity planned for FES that would limit the use of functional electrical stimulation (FES).
  • Unhealed Injuries: Unrecovered fractures or skin/tissue lesions in the FES stimulated extremity.
  • Joint Issues: Ossification, contraction, or stiffness of the wrist joint in the FES stimulated extremity that would limit treatment.
  • Botulinum Toxin: Participants who received botulinum-toxin treatment within 6 weeks prior to study inclusion and/or for whom botulinum-toxin treatment is planned during the study duration.
  • Co-morbidities: The following conditions will exclude participation:

    • (Stage IV).
    • Cardiac insufficiency ( Stage IV).
    • Severe acute infections.
    • Significant circulatory disturbances in the stimulated extremity.
    • Sensory disorders that significantly impair the patient's ability to feel pain or react to unsuitable proprioceptive stimuli.
    • Any other general medical conditions that, in the investigator's judgment, limit the safety or performance of study procedures (investigator's judgement).
  • Electrical Stimulation Intolerance: Known inability to tolerate cutaneous electrical stimulation.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    All participants

    25 BCI-FES therapy sessions over 13 weeks

    Device: closed-loop BCI-FES device

Interventions

  • Deviceclosed-loop BCI-FES device

    Closed-loop neurorehabilitation system that combines EEG-based brain-computer interface technology with functional electrical stimulation (FES) to facilitate neural and motor recovery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS)

    The GUSS is a standardised assessment tool used to evaluate swallowing ability and the risk of aspiration in patients with dysphagia. 4-step clinical assessment; total score ranges from 0 to 20 points. It includes an initial screening followed by assessments of different consistencies of food and drink to determine swallowing safety.

    Time frame: Baseline, treatment session 16, week 17, week 21 and week 47

  2. Change in Bielefeld Aphasia Screening Reha (BIAS-R)

    The BIAS-R is a validated, and standardised assessment tool specifically designed to assess language impairments in aphasic patients in the post-acute stage. It evaluates different aspects of language function such as comprehension, expression, and overall communication ability for different linguistic domains. It is a score-based aphasia screening tool; total score indicates severity of language impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline, treatment session 16, week 17, week 21 and week 47

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Munich Swallowing Score (MUCCS)

    The MUCCS assesses swallowing function by rating specific criteria related to oral and pharyngeal swallowing phases on two subscales related to saliva swallow (MUCCS-S and oral intake (MUCCS-N). It is a 16-point Likert scale clinical rating.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 17, week 21 and week 47

  2. Change in M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (M.D.ADI)

    The M.D.ADI evaluates the impact of dysphagia on a patient's quality of life. 20-item, 5-point Likert scale per item. Provides subscale scores (emotional, functional, physical) and a total composite score. Composite Score ranges from 20 (extremely low functioning) to 100 (high functioning).

    Time frame: Baseline, week 17, week 21 and week 47

  3. Change in Communication Outcome after Stroke (COAST)

    The COAST measures the impact of stroke on communication abilities and social participation, focusing on how well individuals are able to interact in everyday situations. The primary caregiver of the study participant will complete this outcome assessment. 2 domains, each item rated on a 5-point Likert scale.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 17, week 21 and week 47

  4. Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)

    The FMA-UE is a stroke-specific assessment used to evaluate motor recovery in the upper extremity, focusing on range of motion, coordination, and reflexes. Ordinal 3-point scale per item (0-2); maximum score: 66.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 17, week 21 and week 47

  5. Change in Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT)

    The NHPT measures fine motor skills and dexterity of the upper extremity, particularly focusing on hand function. Performance-based timed test; outcome = time in seconds required to complete the task.

    Time frame: Baseline, treatment sessions 6, 16 and 21, week 17, week 21 and week 47

  6. Change in Box-and-Block Test (BBT)

    The BBT is a standardised test used to evaluate gross manual dexterity. It assesses the patient's ability to grasp, lift, and transfer blocks from one side of a box to another. Performance-based test; outcome = number of blocks transferred in 60 seconds.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 17, week 21 and week 47

  7. Change in Scores of Independence for Neurologic and Geriatric Rehabilitation (SINGER)

    The SINGER measures independence in daily activities and is specifically designed for neurological and geriatric rehabilitation settings. Ordinal scale; higher scores reflect greater independence in daily activities during neurorehabilitation.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 17, week 21 and week 47

  8. Change in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L)

    The EQ-5D-3L is a widely used instrument to assess health-related quality of life across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is rated on a 3-level ordinal scale. The EQ-5D-3L also contains a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 100.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 17, week 21 and week 47

  9. Change in Scale for Measuring Digital Technology Acceptance Adapted for Digital Therapeutic Devices (DTAS-th)

    The DTAS-th is an adapted instrument originally designed to assess the acceptance of new technologies. The DTAS-th emphasizes two key dimensions: perceived usefulness, which refers to the therapists' view of how effective the treatment method is in improving patient outcomes, and perceived ease of use, which captures how user-friendly and practical the method is from the therapists' perspective. 13-item questionnaire based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree).

    Time frame: Treatment Sessions 6 and 21, week 17

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department for Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck
    Innsbruck, Tyrol 6020, Austria
    Recruiting
    • Michael Knoflach, Assoc.-Prof. · Contactmichael.knoflach@i-med.ac.at · +43 512 504 81697
    • Michael Knoflach, Assoc.-Prof. · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06940635
Lead sponsor
VASCage GmbH
Collaborators
g.tec medical engineering GmbH, Medical University Innsbruck
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 23, 2025
Start date
Jun 4, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 26, 2025

Study contacts

Simon Sollereder, MSc
Contact
simon.sollereder@vascage.at
+43 664 1004838
Petr Simurda, MD
Contact
petr.simurda@vascage.at
+43 512 554 43513
Michael Knoflach, Assoc.-Prof.
principal investigator · Medical University Innsbruck

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion