ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06937671Updated Jul 29, 2026

Randomized Trial of Cold EMR Compared to Hybrid Cold EMR.

An interventional study of Cold EMR and Hybrid EMR in Polyp of Colon and Endoscopic Mucosal Resection, sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-29.

Sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2025; still recruiting 1 year 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
194
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to learn if a combination of hot and cold EMR technique is associated with a lower risk of polyp recurrence without increasing the risk of complication when removing large polyps.

Participants will undergo EMR and return for a follow-up endoscopy in 3-6 months to check for polyp recurrence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Polyp of Colon
  • Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • EMR
  • Cold EMR
  • Hybrid EMR
  • Endoscopic mucosal resection
03

In context

Colonic Polyps

377 studies on the registry are indexed under Colonic Polyps; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 194 is below the median of 274 across 250 interventional studies indexed under Colonic Polyps.

Browse Colonic Polyps studies →

Lead sponsor

The Cleveland Clinic is the lead sponsor of 831 studies on the registry; 119 are open to participants now.

Of its 90 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patient (age 18 years or older)
  • Polyp size of at least 20 mm
  • - Morphology: Flat or superficially raised polyp morphology (i.e., Paris classification 1s, 0-IIa or 0-IIb, or a combination of the above)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Polyps with previous failed resection attempts or polyp recurrence
  • Suspected deep submucosal invasion on endoscopic assessment of surface mucosal pit pattern (Kudo V or NICE 3 pattern) or confirmed (invasive adenocarcinoma)
  • Polyps with nodules too large (>1-1.5cm) for the use of a cold snare
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
194 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Cold EMR

    Control group patients that receive standard cold EMR treatment.

    Procedure: Cold EMR

  • Experimental
    Hybrid cold EMR

    Intervention group patients. Patients will receive hybrid EMR treatment.

    Procedure: Hybrid EMR

Interventions

  • ProcedureCold EMR

    Cold EMR with cold forceps (regular or jumbo forceps) removal of any visible neoplasia that cannot be ensnared.

  • ProcedureHybrid EMR

    Cold EMR with hot avulsion of any visible residual neoplasia within the resection bed, in addition to precise APC of the fibrotic bands that may harbor invisible neoplasia within the resection bed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recurrence of polyps

    Recurrence of polyps confirmed by biopsy at the site of EMR on follow-up colonoscopy

    Time frame: 3-6 months after the procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adverse events

    Composite of clinically important adverse events: (1) Perforation requiring hospitalization or surgery (2) Bleeding associated with at least 2-gram Hb drop or hospitalization or Intervention (3) Post-polypectomy syndrome requiring hospital admission

    Time frame: 3-6 months after the procedure

  2. Polyp recurrence rates

    Recurrence of polyps confirmed by biopsy at the site of EMR on follow-up colonoscopy

    Time frame: 3-6 months after EMR procedure

  3. Cost benefit analysis

    \- Cost-benefit analysis includes the costs of additional hospitalizations related to post-procedure complications and the cost of additional colonoscopies required to follow up treatment of recurrence. Costs will be calculated from a Medicare perspective.

    Time frame: 3-6 months after the procedure

  4. Subgroup polyp recurrence rate

    \- Recurrence rates in the subgroup of patients with visible residual neoplasia after snare resection before utilizing forceps or cautery resection/ablation

    Time frame: 3-6 months after the procedure

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06937671
Responsible party
Shah,Tilak (Medical Doctor, The Cleveland Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 22, 2025
Start date
May 1, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 29, 2026

Study contacts

Akram Ahmad, M.D.
Contact
ahmada5@ccf.org
954-659-5000
Michael Nicolas, B.S.
Contact
nicolam4@ccf.org
9546596213
Tilak Shah, M.D.
principal investigator · Cleveland Clinic Florida (Weston Hospital)

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion