CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06936878BOLSTERUpdated Jun 18, 2026

BOLSTER: Learning New Skills to Thrive

An interventional study of BOLSTER Program in Gastrointestinal Cancer, Gynecologic Cancer and Advanced Cancer, sponsored by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-18.

Sponsored by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
600
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This research study is evaluating a new program called Building Out Lifelines for Safety, Trust, Empowerment, and Renewal or (BOLSTER), which was designed to support participants with a gynecological or gastrointestinal cancer and new and complex care needs.

Read the detailed description

This multi-center, randomized trial is to test the efficacy of the BOLSTER Program and to improve participant quality of life (QOL), alleviate symptoms, reduce burden, and decrease the need for hospital care in participants with complex care needs from advanced gastrointestinal and gynecologic (GI/GYN) cancers.

The research study procedures include screening for eligibility, questionnaires, and telehealth visits.

Participation in this research study is expected to last about 12 weeks.

About 300 dyads (patients with family caregivers) are expected to participate in this research study.

The National Cancer Institute is funding this research study by providing funding.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastrointestinal Cancer
  • Gynecologic Cancer
  • Advanced Cancer

Keywords

  • Gastrointestinal Cancer
  • Gynecologic Cancer
  • Advanced Cancer
  • Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancer
  • Advanced Gynecologic Cancer
03

In context

Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

779 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; 231 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 600 is above the median of 60 across 569 interventional studies indexed under Gastrointestinal Neoplasms.

Browse Gastrointestinal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute is the lead sponsor of 813 studies on the registry; 124 are open to participants now.

Of its 113 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 77 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Participant Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Currently hospitalized with skilled care need or have acquired a new skilled care need as an outpatient
  • Diagnosed with advanced gastrointestinal cancer (esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, hepatobiliary, colorectal, unknown GI primary, anal) or advanced gynecologic cancer (ovarian, endometrial, cervical, vaginal, vulvar)
  • Has a complex care need (e.g., ostomy, ileostomy, urostomy, nephrostomy, biliary drain, venting gastric tube, feeding tube, intraabdominal or pleural catheter, wound VAC)
  • Plans to receive ongoing cancer treatment
  • Has a family caregiver or friend (hereafter designated family caregiver) willing to participate
  • Able to speak and read English or Spanish (self-report)
  • Are willing to be audio-recorded
  • Have the cognitive/physical ability to participate in a 60-minute interview

Family or Caregiver Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Identified by a patient (as defined above) as a family or friend who is involved in their care.
  • Willing to participate in study visits
  • Willing to be audio recorded

Participant Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has cognitive impairments (as determined by the patient's oncologist)
  • Planning to enroll in hospice
  • Unable to complete baseline survey
  • Adults unable to consent
  • Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers)
  • Prisoners

Family or Caregiver Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to complete baseline survey
  • Adults unable to consent
  • Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers)
  • Prisoners
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
600 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Arm 1: Usual Care

    Participants and their care partners (a family member or loved one involved in their care) will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion and stratified by institution and cancer type and will complete: * Baseline visit * Standard-of-care oncology appointments * Access to nurse and specialist appointments * 6 week survey * 12 week survey

  • Experimental
    Arm 2: Bolster Program

    Patients and their care partners (a family member or loved one involved in their care) will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion and stratified by institution and cancer type and will complete: * Baseline visit * 6 telehealth sessions with a nurse for patients and their care partners * 2 brief telehealth sessions for care partners. * Access to the Bolster Program website with tailored educational materials * 6 week survey * 12 week survey

    Behavioral: BOLSTER Program

Interventions

  • BehavioralBOLSTER Program

    This supportive care program includes six telehealth sessions led by a trained nurse to help patients with advanced gynecological or gastrointestinal cancers and their care partners build skills, manage symptoms, and cope with challenges. Two additional sessions will be help support care partners. Participants will also get access to the BOLSTER website, which offers personalized educational materials to support their well-being

    Also known as: BOLSTER

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) Score from Baseline to Week 6 (Arm 1)

    Assessed by the FACT-G, a 27-item scale designed to measure physical, emotional, social, functional, and family well-being in patients with life-limiting cancer. Answers are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 "Not At All" to 4 "Very Much" with a total scores range of 0 to 108. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks post-discharge

  2. Change in FACT-G Score From Baseline to Week 6 (Arm 2)

    Assessed by the FACT-G, a 27-item scale designed to measure physical, emotional, social, functional, and family well-being in patients with life-limiting cancer. Answers are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 "Not At All" to 4 "Very Much" with a total scores range of 0 to 108. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks post-discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in FACT-G Score From Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 1)

    Assessed by the FACT-G, a 27-item scale designed to measure physical, emotional, social, functional, and family well-being in patients with life-limiting cancer. Answers are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 "Not At All" to 4 "Very Much" with a total scores range of 0 to 108. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  2. Change in FACT-G Score From Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 2)

    Assessed by the FACT-G, a 27-item scale designed to measure physical, emotional, social, functional, and family well-being in patients with life-limiting cancer. Answers are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 "Not At All" to 4 "Very Much" with a total scores range of 0 to 108. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  3. Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General 7 item Version (FACT-G7) Score from Baseline to Week 6 (Arm 1)

    Assessed by the FACT-G7, a 7-item designed to measure physical, emotional, social, functional, and family well-being in patients with life-limiting cancer in the past 7 days. Answers are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 "Not At All" to 4 "Very Much" with a total scores range of 0 to 28. A higher score indicates better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks post-discharge

  4. Change in FACT-G7 Score from Baseline to Week 6 (Arm 2)

    Assessed by the FACT-G7, a 7-item designed to measure physical, emotional, social, functional, and family well-being in patients with life-limiting cancer in the past 7 days. Answers are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 "Not At All" to 4 "Very Much" with a total scores range of 0 to 28. A higher score indicates better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks post-discharge

  5. Change in FACT-G7 Score from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 1)

    Assessed by the FACT-G7, a 7-item designed to measure physical, emotional, social, functional, and family well-being in patients with life-limiting cancer in the past 7 days. Answers are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 "Not At All" to 4 "Very Much" with a total scores range of 0 to 28. A higher score indicates better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  6. Change in FACT-G7 Score from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 2)

    Assessed by the FACT-G7, a 7-item designed to measure physical, emotional, social, functional, and family well-being in patients with life-limiting cancer in the past 7 days. Answers are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 "Not At All" to 4 "Very Much" with a total scores range of 0 to 28. A higher score indicates better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  7. Change in Participant Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions Score from Baseline to Week 6 (Arm 1)

    Assessed by the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions - Short Form 4a, an 8-item measure for determining managements of symptoms and medications. Answers are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 "I am not at all confident" to 5 "I am very confident" with a total scores range of 0 to 40. A higher score indicates greater self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks post-discharge

  8. Change in Participant Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions Score from Baseline to Week 6 (Arm 2)

    Assessed by the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions - Short Form 4a, an 8-item measure for determining managements of symptoms and medications. Answers are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 "I am not at all confident" to 5 "I am very confident" with a total scores range of 0 to 40. A higher score indicates greater self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks post-discharge

  9. Change in Participant Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions Score from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 1)

    Assessed by the PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions - Managing Care Needs and Managing Medications and Treatment. The Managing Care Needs (7 items) and Managing Medications and Treatment - Short Form 4a (6 items) evaluate confidence in handling medical care, including managing devices, medications, and symptoms. Responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 ("Not at all confident") to 5 ("Very confident"), with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  10. Change in Participant Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions Score from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 2)

    Assessed by the PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions - Managing Care Needs and Managing Medications and Treatment. The Managing Care Needs (7 items) and Managing Medications and Treatment - Short Form 4a (6 items) evaluate confidence in handling medical care, including managing devices, medications, and symptoms. Responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 ("Not at all confident") to 5 ("Very confident"), with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  11. Change in Health Care Utilization from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 1)

    Defined as the numeric value of the frequency of health care utilization by participant and collected by the Health Care Utilization Report, which is a log that covers the previous 12 weeks and collects emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and rehabilitation admissions.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  12. Change in Health Care Utilization from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 2)

    Defined as the numeric value of the frequency of health care utilization by participant and collected by the Health Care Utilization Report, which is a log that covers the previous 12 weeks and collects emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and rehabilitation admissions.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  13. Change in Advanced care planning (ACP) from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 1)

    ACP measures a patient's preferences, understanding, and preparedness for future medical care, as documented in the electronic health record.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  14. Change in Advanced care planning (ACP) from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 2)

    ACP measures a patient's preferences, understanding, and preparedness for future medical care, as documented in the electronic health record.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  15. Change in Participant Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HADS) Anxiety Subscale Score from Baseline to Week 6 (Arm 1)

    Assessed by the Anxiety Subscale of the HADS questionnaire, a 7-item survey with answers scored on a 0-3 point scale. A total scores range is 0 - 21 with a higher score indicating increasing abnormality (or caseness) for anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks post-discharge

  16. Change in Participant HADS Anxiety Subscale Score from Baseline to Week 6 (Arm 2)

    Assessed by the Anxiety Subscale of the HADS questionnaire, a 7-item survey with answers scored on a 0-3 point scale. A total scores range is 0 - 21 with a higher score indicating increasing abnormality (or caseness) for anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks post-discharge

  17. Change in Participant HADS Anxiety Subscale Score from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 1)

    Assessed by the Anxiety Subscale of the HADS questionnaire, a 7-item survey with answers scored on a 0-3 point scale. A total scores range is 0 - 21 with a higher score indicating increasing abnormality (or caseness) for anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  18. Change in Participant HADS Anxiety Subscale Score from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 2)

    Assessed by the Anxiety Subscale of the HADS questionnaire, a 7-item survey with answers scored on a 0-3 point scale. A total scores range is 0 - 21 with a higher score indicating increasing abnormality (or caseness) for anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  19. Change in Participant HADS Depression Subscale Score from Baseline to Week 6 (Arm 1)

    Assessed by the Depression Subscale of the HADS questionnaire, a 7-item survey with answers scored on a 0-3 point scale. A total scores range is 0 - 21 with a higher score indicating increasing abnormality (or caseness) for depression.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks post-discharge

  20. Change in Participant HADS Depression Subscale Score from Baseline to Week 6 (Arm 2)

    Assessed by the Depression Subscale of the HADS questionnaire, a 7-item survey with answers scored on a 0-3 point scale. A total scores range is 0 - 21 with a higher score indicating increasing abnormality (or caseness) for depression.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks post-discharge

  21. Change in Participant HADS Depression Subscale Score from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 1)

    Assessed by the Depression Subscale of the HADS questionnaire, a 7-item survey with answers scored on a 0-3 point scale. A total scores range is 0 - 21 with a higher score indicating increasing abnormality (or caseness) for depression.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  22. Change in Participant HADS Depression Subscale Score from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 2)

    Assessed by the Depression Subscale of the HADS questionnaire, a 7-item survey with answers scored on a 0-3 point scale. A total scores range is 0 - 21 with a higher score indicating increasing abnormality (or caseness) for depression.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  23. Caregiver Perception of Quality of End-of-Life Care

    Caregiver perception of end-of-life care will be assessed through a validated after-death bereaved family interview, evaluating healthcare utilization, quality of care, symptom management, and goal attainment.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks

  24. Change in Caregiver Short Form ZARIT Burden Interview (ZBI-12) Score from Baseline to Week 6 (Arm 1)

    Assessed by the Short Form ZARIT Burden Interview, a 12-item measure rated on a 5-point Likert scale with answers ranging from 0 "Never" to 4 "Nearly always." A total scores range is 0 to 48 with a higher score indicating higher caregiver burden.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks post-discharge

  25. Change in Caregiver ZBI-12 Score from Baseline to Week 6 (Arm 2)

    Assessed by the Short Form ZARIT Burden Interview, a 12-item measure rated on a 5-point Likert scale with answers ranging from 0 "Never" to 4 "Nearly always." A total scores range is 0 to 48 with a higher score indicating higher caregiver burden.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks post-discharge

  26. Change in Caregiver ZBI-12 Score from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 1)

    Assessed by the Short Form ZARIT Burden Interview, a 12-item measure rated on a 5-point Likert scale with answers ranging from 0 "Never" to 4 "Nearly always." A total scores range is 0 to 48 with a higher score indicating higher caregiver burden.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  27. Change in Caregiver ZBI-12 Score from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 2)

    Assessed by the Short Form ZARIT Burden Interview, a 12-item measure rated on a 5-point Likert scale with answers ranging from 0 "Never" to 4 "Nearly always." A total scores range is 0 to 48 with a higher score indicating higher caregiver burden.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  28. Change in Caregiver HADS Anxiety Subscale Score from Baseline to Week 6 (Arm 1)

    Assessed by the Anxiety Subscale of the HADS questionnaire, a 7-item survey with answers scored on a 0-3 point scale. A total scores range is 0 - 21 with a higher score indicating increasing abnormality (or caseness) for anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks post-discharge

  29. Change in Caregiver HADS Anxiety Subscale Score from Baseline to Week 6 (Arm 2)

    Assessed by the Anxiety Subscale of the HADS questionnaire, a 7-item survey with answers scored on a 0-3 point scale. A total scores range is 0 - 21 with a higher score indicating increasing abnormality (or caseness) for anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks post-discharge

  30. Change in Caregiver HADS Anxiety Subscale Score from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 1)

    Assessed by the Anxiety Subscale of the HADS questionnaire, a 7-item survey with answers scored on a 0-3 point scale. A total scores range is 0 - 21 with a higher score indicating increasing abnormality (or caseness) for anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  31. Change in Caregiver HADS Anxiety Subscale Score from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 2)

    Assessed by the Anxiety Subscale of the HADS questionnaire, a 7-item survey with answers scored on a 0-3 point scale. A total scores range is 0 - 21 with a higher score indicating increasing abnormality (or caseness) for anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  32. Change in Caregiver HADS Depression Subscale Score from Baseline to Week 6 (Arm 1)

    Assessed by the Depression Subscale of the HADS questionnaire, a 7-item survey with answers scored on a 0-3 point scale. A total scores range is 0 - 21 with a higher score indicating increasing abnormality (or caseness) for depression.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks post-discharge

  33. Change in Caregiver HADS Depression Subscale Score from Baseline to Week 6 (Arm 2)

    Assessed by the Depression Subscale of the HADS questionnaire, a 7-item survey with answers scored on a 0-3 point scale. A total scores range is 0 - 21 with a higher score indicating increasing abnormality (or caseness) for depression.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks post-discharge

  34. Change in Caregiver HADS Depression Subscale Score from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 1)

    Assessed by the Depression Subscale of the HADS questionnaire, a 7-item survey with answers scored on a 0-3 point scale. A total scores range is 0 - 21 with a higher score indicating increasing abnormality (or caseness) for depression.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  35. Change in Caregiver HADS Depression Subscale Score from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 2)

    Assessed by the Depression Subscale of the HADS questionnaire, a 7-item survey with answers scored on a 0-3 point scale. A total scores range is 0 - 21 with a higher score indicating increasing abnormality (or caseness) for depression.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  36. Change in Caregiver-Patient Activation from Baseline to Week 6 (Arm 1)

    The Caregiver Patient Activation Survey is a 10-item survey used to measure a caregiver's knowledge, skills, confidence, and willingness to advocate for and support a patient's healthcare needs. It assesses the caregiver's ability to navigate the healthcare system, communicate with providers, manage medications, and ensure adherence to treatment plans.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks post-discharge

  37. Change in Caregiver-Patient Activation from Baseline to Week 6 (Arm 2)

    The Caregiver Patient Activation Survey is a 10-item survey used to measure a caregiver's knowledge, skills, confidence, and willingness to advocate for and support a patient's healthcare needs. It assesses the caregiver's ability to navigate the healthcare system, communicate with providers, manage medications, and ensure adherence to treatment plans.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks post-discharge

  38. Change in Caregiver-Patient Activation from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 1)

    The Caregiver Patient Activation Survey is a 10-item survey used to measure a caregiver's knowledge, skills, confidence, and willingness to advocate for and support a patient's healthcare needs. It assesses the caregiver's ability to navigate the healthcare system, communicate with providers, manage medications, and ensure adherence to treatment plans.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

  39. Change in Caregiver-Patient Activation from Baseline to Week 12 (Arm 2)

    The Caregiver Patient Activation Survey is a 10-item survey used to measure a caregiver's knowledge, skills, confidence, and willingness to advocate for and support a patient's healthcare needs. It assesses the caregiver's ability to navigate the healthcare system, communicate with providers, manage medications, and ensure adherence to treatment plans.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks post-discharge

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
    Recruiting
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to: \[contact information for Sponsor Investigator or designee\]. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06936878
Lead sponsor
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Responsible party
Alexi A. Wright, MD (Principal Investigator, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 20, 2025
Start date
May 12, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 18, 2026

Study contacts

Alexi Wright, MD, MPH
Contact
alexi_wright@dfci.harvard.edu
617-632-2334
Irene Wang, MPH
Contact
irene_wang@dfci.harvard.edu
617-582-7238
Alexi Wright, MD MPH
principal investigator · Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion