CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06933927Updated Apr 22, 2025

Comparative Evaluation of Gingival Health and Bacterial Adhesion in Bioflx vs. Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars

An interventional study of (Group A: Bioflx crowns) and (Group B) : Preformed Zirconia crown in Carious Primary Molars, sponsored by Cairo University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 8 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-22.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 8 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the Evaluation of Gingival Health and Bacterial Adhesion of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars of Bioflx crowns compared to zirconia crowns in the restoration of primary molars. The main question[s] it aims to answer is there are the differences in bacterial adhesion and gingival health between bioflx and zirconia crowns The study will also assess the clinical performance of both types of crowns in terms of bacterial adhesion , child and parents satisfaction,as well as preparation time.

Read the detailed description

Dental caries is an oral disease most ubiquitous among children, characterized by a series of demineralization and remineralization cycles. If left untreated, it can progress to cavitated lesions. Usually, the familiar method of managing multi-surface carious lesions in primary teeth with stainless steel crowns .Streptococcus mutans is considered to be the main colonizer and primary etiological factor in caries progression as it stimulates the production of glucans from the food substrates. Research has indicated that S. mutans can be isolated from plaque samples. Consequently the long-term success of a restored tooth is significantly affected by the adhesion of S. mutans to the preformed crowns.Bacterial adhesion on zirconia are sparse. An in vitro study reported the initial bacterial adhesion on the surface of zirconia to be less compared with resins. When a primary tooth is restored with a full-coverage restoration, it establishes a fresh environment conducive to microbial adhesion. Bioflx Crowns the first flexible, durable, and esthetic preformedcrown for primary molars .BFCs are monochromatic, metal-free, tooth-colored crowns used in the medical device industry having high strength, flexibility, and durability. These crowns are autoclavable and are similar to SSC in tooth preparation. Additionally, they offer a cost benefit compared to zircon crowns,

02

Conditions studied

  • Carious Primary Molars

Browse trials for

03

In context

Tissue Adhesions

241 studies on the registry are indexed under Tissue Adhesions; 29 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 28 is below the median of 60 across 184 interventional studies indexed under Tissue Adhesions.

Browse Tissue Adhesions studies →

Lead sponsor

Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,780 studies on the registry; 1,427 are open to participants now.

Of its 36 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 8 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. patients aged 4-8 years.
  2. decayed in primary molars require full-coverage crowns.
  3. No history of systemic diseases affecting oral health.
  4. Cooperative children.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-patients with severe medical conditions, badly decayed in primary molars and trauma.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
28 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bioflex crowns

    Bioflx Crowns (BFCs) the first flexible, durable, and esthetic preformedcrown for primary molars .BFCs are monochromatic, metal-free, tooth-colored crowns used in the medical device industry having high strength, flexibility, and durability. These crowns are autoclavable and are similar to SSC in tooth preparation. Additionally, they offer a cost benefit compared to zircon crowns

    Other: (Group A: Bioflx crowns)

  • Experimental
    Zirconia crowns

    zirconia crowns are frequently chosen as a comparator due to their established clinical performance and favorable biological properties. Studies have demonstrated that zirconia crowns exhibit lower bacterial adhesion, particularly of Streptococcus mutans, compared to stainless steel crowns (SSCs). highly polished and smooth surface of zirconia, which minimizes plaque accumulation and subsequent gingival inflammation.

    Other: (Group B) : Preformed Zirconia crown

Interventions

  • Other(Group A: Bioflx crowns)

    Minimal preparation will be required due to their flexural adaptability:1. Choose an appropriately sized Bioflex (Nusmile) crown of similar size to the mesiodistal width.2. The tooth will be prepared using a flame stone for occlusal reduction by 1-1.5 mm, including the central groove .3Proximal preparation will be around 0.5 mm, by using a fine, long, tapered diamond stone to cut interproximal slices mesially and distally.4. The crown will be placed with a snug fit and cemented using glass ionomer

  • Other(Group B) : Preformed Zirconia crown

    1. Size Determination can be achieved by holding a crown up to the existing tooth or, if available, using digital x-ray measurements to match the patient's interproximal width to the corresponding crown size.2. OcclusalPerform an occlusal reduction of about 1.5-2 mm, ensuring adequate space for the crown material. 3. Axial ReductionReduce the buccal and lingual surfaces uniformly, ensuring the removal of any prominent buccal bulges to allow for a passive crown fit. 4. Interproximal ReductionClearance: Ensure sufficient interproximal space by removing enough tooth structure to allow the crown to seat without interference.5. Subgingival PreparationMargin Placement: Extend the preparation subgingivally by approximately 2 mm to achieve optimal crown retention and aesthetics. This involves removing the chamfer margin at the tissue level and ensuring a smooth transition from the root to the coronal tooth structure

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gingival Health

    plaque index using Silness\& Löe plaque index:0 - 3 0: no plaque.1: film at gingival margin.2: moderate accumulation.3: abundance of plaque.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Gingival health

    Gingival index using Löe\& Silness :0 - 3 0: healthy gum.1: mild discoloration and edematous gingiva, no bleeding on probing.2: red oedematous and shiny gingiva,bleeding on probing.3: red oedematous and ulceration gingiva, spontaneous bleeding.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bacterial adhesion

    Method of measurement : by( Mitis salivarius agar) Unit of measurement :Colony-formingunits.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  2. child and parental satisfaction

    5-Point likert's scale / Questionnaire. 1. Very Happy.2. Happy.3. Neither.4. Unhappy.5. Very Unhappy.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Preparation time

    Method of measurement : stop watch Unit of measurement : minutes

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of dentistry cairo university
    Cairo, Giza 12613, Egypt
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Patil AS, Jain M, Choubey S, Patil M, Chunawala Y. Comparative evaluation of clinical success of Stainless Steel and Bioflx crowns in primary molar - A 12 month split mouth prospective randomized clinical trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2024 Jan 1;42(1):37-45. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_484_23. Epub 2024 Apr 15. PubMed 38616425 ↗
  • Bin AlShaibah WM, El-Shehaby FA, El-Dokky NA, Reda AR. Comparative study on the microbial adhesion to preveneered and stainless steel crowns. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Jul-Sep;30(3):206-11. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.105012. PubMed 23263423 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06933927
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Salma Ahmed Abdelrazig Mohammed (principal investigator, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 18, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 26, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 22, 2025

Study contacts

Salma Ahmed Abdelrazig, Master degree
Contact
Salma.abdelrazig@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
00201022584032
Manal Ahmed Elsheikh, PHD
study director · Cairo University
Shaimaa Mohamed Sabry mostafa, PHD
study director · Cairo University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion