ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06930950Updated Apr 16, 2025

The NACHO Trial (Nut Allergy Children OIT)

An interventional study of Cashew nut oral immunotherapy in Oral Immunotherapy for Food Allergy, Tree Nut Allergy and Cashew Nut Allergy, sponsored by HUS Skin and Allergy Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Finland. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-16.

Sponsored by HUS Skin and Allergy Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2024, registered Apr 2025).
  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Year to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Most food allergies that begin in early childhood are mild and resolve by school age, but nut allergies persist in about 80-90% of individuals into adulthood. The consumption of nuts, particularly cashew nuts, has increased dramatically in Finland in the 21st century, leading to a rise in severe allergic reactions to cashew nuts among young children. Of the food anaphylaxis cases reported in the Finnish Anaphylaxis Registry between 2015-2020, 49% were caused by nuts, with cashew nuts being the most common trigger. The standard treatment for nut allergies is strict avoidance of nuts and symptom management with emergency medications.

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a food allergy treatment that increases tolerance, and it has primarily been studied in school-aged children, with desensitization achieved in about 80% of cases. Permanent tolerance, depending on the allergen, develops in 30-50% of cases within five years. International guidelines recommend peanut OIT for children over the age of 4 who have severe peanut allergies. The likelihood of achieving tolerance, especially permanent tolerance, appears to improve the earlier the treatment is started. To date, only one study (NUIT CRACKER) has been published on cashew nut desensitization in children over 4 years old, involving 50 children, where 88% achieved desensitization to both cashew nuts and pistachios.

The aim of this study is to develop a cashew nut desensitization protocol and investigate its effectiveness in achieving tolerance and permanent desensitization in children aged 1-17 years, compared to cashew nut avoidance. The study will assess the safety of cashew nut desensitization and its impact on the quality of life of patients and their families.

02

Conditions studied

  • Oral Immunotherapy for Food Allergy
  • Tree Nut Allergy
  • Cashew Nut Allergy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Oral immunotherapy
  • Cashew
  • Tree Nut
  • Food allergen immunotherapy
03

In context

Nut Hypersensitivity

33 studies on the registry are indexed under Nut Hypersensitivity; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 45 is close to the median of 47 across 20 interventional studies indexed under Nut Hypersensitivity.

Browse Nut Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

HUS Skin and Allergy Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 6 months - 17 years
  2. Sensitization to cashew nut (allergen-specific IgE or positive skin PRICK test)
  3. Positive oral food challenge for cashew nut

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Poor adherence
  2. Uncontrolled or severe asthma
  3. Uncontrolled active or severe or atopic dermatitis
  4. Chronic urticaria
  5. Eosinophilic esophagitis or other gastrointestinal eosinophilic disorders
  6. Active malignant neoplasia
  7. Active systemic, disease
  8. Diabetes treated with insulin
  9. Severe systemic illness or severe medical conditions such as cardiovascular or lung diseases
  10. Medication with beta blockers
  11. Medication with ACE-inhibitors
  12. Mastocytosis
  13. Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  14. Language barriers (not fluent Finnish or Swedish)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intervention group

    The group that will receive oral immunotherapy for cashew nut

    Other: Cashew nut oral immunotherapy

  • No intervention
    Control group

    The group that will continue avoiding cashew nut for 12 months before crossover to active OIT to cashew nut

Interventions

  • OtherCashew nut oral immunotherapy

    Cashew nut oral immunotherapy (OIT) where the aim is desensitizing individuals with cashew nut allergies. The approach involves the gradual administration of increasing doses of cashew nut protein. The goal of OIT is to increase the threshold of tolerance to cashew nuts, thereby reducing the risk of severe allergic reactions upon accidental exposure

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Desensitization

    The proportion of patients able to tolerate the target dose of 1000 mg of cashew nut protein in an Oral Food Challenge (OFC) after 12 months of Oral Immunotherapy (OIT) compared to the control group.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sustained unresponsiveness

    The proportion of patients able to tolerate 1000mg of cashew nut protein in an OFC after 23 months of OIT followed by one month of avoidance.

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. Partial desensitization at 12 months

    The proportion of patients able to tolerate a dose below 1000mg of cashew nut protein in an OFC after 12 months of OIT compared to the control group.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Partial desensitization at 24 months

    The proportion of patients able to tolerate a dose below 1000 mg of cashew nut protein in an OFC after 23 months of OIT followed by one month of avoidance

    Time frame: 24 months

  4. Impact on quality of life

    The proportion of patients who report improved quality of life in the FAQLQ surveys after OIT, compared to their QoL while avoiding cashew nuts

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Sep 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2029, 61 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 9, 2025
First posted
Apr 16, 2025
StartActual
Sep 13, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Nov 5, 2029
CompletionEst.
Nov 5, 2029
Last update
Apr 16, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06930950
Lead sponsor
HUS Skin and Allergy Hospital
Responsible party
Heidi Sandström (Medical Doctor, HUS Skin and Allergy Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 16, 2025
Start date
Sep 13, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 5, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 5, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 16, 2025

Study contacts

Heidi Sandström, MD
Contact
heidi.sandstrom@hus.fi
+358 50 428 7931

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion