ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03377192IPAACUpdated Feb 13, 2020

Impedance Pneumography in Assessment of Asthma Control in Preschool Children

An observational study in Wheezing and Asthma in Children, sponsored by HUS Skin and Allergy Hospital. Status unknown at 2 sites in Finland. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 7 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-13.

Sponsored by HUS Skin and Allergy Hospital · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2020), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
53
Ages
4 Years to 7 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the value of impedance pneumography, used as overnight home recordings during a longitudinal design, in assessing asthma control in preschool children

Read the detailed description

Lung function assessment of preschool children is hindered by their limited co-operation in conventional tests such as peak expiratory flow (PEF) or spirometry. However, indices derived from spontaneous tidal respiratory air flow and the shape of tidal expiratory flow-volume and flow-time curves relate to lung function and are easier to record even in young children. As a more advanced approach, the time dynamics and complexity properties of the tidal breathing flow volume (TBFV) signal have been analysed and found to relate to various respiratory conditions.

Impedance pneumography (IP) is a method for measuring changes in the thoracic electrical impedance through skin electrodes, which varies as a function of lung aeration i.e. breathing. Recent technical advancements have enabled IP to be used for accurate non-invasive tidal flow signal measurement. Moreover, in overnight recordings at home, IP was found feasible for quantifying nocturnal TBFV variability in young children with lower respiratory symptoms, showing that preschool children with high risk of asthma present with increased variation of tidal flow profile shape, and momentarily lowered chaoticity, compared to children with lower risk of asthma. So far, there are no studies that have addressed the utility of IP to assess asthma control in young children with asthma.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the utility of a commercially available IP device (VENTICA, Icare Finland, Finland) and IP-derived clinical indices in assessing the clinical control of asthmatic children receiving normal therapy in a longitudinal setting. The primary hypothesis is that TBFV variability quantified by IP is associated with disease control during management of young children with asthma. The secondary hypothesis is that TBFV variability quantified by IP predicts changes in disease control during management of young children with asthma.

02

Conditions studied

  • Wheezing
  • Asthma in Children

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Impedance pneumography
  • Respiratory function
  • Asthma management
03

In context

Respiratory Sounds

189 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Sounds; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 53 is below the median of 109 across 82 observational studies indexed under Respiratory Sounds.

Browse Respiratory Sounds studies →

Lead sponsor

HUS Skin and Allergy Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 7 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Thirty (30) patients who have attended pediatric ward in the study centre(s) due to asthmatic symptoms (wheeze, cough, dyspnea) will be recruited.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 4-7 years, both sexes
  • Attending pediatric ward in the study centre due to asthmatic symptoms (wheeze, cough and/or dyspnea)
  • History and clinical signs allowing diagnosis of doctor diagnosed asthma and the need to start regular anti-asthmatic medication
  • Signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of inhaled medication 30 days prior to study entry
  • Other cardiorespiratory or neurological chronic diseases or states that may affect breathing
  • Acute respiratory infection 2 weeks prior to study entry
  • Chronic respiratory disorder of prematurity
  • Implanted or external active medical devices
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
53 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Childhood asthma control test (C-ACT)

    Questionnaire that measures current asthma control, including 7 questions and a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 27; score 19 or less indicates that asthma is not controlled.

    Time frame: Weekly up to maximum 6 months or until loss of asthma control/exacerbation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time-to-response (TTR)

    Duration from visit 1 to good asthma control (C-ACT\>19)

    Time frame: Minimum of 30 days from initiation of anti-asthmatic medication up to max 6 months

  2. Time-to-loss-of-control (TTLOC)

    Duration from the visit 2 and 3 until loss of asthma control (C-ACT\<16) or asthma exacerbation

    Time frame: Minimum of 30 days from initiation of anti-asthmatic medication up to max 6 months

  3. Lung function

    Respiratory resistance and exercise induced increase in resistance, measured by the oscillometric method

    Time frame: Every visit up to maximum 6 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • HUS Skin and Allergy Hospital
    Helsinki, 00029, Finland
  • Mehiläinen Paediatric Allergy Clinic
    Helsinki, 00260, Finland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Burman J, Malmberg LP, Remes S, Jartti T, Pelkonen AS, Makela MJ. Impulse oscillometry and free-running tests for diagnosing asthma and monitoring lung function in young children. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Sep;127(3):326-333. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.03.030. Epub 2021 Apr 2. PubMed 33819614 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2017 to primary completion in Nov 2019, 23 months.

Of 38 observational studies under Respiratory Sounds, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 97. This study's 23 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 5, 2017
First posted
Dec 19, 2017
StartActual
Nov 28, 2017
Primary completionActual
Nov 14, 2019
CompletionEst.
Jun 2020
Last update
Feb 13, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 13, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03377192
Lead sponsor
HUS Skin and Allergy Hospital
Collaborators
Revenio Research, Mehiläinen
Responsible party
Pekka Malmberg, MD, PhD (Head of clinical physiology, HUS Skin and Allergy Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 19, 2017
Start date
Nov 28, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 14, 2019
Completion
Jun 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 13, 2020

Study contacts

Pekka Malmberg, MD, PhD
principal investigator · HUS Skin and Allergy Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion