ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06922942MS-FLOWERUpdated Nov 2, 2026

MSCopilot Users' Feedback in Real Life - Outcomes Regarding Integration in Patients' pathWay and Users' ExpeRience

An interventional study of MSCopilot Flower mobile application in Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by Ad scientiam. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.

Sponsored by Ad scientiam · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Updated Nov 2, 2026Now CompletedPrimary completion moved+2 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This US multicenter, prospective cohort study aims to evaluate how MSCopilot can be seamlessly integrated into the current care pathway and identify potential optimizations to enhance its impact on both MS patients and clinicians, facilitating broader implementation. Specifically, the study will assess:

  • The overall integration of MSCopilot into routine clinical practice,
  • Patients' ability to use MSCopilot at home without supervision,
  • The need for patient support when using MSCopilot at home,
  • User behavior based on usage analytics data from the MSCopilot mobile app and dashboard,
  • Patient adherence to MSCopilot use in routine clinical practice,
  • The adequacy of the onboarding/training process for HCPs,
  • The effectiveness of HCPs onboarding/training in ensuring successful patient onboarding,
  • The variances in user behavior and adherence to MSCopilot use according to socio-demographic factors and EDSS scores
02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis

3,264 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 659 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 62 is above the median of 50 across 2,201 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Ad scientiam is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

For patients

  • 18 years and older
  • With a confirmed and documented MS diagnosis, per the 2010 Revised
  • McDonald criteria
  • With an EDSS score ranging from 0 to 6.5
  • Able to monitor their disease from home (i.e. not hospitalized or under medical assistance).
  • Having a personal smartphone with a mobile operating system above 16 for IOS (iPhone) and 8 for Android and having access to a good internet connection.
  • Able to read language in which the mobile application is available and able to understand pictograms Having read the information sheet and signed the form

For HCPs:

  • Licensed neurologists trained in the management of Multiple Sclerosis patients and allowed to conduct clinical studies within their departments
  • If applicable: nurses or medical assistants specifically trained in the management of Multiple Sclerosis and allowed to participate in clinical studies within their departments
  • Ability to use a computer

Exclusion Criteria (for patients):

  • Pregnant and nursing women
  • Person under guardianship or curatorship
  • Inability to use a smartphone application
  • Patient who previously participated in a study using MSCopilot

Early termination criteria (for patients):

  • exclusion criteria,
  • death,
  • abandon,
  • loss of follow-up,
  • investigator's decision
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Performance of digital tests at home at day 0 (D0), D30, D60, D90, D120, D150 and D180

    Device: MSCopilot Flower mobile application

Interventions

  • DeviceMSCopilot Flower mobile application

    MSCopilot Flower includes active tests for walking, cognition, dexterity and vision, and e-questionnaires related to fatigue and Anxiety

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To assess the ease of integrating the MSCopilot dashboard into clinical workflows for neurologists and the ease of use at home for patients with multiple sclerosis.

    Descriptive analysis and acceptance criteria of a minimum score of \>2/4 on neurologists' questionnaires regarding the ease of integrating the MSCopilot dashboard into clinical workflows Descriptive analysis and acceptance criteria of a minimum score of \>2/4 on patients' questionnaires regarding the ease of use of MSCopilot at home

    Time frame: For neurologists: Day 180 (+/- 30 days) and for patients: Day 1, Day 90 and Day 180 (+/- 30 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. To assess the integration of MSCopilot dashboard and application into routine clinical practice as well as perceived value for both HCPs and patients.

    Descriptive analysis of neurologists' questionnaires, to be completed after each investigator's last visit, regarding the Health Care Profesionnals (HCPs) dashboard Descriptive analysis and acceptance criteria of a minimum score of \>2/4 for each item, of neurologists' questionnaires after the last visit on the HCPs dashboard Descriptive analysis of patients' questionnaires after the last visit regarding MSCopilot app and dashboard use by the HCPs. Descriptive analysis and acceptance criteria of a minimum score of \>2/4 for each item in patients' questionnaires, to be completed after the follow-up visit, regarding MSCopilot application and dashboard use by HCPs

    Time frame: At Day 180 ± 30days

  2. To assess patients' ability to use MSCopilot at home without supervision.

    Descriptive analysis of patient questionnaires Acceptance criteria of a minimum of \>2/4 for each item, of patient questionnaires

    Time frame: Day 1 (+/- 30 days)

  3. To assess patients' ability to use MSCopilot at home without supervision.

    Descriptive analysis of patient questionnaires at mid-study Descriptive analysis and acceptance criteria of a minimum score of \>2/4 for each item, of patient questionnaires at mid-study

    Time frame: Day 90 (+/-30 days)

  4. To assess the need for patient support when using MSCopilot at home

    Descriptive analysis of nurses or medical assistants' questionnaires (if applicable) Descriptive analysis and acceptance criteria of a minimum score of \>2/4 for each item, of nurses or medical assistants' questionnaires (if applicable)

    Time frame: Day 180 (+/-30 days)

  5. To assess patient adherence to MSCopilot use in routine clinical practice.

    Descriptive analysis of the mobile application's adherence data, including: Number of performed tests, Number of performed sessions, Number of completed questionnaires.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Day 180 (+/-30 days)

  6. To assess user behavior based on usage analytics data from the MSCopilot mobile app and the dashboard.

    Quantitative analysis of real-world utilization patterns of the MSCopilot mobile app through analytics data Quantitative analysis of real-world utilization patterns of the HCPs dashboard through analytics data

    Time frame: Day 1 to Day 180 (+/-30 days)

  7. To assess the effectiveness of HCPs onboarding/training in ensuring successful patient onboarding.

    Descriptive analysis of HCPs (neurologists) questionnaires Descriptive analysis and acceptance criteria of a minimum score of \>2/4 for each item, of HCPs (neurologists) questionnaires

    Time frame: At the end of inclusion period (90 days)

  8. To assess the effectiveness of HCPs onboarding/training in ensuring successful patient onboarding.

    Descriptive analysis of patient questionnaires Descriptive analysis and acceptance criteria of a minimum score of \>2/4 for each item, of patient questionnaires

    Time frame: After patient inclusion visit (90 days)

  9. To assess the adequacy of the onboarding/training process for HCPs, including neurologists, nurses, and medical assistants, focusing on clarity, satisfaction, and confidence in using MSCopilot

    Descriptive analysis of HCPs questionnaires post-onboarding/training session Descriptive analysis and acceptance criteria of a minimum score of \>2/4 for each item in HCPs questionnaires post-onboarding/training

    Time frame: After onboarding/training session (Day 0)

  10. To assess the variances in user behavior and adherence to MSCopilot use according to socio-demographic factors and EDSS scores.

    Descriptive analysis of how socio-demographic factors and EDSS scores affect patient behavior and adherence to MSCopilot mobile application.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Day 180 (+/-30 days)

  11. To assess the variances in user behavior and adherence to MSCopilot use according to socio-demographic factors and EDSS scores.

    Descriptive analysis of how HCPs socio-demographic factors affect their behavior toward MSCopilot dashboard.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Day 180 (+/-30 days)

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Jenny Feng
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, United States
  • Robert Naismith
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Gabriel Pardo
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
  • Leorah Freeman
    Austin, Texas 78712, United States
08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2025 to primary completion in Apr 2026, 8 months.

Of 847 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Multiple Sclerosis, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 43. This study's 8 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 869 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Nov 2, 2026: primary completion Mar 2026 → Apr 2026 and completion Mar 2026 → Apr 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 1, 2025
First posted
Apr 11, 2025
StartActual
Aug 12, 2025
Primary completionActual
Apr 27, 2026was Mar 2026
CompletionActual
Apr 27, 2026was Mar 2026
Last update
Nov 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Active, not recruiting→Completed
changed Nov 2, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2026→Apr 27, 2026 (actual)
Nov 2, 2026
Study completion
Mar 1, 2026→Apr 27, 2026 (actual)
Nov 2, 2026
Enrollment
60 (estimated)→62 (actual)
Nov 2, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 2, 2026
    Active, not recruiting→Completed
    Primary completion Mar 1, 2026→Apr 27, 2026 (now actual)
    Study completion Mar 1, 2026→Apr 27, 2026 (now actual)
    Enrollment 60 (estimated)→62 (actual)

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06922942
Lead sponsor
Ad scientiam
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 11, 2025
Start date
Aug 12, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 27, 2026
Completion
Apr 27, 2026
Last update
Nov 2, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion