ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06912282Updated Apr 4, 2025

Bilateral Single-Electrode VO Combined With STN-DBS for Treating Meige Syndrome

An interventional study of deep brain stimulation in Meige Syndrome, sponsored by Huashan Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-04.

Sponsored by Huashan Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Meige syndrome is a rare and debilitating movement disorder characterized by blepharospasm, oromandibular dystonia, and cervical muscle contractions, often refractory to pharmacological therapies. Deep brain stimulation (DBS), initially developed to treat essential tremor and Parkinson's disease, has been explored in recent years as a potential treatment for various dystonias, including Meige's syndrome. This clinical study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bilateral single-electrode ventralis oralis (VO) nucleus stimulation combined with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) in patients with Meige syndrome.

Read the detailed description

While deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or the globus pallidus interna (GPi) has shown moderate efficacy, incomplete symptom relief and high stimulation thresholds with associated side effects remain significant limitations. Emerging evidence suggests that dual-target neuromodulation combining STN with ventralis oralis (VO) nucleus stimulation may synergistically modulate hyperactive basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits, potentially enhancing therapeutic outcomes.The study will involve patients diagnosed with Meige syndrome who are eligible for DBS therapy. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups.The primary outcome measure is the improvement in motor symptoms, assessed using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) before and after treatment. Secondary outcomes will include changes in quality of life, anxiety and depression scores, and any adverse effects related to the DBS procedure.The results of this study will be used to guide future clinical trials and inform the treatment options for patients with Meige syndrome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Meige Syndrome

Keywords

  • DBS
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Huashan Hospital is the lead sponsor of 247 studies on the registry; 105 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must meet the clinical diagnostic criteria for Meige syndrome
  • Only includes patients with: Blepharospasm-type Meige syndrome and Blepharospasm with lower jaw muscle dystonia-type
  • All patients must have undergone at least one year of systematic and standard treatment prior to surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of neurological diseases other than Meige syndrome
  • Severe cognitive impairment
  • Severe psychiatric disorders
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    VO-DBS / VO Combined with STN-DBS Group

    Patients will undergo bilateral single-electrode VO combined with STN target implantation. After device activation, VO-DBS single-target stimulation will be applied. Evaluation will be conducted after three months, followed by the initiation of combined VO and STN-DBS stimulation.

    Device: deep brain stimulation

  • Active comparator
    STN-DBS / VO Combined with STN-DBS Group

    Patients will undergo bilateral single-electrode VO combined with STN target implantation. After device activation, STN-DBS single-target stimulation will be applied. Evaluation will be conducted after three months, followed by the initiation of combined VO and STN-DBS stimulation.

    Device: deep brain stimulation

Interventions

  • Devicedeep brain stimulation

    bilateral single-electrode VO combined with STN target implantation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Improvement of primary symptoms

    Scale title: Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale Section I: Motor subscale (0-120) Section II: Disability scale (0-30) Higher scores: Indicate worse outcomes (more severe dystonia symptoms).

    Time frame: 1 year after stimulation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Improvement of symptoms

    Scale title: Jankovic Rating Scale Minimum value: 0 (No dystonia) Maximum value: 8 (Severe dystonia) Higher scores: Indicate worse outcomes (more severe dystonia symptoms).

    Time frame: 1 year after stimulation

  2. Improvement of symptoms

    Scale title: Blepharospasm Disability Index Minimum value: 0 (No disability) Maximum value: 24 (Severe disability) Higher scores: Indicate worse outcomes (more severe disability due to blepharospasm).

    Time frame: 1 year after stimulation

  3. Improvement of symptoms

    Scale title: Oromandibular Dystonia Questionnaire Minimum value: 0 (No symptoms or disability) Maximum value: 100 (Severe disability) Higher scores: Indicate worse outcomes (more disability due to oromandibular dystonia).

    Time frame: 1 year after stimulation

  4. Improvement of symptoms

    Scale title: Oromandibular Dystonia Rating Scale Minimum value: 0 (No dystonia) Maximum value: 314 (Severe dystonia) Higher scores: Indicate worse outcomes (more severe oromandibular dystonia symptoms).

    Time frame: 1 year after stimulation

  5. Psychological assessment

    Scale title: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Minimum value: 0 (No anxiety) Maximum value: 56 (Severe anxiety) Higher scores: Indicate worse outcomes (more severe anxiety).

    Time frame: 1 year after stimulation

  6. Psychological assessment

    Scale title: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Minimum value: 0 (No depression) Maximum value: 52 (Severe depression) Higher scores: Indicate worse outcomes (more severe depression).

    Time frame: 1 year after stimulation

  7. Cognitive assessment

    Scale title: Mini-Mental State Examination Minimum value: 0 (Severe cognitive impairment) Maximum value: 30 (No cognitive impairment) Higher scores: Indicate better outcomes (better cognitive function).

    Time frame: 1 year after stimulation

  8. Cognitive assessment

    Scale title: Montreal Cognitive Assessment Minimum value: 0 (Severe cognitive impairment) Maximum value: 30 (No cognitive impairment) Higher scores: Indicate better outcomes (better cognitive function).

    Time frame: 1 year after stimulation

  9. health-related quality of life

    Scale title:Short Form 36 Health Survey The SF-36 is a widely used tool to assess general health status and quality of life. It includes 36 items that measure eight health domains: Physical functioning Role limitations due to physical health problems Role limitations due to emotional problems Energy/fatigue Emotional well-being Social functioning Pain General health perceptions Each of the domains is scored separately, and the overall score can reflect a person's physical and mental health. Minimum value: 0 (Worst health status) Maximum value: 100 (Best health status) Higher scores: Indicate better outcomes (better health-related quality of life).

    Time frame: 1 year after stimulation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Huashan Hospital, Fudan University.
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality 200040, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2026, 15 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 26, 2025
First posted
Apr 4, 2025
StartActual
Mar 6, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jan 1, 2027
Last update
Apr 4, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 4, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06912282
Lead sponsor
Huashan Hospital
Responsible party
Jie Hu (Principal Investigator, Huashan Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 4, 2025
Start date
Mar 6, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 4, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion