ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07834450CORTEX-ALSUpdated Sep 22, 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Cyclophosphamide in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Cyclophosphamide and Riluzole in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, sponsored by Huashan Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-22.

Sponsored by Huashan Hospital · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether cyclophosphamide (CTX) combined with standard treatment can slow disease progression in adults with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). It will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of CTX. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does CTX combined with standard treatment reduce the decline in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) scores over 48 weeks compared with standard treatment alone?
  2. What medical problems and side effects do participants have while receiving CTX?
  3. Are markers of neuroinflammation and immune activity, including TSPO-PET, neurofilament light chain (NfL), upper motor neuron burden, electrophysiological measures, immune cell profiles, and autoantibodies, associated with treatment response?

Researchers will compare CTX combined with standard treatment with standard treatment alone to see whether CTX can slow the progression of ALS.

Participants will:

  1. Be randomly assigned to receive CTX plus standard treatment or standard treatment alone
  2. Receive CTX treatment for up to 36 weeks if assigned to the CTX group
  3. Visit the study center regularly for clinical assessments, blood tests, lung function tests, electrophysiological tests, and other safety evaluations
  4. Complete assessments of physical function, muscle strength, respiratory function, and quality of life
  5. Undergo biomarker assessments, including TSPO-PET imaging and NfL testing
  6. Be followed for 48 weeks during the main study period and for up to 96 weeks for long-term outcomes and safety
02

Conditions studied

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
03

In context

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

978 studies on the registry are indexed under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; 277 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 38 across 662 interventional studies indexed under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Browse Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Huashan Hospital is the lead sponsor of 247 studies on the registry; 104 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 to 75 years.
  • Diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) according to the 2020 revised Gold Coast diagnostic criteria, confirmed by an ALS specialist at a participating study center.
  • A decline of 1 to 4 points in the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) during the 12-week observation period before randomization.
  • Time from symptom onset to randomization ≤2 years.
  • Positive TSPO-PET confirmed by the central imaging core laboratory.
  • Each ALSFRS-R item score ≥2 at baseline; the dyspnea, orthopnea, and respiratory insufficiency items must each have a score of 4.
  • Baseline forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥70% of the predicted value.
  • Willing and able to comply with study treatment and follow-up procedures and provide written , including informed consent for off-label use of cyclophosphamide.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of an ALS mimic or another condition that better explains the clinical presentation, including multifocal motor neuropathy, motor-predominant chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, cervical spinal cord compression, Kennedy disease, hereditary spastic paraplegia, myasthenia gravis, inclusion body myositis, or metabolic, infectious, or paraneoplastic disorders.
  • Motor conduction block or sensory nerve conduction abnormalities on nerve conduction studies.
  • Systemic disease, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, or Sjögren syndrome, requiring systemic therapy.
  • Familial ALS, or a defined genetic ALS subtype such as SOD1-associated ALS currently receiving gene-targeted therapy or participating in another drug trial.
  • (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >1.5 times the , or serum creatinine above the upper limit of normal.
  • Active infection, or uncontrolled virus infection, virus infection, infection, or active tuberculosis identified during screening.
  • White blood cell count \<3.5 × 10\^9/L, \<1.5 × 10\^9/L, count \<100 × 10\^9/L, or \<90 g/L.
  • Severe concomitant neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, hematologic, endocrine, or psychiatric disease that, in the investigator's judgment, may interfere with study participation or safety.
  • Suspected or confirmed history of alcohol or drug abuse.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding, or unwillingness of participants of to use effective .
  • Known to cyclophosphamide.
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial within 3 months before screening.
  • Baseline imaging data of inadequate quality for analysis, including severe motion artifacts or incorrect acquisition parameters.
  • Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the participant unsuitable for the study, including poor adherence or a high likelihood of loss to follow-up.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(16)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Reproductive potential

Able to have children. For women this usually means from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery; for men, unless permanently sterile. Read who the line is about — participants, women, men, or their partners.

Criteria about it usually ask for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cyclophosphamide Plus Standard Treatment

    Drug: Cyclophosphamide · Drug: Riluzole

  • Active comparator
    Standard Treatment Alone

    Drug: Riluzole

Interventions

  • Cyclophosphamide will be administered intravenously for 36 weeks in addition to standard treatment with riluzole. During the induction phase, participants will receive a total dose of 2.0 g over approximately 2 weeks in four divided infusions (400 mg, 600 mg, 400 mg, and 600 mg), with an interval of 1-2 days between infusions. During the maintenance phase, cyclophosphamide 1.0 g will be administered intravenously every 4 weeks through Week 36, for a planned cumulative dose of approximately 10.0 g. Hydration, mesna, and antiemetic treatment will be provided as appropriate. Dose delay, dose reduction, or permanent discontinuation will be permitted for treatment-related toxicity according to the study protocol.

  • Riluzole will be administered orally at a dose of 50 mg twice daily as standard treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Participants should be receiving a stable dose before randomization and will continue treatment during the study unless dose modification or discontinuation is required for safety or tolerability reasons.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score at Week 48

    The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) is a 12-item scale used to assess functional impairment in participants with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 48. Higher total scores indicate better functional status, whereas lower scores indicate greater functional impairment. The outcome measure is the change in ALSFRS-R total score from baseline to Week 48, calculated as the Week 48 score minus the baseline score. A more negative change indicates greater functional decline.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Rasch-Built Overall Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disability Scale (ROADS) Score at Week 48

    The Rasch-Built Overall Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disability Scale (ROADS) is a 28-item patient-reported scale used to assess overall disability in participants with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Each item is scored from 0 to 2, yielding a raw total score ranging from 0 to 56. The raw score is converted to a linearly weighted normed ROADS score ranging from 0 to 120, with higher scores indicating better functional status and lower scores indicating greater disability. The outcome measure is the change in the normed ROADS score from baseline to Week 48, calculated as the Week 48 score minus the baseline score. A more negative change indicates greater functional decline.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

  2. Change From Baseline in Dominant Hand Grip Strength at Week 48

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

  3. Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 48

    Forced vital capacity (FVC) will be measured using standardized pulmonary function testing procedures and expressed as a percentage of the predicted value based on appropriate reference equations. The outcome measure is the change in percent-predicted FVC from baseline to Week 48, calculated as the Week 48 value minus the baseline value. A greater decrease indicates greater deterioration in respiratory function.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

  4. Change From Baseline in Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Levels at Week 48

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

  5. Change From Baseline in Compound Muscle Action Potential (CMAP) Amplitude at Week 48

    Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude will be assessed using standardized motor nerve conduction studies. CMAP amplitude will be measured in millivolts (mV). The outcome measure is the change in CMAP amplitude from baseline to Week 48, calculated as the Week 48 value minus the baseline value. A greater reduction in CMAP amplitude indicates greater loss of functional motor axons.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

  6. Change From Baseline in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire-40 (ALSAQ-40) Score at Week 48

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

  7. Time to Death, Enteral Feeding, or Permanent Assisted Ventilation

    Time frame: Randomization through Week 48

  8. Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted Slow Vital Capacity (SVC) at Week 48

    Slow vital capacity (SVC) will be measured using standardized pulmonary function testing procedures and expressed as a percentage of the predicted value based on appropriate reference equations. The outcome measure is the change in percent-predicted SVC from baseline to Week 48, calculated as the Week 48 value minus the baseline value. A greater decrease indicates greater deterioration in respiratory function.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

  9. Change From Baseline in Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Amplitude at Week 48

    Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude will be assessed using standardized transcranial magnetic stimulation and neurophysiological recording procedures. MEP amplitude will be measured in millivolts (mV). The outcome measure is the change in MEP amplitude from baseline to Week 48, calculated as the Week 48 value minus the baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Other outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in ALSFRS-R Total Score at Week 96

    The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) is a 12-item scale used to assess functional impairment in participants with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 48. Higher total scores indicate better functional status, whereas lower scores indicate greater functional impairment. The outcome measure is the change in ALSFRS-R total score from baseline to Week 48, calculated as the Week 48 score minus the baseline score. A more negative change indicates greater functional decline.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 96

  2. Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 96

    Forced vital capacity (FVC) will be measured using standardized pulmonary function testing procedures and expressed as a percentage of the predicted value based on appropriate reference equations. The outcome measure is the change in percent-predicted FVC from baseline to Week 96, calculated as the Week 96 value minus the baseline value. A greater decrease indicates greater deterioration in respiratory function.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 96

  3. Change From Baseline in King's College Clinical Staging System Stage Through Week 96

    Disease progression will be assessed using the King's College Clinical Staging System for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The system classifies disease progression according to the number of central nervous system regions involved and the occurrence of nutritional or respiratory failure. Stages range from Stage 1 to Stage 4, with Stage 4 subdivided into Stage 4A (nutritional failure) and Stage 4B (respiratory failure). Higher stages indicate more advanced disease. Change in King's College Clinical Stage from baseline through Week 96 will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 96

  4. Change From Baseline in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Milano-Torino Staging (ALS-MiToS) System Stage Through Week 96

    Disease progression will be assessed using the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Milano-Torino Staging (ALS-MiToS) System, which is based on loss of independence in four functional domains derived from the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R): walking/self-care, swallowing, communicating, and breathing. Stages range from 0 to 5. Stage 0 indicates no loss of independence in any domain; Stages 1 through 4 indicate loss of independence in one to four domains, respectively; and Stage 5 indicates death. Higher stages indicate more advanced disease and greater loss of functional independence. Change in ALS-MiToS stage from baseline through Week 96 will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 96

  5. Time to Death or Permanent Assisted Ventilation Through Week 96

    Time frame: Randomization through Week 96

  6. Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted Slow Vital Capacity (SVC) at Week 96

    Slow vital capacity (SVC) will be measured using standardized pulmonary function testing procedures and expressed as a percentage of the predicted value based on appropriate reference equations. The outcome measure is the change in percent-predicted SVC from baseline to Week 96, calculated as the Week 96 value minus the baseline value. A greater decrease indicates greater deterioration in respiratory function.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07834450
Lead sponsor
Huashan Hospital
Responsible party
Xiangjun Chen (Professor, Huashan Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 22, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 22, 2026

Study contacts

Xiangjun Chen, M.D. & Ph.D.
Contact
Xiangjchen@fudan.edu.cn
+8618221382327

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cyclophosphamide

Start the discussion