CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06897501Updated May 18, 2025

Postoperative Vocal Cord Palsy Between Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube and Bronchial Blocker for Robot-assisted Esophagectomy

An interventional study of bronchial blocker and double-lumen endobronchial tube in One Lung Ventillation (OLV), sponsored by Samsung Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-18.

Sponsored by Samsung Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2025; still recruiting 1 year 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
202
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate whether the use of bronchial blocker could reduce the incidence of postoperative vocal cord palsy than the use of double-lumen endobronchial tube in robot-assisted esophagectomy.

Read the detailed description

Esophagectomy is a challenging surgery that usually requires one lung ventilation, and double-lumen endobronchial tubes and bronchial blockers are commonly used for one lung ventilation.

Successful resection of recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes during esophagectomy is important to survival and prevention of cancer recurrence, but there is a risk of postoperative vocal cord palsy due to the recurrent laryngeal nerve injury during the resection.

Compared to a double-lumen endobronchial tube, the use of a bronchial blocker is expected to reduce the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury; however, few clinical studies compare the two devices in terms of the incidence of postoperative vocal cord palsy in robot-assisted esophagectomy.

Therefore, the researchers aimed to investigate whether the use of bronchial blocker could reduce the incidence of postoperative vocal cord palsy than the use of double-lumen endobronchial tube in robot-assisted esophagectomy.

02

Conditions studied

  • One Lung Ventillation (OLV)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • robot-assisted esophagectomy
  • double-lumen endobronchial tube
  • bronchial blocker
  • vocal cord palsy
03

In context

Vocal Cord Paralysis

55 studies on the registry are indexed under Vocal Cord Paralysis; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 202 is above the median of 39 across 38 interventional studies indexed under Vocal Cord Paralysis.

Browse Vocal Cord Paralysis studies →

Lead sponsor

Samsung Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 980 studies on the registry; 146 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 19 or older
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I - III
  • Elective robot-assisted esophagectomy
  • Any clinical stage of esophageal cancer
  • Patients who need recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes resection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who diagnosed vocal cord palsy or damage before surgery
  • Patients who need specific airway device due to airway problem
  • History of thoracic surgery
  • Emergency surgery
  • Combined surgery with other department
  • Pregnant or nursing women
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
202 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    double-lumen endobronchial tube group

    Device: double-lumen endobronchial tube

  • Experimental
    bronchial blocker group

    Device: bronchial blocker

Interventions

  • Devicebronchial blocker

    Lung isolation for robot-assisted esophagectomy will be performed using bronchial blocker in this group.

  • Devicedouble-lumen endobronchial tube

    Lung isolation for robot-assisted esophagectomy will be performed using double-lumen endobronchial tube in this group.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative vocal cord palsy

    On postoperative day 7, ENT doctor will performed the laryngoscopy exam to check the presence of vocal cord palsy.

    Time frame: On postoperative day 7 after robot-assisted esophagectomy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of resected recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes

    Number of successfully resected recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes will be counted at the end of surgery

    Time frame: At the end of surgery

  2. Quality of one lung ventilation

    during one lung ventilation, anesthesiologists will evaluate the degree (excellent, fair, poor) of lung collapse.

    Time frame: during one lung ventilation

  3. Surgical difficulty reported by surgeon

    Surgeon will report the surgical difficulty (easy, moderate, difficult).

    Time frame: At the end of surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Samsung Medical Center
    Seoul, 06351, Korea, Republic of
    • Heejoon Jeong, MD · Contact · heejoonjeong@skku.edu · +82-2-3410-0841
    • Hyun Joo Ahn, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chao YK, Li Z, Jiang H, Wen YW, Chiu CH, Li B, Shang X, Fang TJ, Yang Y, Yue J, Zhang X, Zhang C, Liu YH. Multicentre randomized clinical trial on robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy (REVATE trial). Br J Surg. 2024 Jul 2;111(7):znae143. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae143. PubMed 38960881 ↗
  • Li B, Yang Y, Toker A, Yu B, Kang CH, Abbas G, Soukiasian HJ, Li H, Daiko H, Jiang H, Fu J, Yi J, Kernstine K, Migliore M, Bouvet M, Ricciardi S, Chao YK, Kim YH, Wang Y, Yu Z, Abbas AE, Sarkaria IS, Li Z; Cooperative Group of International Expert Consensus on Robot-assisted Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. International consensus statement on robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE). J Thorac Dis. 2020 Dec;12(12):7387-7401. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-1945. No abstract available. PubMed 33447428 ↗
  • Palaczynski P, Misiolek H, Szarpak L, Smereka J, Pruc M, Rydel M, Czyzewski D, Bialka S. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficiency and Safety of Double-Lumen Tube and Bronchial Blocker for One-Lung Ventilation. J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 27;12(5):1877. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051877. PubMed 36902663 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06897501
Lead sponsor
Samsung Medical Center
Responsible party
Hyun Joo Ahn (Professor, Anesthesiologist, Samsung Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 27, 2025
Start date
Apr 14, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 18, 2025

Study contacts

Hyun Joo Ahn, MD PhD
Contact
hyunjooahn@skku.edu
+821099330784
Heejoon Jeong, MD
Contact
heejoonjeong@skku.edu
+821087282414
Hyun Joo Ahn, MD PhD
principal investigator · Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion