An interventional study of Conventional therapy and Sensory Training in Distal Radius Fractures, sponsored by Istanbul University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-25.
Sponsored by Istanbul University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This randomized controlled trial examines the effectiveness of sensory training in patients undergoing rehabilitation for distal radius fractures. Forty-four participants (aged 18-65, with no prior upper extremity injuries) will be randomly assigned to a control group (conventional physiotherapy) or an experimental group (conventional physiotherapy plus sensory training, including desensitization and proprioception exercises). Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks using grip strength, sensory function, fine motor skills, pain level, and functional capacity measures. The study aims to compare the impact of sensory training versus conventional physiotherapy on pain reduction, sensory recovery, grip strength, and functional hand use.
This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of sensory training in patients with distal radius fractures. Designed as a randomized controlled trial, the study will include 44 participants aged 18-65 years who have not had a prior upper extremity injury and are in the rehabilitation phase after a fracture. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the control group (receiving conventional physiotherapy) or the experimental group (receiving conventional physiotherapy plus sensory training, including desensitization and proprioception exercises).
Assessments will be conducted before treatment, at 4 weeks, and at 8 weeks. The evaluation tools will include grip strength (hand dynamometer \& pinch meter), sensory function (monofilament test), fine motor skills (Nine-Hole Peg Test - NHPT), pain level (Numerical Pain Rating Scale - NPRS), and functional capacity (DASH questionnaire).
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of sensory training versus conventional physiotherapy on pain reduction, sensory recovery, grip strength, and functional hand use.
2,261 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Bone; 325 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 44 is below the median of 69 across 1,482 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Bone.
Browse Fractures, Bone studies →Istanbul University is the lead sponsor of 496 studies on the registry; 79 are open to participants now.
Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Conventional range of motion (ROM) exercises * Muscle strengthening exercises * Fine motor skill exercises * Functional rehabilitation exercises The group will be followed 3 times per week for 8 weeks.
Other: Conventional therapy
* Conventional range of motion (ROM) exercises * Muscle strengthening exercises * Fine motor skill exercises * Functional rehabilitation exercises • Experimental Group: (Conventional therapy + Sensory Training) * Desensitization training (exposure to various textures and stimuli to improve sensory tolerance) * Proprioceptive exercises (closed-eye position sense training, weight transfer exercises) * Tactile stimulation The group will be followed 3 times per week for 8 weeks.
Other: Conventional therapy · Other: Sensory Training
* Conventional range of motion (ROM) exercises * Muscle strengthening exercises * Fine motor skill exercises * Functional rehabilitation exercises
* Desensitization training (exposure to various textures and stimuli to improve sensory tolerance) * Proprioceptive exercises (closed-eye position sense training, weight transfer exercises) * Tactile stimulation
Monofilament Test
The monofilament test is a clinical assessment method used to evaluate sensory function and detect peripheral nerve damage. It is widely used in physiotherapy and neurology to measure tactile sensitivity and identify sensory impairments. 1. The patient is comfortably seated, and the test area is exposed. 2. Applying the monofilament: * The monofilament is placed perpendicularly to the skin surface. * It is gently pressed until it reaches its bending point (held for approximately 1-2 seconds). 3. Patient response: The patient is asked to indicate when they feel the touch. 4. Recording results: The areas where the patient does or does not feel the stimulus are noted, creating a sensory map.
Time frame: on the first day, four and eight week change
Numerical Pain Rating Scale
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a measurement method based on the patient's numerical expression of pain. It is commonly used to determine the intensity of pain and track changes during the treatment process. Test Procedure Explaining the Scale to the Patient: A scale ranging from 0 to 10 is shown to the patient. 0 = No pain, 10 = The most intense pain imaginable. The patient is asked to choose the number that best represents their current pain.
Time frame: on the first day, four and eight week change
Grip Strength
Hand Dynamometer: The hand dynamometer is a device used to measure hand grip strength and is commonly used in the evaluation of hand functions. * The device is placed on a stable surface and calibrated to ensure accurate measurement. * The patient should sit or stand in a comfortable position, with the elbow typically bent at a 90-degree angle. * The patient holds the dynamometer and is asked to squeeze the handle. Pinch Meter: Pincer Meter is a device used to measure the strength of a pinching or gripping action, typically between the thumb and index finger. * The patient should be seated comfortably or standing, with their elbow typically at a 90-degree angle. * The device measures the force exerted between the thumb and index finger. * The test will repeat three times, and the highest value is recorded.
Time frame: on the first day, four and eight week change
Nine-Hole Peg Test
Nine-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) is a test used to assess hand function, fine motor skills, and hand coordination. It is commonly used in neurological conditions, hand injuries, and rehabilitation processes. Procedure: 1. Preparation: A pegboard with 9 holes is placed on a flat surface, with a peg in each hole. The patient sits comfortably, and the test is performed on one hand at a time. 2. Test Execution: * Starting Position: The patient prepares by looking at the pegs placed in the starting position. * Placing the Pegs: The patient is instructed to pick up each peg and place it into the holes one by one. * Test Duration: The time taken to place and remove the pegs is recorded. The test is repeated on both hands. 3. Results Evaluation: At the end of the test, the total time taken is recorded and used to evaluate hand function. The test is typically repeated three times, and the average time is calculated.
Time frame: on the first day, four and eight week change
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire
The DASH Scale (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) is a widely used and valid questionnaire for assessing upper extremity function. The DASH scale consists of 30 questions. These questions cover the difficulties patients experience with arm, shoulder, and hand functions, the level of pain they experience, and any difficulties they encounter in daily activities. Additionally, a 5-point Likert scale is used to assess the severity of the complaints (1 = no difficulty, 5 = very difficult). Each response is scored, and a total result is obtained. The scores are then evaluated on a scale of 0-100. Lower scores indicate less disability, while higher scores indicate greater functional impairment. Evaluation: The results are used to assess the patient's overall functional status and their response to treatment. Higher scores indicate significant difficulties with upper extremity function.
Time frame: on the first day, four and eight week change
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Istanbul University