CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06876116Updated Mar 14, 2025

Once-daily Fluorometholone vs Twice-daily Cyclosporine in Dry Eye Disease

A Phase 4 interventional study of Fluorometholone 0.1% ophthalmic solution and Cyclosporine 0.05% eye drops in Dry Eye Disease (DED), sponsored by Korea University Anam Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-14.

Sponsored by Korea University Anam Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2022, registered Feb 2025).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compares the therapeutic effects of once-daily fluorometholone 0.1% versus twice-daily cyclosporine 0.05% after short-term fluorometholone induction treatment in dry eye disease.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Dry Eye Syndromes

1,292 studies on the registry are indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes; 191 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 32 is below the median of 60 across 1,077 interventional studies indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes.

Browse Dry Eye Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

Korea University Anam Hospital is the lead sponsor of 110 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. participants aged 18 years or older
  2. complaint of dry eye symptoms for 6 months or longer at screening
  3. ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score of 33 or higher
  4. tear film breakup time of 7 seconds or less

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. abnormal lid anatomy or active blepharitis
  2. severe systemic autoimmune diseases
  3. received permanent lacrimal plug within 3 months
  4. DED secondary to alkali burns, cicatricial pemphigoid, or Stevens-Johnson syndrome
  5. ocular/periocular malignancy
  6. active ocular allergies or allergy to the study drug or its components
  7. active infection
  8. intraocular surgery or ocular laser surgery within 6 months
  9. uncontrolled systemic disease or history of herpetic keratitis
  10. contact lens user
  11. intraocular pressure >25mmHg
  12. pregnancy or current breast-feeding.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    once-daily fluorometholone 0.1% group

    After induction therapy with fluorometholone 0.1% four times a day for 4 weeks, patients continued with fluorometholone 0.1% once a day for 8 weeks.

    Drug: Fluorometholone 0.1% ophthalmic solution

  • Active comparator
    twice-daily cyclosporine 0.05% group

    After induction therapy with fluorometholone 0.1% four times a day for 4 weeks, patients continued with cyclosporine 0.05% twice a day for 8 weeks.

    Drug: Cyclosporine 0.05% eye drops

Interventions

  • DrugFluorometholone 0.1% ophthalmic solution

    After induction therapy with fluorometholone 0.1% four times a day for 4 weeks, patients continued with fluorometholone 0.1% once a day for 8 weeks.

  • DrugCyclosporine 0.05% eye drops

    After induction therapy with fluorometholone 0.1% four times a day for 4 weeks, patients continued with cyclosporine 0.05% twice a day for 8 weeks.

    Also known as: fluorometholone 0.1%

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score

    Score 0-100

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

  2. tear breakup time (TBUT)

    Unit: Seconds

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

  3. corneal staining score (CSS)

    National Eye Institute Scale, 0-15

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

  4. Schirmer's test

    Unit: mm/5 min

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

  5. Meibomian gland dysfunction grade (0-4)

    Scale 0-4

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

  6. tear matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) grade

    Grade 0-4

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

  7. tear osmolarity

    Unit: mOsm/L

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tear IL-6 levels

    Unit: pg/mL

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

  2. tear 8-oxo-dG levels

    Unit: pg/mL

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Korea University Anam Hospital
    Seoul, 02841, Korea, Republic of
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available due to reasons of sensitivity and may available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06876116
Lead sponsor
Korea University Anam Hospital
Collaborators
Taejoon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Responsible party
Dong Hyun Kim (Principal Investigator, Korea University Anam Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 14, 2025
Start date
Sep 1, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2024
Completion
May 24, 2024
Last update
Mar 14, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion