ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06866249Updated Jun 26, 2025

Investigation of the Development of Infants With a History of Colic

An observational study in Colic, Infantile, Motor Development and Sleep, sponsored by Nigde Omer Halisdemir University. Completed at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 10 Months to 15 Months, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-26.

Sponsored by Nigde Omer Halisdemir University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
46
Ages
10 Months to 15 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study was to evaluate the motor development, sleep characteristics and sensory processing skills of infants with a history of colic and to compare them with their peers without a history of colic.

Read the detailed description

Infantile colic (IC) is a condition characterized by incessant crying and restlessness in healthy, normally growing infants. Prolonged and intense crying in an otherwise healthy infant is a significant challenge for families. Infantile colic was first described by Wessel nearly 50 years ago. According to Wessel, episodes of crying and restlessness that last three hours a day, at least three days a week, for a minimum of three weeks are classified as infantile colic.

The long-term effects of IC include an increased risk of behavioral problems in children. A meta-analysis found that children with a history of excessive crying are more likely to develop general behavioral problems, internalizing problems (such as anxiety, depression, or withdrawal), and externalizing problems (such as aggression or disruptive behavior). Additionally, these difficulties are exacerbated by adverse family environments, including parental stress or poor maternal mental health. As these infants approach preschool age, they may struggle with sustaining attention, engaging in reciprocal play interactions, and tolerating change and separation.

The first two years of life are a critical period for supporting infant development, as brain growth and neural plasticity progress rapidly. When children reach 10-15 months of age and begin exploring their environment through walking and trial-and-error experiences, assessing sensory processing skills becomes particularly important. At this stage, children actively expand their motor repertoire, especially while developing skills such as crawling and walking. However, a review of existing studies reveals a lack of evaluations conducted during the toddler, preschool, and school-age periods. Furthermore, most studies focus primarily on behavioral problems and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). For this reason, 10-15-month-old infants were included in this study to assess early-stage development.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colic, Infantile
  • Motor Development
  • Sleep
  • Sensory Integration Dysfunction

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Infantile colic
  • developmental outcomes
  • motor development
  • sensory processing
  • sleep
03

In context

Colic

127 studies on the registry are indexed under Colic; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 46 is below the median of 300 across 11 observational studies indexed under Colic.

Browse Colic studies →

Lead sponsor

Nigde Omer Halisdemir University is the lead sponsor of 93 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Months to 15 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

It was planned to include infants and families with a history of colic in the study. Children between 10-15 months of age and whose parents' consent was obtained will be included in the study.Additionally, infants and their families between 10 and 15 months of age with no history of colic will be included to compare their development.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Term infatns born at term
  • Infants diagnosed with colic
  • Post-term infants between 10-15 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Premature infants
  • Infants with congenital malformations
  • Infants diagnosed with metabolic, neurological and genetic diseases
  • Children whose parents do not volunteer for the study
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
46 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Infantile colic

    The study planned to include infants with a history of colic and their families. Evaluations will cover the demographic characteristics of the infants, sensory processing skills, motor development, and sleep patterns.

    Behavioral: Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 · Behavioral: Test Of Sensory Functions In Infants (Tsfı) · Behavioral: Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire

  • Healthy infants

    A control group consisting of healthy infants born at term with no history of colic will be established. Evaluations will include the demographic characteristics of the infants, sensory processing skills, motor development, and sleep patterns.

    Behavioral: Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 · Behavioral: Test Of Sensory Functions In Infants (Tsfı) · Behavioral: Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire

Interventions

  • BehavioralPeabody Developmental Motor Scales-2

    Peabody Developmental Motor Scales \| Second Edition (PDMS-2) combines in-depth assessment with training or remediation of gross and fine motor skills of children. The test is designed to identify de

  • BehavioralTest Of Sensory Functions In Infants (Tsfı)

    Test Of Sensory Functions In Infants (TSFI) provides objective criteria that allow you to determine whether, and to what extent, an infant has deficits in sensory functioning. Designed for use with children from 4 months to 18 months old.

  • BehavioralBrief Infant Sleep Questionnaire

    Infant sleep problems are among the most common problems presented to pediatricians. The extended version of the "Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire" is a questionnaire developed by Sadeh to assess sleep problems and their causes in early childhood.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales | Second Edition (PDMS-2)

    Peabody Developmental Motor Scales \| Second Edition (PDMS-2) in-depth assessment with training or remediation of gross and fine motor skills of children from birth through 5 years. It consists of gross motor and fine motor parts. The Gross motor section includes 151 items from 4 subtests: reflexes, stasis, locomotion, and object manipulation. The fine motor section consists of 2 subtests and 98 items: comprehension and visual-motor integration. The total motor part is the sum of the items in the gross and fine 25 motor parts. Items are scored with 0, 1, and 2 points. When the child performs the item according to the specified item criteria, 2 points are given. One point is awarded when the behavior occurs, but the criteria for successful performance are not fully met. A score of 0 is given when the child is unable to try the item or does not reveal any skills when he tries it. Results are expressed as raw, standard, or total motor scores.

    Time frame: 10-15 months

  2. Test of Sensory Functıons ın Infants

    This test helps you identify infants with sensory integrative dysfunction-including those at risk for developing learning disabilities as they grow older. All subtests consist of a total of 24 items. In the tactile deep pressure response section, it is scored as 0: reverse response, 1: mild defensive response, and 2: integrated response. In the adaptive motor response section, it is scored as 0: no response, 1: disorganized, 2: partial, 3: organized. In the visual-tactile integration section, it is scored as 0: hyperactive, 1: hyporeactive, and 2: normal. The oculomotor test section is scored as 0: no response or poorly integrated, 1: well integrated. Response to vestibular stimulation is scored as 0: adverse response, 1: mild defensive response, and 2: integrated response. The total score ranges from 0 to 49. In 10-12-month-old babies, 44-49 points indicate good sensory function, 41-43 points indicate risky status, 0-40 points sensory processing problem.

    Time frame: 10-15 months

  3. Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire

    The Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire will be used to assess sleep. Infant sleep problems are among the most common problems presented to pediatricians. The extended version of the "Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire" is a questionnaire developed by Sadeh to assess sleep problems and their causes in early childhood. This questionnaire has been translated into Turkish and assessed sleep environment and sleep problems in infants. It consists of 33 items, is based on parental reports of infant or toddler sleep patterns and is used to validate the data. It is associated with daily records and parental sleep reports. Its sensitivity in documenting developmental sleep trends is well established

    Time frame: 10-15 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Gazi University
    Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Nigde Omer Halisdemir University
    Niğde, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • DeGangi, G.A. and S.I. Greenspan, The development of sensory functions in infants. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 1989. 8(4): p. 21-33
  • Boran, P., et al., Translation into Turkish of the expanded version of the "Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire" and its application to infants. Marmara Medical Journal, 2014. 27(3): p. 178-183.
  • Folio, M.R., Peabody developmental motor scales. DLM Teaching Resources, 1983.
  • Canivet C, Jakobsson I, Hagander B. Infantile colic. Follow-up at four years of age: still more "emotional". Acta Paediatr. 2000 Jan;89(1):13-7. doi: 10.1080/080352500750028988. PubMed 10677050 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06866249
Lead sponsor
Nigde Omer Halisdemir University
Responsible party
Rabia ZORLULAR (principal investigator, Nigde Omer Halisdemir University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 10, 2025
Start date
Mar 12, 2025
Primary completion
May 1, 2025
Completion
May 1, 2025
Last update
Jun 26, 2025

Study contacts

Rabia ZORLULAR
principal investigator · Nigde Omer Halisdemir University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion