ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06863662Updated Jan 9, 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Etoricoxib/Tizanidine Versus Etoricoxib for Acute Low Back Pain Associated to Muscle Spasm

A Phase 3 interventional study of Etoricoxib + Tizanidine fixed dose and Etoricoxib fixed dose in Acute Low-back Pain and Muscle Spasm; Back Pain, sponsored by Laboratorios Silanes S.A. de C.V.. Completed at 1 site in Mexico. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-09.

Sponsored by Laboratorios Silanes S.A. de C.V. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2024, registered Mar 2025).
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
136
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Phase III, longitudinal, multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination of etoricoxib and tizanidine compared to etoricoxib alone in patients with acute low back pain associated with muscle spasms.

Read the detailed description

Researchers will compare the efficacy of a fixed-dose combination of etoricoxib and tizanidine versus etoricoxib alone in the treatment of acute low back pain associated with muscle spasms. Efficacy will be assessed by evaluating the average change in pain among patients who report improvement over the 7-day follow-up period. Adverse events related to the interventions will be recorded throughout the study.

Participants will:

  • Be randomized into one of two intervention groups (Group A or Group B).
  • Attend three in-person clinic visits: Day 0 (baseline), Day 3, and Day 7 of follow-up.
  • Receive follow-up phone calls on Days 1 and 5.
  • Be allowed to take 500 mg of acetaminophen as rescue medication if needed, with prior authorization from the Principal Investigator.
02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Low-back Pain
  • Muscle Spasm; Back Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Acute Low-back Pain
  • Back pain with muscle spams
  • Etoricoxib
  • Tizanidine
03

In context

Spasm

123 studies on the registry are indexed under Spasm; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 136 is above the median of 80 across 104 interventional studies indexed under Spasm.

Browse Spasm studies →

Lead sponsor

Laboratorios Silanes S.A. de C.V. is the lead sponsor of 45 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Willing to participate in the study and provide written .
  • Diagnosis of acute low back pain, either as a first-time episode or following a previous episode within the past 6 months, with a duration not exceeding 6 weeks.
  • Pain associated with lumbar muscle spasm, assessed through physical examination (muscle hypertonia and/or reflex scoliosis) and clinical history.
  • Patient reports moderate to severe pain intensity (VAS ≥ 40 mm).
  • Patients with a Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire (DN4) score \< 4.
  • For women of childbearing age who are sexually active, the use of an acceptable method (barrier and/or hormonal) as determined by the investigator.
  • At the discretion of the Principal Investigator (PI) or treating physician, the patient is eligible for treatment with the product and may benefit from it.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a history of to any components of the product (Etoricoxib/Tizanidine) or their derivatives (as reported in the medical history and clinical interview).
  • Patients participating in another clinical trial involving an investigational treatment or who have participated in one within the past 2 weeks before the study begins.
  • Patients whose participation in the study may be influenced (e.g., employment relationship with the research center or sponsor, vulnerable populations, etc.).
  • Patients for whom the investigational drug is for medical reasons.
  • Positive pregnancy test, pregnant women, breastfeeding women, or those planning a pregnancy during the study period.
  • Significant history of gastrointestinal disorders (e.g., active gastric ulcer, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, etc.).
  • Prior treatment with opioids and/or NSAIDs, including COX-2 inhibitors, as reported in the medical history within 48 hours before study enrollment.
  • Patients with a history of congestive heart failure: class II-IV.
  • Concomitant use of potent CYP1A2 inhibitors (e.g., fluvoxamine, ciprofloxacin, etc.).
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse within the past year.
  • Patients with a history of established ischemic heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, and/or cerebrovascular disease (including patients who have recently undergone coronary revascularization procedures or angioplasty).
  • Patients with a history of seizure disorders, status epilepticus, or grand mal seizures.
  • History of liver disease classified as A, B, or C, as reported in the medical history or clinical interview.
  • History of acute or severe renal failure ( \<30 ml/min/1.73 m²), as reported in the medical history or clinical interview.
  • Patients with a history of chronic musculoskeletal pain (e.g., fibromyalgia, Paget's disease, cancer-induced bone pain).
  • Patients diagnosed with low back pain due to a history of major trauma within the past 12 months (e.g., vertebral fracture, post-traumatic spondylolisthesis), a visceral disorder (e.g., dysmenorrhea, history of endometriosis), or a neuropathic component.
  • At the physician's discretion, any disease that affects prognosis and prevents outpatient management, which must be evaluated by the principal investigator to determine the subject's eligibility.
  • History or presence of any disease or condition that, in the investigator's opinion, could pose a risk to the patient or confound the efficacy and safety assessment of the investigational product.
  • Patients with symptoms suggesting an active COVID-19 infection (e.g., fever, cough, dyspnea) and/or contact with a suspected or confirmed COVID-19 case in the last 14 days.
  • Oncology patients (except for basal cell skin cancer) or those with severe illnesses who, in the investigator's opinion, have a severe prognosis or a of less than one year
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
136 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Etoricoxib+Tizanidine

    Administered orally, 1 sachet a day for 7 days.

    Drug: Etoricoxib + Tizanidine fixed dose

  • Active comparator
    Etoricoxib

    Administered orally, 1 sachet a day for 7 days.

    Drug: Etoricoxib fixed dose

Interventions

  • DrugEtoricoxib + Tizanidine fixed dose

    One sachet with 120 mg / 4 mg, dissolved in 100 mL of water

    Also known as: Etori + Tiza

  • DrugEtoricoxib fixed dose

    One sachet with 120 mg, dissolved in 100 mL of water

    Also known as: Etori

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of the percentage change in pain intensity, as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), on Days 1, 3, 5, and 7 of follow-up relative to baseline, within each treatment group.

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain is a straight line anchored by two descriptors: one end indicating no pain and the other representing the worst pain imaginable. The investigator will administer the VAS at each study visit to assess pain intensity. At the end of the clinical trial, the percentage change in pain scores from baseline will be calculated and compared between treatment groups.

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. Number of participants reporting treatment-related adverse events, as documented in the patient diary.

    To describe the frequency, intensity, and causality of adverse events reported during the clinical trial, stratified by treatment group. Adverse events will be recorded by patients in their diary logs. Each event will be monitored and followed up at the discretion of the investigator.

    Time frame: 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Analyze the percentage change in pain intensity, as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), on Days 1, 3, 5, and 7, compared to baseline, within and between each treatment group.

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain is a straight line anchored by two descriptors: one end represents the absence of pain, and the other indicates the worst pain imaginable. The investigator will administer the VAS at each study visit to assess pain intensity. At the end of the clinical trial, the percentage change in pain scores from baseline will be calculated and compared across treatment groups. Patients will attend in-person visits on Days 0, 3, and 7 of follow-up, and the investigator will conduct follow-up phone calls on Days 1 and 5.

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. Compare the proportion of patients in each treatment group who achieve a ≥30% reduction in pain intensity, as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), on Days 1, 3, 5, and 7 relative to baseline.

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain is a unidimensional tool consisting of a straight line anchored by two descriptors: one end indicating "no pain" and the other representing "the worst pain imaginable." The investigator will administer the VAS at each study visit to assess pain intensity. The proportion of patients achieving a reduction in pain of more than 30% from baseline will be recorded and compared across treatment groups on Days 1, 3, 5, and 7.

    Time frame: 7 days

  3. Compare the proportion of patients in each treatment group who achieve a ≥50% reduction in pain intensity, as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), on Days 1, 3, 5, and 7 relative to baseline.

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain is a straight line anchored by two descriptors: one end represents the absence of pain, and the other indicates the worst pain imaginable. The investigator will administer the VAS at each study visit to evaluate pain intensity. The proportion of patients achieving a pain reduction greater than 30% from baseline will be documented and compared across treatment groups on Days 1, 3, 5, and 7.

    Time frame: 7 days

  4. Determine the follow-up time point at which each treatment group demonstrates the greatest reduction in pain intensity, as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain is a unidimensional measurement tool represented by a straight line anchored by two descriptors: one end indicating "no pain" and the other representing "the worst pain imaginable." The investigator will administer the VAS at each study visit to assess the patient's pain intensity.

    Time frame: 7 days

  5. Compare the proportion of patients in each treatment group according to the severity of lumbar muscle spasm, as assessed by the Investigator's Global Subjective Assessment.

    The investigator will assess the severity of lumbar muscle spasm using a global subjective scale, which will also allow evaluation of the muscle's response to movement following administration of the study treatment.

    Time frame: 7 days

  6. Assess and compare the degree of physical disability caused by acute low back pain, as measured by the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, on Days 3 and 7 in each treatment group, relative to baseline.

    The Oswestry Disability Questionnaire is designed to assess how back pain affects a patient's ability to perform daily activities. It categorizes quality of life into five levels: no disability, mild disability, moderate disability, severe disability, and complete disability. The degree of disability will be assessed and compared between treatment groups.

    Time frame: 7 days

  7. Assess and compare the degree of disability in performing daily activities due to low back pain, as reported using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, on Days 3 and 7 in each treatment group, relative to baseline.

    The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is designed to assess functional mobility and limitations in daily activities due to low back pain. It consists of 24 items, with higher scores indicating a greater degree of disability. A maximum score of 24 reflects the most severe disability. The degree of disability will be assessed and compared between treatment groups.

    Time frame: 7 days

Other outcomes

  1. Report the percentage of therapeutic adherence on Day 7 of the intervention, in each treatment group.

    Therapeutic adherence will be defined by the principal investigator. Adherence will be considered adequate when the patient has taken ≥80% of the prescribed doses by the time of the corresponding evaluation.

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. Report the number of patients in each treatment group who require the use of rescue medication during the clinical trial.

    The designated rescue medication will be acetaminophen 500 mg. If a patient feels the need for rescue medication, they must contact the study physician. The physician will assess the patient's pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) via telephone. If deemed appropriate, the physician will authorize the use of the rescue medication.

    Time frame: 7 days

  3. Report the number of patients who experience therapeutic failure during the study, stratified by treatment group.

    Therapeutic failure will be defined by the principal investigator following a medical consultation. The following criteria must be met: a decrease of less than 10 mm or an increase in pain intensity on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) compared to baseline, along with a treatment adherence rate of ≥80%.

    Time frame: 7 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Laboratorio Silanes, S.A. de C.V.
    Mexico City, Mexico City 11000, Mexico
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Baumgartner PC, Haynes RB, Hersberger KE, Arnet I. A Systematic Review of Medication Adherence Thresholds Dependent of Clinical Outcomes. Front Pharmacol. 2018 Nov 20;9:1290. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01290. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30524276 ↗
  • Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 4;353(5):487-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra050100. No abstract available. PubMed 16079372 ↗
  • Kovacs FM, Llobera J, Gil Del Real MT, Abraira V, Gestoso M, Fernandez C, Primaria Group KA. Validation of the spanish version of the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Mar 1;27(5):538-42. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200203010-00016. PubMed 11880841 ↗
  • Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127-31. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90884-8. No abstract available. PubMed 4139420 ↗
  • Perez C, Galvez R, Huelbes S, Insausti J, Bouhassira D, Diaz S, Rejas J. Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the DN4 (Douleur Neuropathique 4 questions) questionnaire for differential diagnosis of pain syndromes associated to a neuropathic or somatic component. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Dec 4;5:66. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-66. PubMed 18053212 ↗
  • van Tulder MW, Touray T, Furlan AD, Solway S, Bouter LM; Cochrane Back Review Group. Muscle relaxants for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the cochrane collaboration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Sep 1;28(17):1978-92. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000090503.38830.AD. PubMed 12973146 ↗
  • Pallay RM, Seger W, Adler JL, Ettlinger RE, Quaidoo EA, Lipetz R, O'Brien K, Mucciola L, Skalky CS, Petruschke RA, Bohidar NR, Geba GP. Etoricoxib reduced pain and disability and improved quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain: a 3 month, randomized, controlled trial. Scand J Rheumatol. 2004;33(4):257-66. doi: 10.1080/03009740410005728. PubMed 15370723 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06863662
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 7, 2025
Start date
Sep 18, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 26, 2025
Completion
Dec 1, 2025
Last update
Jan 9, 2026

Study contacts

Lilia E Acevedo-Rojas, MD
principal investigator · Oaxaca Site Management Organization, S.C.
Mauricio Flores-Araujo, MD
principal investigator · Mérida/ Investigación Clínica
Salvador Perez-Jaime, MD
principal investigator · Centro de Investigación Médica Aguascalientes (CIMA)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion