ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06531707Updated Oct 23, 2026

Efficacy and Safety in the Combination of Ibuprofen / Loratadine Versus Ibuprofen Versus Loratadine

A Phase 3 interventional study of Ibuprofen + Loratadine fixed dose and Ibuprofen in Common Cold, sponsored by Laboratorios Silanes S.A. de C.V.. Completed at 1 site in Mexico. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.

Sponsored by Laboratorios Silanes S.A. de C.V. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 23, 2026Now CompletedStart date moved+4 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
177
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Phase III longitudinal, multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the drug combination of Ibuprofen/Loratadine versus Ibuprofen versus Loratadine as monotherapy for the symptomatic treatment of the common cold.

Read the detailed description

Researchers will compare the fixed-dose combination of Ibuprofen + Loratadine versus Ibuprofen versus Loratadine for the symptomatic treatment of the common cold. The adverse events related to the interventions will be registered during follow up.

In the event that the symptoms worsen or the patient's clinical condition warrants the use of any additional medication, the principal investigator or designated physician will be in charge of prescribing it according to the individual clinical condition and the physical examination, this will be recorded as "Concomitant medication".

Participants will:

  • Be randomized into one of the 3 intervention groups (A,B,C)
  • Visit the clinic at day 0 (day of enrollment) and at day 7
  • Answer the first symptomatic related survey at the randomization visit (V0) and the following ones in the morning when they wake up, the last survey will be answered at the final visit (day 7)
02

Conditions studied

  • Common Cold

Keywords

  • Common Cold
  • Flu
  • Ibuprofen
  • Loratadine
03

In context

Common Cold

219 studies on the registry are indexed under Common Cold; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 177 is above the median of 150 across 184 interventional studies indexed under Common Cold.

Browse Common Cold studies →

Lead sponsor

Laboratorios Silanes S.A. de C.V. is the lead sponsor of 45 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Agree to participate in the study and give written
  • At least 6 points on the Jackson scale according to physical examination and questioning (sneezing, runny nose, nasal obstruction, sore throat, cough, headache, malaise, and chills).
  • Symptoms associated with the common cold with maximum of 3 days since presentation
  • Women of under a medically acceptable method of
  • At the discretion of the Principal Investigator (PI) or treating physician, treatment with the researching product is indicated and may present clinical benefit

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients in whom respiratory symptoms are suspected to be of bacterial origin and generate a clinical picture compatible with: Rhinosinusitis (muco-purulent discharge, headache or facial pain, etc.), lower respiratory tract disease (wheezing, crackles, productive cough, etc.), acute otitis media (otalgia, purulent discharge from the ear, auditory discomfort, etc.).
  • Patients participating in another clinical trial involving an treatment or participation in one within 4 weeks prior to study start
  • Patients in whom participation in the study may be influenced (employment relationship with the research site or sponsor, inmates, etc.)
  • At medical discretion, a disease that affects prognosis and prevents outpatient management, for example, but not limited to: end-stage cancer, kidney, heart, respiratory or liver failure, mental illness or with scheduled surgical or hospital procedures
  • History/presence of any disease or condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could pose a risk for the patient or confusing the efficacy and safety of the investigational product
  • Patients in whom the study drug is for medical reasons
  • Patients with allergy or to the active substance of the study drugs, related products or (Ibuprofen of Loratadine)
  • Pregnant women, women breastfeeding or planning a pregnancy during the conducting the study
  • Significant history of gastrointestinal diseases (e.g., gastric ulcer, Crohn's disease, Ulcerative Colitis, etc.)
  • History of chronic liver failure A, B, and/or C
  • History of acute renal failure ( \<30 ml/min/1.72 m2)
  • Patients with a history of alcohol or drug abuse in the last year
  • Patients with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 infection (fever, cough, dyspnea) and/or contact in the last 14 days with a suspected or positive patient for COVID-19
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
177 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ibuprofen + Loratadine

    Administered orally (suspension), 5 mL twice a day, for 7 days.

    Drug: Ibuprofen + Loratadine fixed dose

  • Active comparator
    Ibuprofen

    Administered orally (suspension), 20 mL, twice a day for 7 days.

    Drug: Ibuprofen

  • Active comparator
    Loratadine

    Administered orally (suspension), 5 mL, twice a day for 7 days

    Drug: Loratadine

Interventions

  • DrugIbuprofen + Loratadine fixed dose

    Suspension 8,000 mg / 100 mg / 100 mL, 5 mL twice a day

    Also known as: Ibu+Lora

  • Suspension 2,000 mg / 100 mL, 20 mL twice a day

    Also known as: Ibu

  • Suspension 1 mg / 1 mL, 5 mL twice a day

    Also known as: Lora

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assess the improvement in symptoms, comparing the percentage change through the Jackson score

    The Jackson score is calculated by summing 8 symptom scores (sneezing, headache, malaise, chilliness, nasal discharge, nasal obstruction, sore throat and cough), rated as 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe.

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events through the patient's diary record, by treatment group

    To describe the frequency, intensity and causality of the adverse events presented during the clinical trial by treatment group. The adverse events will be registered by the patient in the diary record. Each adverse event will be followed up at the discretion of the researcher

    Time frame: 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assess the subjective change in patients in relation to quality of life through the modified Likert score

    To compare quality of life measured as a difference in the modified Likert score by treatment group during the 7 days after starting treatment with respect to the baseline measurement. The patient will answer the scale daily. The Likert Scale is a seven point scale that is used to allow an individual to express how much they agree or disagree with a particular statement. The scale consists of 1 question associated to quality of life. The possible answers go from No interference to Severe interference.

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. Assess the subjective change in patients in relation to improvement in symptoms through the Subjective Global Scale

    Assess the improvement in symptoms measured as the proportion of patients who present a change in the Global Subjective Scale during the 7 days after starting treatment with respect to the baseline measurement. The subjective global scale for symptom improvement compares with the score of the previous day to determine health status daily. Is consists of 1 question related to the progress in the symptoms presentation, the answers go from much better to really worse.

    Time frame: 7 days

  3. Assess the improvement in health status through the modified Likert Scale

    To compare improvement in health status as a difference in the modified Likert scale by treatment group during the 7 days after starting treatment with respect to the baseline measurement.The patient will answer the scale daily. The Likert Scale is a seven point scale that is used to allow an individual to express how much they agree or disagree with a particular statement. The scale consists of 1 question associated to the health status of the patient. The possible answers go from Not feeling sick to feeling to Severely sick.

    Time frame: 7 days

Other outcomes

  1. Assess the percentage of patients with febrile episodes (≥38°C) during the intervention

    The patient will report the presence of fever during the intervention, quantified with a thermometer.

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. To report the percentage of therapeutic adherence at day 7 of intervention by group of treatment

    Adherence to treatment will be defined as a consumption ≥ 80% of the doses that the patient should have ingested at the time of the corresponding evaluation

    Time frame: 7 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Laboratorio Silanes, S.A. de C.V.
    Mexico City, Mexico City 11000, Mexico
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Heikkinen T, Jarvinen A. The common cold. Lancet. 2003 Jan 4;361(9351):51-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12162-9. PubMed 12517470 ↗
  • Gonzales R, Malone DC, Maselli JH, Sande MA. Excessive antibiotic use for acute respiratory infections in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Sep 15;33(6):757-62. doi: 10.1086/322627. Epub 2001 Aug 21. PubMed 11512079 ↗
  • Kirkpatrick GL. The common cold. Prim Care. 1996 Dec;23(4):657-75. doi: 10.1016/s0095-4543(05)70355-9. PubMed 8890137 ↗
  • Fendrick AM, Monto AS, Nightengale B, Sarnes M. The economic burden of non-influenza-related viral respiratory tract infection in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Feb 24;163(4):487-94. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.4.487. PubMed 12588210 ↗
  • Passioti M, Maggina P, Megremis S, Papadopoulos NG. The common cold: potential for future prevention or cure. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014 Feb;14(2):413. doi: 10.1007/s11882-013-0413-5. PubMed 24415465 ↗
  • Dick EC, Jennings LC, Mink KA, Wartgow CD, Inhorn SL. Aerosol transmission of rhinovirus colds. J Infect Dis. 1987 Sep;156(3):442-8. doi: 10.1093/infdis/156.3.442. PubMed 3039011 ↗
  • Shaw Stewart PD. Seasonality and selective trends in viral acute respiratory tract infections. Med Hypotheses. 2016 Jan;86:104-19. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Nov 6. PubMed 26608252 ↗
  • Monto AS. Studies of the community and family: acute respiratory illness and infection. Epidemiol Rev. 1994;16(2):351-73. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036158. PubMed 7713184 ↗
  • Lopez Olmedo N, Stern D, Perez Ferrer C, Gonzalez Morales R, Canto Osorio F, Barrientos Gutierrez T. Revision rapida: probabilidad de contagio por infecciones respiratorias agudas en el transporte publico colectivo. Salud Publica Mex. 2021 Feb 26;63(2, Mar-Abr):225-231. doi: 10.21149/12027. Spanish. PubMed 33989481 ↗
  • Nieman DC. Exercise, upper respiratory tract infection, and the immune system. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Feb;26(2):128-39. doi: 10.1249/00005768-199402000-00002. PubMed 8164529 ↗
  • Pitkaranta A, Nokso-Koivisto J, Jantti V, Takala A, Kilpi T, Hovi T. Lowered yields of virus-induced interferon production in leukocyte cultures and risk of recurrent respiratory infections in children. J Clin Virol. 1999 Dec;14(3):199-205. doi: 10.1016/s1386-6532(99)00056-6. PubMed 10614857 ↗
  • Turner RB. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatment of the common cold. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Jun;78(6):531-9; quiz 539-40. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63213-9. PubMed 9207716 ↗
  • Eccles R. Understanding the symptoms of the common cold and influenza. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005 Nov;5(11):718-25. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70270-X. PubMed 16253889 ↗
  • Douglas RG Jr, Alford RH, Cate TR, Couch RB. The leukocyte response during viral respiratory illness in man. Ann Intern Med. 1966 Mar;64(3):521-30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-64-3-521. No abstract available. PubMed 4286006 ↗
  • Hendley JO. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatment of the common cold. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 1998 Jan;9(1):50-55. doi: 10.1016/S1045-1870(98)80051-4. Epub 2006 Jun 3. PubMed 32288450 ↗
  • Eccles R. Pathophysiology of nasal symptoms. Am J Rhinol. 2000 Sep-Oct;14(5):335-8. doi: 10.2500/105065800781329528. PubMed 11068659 ↗
  • Proud D, Reynolds CJ, Lacapra S, Kagey-Sobotka A, Lichtenstein LM, Naclerio RM. Nasal provocation with bradykinin induces symptoms of rhinitis and a sore throat. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988 Mar;137(3):613-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/137.3.613. PubMed 3345041 ↗
  • Conti B, Tabarean I, Andrei C, Bartfai T. Cytokines and fever. Front Biosci. 2004 May 1;9:1433-49. doi: 10.2741/1341. PubMed 14977558 ↗
  • Tyrrell DA, Cohen S, Schlarb JE. Signs and symptoms in common colds. Epidemiol Infect. 1993 Aug;111(1):143-56. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800056764. PubMed 8394240 ↗
  • JACKSON GG, DOWLING HF. Transmission of the common cold to volunteers under controlled conditions. IV. Specific immunity to the common cold. J Clin Invest. 1959 May;38(5):762-9. doi: 10.1172/JCI103857. No abstract available. PubMed 13654511 ↗
  • Macintyre S. Gender differences in the perceptions of common cold symptoms. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Jan;36(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90301-j. PubMed 8424180 ↗
  • Vos LM, Bruning AHL, Reitsma JB, Schuurman R, Riezebos-Brilman A, Hoepelman AIM, Oosterheert JJ. Rapid Molecular Tests for Influenza, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, and Other Respiratory Viruses: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Impact Studies. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 13;69(7):1243-1253. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz056. PubMed 30689772 ↗
  • Rhedin S, Lindstrand A, Rotzen-Ostlund M, Tolfvenstam T, Ohrmalm L, Rinder MR, Zweygberg-Wirgart B, Ortqvist A, Henriques-Normark B, Broliden K, Naucler P. Clinical utility of PCR for common viruses in acute respiratory illness. Pediatrics. 2014 Mar;133(3):e538-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3042. Epub 2014 Feb 24. PubMed 24567027 ↗
  • Barrett B, Locken K, Maberry R, Schwamman J, Brown R, Bobula J, Stauffacher EA. The Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey (WURSS): a new research instrument for assessing the common cold. J Fam Pract. 2002 Mar;51(3):265. PubMed 11978238 ↗
  • Barrett B, Brown R, Mundt M, Safdar N, Dye L, Maberry R, Alt J. The Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey is responsive, reliable, and valid. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jun;58(6):609-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.11.019. PubMed 15878475 ↗
  • Barrett B, Brown RL, Mundt MP, Thomas GR, Barlow SK, Highstrom AD, Bahrainian M. Validation of a short form Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey (WURSS-21). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Aug 12;7:76. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-76. PubMed 19674476 ↗
  • Lindberg F, Nelson I, Ranstam J, Riker DK. Early intervention with a glycerol throat spray containing cold-adapted cod trypsin after self-diagnosis of common cold: A randomised trial. PLoS One. 2022 Jul 5;17(7):e0270699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270699. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35789217 ↗
  • Eccles R, Winther B, Johnston SL, Robinson P, Trampisch M, Koelsch S. Efficacy and safety of iota-carrageenan nasal spray versus placebo in early treatment of the common cold in adults: the ICICC trial. Respir Res. 2015 Oct 5;16:121. doi: 10.1186/s12931-015-0281-8. PubMed 26438038 ↗
  • Barrett B, Brown R, Voland R, Maberry R, Turner R. Relations among questionnaire and laboratory measures of rhinovirus infection. Eur Respir J. 2006 Aug;28(2):358-63. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00002606. Epub 2006 Apr 26. PubMed 16641127 ↗
  • JACKSON GG, DOWLING HF, SPIESMAN IG, BOAND AV. Transmission of the common cold to volunteers under controlled conditions. I. The common cold as a clinical entity. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1958 Feb;101(2):267-78. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1958.00260140099015. No abstract available. PubMed 13497324 ↗
  • JACKSON GG, DOWLING HF, MULDOON RL. Acute respiratory diseases of viral etiology. VII. Present concepts of the common cold. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1962 Jun;52(6):940-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.52.6.940. No abstract available. PubMed 14450587 ↗
  • Hemila H. Vitamin C supplementation and common cold symptoms: problems with inaccurate reviews. Nutrition. 1996 Nov-Dec;12(11-12):804-9. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(96)00223-7. PubMed 8974108 ↗
  • West S, Brandon B, Stolley P, Rumrill R. A review of antihistamines and the common cold. Pediatrics. 1975 Jul;56(1):100-7. No abstract available. PubMed 240145 ↗
  • De Sutter AI, Saraswat A, van Driel ML. Antihistamines for the common cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 29;2015(11):CD009345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009345.pub2. PubMed 26615034 ↗
  • Kim SY, Chang YJ, Cho HM, Hwang YW, Moon YS. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the common cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 21;2015(9):CD006362. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006362.pub4. PubMed 26387658 ↗
  • Eccles R. Efficacy and safety of over-the-counter analgesics in the treatment of common cold and flu. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2006 Aug;31(4):309-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2006.00754.x. PubMed 16882099 ↗
  • Handley DA, Magnetti A, Higgins AJ. Therapeutic advantages of third generation antihistamines. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 1998 Jul;7(7):1045-54. doi: 10.1517/13543784.7.7.1045. PubMed 15992014 ↗
  • Clissold SP, Sorkin EM, Goa KL. Loratadine. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs. 1989 Jan;37(1):42-57. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198937010-00003. PubMed 2523301 ↗
  • Kay GG, Harris AG. Loratadine: a non-sedating antihistamine. Review of its effects on cognition, psychomotor performance, mood and sedation. Clin Exp Allergy. 1999 Jul;29 Suppl 3:147-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1999.0290s3147.x. PubMed 10444229 ↗
  • Barenholtz HA, McLeod DC. Loratadine: a nonsedating antihistamine with once-daily dosing. DICP. 1989 Jun;23(6):445-50. doi: 10.1177/106002808902300601. PubMed 2525847 ↗
  • Haria M, Fitton A, Peters DH. Loratadine. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in allergic disorders. Drugs. 1994 Oct;48(4):617-37. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199448040-00009. PubMed 7528133 ↗
  • Zhang J, Kan D. Evaluation of efficiency and safety of combined loratadine and budesonide in patients with anaphylactic rhinitis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Apr 29;101(17):e28851. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028851. PubMed 35512063 ↗
  • Anolik R; Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray With Loratadine Study Group. Clinical benefits of combination treatment with mometasone furoate nasal spray and loratadine vs monotherapy with mometasone furoate in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Mar;100(3):264-71. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60452-8. PubMed 18426147 ↗
  • Ratner PH, van Bavel JH, Martin BG, Hampel FC Jr, Howland WC 3rd, Rogenes PR, Westlund RE, Bowers BW, Cook CK. A comparison of the efficacy of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray and loratadine, alone and in combination, for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. J Fam Pract. 1998 Aug;47(2):118-25. PubMed 9722799 ↗
  • Nayak AS, Philip G, Lu S, Malice MP, Reiss TF; Montelukast Fall Rhinitis Investigator Group. Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002 Jun;88(6):592-600. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61891-1. PubMed 12086367 ↗
  • Dahlen B, Roquet A, Inman MD, Karlsson O, Naya I, Anstren G, O'Byrne PM, Dahlen SE. Influence of zafirlukast and loratadine on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 May;109(5):789-93. doi: 10.1067/mai.2002.123306. PubMed 11994701 ↗
  • Papi A, Papadopoulos NG, Stanciu LA, Degitz K, Holgate ST, Johnston SL. Effect of desloratadine and loratadine on rhinovirus-induced intercellular adhesion molecule 1 upregulation and promoter activation in respiratory epithelial cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Aug;108(2):221-8. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.116861. PubMed 11496238 ↗
  • Berkowitz RB, Connell JT, Dietz AJ, Greenstein SM, Tinkelman DG. The effectiveness of the nonsedating antihistamine loratadine plus pseudoephedrine in the symptomatic management of the common cold. Ann Allergy. 1989 Oct;63(4):336-9. PubMed 2529799 ↗
  • Trukhan DI, Mazurov AL, Rechapova LA. [Acute respiratory viral infections: Topical issues of diagnosis, prevention and treatment in therapeutic practice]. Ter Arkh. 2016;88(11):76-82. doi: 10.17116/terarkh2016881176-82. Russian. PubMed 28005035 ↗
  • Chavez ML, DeKorte CJ. Valdecoxib: a review. Clin Ther. 2003 Mar;25(3):817-51. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80110-8. PubMed 12852704 ↗
  • Wahbi AA, Hassan E, Hamdy D, Khamis E, Barary M. Spectrophotometric methods for the determination of Ibuprofen in tablets. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2005 Oct;18(4):1-6. PubMed 16380350 ↗
  • Potthast H, Dressman JB, Junginger HE, Midha KK, Oeser H, Shah VP, Vogelpoel H, Barends DM. Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: ibuprofen. J Pharm Sci. 2005 Oct;94(10):2121-31. doi: 10.1002/jps.20444. PubMed 16136567 ↗
  • Varrassi G, Pergolizzi JV, Dowling P, Paladini A. Ibuprofen Safety at the Golden Anniversary: Are all NSAIDs the Same? A Narrative Review. Adv Ther. 2020 Jan;37(1):61-82. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01144-9. Epub 2019 Nov 8. PubMed 31705437 ↗
  • Bushra R, Aslam N. An overview of clinical pharmacology of Ibuprofen. Oman Med J. 2010 Jul;25(3):155-1661. doi: 10.5001/omj.2010.49. PubMed 22043330 ↗
  • Zoubek ME, Lucena MI, Andrade RJ, Stephens C. Systematic review: ibuprofen-induced liver injury. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Mar;51(6):603-611. doi: 10.1111/apt.15645. Epub 2020 Jan 27. PubMed 31984540 ↗
  • Barkin RL. Acetaminophen, aspirin, or Ibuprofen in combination analgesic products. Am J Ther. 2001 Nov-Dec;8(6):433-42. doi: 10.1097/00045391-200111000-00008. PubMed 11704782 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Recruiting→Completed
changed Oct 23, 2026
Sites
1 site added, 1 site removed
Show site
  • Laboratorio Silanes, S.A. de C.V. · Mexico City, Mexico
Show 1 removed
  • Laboratorio Silanes, S.A. de C.V. · Mexico City, Mexico
Oct 23, 2026
Start date
May 20, 2024→Jun 24, 2024
Oct 23, 2026
Study completion
Feb 20, 2025→Sep 12, 2025 (actual)
Oct 23, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 23, 2026
    Recruiting→Completed
    1 site added, 1 site removed
    Show site
    • Laboratorio Silanes, S.A. de C.V. · Mexico City, Mexico
    Show 1 removed
    • Laboratorio Silanes, S.A. de C.V. · Mexico City, Mexico
    Start date May 20, 2024→Jun 24, 2024
    Study completion Feb 20, 2025→Sep 12, 2025 (now actual)
    + 3 other changes: index terms, verification date and contact details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06531707
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 1, 2024
Start date
Jun 24, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 20, 2025
Completion
Sep 12, 2025
Last update
Oct 23, 2026

Study contacts

Ana Luara Flores-Barranco, MD
principal investigator · Oaxaca Site Management Organization
Juan A Becerra-Hernández, MD
principal investigator · Centro de Investigación y Avances Médicos Especializados
Salvador Perez-Jaime, MD
principal investigator · CIMA
Victor C Bohorquez-Lopez, MD
principal investigator · Mérida Investigación Clínica

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion