ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06863129PERFORMUpdated Jul 8, 2026

Proximal FEmur Reconstruction or Internal Fixation fOR Metastases (PERFORM) Trial

An interventional study of Internal Fixation and Resection and reconstruction in Metastatic Bone Disease, sponsored by Michelle Ghert, MD. Recruiting at 13 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-08.

Sponsored by Michelle Ghert, MD · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2025; still recruiting 1 year 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
334
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to find out if removing and replacing part of the hip bone works better than using metal hardware to stabilize the bone in patients whose cancer has spread to the hip. The main questions are:

  1. Does removing and replacing part of the bone work better than just stabilizing it with metal hardware?
  2. Does removing and replacing the bone help reduce problems like cancer coming back or the metal hardware breaking?

Researchers will compare two treatments: using metal rods and plates to stabilize the bone (internal fixation) versus removing part of the bone and possibly replacing the hip joint (resection and reconstruction) to see if the second option causes fewer problems.

Participants will:

  • Be randomly assigned to one of two groups (internal fixation or resection and reconstruction).
  • Have one of the two surgeries based on which group they're in.
  • Go to follow-up appointments with the study doctor at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 4 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months after surgery.
Read the detailed description

The Proximal FEmur Resection or Internal Fixation fOR Metastases (PERFORM) trial is a multi-centre randomized controlled trial that aims to test a paradigm shift in the oncological surgical management of patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD) of the proximal femur. The PERFORM trial will aim to determine if resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction improves patient-important outcomes compared to internal fixation in patients with MBD of the proximal femur.

MBD afflicts the majority of patients with advanced stage carcinomas and is the most common oncologic disease of the skeleton. The proximal femur is the most commonly affected location in the appendicular skeleton and is a source of significant morbidity affecting patient mobility and quality of life.

Stabilization of an impending or actual fracture of the proximal femur resulting from MBD has historically been achieved with internal fixation using intramedullary nails, plates and screws. This approach is meant to provide enough stability to ambulate without pain for the remainder of the cancer patient's life. However, many patients with metastatic cancer are experiencing longer life spans due to advances in systemic treatment options. Therefore, the traditional methods of stabilizing bones in the setting of MBD may no longer be meeting the standard of outcomes required for patients who can now live for years with their disease. Internal fixation, which is by nature a palliative surgery, results in disease relapse in nearly 20% of patients, most often due to local MBD recurrence. Alternatively, complete resection of the affected bone followed by reconstruction with an endoprosthesis, although more invasive and conferring higher surgical risks than an internal fixation procedure, reduces the risk of cancer recurrence at the surgical site to approximately 3%, thereby avoiding the deleterious effects on patient function and quality of life. However, the evidence supporting the use of resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur, although promising, is retrospective and methodologically weak, resulting in a gap in the necessary evidence to change practice.

The PERFORM trial will aim to determine if resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction improves patient-important outcomes compared to internal fixation in patients with MBD of the proximal femur.

THe Methods Centre and proposed clinical sites collectively possess the methodological, logistical and clinical expertise required to successfully carry out the PERFORM trial. Ultimately, this trial has the potential to effect significant changes in orthopaedic oncology clinical practice and improve the oncologic, functional, and quality of life outcomes of patients with cancers that have metastasized to their proximal femur. While the introduction of a more invasive yet more durable procedure would represent a paradigm shift in the approach to this patient population, the challenge investigators confront is to support this practice change with high-quality, concrete evidence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Metastatic Bone Disease

Browse trials for

03

In context

Bone Diseases

177 studies on the registry are indexed under Bone Diseases; 38 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 334 is above the median of 53 across 113 interventional studies indexed under Bone Diseases.

Browse Bone Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Michelle Ghert, MD as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • of at least 6 months
  • Lesions in the proximal femur (femoral neck, intertrochanteric region, subtrochanteric region, and combinations thereof)
  • Low or intermediate risk for perioperative morbidity and/or mortality
  • No more than 75% and no less than 25% bone loss
  • Mutual (patient and physician) decision to perform surgical management of an impending or realized pathologic fracture due to MBD of the proximal has been made.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lesions isolated to the femoral neck
  • Lesion with any femoral head involvement
  • High risk for perioperative morbidity and/or mortality
  • Multidisciplinary decision that resection of the entire lesion would be indicated
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
334 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Resection and Reconstruction

    If a participant is randomized to the Resection and Reconstruction treatment arm, a proximal femoral resection or hip arthroplasty will be carried out as per standard surgical practice. The type of endoprosthesis used for reconstruction will be at the treating surgeon's discretion. Acetabular reconstruction (if any), the surgical approach, and the intra-operative use of cement and other adjuvants for disease control will also be at the discretion of the treating surgeon.

    Procedure: Resection and reconstruction

  • Active comparator
    Internal Fixation

    If the participant is randomized to the Internal Fixation treatment arm, the surgery will involve the stabilization of the remaining bone with either an intramedullary nail, plate or screw fixation. All standard surgical principles of stable internal fixation will be followed. The type of fixation, the surgical approach, and the intra-operative use of cement and other adjuvants for disease control will be at the treating surgeon's discretion.

    Procedure: Internal Fixation

Interventions

  • ProcedureInternal Fixation

    Internal Fixation

  • ProcedureResection and reconstruction

    Resection and reconstruction

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mortality at 12 months

    Collected through case report forms via electronic medical records and patient/ caregiver self-reported.

    Time frame: From enrollment to one year follow-up post surgery.

  2. Physical function

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Global Physical Function score: To what extent are you able to carry out your everyday physical activities such as walking, climbing stairs, carrying groceries, or moving a chair? Answer options include: Completely (best outcome); Mostly; Moderately; A little; Not at all (worst outcome)

    Time frame: From enrollment to one year follow-up post surgery.

  3. Number of days at home

    Patient self- reported via patient diary.

    Time frame: From enrollment to one year follow-up post surgery.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of life- PROMIS-PROPr (PROMIS-Preference) health utility score

    PROMIS-PROPr (PROMIS-Preference) utility score - encompassing mental and physical health, and quality of life. The PROMIS-PROPr combines scores from seven PROMIS domains into a single preference-based score (also called a health utility score), which captures the preferences of the general adult population. The total number of items that the patient answers are 31. This instrument gives four different scores: health utility score, domain level scores (one for each of the following domains: physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, social roles and activities, pain interference, cognition, and pain intensity), physical component score, and a mental component score. Answer options include: Not at all (1); A little bit (2); Somewhat (3); Quite a bit (4); Very much (5).

    Time frame: From enrollment to one year follow-up post surgery.

07

Study locations

6 of 13 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Axelrod D, Gazendam AM, Ghert M. The Surgical Management of Proximal Femoral Metastases: A Narrative Review. Curr Oncol. 2021 Sep 28;28(5):3748-3757. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28050320. PubMed 34677238 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Protocol will be shared with other researchers via the study website.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: Throughout study period.

Access criteria: Publicly available.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.performtrial.com

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06863129
Lead sponsor
Michelle Ghert, MD
Collaborators
Canadian Cancer Society (CCS)
Responsible party
Michelle Ghert, MD (Professor, McMaster University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Mar 7, 2025
Start date
Feb 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 8, 2026

Study contacts

Olivia Virag, MA
Contact
viragoe@mcmaster.ca
905- 521-2100 ext. 47105
Hadia Farrukh
Contact
farrukhh@mcmaster.ca
905- 521-2100 ext. 47105
Michelle Ghert, MD
principal investigator · McMaster University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion