CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06859905Updated May 1, 2026

Blood Flow Restriction Training on Upper Limb Performance

An interventional study of blood flow restriction training and regular exercises in Hemiparesis, sponsored by University of Hail. Completed at 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-01.

Sponsored by University of Hail · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background; Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) is a physical intervention that promotes many beneficial muscular activities and functions when low load/intensity is used in healthy and clinical populations.

Objectives: To determine the effect of BFRT on upper extremity motor function, strength, and Activity of daily living in chronic/acute stroke patients.

Read the detailed description

A cerebrovascular accident (CVA) is often known as a stroke and can be described as a localized neurological deficiency caused by various cardiovascular abnormalities that disrupt brain function. Stroke is the primary cause of death worldwide, it also leads to a substantial number of disability among the population.

There is no doubt that stroke is one of the most common causes of adult-onset disabilities. 70-85% of the first strokes are associated with hemiplegia which is usually followed by hemiparesis. Only 60% of patients suffering from hemiparesis need physical rehabilitation and have attained functional independence in basic activities of daily living (ADLs) such as using the restroom and short-distance walking. Patients with sensorimotor and visual-field loss are much more dependent on care than those with pure motor impairments.

Stroke patients require post-stroke rehabilitation and physical therapy procedures to improve their recovery and quality of life. A multidisciplinary approach that addresses each patient's unique physical, occupational, and speech deficits can assist optimize their functional abilities and encourage independence.

Hemiplegic stroke rehabilitation involves structured, interdisciplinary, supportive services that start 48 hours after the stroke starts for stable patients. Although patients and families generally benefit from inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation, each treatment modality's efficacy falls short of standards set by evidence-based therapy (reference). Rehabilitation has always been around teaching patients how to compensate with their unaffected arm or limb. The major goals of physical, occupational, and speech therapists are to modify the surroundings and develop new skills in order to keep patients at home with the least amount of care assistance. The removal of architectural impediments to movement, problem-solving techniques, supporting social and psychological services, braces and other orthotics, and equipment like wheelchairs and walkers all continue to be crucial in assisting patients in doing daily life tasks (Dobkin, 2004).

The goal of physical therapy rehabilitation modalities post-stroke is to enhance activities of daily living, enhance range of motion, reduce pain, and improving muscle tone. Previous studies on BFRT have focused on healthy populations, limited number of observational trials have been performed on BFRT in patients with neurological problems, such as Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, and stroke.

BFRT involves partially restricting arterial blood flow into muscles as well as occluding the venous outflow during exercise. It was first introduced into the literature by a Japanese doctor Yoshiaki Sato in Japan in 1987 who used tourniquet ischemia to induce muscle fatigue. This technique was originally called "kaatsu training," meaning "training with added pressure." Kaatsu training is now performed all over the world and is more commonly referred to as "BFRT" and is achieved using a pneumatic tourniquet system.

In addition to physical rehabilitation, BFRT is used for physical training and performance in healthy individuals. There has been extensive research into its value as a training tool, including elite- and amateur-level athletes, untrained young and older adults, and hypertensive individuals.

In addition to reducing arterial blood flow to working muscles, blood flow restriction obstructs venous return. When active muscles are exposed to BFR conditions, they are subjected to ischemia, which increases the metabolic stress on them. In addition to BFR, venous occlusion increases muscle cell swelling, activates intracellular anabolic pathways, and recruits fast-twitch fibers, which are thought to be involved in muscle adaptation.

There were different Factors affecting exercise adaptations with BFR including pressure of occlusion (partial or complete), type of occlusion (continuous or intermittent), intensity of exercise, and volume of exercise with BFR.

BFR along with low-load resistance training, cardio endurance training, and other activities that are generally recommended to improve muscular mass/strength are also associated with these adaptations in muscles.

The combination of Low-load Resistance Exercise with Body-Focused Rehabilitation (BFR) promotes greater strength adaptations and hypertrophy than the combination of Low-Load Resistance Exercise with BFR alone. Exercises that combine low load resistance with BFR can promote comparable levels of hypertrophy to those that combine high load resistance.

The review done by Vinolo-Gil and colleagues revealed that treatment with blood flow restriction appears to be helpful for neurological conditions without having side effects. Improvements have been shown in gait, quality of life, endurance, muscle strength, and limb functions.

Many studies done on the effect of BFRT on the lower limb in stroke patients, for an example the randomized trial done to compare low-intensity resistance training with BFR (LIRT-BFR) and high-intensity resistance training in stroke patients, results revealed that BFRT produced a significant improvement in lower limb strength, balance, gait, and depression No previous studies done on the effect of BFRT on upper limbs in post-stroke patients so This study aims to study the effect of Blood Flow Restriction training on motor function, strength, and Activity of daily living in stroke patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemiparesis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • cerebro vascular accident, hemoplegia, blood restriction, performance, upper extremity
03

In context

Paresis

519 studies on the registry are indexed under Paresis; 111 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 70 is above the median of 36 across 448 interventional studies indexed under Paresis.

Browse Paresis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Hail is the lead sponsor of 23 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 30 ≥ years of age.
  • The diagnosis of stroke
  • Confirmed by cranial CT and/or MRI
  • Hemipaises (weakness of one side of the body ), clear consciousness, stable vital signs

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Deep vein thrombosis
  • Severe osteoarthritis
  • Cognitive impairment, inability to cooperate
  • Any severe musculoskeletal problem that prevented the participants from doing resistance training
  • unstable complications related to heart, lung, and kidney diseases.
  • Serious cognitive or audio-visual impairment
  • Mini-Mental Scale Examination score, \<24)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    study group

    this group will receive blood flow restriction training (BFRT) plus regular exercises for the upper extremity for 8 weeks

    Other: blood flow restriction training · Other: regular exercises

  • Active comparator
    control group

    this group will receive regular exercises for 8 weeks

    Other: regular exercises

Interventions

  • Otherblood flow restriction training

    Position of the patient The vascular occlusion pressure required for the full blockage of upper extremity blood flow will be measured at rest, with the individual relaxed in a sitting position(Sieljacks et al., 2018). Position of the of the cuff during BFRT Placing a 5 to 6 cm wide cuff on the more proximal part of the affected upper limb, it should be around the bulk of biceps muscle above the cubital fossa . BFRT Cuff Pressure The upper arm external pressure of the cuff (100-130 mmHg) will be selected concerning the subject's resting blood pressure as described previously by Yasuda et al. 2008 (Yasuda et al., 2008). BFRT exercises prescription 1. Exercise frequency and duration -The study group (BFRT G) will be subjected to supervised exercises with low-load blood flow restriction training LIBFR (three days per week for 8 weeks), 2. Exercise intensity -Low load blood flow restriction training LIBFR (20%-40% of 10 repetition maximum (10 RM) BFR training for the study group,

  • Otherregular exercises

    the routine rehabilitation will be applied 3 times per week for 8 weeks, including the following training 1. Appropriate neurodevelopmental techniques as needed by each patient 2. Progressive resistance exercise for muscles in the affected upper extremity using sandbags, free weights, or elastic resistance bands according to each patient's abilities 3. prolonged stretching using splints if needed 4. Functional electrical stimulation (FES)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Muscle power

    muscle power will be assessed using by Manual muscle test for shoulder and elbow flexor and extensor

    Time frame: at base line and after 8 weeks of tretment

  2. 2- Hand grip strength

    handgrip strength will be measured using (hand dynamometer ) Based on previous studies, the JAMAR® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer has been widely used, and has been validated and reliable. 1. The subject should sit with the back, pelvis, and knees as close to 90 degrees as possible. 2. The shoulder is adducted and neutrally rotated, elbow at 90 degrees flexion, forearm neutral, wrist held between 0-15 degrees of ulnar deviation. 3. A dynamometer is placed vertically on the forearm without support from the examiner or armrest. 4. Three trials are taken to determine the maximum grip.

    Time frame: at base line and after 8 weeks of tretment

  3. The Stroke Upper-Limb Capacity Scale

    The Stroke Upper-Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS) is a validated tool for upper extremity (UE) functional tasks, SULCS measures upper limb capacity, including basic arm capacities. There are ten items in the SULCS that represent meaningful tasks that relate to daily activities at home. The selection of these tasks was based on extensive interviews with rehabilitation physicians, occupational therapists, and physical therapists

    Time frame: at base line and after 8 weeks of tretment

  4. Activity of daily living by Barthel Index

    Activity of daily living by Barthel Index Functional independence was assessed using the Barthel Index, validated for cerebrovascular diseases and elderly , The index analyzes 10 aspects: bowels, bladder, grooming, toilet use, feeding, transfer, mobility, dressing, stairs, and bathing. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 points. The higher the score, the greater the functional independence

    Time frame: at base line and after 8 weeks of tretment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Modified Disability Arm Shoulder Hand

    Modified Disability Arm Shoulder Hand (QuickDASH), is a validated and widely used 11-item questionnaire that measures upper-extremity specific symptoms and disability

    Time frame: at base line and after 8 weeks of tretment

  2. Patient satisfaction (PSQ 18)

    Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form PSQ18 was validated for use among various settings to measure Patient Satisfaction regarding medical services, it was shortened from substantially larger questionnaires while maintaining internal consistency and reliability ,there are seven dimensions of patient satisfaction with their doctors including (interpersonal manner, communication, financial aspect, time spent with the doctor), The response options required the patients to rate each item using a 5-point rating scale. A scale of 1-5 is used to rank the answers, with 1 equaling totally disagreeing and 5 equaling totally agreeing. A higher score indicates a better relationship between the patient and the doctor or a higher level of patient satisfaction

    Time frame: at base line and after 8 weeks of tretment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hail-Waseta
    Ha'il, Ha'il Region 2442, Saudi Arabia
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — the data could be used in future study

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06859905
Lead sponsor
University of Hail
Responsible party
Ahmed Abdelmoniem Ibrahim (Associate Professor, University of Hail) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 5, 2025
Start date
May 30, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 25, 2026
Completion
Apr 28, 2026
Last update
May 1, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion