ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06853015Updated Jun 3, 2026

Double Dose 4-AP on Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Dalfampridine and Placebo in SCI - Spinal Cord Injury, sponsored by Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-03.

Sponsored by Shirley Ryan AbilityLab · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2025; still recruiting 1 year 9 months later.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
27
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to test a strategy to potentiate functional recovery of lower limb motor function in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). The FDA approved drug, Dalfampridine (4-AP). 4-AP will be used twice-daily in combination of Spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) stimulation and STDP stimulation with limb training.

Read the detailed description

Currently, research has shown that 4-AP has a positive effect on sensory and motor function rehabilitation in humans with chronic SCI in addition to decreasing recorded spasticity, increased sensation, and decreased pain. A pharmacokinetic study showed that twice-daily administration of sustained release 4-AP maintains a steadier plasma concentration. Utilizing limb training to promote recovery of motor function is enhanced by eliciting STDP in the limbs. An important strength of this aim is the combination of training and STDP, which aims to enhance the beneficial effects of motor training by promoting plasticity in the corticospinal pathway. Training effects on physiological pathways will be explored and correlated with lower limb motor function. We hypothesize that introducing 4-AP into the STDP stimulation and STDP stimulation with training will further improve motor function rehabilitation in patients with chronic SCI.

02

Conditions studied

  • SCI - Spinal Cord Injury

Keywords

  • spinal cord injury
  • neurostimulation
  • 4-AP
  • rehabilitation
03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

2,025 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 537 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 27 is above the median of 24 across 1,633 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab is the lead sponsor of 180 studies on the registry; 44 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (40%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and females between ages 18-85 years
  • SCI 6 months post injury
  • Spinal Cord injury at or above L2
  • ASIA A, B, C, or D, complete or incomplete
  • The ability to perform a small visible contraction with dorsiflexion and hip flexor muscles

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled medical problems including pulmonary, cardiovascular or orthopedic disease
  • Any history of renal impairment
  • Any debilitating disease prior to the SCI that caused exercise intolerance
  • Premorbid, ongoing major depression or psychosis, altered cognitive status
  • History of head injury or stroke
  • Vascular, traumatic, tumoral, infectious, or metabolic lesion of the brain, even without history of seizure, and without anticonvulsant medication
  • History of seizures or epilepsy
  • Receiving drugs acting primarily on the central nervous system, which lower the seizure threshold (see appendix 2)
  • Pregnant females
  • If a women of child bearing age is unsure of the pregnancy, and does not want to take the pregnancy test
  • Ongoing cord compression or a syrinx in the spinal cord or who suffer from a spinal cord disease such as spinal stenosis, spina bifida, MS, or herniated disk
  • Metal plate in skull
  • Individuals with scalp shrapnel, cochlear implants, or aneurysm clips
  • Individuals taking Bupropion, Dolutegravir, Lacosamide, Trilaciclib, or PR Interval prolonging drugs
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
27 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    4-AP(AM) + STDP stimulation + training + 4-AP(PM)

    The effects of the functional recovery of the lower-limb muscles will be determined after 40 sessions of twice-daily-dosing 4-AP, STDP stimulation and training.

    Drug: Dalfampridine · Other: STDP stimulation · Behavioral: Exercise training

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo(AM) + STDP stimulation + training + Placebo(PM)

    The effects of the functional recovery of the lower-limb muscles will be determined after 40 sessions of twice-daily-dosing Placebo, STDP stimulation and training.

    Drug: Placebo · Other: STDP stimulation · Behavioral: Exercise training

Interventions

  • The study drug (4-AP) will be administered as a 10 mg dose twice a day.

  • DrugPlacebo

    The placebo provided by the SRAL pharmacy that looks identical to the 4-AP, will be administered twice a day.

  • OtherSTDP stimulation

    Paired stimulation will be given to the spinal cord and to peripheral nerves so that the signals are received at the spinal cord at a specific interval.

    Also known as: Hebbian stimulation, spike timing dependent plasticity

  • BehavioralExercise training

    Lower-limb exercises will involve over-ground walking, treadmill, walking and stair climbing training.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in TMEPs

    Electrical stimulation will be performed placing the cathode on the upper thoracic between the spinal processes between T3 and T4 vertebrae and the anode at \~10 cm above

    Time frame: TMEPs measured at baseline, at 6 weeks (post 20 sessions), and at 12 weeks (post 40 sessions).

  2. Change in MVC

    Individuals will perform a maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) of each targeted muscle (quadriceps femoris, tibialis anterior or soleus) through surface electrodes secured to the skin over the belly of each muscle. Ankle flexion torque will be measured by measured by force sensors.

    Time frame: MVC measured at baseline, at 6 weeks (post 20 sessions), and at 12 weeks (post 40 sessions).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in 10-meter walk test

    We will use the 10-meter walk test to quantify walking speed in meters per second. The same percentage of body-weight support will be used during pre- and post-assessments. Less time to walk 10-meter indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: 10-m walk measured at baseline, at 6 weeks (post 20 sessions), and at 12 weeks (post 40 sessions).

  2. Change in 6-minute walk test

    We will measure the distance walked over 6 minutes. The same percentage of body-weight support will be used as in 10-meter walk test. The longer distance walked during 6 minutes indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: 6-min walk measured at baseline, at 6 weeks (post 20 sessions), and at 12 weeks (post 40 sessions).

  3. Change in International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury exam

    Motor part of the exam is completed through the testing of key muscle functions corresponding to 10 myotomes (C5-T1 and L2-S1) for right and left side separately. The strength of each muscle function is graded on a six-point scale ranging from 0 meaning complete paralysis to 5 meaning full strength. The total motor score is sum of all motor scores range from 0-100. Sensory part of the exam is completed through the testing of a key point in each of the 28 dermatomes (from C2 to S4-5) on the right and left sides of the body. At each of these key points, two aspects of sensation are examined: light touch and pin prick. Appreciation of light touch and pin prick sensation at each of the key points is separately scored on a three-point scale; 0-absent, 1-altered, and 2-normal or intact. 56 is the maximum score for both light touch and pin prick and the total sensory score ranges from 0 to 112. Higher scores represent better outcome for motor and sensory scores.

    Time frame: Scores measured at baseline, at 6 weeks (post 20 sessions), and at 12 weeks (post 40 sessions).

  4. Change in EPT

    We use electrical perceptual threshold (EPT) to measures the minimum amount of electrical current that the participant can perceive when applied to the lower limb dermatomes (L2-S2).

    Time frame: EPT will be measured at baseline, at 6 weeks (post 20 sessions), and at 12 weeks (post 40 sessions).

  5. Change in surveys on ambulation, basic mobility, bowel and bladder management difficulties

    The name of the questionnaire is Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) and we used four subdomains: ambulation, self-care, bowel management difficulties, and bladder management difficulties. Scores on all subdomains of SCI-QOL use a standardized T metric, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Ambulation and basic mobility subdomains assess the ability to engage in walking activities in different locations that vary based on speed, time and condition and the ability to manage stairs under different conditions. Bowel management difficulties subdomain measures an ability to carry out a bowel program; concerns about incontinence and bowel accidents; and the impact of bowel management on everyday living. Bladder management difficulties subdomain measures ability to carry out a bladder program; worry about bladder accidents; concerns about implementing one's bladder program; and impact on everyday living. Higher scores on all subdomains represent better outcome.

    Time frame: SCI-QOL measured at at baseline, at 6 weeks (post 20 sessions), and at 12 weeks (post 40 sessions).

  6. Change in morphological characterization of corticospinal and reticulospinal pathways in MRI

    In order to identify descending motor tract, brainstem and C2 cervical spinal cord images will be acquired on a MAGNETOM Prisma 3T system using a 64-channel birdcage head/neck coil. To quantify the effect of atrophy in oblique directions, we will measure the radius from the cord shape center of mass to its border, R(α), for angles α over the whole circle with an angular resolution of 6°. Mean measures of all 5 axial slices will be used for statistical from nerve roots, noise, and other confounding effects.

    Time frame: MRI measured at baseline, and at 12 weeks (post 40 sessions).

Other outcomes

  1. Changes in spinal excitability

    We will measure spinal excitability by measuring F-wave and H-reflex in soleus and TA muscles. Post-Activation Depression (PAD) of the H-reflex will also be quantified in soleus muscle

    Time frame: Changes in spinal excitability will be measured at baseline, at 6 weeks (post 20 sessions), and at 12 weeks (post 40 sessions).

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2025 to primary completion in Mar 2026, 13 months.

Of 24 phase 1/2 interventional studies under Spinal Cord Injuries, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 60. This study's 13 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 14, 2025
First posted
Feb 28, 2025
StartActual
Feb 1, 2025
Primary completionActual
Mar 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2026
Last update
Jun 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06853015
Responsible party
Monica Perez (Scientific Chair, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 28, 2025
Start date
Feb 1, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2026
Completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 3, 2026

Study contacts

Monica Perez, PT, PhD
Contact
mperez04@sralab.org
312-238-2886
Bing Chen, PhD
Contact
bchen03@sralab.org
312-238-7895
Monica Perez, PT, PhD
principal investigator · Shirley Ryan Ability Lab

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: 4-Aminopyridine

Start the discussion