ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06848634PELFISPORTUpdated Feb 27, 2025

Impact of Equestrian Sports, CrossFit, and Gym Training on Pelvic Floor Health (PELFISPORT )

An observational study in Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP), sponsored by University of Oviedo. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-27.

Sponsored by University of Oviedo · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2025, 1 year 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This observational cross-sectional study investigates the impact of equestrian sports, CrossFit, and gym training on pelvic floor health in both athletes and non-athletes. The study aims to determine whether specific sports are associated with a higher risk of pelvic floor dysfunction, including urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and chronic pelvic pain.

Participants will complete an online survey that collects demographic information, sports participation details, and pelvic floor health symptoms. The survey includes standardized questionnaires to assess pelvic floor function. Data will be analyzed to compare the prevalence of pelvic floor issues among different sports and between athletes and non-athletes.

The study seeks to provide insights into how sports participation influences pelvic health and to raise awareness of pelvic floor dysfunction in both male and female athletes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)
  • Chronic Pelvic Pain

Keywords

  • Urinary incontinence
  • Pelvic organ prolapse
  • Chronic pelvic pain
  • Equestrian sports
  • CrossFit
  • Gym training
  • Women's health
  • Physical activity
03

In context

Urinary Incontinence

983 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Incontinence; 180 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 120 across 215 observational studies indexed under Urinary Incontinence.

Browse Urinary Incontinence studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Oviedo is the lead sponsor of 47 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study includes adults aged 18 and older who voluntarily participate by completing an online survey on pelvic floor health and sports practice. The study targets both athletes (equestrian sports, CrossFit, gym training, and other sports) and non-athletes to compare the prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction across different activity levels.

Participants in the sports groups must have at least two years of experience in their respective sport and train at least twice per week. The survey is distributed via social media, sports federations, gyms, and CrossFit centers to ensure a diverse sample.

The study aims to provide insights into the impact of sports participation on pelvic floor health and identify potential risk factors for dysfunction.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults 18 years or older.
  • Voluntary participation with signed .
  • Completion of the online survey.
  • For the sports groups (Equestrian, CrossFit, Gym, Other Sports):

    • Minimum 2 years of experience in the sport.
    • Minimum 2 training sessions per week.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals under 18 years old.
  • Participants who do not complete the survey.
  • Individuals with neurological conditions affecting mobility.
  • Individuals with mobility impairments unrelated to sports.
  • Sports participants with less than 2 years of experience or training less than twice per week.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Equestrian

    Participants who have been practicing equestrian sports for more than 2 years and train at least twice per week. This group will be assessed for pelvic floor dysfunction and compared with other sports disciplines and non-athletes.

  • CrossFit

    Participants engaged in CrossFit for at least 2 years, training at least twice per week. The study will evaluate how high-intensity training affects pelvic floor health.

  • Gym Group

    Participants who train in a gym (cardio, weightlifting, or fitness classes) for at least 2 years, with a minimum frequency of twice per week. The study aims to assess the impact of different gym training modalities on pelvic health.

  • Other Sports Group

    Participants engaged in other sports (e.g., swimming, cycling, team sports) for at least 2 years, training at least twice per week. This group provides a broader comparison of pelvic floor health across different physical activities.

  • Non-Athletes Group

    Participants who do not engage in regular physical activity. This group serves as a baseline comparison to evaluate the potential impact of sports on pelvic floor health.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Among Different Sports Groups

    Percentage of participants reporting symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction (urinary incontinence, prolapse, chronic pelvic pain) across different sports groups and non-athletes.

    Time frame: Baseline (At the time of survey completion (single assessment point))

Secondary outcomes

  1. Impact of Sports Frequency on Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

    Correlation between training frequency (sessions per week) and severity of pelvic floor symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline (At the time of survey completion (single assessment point))

  2. Effect of Childbirth History on Pelvic Floor Dysfunction checklist

    Comparison of pelvic floor symptoms between women with and without childbirth history, including mode of delivery.

    Time frame: Baseline (At the time of survey completion (single assessment point))

  3. Perceived Impact of Menstrual Cycle on Athletic Performance

    Self-reported impact of menstrual symptoms on sports performance, using a 0-10 scale.

    Time frame: Baseline (At the time of survey completion (single assessment point))

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Feb 2025; primary completion for Mar 2025, 0 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 20, 2025
First posted
Feb 27, 2025
StartEst.
Feb 28, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Mar 22, 2025
CompletionEst.
Apr 5, 2025
Last update
Feb 27, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 27, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06848634
Lead sponsor
University of Oviedo
Responsible party
Maria Blanco Diaz (Principal investigator, University of Oviedo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 27, 2025
Start date
Feb 28, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 22, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 5, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 27, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion