CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06840860MBOTE-EPICUpdated May 2, 2025

Epidemiological and Pathophysiological Insights Through a Cross-sectional Survey (EPIC)

An observational study in Monkeypox (Mpox), sponsored by Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium. Recruiting at 2 sites in Congo, The Democratic Republic of the. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-02.

Sponsored by Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 6 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to better understand how mpox is spreading in the DRC, how it affects different groups of people, and how well vaccines protect against it. The study is designed as a cross-sectional survey, meaning researchers will collect and analyze data from patients diagnosed with mpox at a single point in time. It will also use a case-control approach, comparing people who test positive for the virus to those who test negative, to identify risk factors and evaluate the effectiveness of the vaccine.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to better understand how mpox is spreading in the DRC, how it affects different groups of people, and how well vaccines protect against it. The study is designed as a cross-sectional survey, meaning researchers will collect and analyze data from patients diagnosed with mpox at a single point in time. It will also use a case-control approach, comparing people who test positive for the virus to those who test negative, to identify risk factors and evaluate the effectiveness of the vaccine.

The study is being conducted by Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale (INRB) in collaboration with several international partners, including the Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM) in Belgium, Johns Hopkins University, the University of Manitoba, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), and other leading research institutions. The study is funded by organizations such as the European \& Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP3) and the Belgian Federal Government.

The study will be carried out in the DRC, focusing on provinces that have been hit hardest by mpox outbreaks, including North Kivu, South Kivu, Maniema, Kinshasa, and Equateur. Participants will be recruited from hospitals and health centers that provide mpox testing and care.

What Will Happen During the Study?

  • People with suspected mpox who come to a hospital or health center for testing will be invited to participate.
  • Participants will answer questions about their symptoms, medical history, and possible exposure to the virus, including vaccination status.
  • Biological samples (blood, throat swabs, and skin lesion swabs) will be collected and analyzed for mpox and other infections such as measles or chickenpox.
  • Hospitalized patients will have additional data recorded about their recovery.

Key Study Goals

  • Describe how mpox affects people in different parts of the DRC, including symptoms, risk factors, and how the virus spreads.
  • Compare differences between two types of the virus (clades Ia and Ib) to understand whether one is more severe than the other.
  • Assess the effectiveness of the mpox vaccine by comparing vaccination rates between infected and uninfected individuals.
  • Identify risk factors for severe disease, complications, and death in mpox patients.
  • Investigate co-infections (e.g., with measles or chickenpox) that might worsen the disease.
  • Support mpox treatment and prevention efforts by training healthcare workers and improving real-time data sharing through an online platform.
02

Conditions studied

  • Monkeypox (Mpox)

Keywords

  • Monkeypox
  • Poxviridae Infections
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Infections
  • Virus Diseases
  • DNA Virus Infections
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium is the lead sponsor of 103 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study will take place in the DRC, in the provinces most affected by mpox in recent months, namely North Kivu, South Kivu, Maniema, Kinshasa and Equateur. The study could be extended to other provinces, depending on the dynamics of the epidemic and research needs. Participants will be recruited from general referral hospitals (HGR) and from referral health centers (CSR) or health centers (CS) in the most affected areas, which provide mpox screening and management services.

Inclusion criteria

  • Apply to be tested for VMPX at HGR or another test center.
  • Patients of all ages and sexes. However, minors under the age of 12 are excluded from questions on sex life.
  • The patient or his/her culturally acceptable representative is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • NA
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
10 Days
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Manifestations of Mpox

    The frequency and distribution of clinical symptoms and disease severity in confirmed mpox cases. (Percentage of cases presenting each symptom (e.g., fever, rash, lymphadenopathy)

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Sociodemographic Characteristics of Confirmed Mpox Cases

    The distribution of age, gender, occupation, and other demographic characteristics of confirmed mpox cases. (Mean/median values for continuous variables (e.g., age in years) and proportions for categorical variables (e.g., gender distribution, occupation)

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Exposure Factors Among Mpox Cases

    The percentage of cases reporting different exposure factors contributing to mpox transmission. ( Proportion of cases with specific exposure risks)

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Modes of Transmission of Mpox

    The relative contribution of different modes of transmission to the spread of mpox in the studied population. (Proportion of cases attributed to specific transmission routes)

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Mpox Cases Among Individuals with and without Prior Orthopoxvirus Vaccination

    This measure assesses the protective effect of prior vaccination against mpox by comparing vaccination coverage among PCR-confirmed cases versus unconfirmed suspected cases in a test-negative case-control study. The primary metric is the odds ratio (OR) of prior vaccination among cases versus controls, with vaccine efficacy (VE) calculated as VE = 1 - OR.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Regional Variability in Clinical Manifestations of Mpox

    Comparison of the frequency and distribution of clinical symptoms and disease severity in confirmed mpox cases across different regions of the DRC.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Regional Variability in Sociodemographic Characteristics of Mpox Cases

    Comparison of sociodemographic factors such as age, gender, occupation, and household composition among confirmed mpox cases in different regions.

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Regional Variability in Exposure Factors for Mpox

    Comparison of reported exposure factors (e.g., human contact, animal exposure) among mpox cases in different regions of the DRC.

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. Regional Variability in Modes of Mpox Transmission

    Comparison of the distribution of transmission modes in different regions, identifying dominant transmission pathways.

    Time frame: 2 years

  6. Differences in Clinical Symptoms Between Mpox Clades Ia and Ib

    The frequency of clinical symptoms will be compared between infections caused by Clade Ia and Clade Ib, based on genomic sequencing data.

    Time frame: 2 years

  7. Comparison of Disease Severity Between Mpox Clades Ia and Ib

    The severity of mpox disease will be assessed and compared between Clade Ia and Clade Ib infections. Severity classification will follow standardized clinical definitions.

    Time frame: 2 years

  8. Comparison of Mpox Transmission Routes Between Clade Ia and Clade Ib Cases

    Transmission modes will be compared between cases of Clade Ia and Clade Ib to identify potential differences in transmission dynamics.

    Time frame: 2 years

  9. Risk Factors for Severe Mpox Outcomes, Including Hospitalization and Mortality

    This measure evaluates predictors of severe disease, including underlying comorbidities, demographic risk factors, and exposure history. It analyzes hospitalization rates, complications, and case fatality rates among mpox-positive patients.

    Time frame: 2 years

  10. Proportion of Mpox Cases with Co-infections Detected by PCR

    This measure determines the prevalence of co-infections (e.g., measles, varicella, bacterial infections) among confirmed mpox cases, using PCR testing for other viral pathogens.

    Time frame: 2 years

  11. Estimating the Risk of Complications and Mortality in Mpox Cases

    This measure quantifies the proportion of confirmed mpox cases that develop complications or result in fatality. A multivariate analysis will be conducted to identify independent predictors of severe disease progression.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Masina Mpox Treatment Center
    Kinshasa, Masina, Congo, The Democratic Republic of the
    Not yet recruiting
  • Masina Mpox Treatment Center
    Kinshasa, Congo, The Democratic Republic of the
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Brosius I, Vakaniaki EH, Mukari G, Munganga P, Tshomba JC, De Vos E, Bangwen E, Mujula Y, Tsoumanis A, Van Dijck C, Alengo A, Mutimbwa-Mambo L, Kumbana FM, Munga JB, Mambo DM, Zangilwa JW, Kitwanda SB, Houben S, Hoff NA, Makangara-Cigolo JC, Kinganda-Lusamaki E, Peeters M, Rimoin AW, Kindrachuk J, Low N, Katoto PDMC, Malembaka EB, Amuasi JH, Tshiani-Mbaya O, Kambaji DM, Kojan R, Kacita C, Mukadi-Bamuleka D, Ahuka-Mundeke S, Vercauteren K, Wawina-Bokalanga T, Muyembe-Tamfum JJ, Nundu SS, Liesenborghs L, Mbala-Kingebeni P. Epidemiological and clinical features of mpox during the clade Ib outbreak in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2025 Feb 15;405(10478):547-559. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00047-9. Epub 2025 Jan 29. PubMed 39892407 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06840860
Lead sponsor
Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium
Collaborators
University of Manitoba, Catholic University of Bukavu, Democratic Republic of Congo, University of Bern, Alliance for International Medical Action, Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement, Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale. Kinshasa, République Démocratique du Congo, European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP), University of California, Los Angeles
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 21, 2025
Start date
Mar 28, 2025
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 28, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 2, 2025

Study contacts

Laurens Liesenborghs, MD, PhD
Contact
lliesenborghs@itg.be
00000000000
Sarah Houben, PhD
Contact
shouben@itg.be

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion