ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06837285RACEMADTUpdated Feb 24, 2025

Clinial Study of Treatment With Mandibular Advancement Device in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Across 6 General Hospitals

An observational study in Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) and Mandibular Advancement Device, sponsored by University Hospital, Antwerp. Completed at 6 sites in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-24.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Antwerp · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
182
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Study Objectives: To retrospectively study mandibular advancement treatment efficacy using apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI), in a large cohort of patients, in 'real world' settings across 6 general hospitals.

Methods: Diagnosis at 6 Belgian recognised OSA sleepcenters with type-1 polysomnography. After drug-induced sleep endoscopy by Ear-Nose-Troat-specialist, patients with positive effect of mandibular protrusion on reopening the upper airway were referred. The mandibular advancement device (MAD) was fitted in 'maximal comfortable protrusion' minus 2mm. A type-3 home polygraphy with MAD followed titration.

Read the detailed description

Methods Patients were diagnosed at conventionalized Belgian OSA sleep centers, in alphabetical order: AZ Monica (Antwerpen), AZ Sint-Maarten (Mechelen), AZ Voorkempen (Malle), Heilig Hart Ziekenhuis (Lier), Imelda Ziekenhuis (Bonheiden), and VITAZ (Sint-Niklaas), with a type 1 polysomnography. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI; number of events/h sleep), oxygen desaturation index (ODI; number of desaturations/h sleep) and body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) were calculated.

The Ear-Nose-Troat-specialist at the OSA sleep center performed an awake examination of the upper airway, followed by a drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE). Patients with positive effect of mandibular protrusion on reopening of the upper airway were referred to the dental sleep professional (DSP) for dental clinical and/or radiological examination. The DSP registered the mandibular protrusive trajectory with a bite registration device (The BiteFix, Scheu-Dental, Iserlohn, Germany) and a hard bite registration paste (Futar Fast, Kettenbach, Germany), as to achieve a stable fit on both tooth arcs. Next, the 'maximal comfortable protrusion' (MCP, mm) of the mandible was determined, being the most forward mandibular protrusion still tolerated by the patient and tested during DISE.

At the time of fitting, the patients received full explanation on the MAD titration schedule and were instructed to titrate after fitting of the MAD till resolution of the snoring symptoms or upon reaching physiological limits. A 1-month follow-up was performed by telephone. Next, a type 3 home polygraphy with the MAD was organized between 3 to 5 months after treatment start, recording identical parameters as at baseline, making each patient to serve as the own control.

Inclusion In Belgium, the reimbursement criterion for MADt leaves out central apneas in the calculation of AHI and requires this 'obstructive AHI' (OAHI) to be ≥ 15 events/h. In the absence of any central event, the OAHI = AHI, whereas in the presence of central events OAHI \< AHI. Patients with OAHI ≥ 15 events/h and therefore AHI ≥ 15 events/h were included on the condition that the full clinical pathway as described before was followed and that the MAD was self-reportedly used at least 4 hours per night. Further reporting is done on AHI, for reasons of comparison with other studies.

Parameters Age (years) and gender (Male/Female, M/F) were noted. Questionnaires were used at baseline and controls for the quantification of snoring using a visual analogue score on loudness (VAS-snore) with a Likert-scale from 0 (no snoring) up to 10 (partner sleeps in other room). A VAS-snore > 3/10 represents socially disturbing snoring. The Epworth sleepiness score (ESS) quantifies daytime sleepiness with ESS ≥ 11/24 representing increased propensity to fall asleep during daytime.

Mandibular advancement device The starting position of the MADt was set at MCP minus 2mm (MCP-2, mm). Digital imprints of both tooth arcs were taken (Trios, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) as well of the bite-registration in the MCP-2 position. The selected MAD (EVO, ProSomnus Sleep Technologies, Pleasanton, CA, USA) uses a Class IV resin (United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary) which is the highest grade of material currently available. Its design is characterized by perpendicular rectangular posts to protrude the mandible. Such design could preserve mandibular advancement even during limited mouth opening while asleep. The fully digital manufacturing pathway, starting from the digital intra-oral scans up to the 3D milling, favors accuracy-of-fit on the dental arcs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)
  • Mandibular Advancement Device

Keywords

  • obstructive sleep apnea
  • non invasive therapy
  • mandibular advancement device
03

In context

Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

2,263 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; 465 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 182 is above the median of 105 across 666 observational studies indexed under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive.

Browse Sleep Apnea, Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Antwerp is the lead sponsor of 242 studies on the registry; 69 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

patients referred by sleep physicians and after ear-nos-troat-specialist examination, for mandibular advancement treatment in routine clinical settings.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • obstructive apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15 events/h sleep
  • complete clinical pathway

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • obstructive apnea-hypopnea index \< 15 events/h sleep
  • not dental fit
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
182 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Devicemandibular advancement device

    Results of clinical trials on MADs are regularly published in the international literature but are generally very strongly controlled studies, still far away from being applied in routine daily clinical practice. The current retrospective study evaluates real-world data to determine the extent to which MAD improves both symptoms in patients with OSA. It is estimated that about 3% of newly diagnosed OSA patients are treated with MAD. In the light of new future treatment conventions, health government departments are increasingly demanding real-world data to stimulate knowledge of the relative effectiveness and value of treatments in the management of patients in routine clinical settings.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Respiratory index "apnea-hypopnea index" (AHI)

    The first primary outcome is an expected improvement in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI; number of apneas and hypopneas per hour of sleep; a higher AHI means more severe obstructive sleep apnea) upon MAD treatment (MADt). Functional objective outcome measure is the quantification of the effect of MADt on AHI. "Success" is defined as treatment AHI≤15 events/h following the Belgian threshold for reimbursement, and any decrease in baseline AHI.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the control home polygraphy at 3 to 5 months after fitting the MAD

  2. Respiratory index "oxygen desaturation index" (ODI)

    The second primary outcome is an expected improvement in respiratory parameter oxygen desaturation index (ODI; number of desaturations per hour of sleep; a higher ODI means a more severe condition) upon MAD treatment (MADt). Functional objective outcome measure is the quantification of the effect of MADt on ODI. "Success" is defined as treatment AHI≤15 events/h following the Belgian threshold for reimbursement, and any decrease in baseline AHI.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the control home polygraphy at 3 to 5 months after fitting the MAD

  3. Obstructive sleep apnea severity

    The third primary outcome is an expected improvement in OSA severity category upon MAD treatment (MADt). Categories are defined as AHI 5-14.9/hour = mild OSA; AHI 15-29.9/hour = moderate OSA; and OSA ≥30/hour = severe OSA.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the control home polygraphy at 3 to 5 months after fitting the MAD

  4. Visual analogue score for snoring

    The fourth primary outcome is an expected improvement in snoring as reported by the patient. This functional subjective outcome measure quantifies the snoring using a questionnaire with a visual analogue score on loudness of snoring (VAS-snore) with a Likert-scale from 0 (no snoring) up to 10 (partner sleeps in other room). A VAS-snore \> 3/10 represents socially disturbing snoring. The higher the VAS-snore score the louder the snoring is.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the control home polygraphy at 3 to 5 months after fitting the MAD

  5. Epworth Sleepiness Scale

    The fifth primary outcome is an expected improvement in daytime sleepiness as reported by the patient. This functional subjective outcome measure quantifies the propensity to fall asleep during daytime activities, using a questionnaire with with the Epworth Sleepiness Score-scale (ESS) from 0 (no propensity to fall asleep) up to 24 (extremely high propensity to fall asleep). An EES-score ≥ 11/24 represents a pathological increased daytime sleepiness. The higher the ESS-score the more pronounce the daytime sleepiness is.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the control home polygraphy at 3 to 5 months after fitting the MAD

  6. Titration

    The sixth primary outcome is the amount of titration required at the moment when the control home-polygraphy (HPG) is recorded. The starting position of the MADt was set at the maximal comfortable protrusion (MCP) minus 2mm: first the mandibular maximal protrusive trajectory was measured in millimeters. Next, MCP was determined, being the most forward mandibular protrusion still tolerated by the patient. The actual protrusive position of the MAD at the time of the HPG minus the start position quantifies the amount of protrusion. This result cannot be interpreted in terms of a 'higher' protrusion as a 'better' protrusion since this is a patient specific characteristic, as is the range of mandibular protrusion.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the control home polygraphy at 3 to 5 months after fitting the MAD

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • AZ Voorkempen
    Malle, Antwerpen 2390, Belgium
  • Imelda Ziekenhuis Bonheiden
    Bonheiden, Mechelen 2820, Belgium
  • VITAZ
    Sint-Niklaas, Oost-Vlaanderen 9100, Belgium
  • AZ Monica
    Antwerp, 2000, Belgium
  • Heilig Hartziekenhuis Lier
    Lier, 2500, Belgium
  • AZ Sint-Maarten
    Mechelen, 2800, Belgium
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06837285
Collaborators
AZ Sint-Maarten, AZ Voorkempen, AZ Monica Campus Antwerpen, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Vitaz, Regionaal Ziekenhuis Heilig Hart Tienen
Responsible party
Marc Braem (em. prof. dr., University Hospital, Antwerp) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 20, 2025
Start date
Sep 22, 2021
Primary completion
Oct 24, 2024
Completion
Oct 24, 2024
Last update
Feb 24, 2025

Study contacts

Marc J BRAEM, DDS, PhD
principal investigator · UZA Afd. Tandheelkunde

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion