CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06833086Updated Apr 3, 2025

Influence of Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Atrioventricular Conduction

An observational study in Conduction Abnormalities and Paravertebral Anesthesia, sponsored by Medical University of Gdansk. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-03.

Sponsored by Medical University of Gdansk · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to assess the changes in electrical activity of heart atria and in atrioventricular conduction induced by anaesthetic thoracic paravertebral blockade, depending on site on which blockade was performed.

Researchers will retrospectively compare ECG recordings of patients that undergone unilateral paravertebral blockade at T3 level with 0.5% ropivacaine. The investigation will include measurement of P wave and PR interval, and subsequent statystical analysis.

Read the detailed description

Paravertebral blockade (PVB), the injection of local anaesthetic into the paravertebral space located along the vertebral column, temporarily impair the transmission in nerve fibers located in this space. Although PVB is usually used primarily with the intention of achieving block of the thoracic wall pain sensation, the paravertebral space contains not only motoric and sensory nerves, but also autonomic nerve fibers. Achieving the blockade at top four thoracic levels of paravertebral space may affect, among the others, the function of preganglionic sympathetic fibers, forming cardiac nerves, and affecting the heart function in various ways.

The assessment of electrocardiographical phenomena representing the depolarisation of the atria (P wave) and the propagation of the depolarisation by the atrioventricular node and bundle (PQ/PR interval) allows to detect the abnormalities related to proability of occurrence of supraventricular arrythmias and conduction blocks, including the life-threatening arrythmias.

The design of the study assume to retrospective re-analyse the electrocardiographical data achieved in the "Influence of Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Cardiac Repolarization" study (registred in Clinicaltrials.gov under ID NCT05822076), focused changes in heart repolarisation represented mainly by electrocardiographical QT interval and T wave dispersion.

The population of primary investigation was 60 women above 18 years of age scheduled to elective breast surgery in combined regional and general anaesthesia will be enrolled to study, divided in two groups depending of the side of operation. Participants underwent the ultrasound-guided paravertebral block with single injection of 0.5% ropivacaine (0.3 ml·kg-1, not exceeding 30 ml, based on ideal body weight in obese patients) without adjuvants. Before injection (T0) and after confirmation of sufficient sensory block area covering 1st to 4th thoracic dermatomes (T1), 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) will be recorded using a Holter device. First examination of sensory block distribution was performed 6 minutes after injection, with subsequent examinations if needed - every minute up to 15 minutes. No sedative premedication, general anaesthesia induction or additional medications (except of neutral saline maintaining intravenous access) were administered until completions of ECG recording. Both T0 and T1 electrocardiogram will be preceded by rest in supine position for at least 5 minutes, without any medical procedures other than monitoring.

As part of the retrospective analysis of ECG recordings obtained from the primary study, repeated measurements will be performed to assess the length of the P wave and the PQ interval at time points T0 and T1, taken as the average of three subsequent heart evolutions and measured separately for each lead. Only cases in which ECG waveform without significant artifact or interferences was obtained in at least 8 leads in both T0 and T1 will be analyzed.

From the obtained values, the P wave dispersion will be calculated (as the difference in the length of the P wave in two leads in which the average time of three evolutions was the longest and the shortest) and the PQ dispersion (as the difference in the length of the PQ interval in two leads in which the average time of three evolutions was the longest and the shortest). The obtained data will be subjected to statistical analysis taking into account the side of the body on which the intervention was performed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Conduction Abnormalities
  • Paravertebral Anesthesia

Keywords

  • P wave
  • PR interval
  • PQ interval
  • P wave dispersion
  • Paravertebral block
  • Atrioventricular conduction
  • Ropivacaine
03

In context

Congenital Abnormalities

980 studies on the registry are indexed under Congenital Abnormalities; 177 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 153 across 446 observational studies indexed under Congenital Abnormalities.

Browse Congenital Abnormalities studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Gdansk is the lead sponsor of 130 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Women above 18 years of age, without severe systemic comorbidities, patients of University Clinical Centre of Medical University of Gdańsk qualified for elective breast surgery

Inclusion criteria

  • woman above 18 years of age, legally able of giving informed consent
  • participants previously qualified for elective breast surgery due to neoplasm, with or without axillary node dissection
  • physical status corresponding to class I or II in American Society of Anaesthesiologist classification

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lack of consent to participation or to regional anaesthesia for planned surgery
  • bilateral operation planned
  • symptomatic circulatory disease at the time of qualification, artificial heart pacemaker presence, positive history of arrythmia
  • allergy to amide local anaesthetics
  • severe deformation of thoracic spine
  • use of medications with "known" or "possible" potential of QT prolongation, according to Arizona Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics [AZCERT] Inc. list, in 5 days preceding the intervention
  • use of beta-adrenolytic medications in 5 days preceding the intervention All exclusion criteria except the last one are based on the original study protocol (NCT05822076).
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • L - paravertebral block left

    30 woman above 18 years of age qualified for elective breast surgery on the left side of the body

    Procedure: Paravertebral block (ropivacaine) left

  • P - paravertebral block right

    30 woman above 18 years of age qualified for elective breast surgery on the right side of the body

    Procedure: Paravertebral block (ropivacaine) right

Interventions

  • ProcedureParavertebral block (ropivacaine) left

    Paravertebral block at the level of 3rd thoracic intervertebral space on the left side. 0.5% Ropivacaine 0.3 ml·kg-1, not exceeding 30 ml, based on ideal body weight in obese patients

  • ProcedureParavertebral block (ropivacaine) right

    Paravertebral block at the level of 3rd thoracic intervertebral space on the right side. 0.5% Ropivacaine 0.3 ml·kg-1, not exceeding 30 ml, based on ideal body weight in obese patients

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. P wave time

    difference in milliseconds of P wave time (as a mean from all measured leads) between baseline ECG \[T0\] and ECG after confirmation of sufficient area of sensory block \[T1\]

    Time frame: from 6 up to 15 minutes (according to time of developement of sufficient block distribution)

  2. P wave minimal time

    difference in milliseconds of shortest P wave time (from all measured leads) between baseline ECG \[T0\] and ECG after confirmation of sufficient area of sensory block \[T1\]

    Time frame: from 6 up to 15 minutes (according to time of developement of sufficient block distribution)

  3. P wave maximal time

    difference in milliseconds of longest P wave time (from all measured leads) between baseline ECG \[T0\] and ECG after confirmation of sufficient area of sensory block \[T1\]

    Time frame: from 6 up to 15 minutes (according to time of developement of sufficient block distribution)

  4. PR interval

    difference in milliseconds of PR interval (as a mean from all measured leads) between baseline ECG \[T0\] and ECG after confirmation of sufficient area of sensory block \[T1\]

    Time frame: from 6 up to 15 minutes (according to time of developement of sufficient block distribution)

  5. PR minimal interval

    difference in milliseconds of PR minimal interval (from all measured leads) between baseline ECG \[T0\] and ECG after confirmation of sufficient area of sensory block \[T1\]

    Time frame: from 6 up to 15 minutes (according to time of developement of sufficient block distribution)

  6. PR maximal interval

    difference in milliseconds of PR maximal interval (from all measured leads) between baseline ECG \[T0\] and ECG after confirmation of sufficient area of sensory block \[T1\]

    Time frame: from 6 up to 15 minutes (according to time of developement of sufficient block distribution)

Secondary outcomes

  1. P wave dispersion

    difference in milliseconds of P wave dispersion (calculated as a difference between the longest and shortest P wave time from all measured leads) between baseline ECG \[T0\] and ECG after confirmation of sufficient area of sensory block \[T1\]

    Time frame: from 6 up to 15 minutes (according to time of developement of sufficient block distribution)

  2. P wave index

    difference of standard deviations from P wave durations (from all measured leads) between baseline ECG \[T0\] and ECG after confirmation of sufficient area of sensory block \[T1\]

    Time frame: from 6 up to 15 minutes (according to time of developement of sufficient block distribution)

  3. PR interval dispersion

    difference in milliseconds of PR interval dispersion (calculated as a difference between the longest and shortest PR interval from all measured leads) between baseline ECG \[T0\] and ECG after confirmation of sufficient area of sensory block \[T1\]

    Time frame: from 6 up to 15 minutes (according to time of developement of sufficient block distribution)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Gdański Uniwersytet Medyczny
    Gdańsk, Poland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06833086
Lead sponsor
Medical University of Gdansk
Responsible party
Radosław Owczuk (Prof., Medical University of Gdansk) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 18, 2025
Start date
Feb 20, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2025
Completion
Mar 31, 2025
Last update
Apr 3, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion