ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06827990ARISE IIIUpdated Oct 23, 2026

GORE® Ascending Stent Graft in the Treatment of De Novo Type A Aortic Dissections

An interventional study of GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device) in Aortic Dissection, sponsored by W.L.Gore & Associates. Active, not recruiting at 22 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.

Sponsored by W.L.Gore & Associates · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 23, 2026Now Active, not recruitingGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
112
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To assess the safety and effectiveness of the ASG device in the treatment of de novo Type A aortic dissections.

Read the detailed description

This pivotal investigation is a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the ASG device for the treatment of de novo Type A aortic dissections in patients considered to be high-risk for open surgical repair.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Dissection

Browse trials for

03

In context

Aortic Dissection

205 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Dissection; 73 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 112 is close to the median of 114 across 86 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Dissection.

Browse Aortic Dissection studies →

Lead sponsor

W.L.Gore & Associates is the lead sponsor of 96 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria - Primary Arm:

The subject is/has:

  1. De novo Type A aortic dissection (≤30 days from symptom onset to index endovascular procedure) compatible with the treatment requirements of the ASG device.
  2. Primarily intended to be treated by placement of the ASG device in the ascending aorta. Distal adjunctive procedures not in contact with the ASG device may be performed during the index endovascular procedure at the discretion of the Investigator.
  3. Anatomic compatibility of the ascending aorta required for implanting the ASG device:

    a) Proximal Aortic Landing Zone: i. Primary entry tear must be in the ascending aorta and ≥ 2 cm distal to the most distal coronary artery ostium.

    ii. Total aortic diameter between 27mm - 48mm iii. Landing zone cannot be heavily calcified or thrombosed. b) Distal Aortic Landing Zone: i. Primary entry tear must be in the ascending aorta and ≥ 2 cm proximal to BCA ostium.

    c) Adequate aortic length

  4. The Aortic Treatment Team (as defined by the protocol) attest endovascular repair is in the best interest of the patient AND considers the patient to be high-risk for open surgical repair by meeting at least one of the following criteria:

    1. ≥80 years of age
    2. (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m2
    3. History of Respiratory Insufficiency (defined by home O2 usage, exertional dyspnea, imaging evidence of , previous evidence of compromised pulmonary function tests (PFT) on spirometry or other factors as determined by the Investigator)
    4. Prior Cardiac Surgery
    5. Hostile Chest (VARC-2 Definition)
    6. Clinical Frailty Scale 3-7
    7. Clinical malperfusion (head, gut, lower extremity)
    8. Transfusion is not possible (e.g., Jehovah's Witness)
    9. Renal Dialysis prior to aortic dissection
    10. Chronic renal insufficiency (\<60 without dialysis or other documented history of chronic kidney disease prior to dissection)
  5. Age ≥18 years at time of signature.
  6. Adequate vascular access via transfemoral or retroperitoneal approach.
  7. Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed by the subject or legally authorized representative.
  8. Agrees to comply with protocol requirements, including imaging and 5-year follow-up, as the subject's condition allows.

Exclusion Criteria - Primary Arm

The subject is/has:

  1. Mechanical heart valve in the aortic position.
  2. Aortic insufficiency grade 3 or greater confirmed during TEE pre-implant.
  3. Indwelling intravascular device that would interfere with or result in contact with planned repair (e.g., contiguous arch graft, LVAD, TAVR device in continuity with aortic tear).
  4. Known degenerative connective tissue disease (e.g., Marfan's or Ehler-Danlos Syndrome).
  5. Participation in drug or medical device study within one year of enrollment unless approved by the Sponsor.
  6. Known history of drug abuse within one year of treatment which would affect the ability to obtain follow-up.
  7. Pregnant at time of procedure.
  8. Active infected aorta, mycotic aneurysm.
  9. Active systemic infection (e.g., infection requiring treatment with parenteral anti-infective medication).
  10. \<12 months due to presence of another comorbid condition.
  11. Known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials (Previous instance of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia type 2 [HIT-2], known to heparin, or a history of a hypercoagulability disorder and/or state should be considered exclusion if treatment plan includes implant of a TBE device).
  12. Known hypersensitivity or to anticoagulants or contrast media, which is not amenable to pre-treatment.
  13. Coronary malperfusion.
  14. Catastrophic neurological complications in the 30 days prior to the dissection diagnosis (e.g., progressively worsening symptoms, coma, Glasgow Coma Scale \<=8).
  15. Aortic fistula.
  16. In circulatory shock (e.g., systolic blood pressure \<80 mmHg without inotropes, base deficit > -10 mmol/L or -10 mEq/L) at any time prior to the initiation of the index endovascular procedure.
  17. In extreme hemodynamic compromise requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation at any time prior to the initiation of the index endovascular procedure.
  18. Clinical or radiographic signs of bowel infarction, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, or bowel necrosis (as determined by the implanting physician based on imaging observations, peritoneal signs, surgical exploration, elevated serum lactate levels, low pH, and/or acidosis) at any time prior to the initiation of the index endovascular procedure.

Inclusion Criteria - Secondary Arm

The subject is/has:

  1. De novo Type A aortic dissection (≤90 days from symptom onset until first study procedure) compatible with the treatment requirements of the ASG device alone or the ASG device in combination with the TBE device in the Zone 0 position.
  2. Primarily intended to be treated by placement of the ASG device in the ascending aorta or ASG device in combination with the TBE device in the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Distal adjunctive procedures not in contact with the ASG device may be performed during the index endovascular procedure at the discretion of the Investigator.
  3. Anatomic requirements for intended treatment with the ASG device alone or in combination with the TBE device.

    a) Anatomic compatibility required for implanting the ASG device (Intended treatment with ASG device alone) i. Proximal Aortic Landing Zone:

    1. Primary entry tear must be in the ascending aorta and ≥ 2 cm distal to the most distal coronary artery ostium.
    2. Total aortic diameter between 27mm - 48mm.
    3. Landing zone cannot be heavily calcified or thrombosed. ii. Distal Aortic Landing Zone:

    <!-- -->

    1. Primary entry tear must be in the ascending aorta and ≥ 2 cm proximal to BCA ostium.

      iii. Adequate aortic length

    2. Anatomic compatibility required for implanting the ASG device (Intended treatment with ASG device and TBE device) i. Proximal Aortic Landing Zone:

    <!-- -->

    1. Primary entry tear must be identified in Zone 0-5.
    2. Landing zone is native aorta.
    3. Primary entry tear location is ≥2cm distal to the most distal coronary artery ostium.
    4. Proximal landing zone must be ≥2cm in the ascending aorta.
    5. Landing zone cannot be heavily calcified or thrombosed.
    6. Total aortic landing zone diameter 27mm - 48mm. ii. Branch Vessel Landing Zone:

    <!-- -->

    1. Length of ≥2.5 cm proximal to first major branch vessel.
    2. Target branch vessel inner diameters of 11-18 mm.
    3. Target branch vessel landing zone must be in native vessel that cannot be heavily calcified or thrombosed.
    4. The distal 15mm landing zone cannot be dissected.
  4. The Aortic Treatment Team (as defined by the protocol) attest endovascular repair is in the best interest of the patient AND considers the patient to be high-risk for open surgical repair by meeting at least one of the following criteria:

    1. ≥80 years of age
    2. BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2
    3. History of Respiratory Insufficiency (defined by home O2 usage, exertional dyspnea, imaging evidence of COPD, previous evidence of compromised PFTs on spirometry or other factors as determined by the Investigator)
    4. Prior Cardiac Surgery
    5. Hostile Chest (VARC-2 Definition)
    6. Clinical Frailty Scale 3-9
    7. Clinical malperfusion (head, gut, lower extremity)
    8. Transfusion is not possible (e.g., Jehovah's Witness)
    9. Renal Dialysis prior to aortic dissection
    10. Chronic renal insufficiency (eGFR\<60 without dialysis or other documented history of chronic kidney disease prior to dissection)
  5. Age ≥18 years at time of informed consent signature.
  6. Adequate vascular access via transfemoral or retroperitoneal approach.
  7. Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed by the subject or legally authorized representative.
  8. Agrees to comply with protocol requirements, including imaging and 5-year follow-up, as the subject's condition allows.

Exclusion Criteria - Secondary Arm:

The subject is/has:

  1. Mechanical heart valve in the aortic position.
  2. Pregnant at time of procedure.
  3. Active infected aorta, mycotic aneurysm.
  4. Active systemic infection (e.g., infection requiring treatment with parenteral anti-infective medication).
  5. Known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials (Previous instance of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia type 2 [HIT-2], known hypersensitivity to heparin, or a history of a hypercoagulability disorder and/or state should be considered exclusion if treatment plan includes implant of a TBE device).
  6. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulants or contrast media, which is not amenable to pre-treatment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
112 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Primary

    A hypothesis driven analysis of the safety and effectiveness of the GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG) device alone in the ascending aorta. Dissection chronicity in the primary arm must be 30 days or less from symptom onset to index endovascular procedure.

    Device: GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device)

  • Experimental
    Secondary

    Descriptive analysis of use of the ASG device in patients who are not eligible for treatment in the primary arm. Dissection chronicity up to 90 days from symptom onset until the first study procedure is allowed in the secondary arm.

    Device: GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device)

Interventions

  • DeviceGORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device)

    Endovascular aortic repair of the ascending aorta

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Safety Endpoint

    Composite of the following events: Death ≤30 days of the index endovascular procedure, or during initial hospitalization, whichever is later Disabling Stroke ≤30 days following the index endovascular procedure

    Time frame: 30 Days

  2. Primary Effectiveness Endpoint

    Clinical Success, a composite of: Assisted Technical Success (at end of index endovascular procedure) Absence of the following (cumulative through 30-days, except as specified): Aortic rupture Death ≤30days of the index endovascular procedure, or during initial hospitalization, whichever is later Study Device Reintervention Conversion to open surgical repair

    Time frame: 30 Days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Endpoint

    Procedural Success Treatment Success Primary Technical Success (Unassisted) SF-36® Physical Component Summary measured at one year follow-up

    Time frame: 1 Year

07

Study locations

22 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be available to other researchers.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Recruiting→Active, not recruiting
changed Oct 23, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 23, 2026
    Recruiting→Active, not recruiting
    + 3 other changes: verification date, contact details and site details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06827990
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 14, 2025
Start date
Sep 22, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 23, 2026

Study contacts

Eric Roselli, MD
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion