ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06826482Updated Feb 14, 2025

Evaluation of the Effects of Tongue-Tie and Upper Lip-Tie

An observational study in Tongue-tie and Upper Lip-tie, sponsored by Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University. Completed at 2 sites in Turkey. Open to participants aged 1 Hour to 48 Hours, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-14.

Sponsored by Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
67
Ages
1 Hour to 48 Hours
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Tongue-tie and upper-lip tie have been linked to breastfeeding difficulties; however, the traditional evaluation tools that provide this information rely primarily on subjective assessments. In this context, ultrasound imaging has enabled an objective assessment of the sucking dynamics of infants. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of tongue-tie and upper lip-tie on sucking function in newborns via ultrasonography and other tools.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included 67 newborns (25 with tongue-tie, 21 with upper lip-tie, and 21 control) as well as their mothers. The maxillary labial frenulum was evaluated according to Kotlow, and the lingual frenulum was evaluated according to the Tongue Tie and Breastfed Infants (TABBY) tool. Sucking functions were examined via ultrasonography between postnatal days 5 and 15. Breastfeeding was evaluated via the LATCH tool, and maternal nipple pain was graded via a numerical rating scale. Mothers were interviewed by telephone about their breastfeeding continuity in the 1st month after birth. The data were analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics and association tests.

Read the detailed description
  1. Sample characteristics and study design:

    This prospective cohort study was conducted at Ankara Yıldırım Beyazit University Faculty of Medicine, Internal Medicine Sciences, Department of Child Health and Diseases, Neonatology Clinic, from May 2022 to December 2022. The study included newborns with tongue-tie, newborns with upper lip-tie, and newborns without both. Written informed consent was obtained from all participating mothers, and the study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Ankara Yıldırım Beyazit University Faculty of Medicine (date and number: 30.03.2022 /26379996/06).

    The inclusion criteria were breastfed newborns born within the last 48 hours, with a gestational age of 38 weeks or more, uncomplicated delivery, and no systemic problems, craniofacial anomalies, or birth defects. The exclusion criteria included premature or low birth weight newborns; those with delivery complications; intensive care unit admissions; systemic problems; craniofacial anomalies; birth defects; both tongue-tie and upper lip-tie; and those exclusively formula-fed.

    As there was no comparable study that could be consulted to determine the sample size in the literature, a total of 60 neonates were recruited, with 20 in each group: tongue-tie (group 1), upper lip-tie (group 2), and control (group 3).

  2. Data collection:

    Data on maternal age, medical conditions, pregnancy medication, consanguineous marriage, number of births, breastfeeding experience, and breastfeeding education were collected via face-to-face interviews. Gestational week, sex, birth weight and mode of delivery were obtained from the birth records.

    The baby's tongue movements while crying were observed for lingual frenulum examination. To evaluate the tongue and lingual frenulum, the TABBY assessment tool, which consists of 12 images demonstrating the appearance of the tongue tip, the insertion of the frenulum, and the mobility of the tongue (lift and protrusion), was used. It has a score between 0 and 8. Normal tongue function is represented by a score of 8; borderline values are represented by scores of 6 and 7; and impaired tongue function is indicated by scores of 5 and below. Newborns who scored five or below were included in the tongue-tie group in this study.

    The maxillary labial frenulum in the newborn was examined by lifting the upper lip and classified according to Kotlow [4]. Newborns with a frenulum grade 3 (the frenulum inserts just in front of the anterior papilla) or grade 4 (the frenulum attaches just into the anterior papilla and extends into the hard palate) were included in the upper lip-tie group. In addition, when the upper lip was lifted upward, whether the upper lip touched the newborn's nose and whether whitening occurred in the area where the frenulum adhered to the alveolar crest were noted.

    The control group comprised newborns without tongue-tie or upper lip-tie.

    Ultrasound imaging was conducted between the 5th and 15th days after birth by a single dentomaxillofacial radiologist with 14 years of experience. To evaluate the infants' sucking abilities, the mother was seated in a comfortable chair in the correct posture for breastfeeding. A GE Medical System Verasana Active (Wuxi, Jiangsu, China) mobile ultrasonography device equipped with a 6-10 MHz 8C-RS microconvex probe was used to capture 2D real-time, B-mode, and M-mode images of the oral cavity of the neonates. Imaging was performed through a submental approach via ultrasonic gel (Aquasonic, Parker Labs., Fairfield, NJ, USA).

    The data collection commenced when the infant began to latch onto the breast and concluded when the feeding ended. The study excluded recordings that exhibited artifacts resulting from movements of the mother-newborn pair or the operator, as well as recordings in which the presence of nutritive sucking could not be observed. All measurements were conducted on recorded ultrasonography images. Before starting the measurement in the study, the observer was calibrated to recognize and identify the neonate maxillofacial and oral anatomy; for this purpose, 10 different neonate ultrasonography images other than those used in the study were used. The observer was blinded to any patient data.

    During sucking, ultrasound imaging of the tongue, hyoid bone, nipple, and hard and soft palates was performed in the midsagittal plane. A suck cycle was defined as beginning when the mid-tongue was in apposition with the palate (tongue up), followed by a downward excursion of the tongue until the mid-tongue reached its lowest point (tongue down) and then reunited with the palate. During sucking, while the tongue is positioned both upward and downward, the distance between the nipple (N) and the hard-soft palate junction (HSPJ), the depth of the intraoral space (the distance from the HSPJ to the surface of the mid-tongue), the nipple diameter (ND) measured at intervals of 2, 5, 10, and 15 mm from the tip of the nipple, and the anterior and mid-tongue heights (the distance between the dorsal surface of the anterior and mid-tongues and the inferior border of the genioglossus muscle) were assessed via ultrasound imaging.

    Breastfeeding was assessed via the LATCH tool during ultrasound imaging. This tool consists of 5 items that score latch, audible swallowing, type of nipple, comfort, and hold (positioning). Each item is evaluated on a scale of 0-2 points. The highest possible total score that can be obtained from the LATCH assessment tool is 10. A high score indicates greater success in breastfeeding.

    To evaluate nipple pain, the mother was asked to rate her pain during breastfeeding on a numerical scale. A score of 0 indicated "absence of pain," and a score of 10 indicated "presence of unbearable pain".

    Newborns' feeding practices (exclusive or nonexclusive breastfeeding) were also noted.

    Mothers were interviewed by telephone at the 1st month after birth and asked questions about infant feeding practices, maternal nipple pain, and whether any intervention was made for newborns with tongue-tie and upper lip-tie.

  3. Statistical analysis:

The data were analyzed via IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) Nonnormally distributed data were compared via the Mann-Whitney U test for paired groups and the Kruskall-Wallis H test for three or more groups. Descriptive statistics, chi-square test and correlation analyses were conducted. A value of p\<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tongue-tie
  • Upper Lip-tie

Keywords

  • Tongue-tie
  • upper lip-tie
  • breastfeeding
  • ultrasonography
  • newborn
03

In context

Ankyloglossia

32 studies on the registry are indexed under Ankyloglossia; 8 are open to participants now.

Browse Ankyloglossia studies →

Lead sponsor

Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University is the lead sponsor of 241 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Hour to 48 Hours
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Newborns born within the last 48 hours

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Breastfed newborns born within the last 48 hours
  • Gestational age of 38 weeks or more
  • Uncomplicated delivery
  • Absence of systemic problems, craniofacial anomalies, or birth defects.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Premature or low birth weight newborns
  • Newborns with delivery complications
  • Newborns admitted to the intensive care unit
  • Any systemic problems, craniofacial anomalies, birth defects
  • Presence of both tongue-tie and upper lip-tie
  • Newborns exclusively formula-fed.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
67 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • tongue-tie

    To evaluate the tongue and lingual frenulum, the TABBY assessment tool, which consists of 12 images demonstrating the appearance of the tongue tip, the insertion of the frenulum, and the mobility of the tongue (lift and protrusion), was used. It has a score between 0 and 8. Normal tongue function is represented by a score of 8; borderline values are represented by scores of 6 and 7; and impaired tongue function is indicated by scores of 5 and below. Newborns who scored five or below were included in the tongue-tie group.

  • upper lip-tie

    The maxillary labial frenulum in the newborn was examined by lifting the upper lip and classified according to Kotlow. Newborns with a frenulum grade 3 (the frenulum inserts just in front of the anterior papilla) or grade 4 (the frenulum attaches just into the anterior papilla and extends into the hard palate) were included in the upper lip-tie group.

  • control

    The control group comprised newborns without tongue-tie or upper lip-tie

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Distance between the nipple (N) and the hard-soft palate junction

    During sucking, while the tongue is positioned both upward and downward, the distance between the nipple (N) and the hard-soft palate junction (HSPJ) was measured via ultrasound imaging.

    Time frame: Between the 5th and 15th days after birth.

  2. Intraoral space dept

    During sucking, while the tongue is positioned both upward and downward, the intraoral space dept (the distance from the HSPJ to the surface of the mid-tongue) was measured via ultrasound imaging.

    Time frame: Between the 5th and 15th days after birth.

  3. Nipple diameter (ND) at 2 mm from the tip of the nipple.

    During sucking, while the tongue is positioned both upward and downward, the nipple diameter (ND) at 2 mm from the tip of the nipple was measured via ultrasound imaging.

    Time frame: Between the 5th and 15th days after birth.

  4. Nipple diameter (ND) at 5 mm from the tip of the nipple.

    During sucking, while the tongue is positioned both upward and downward, the nipple diameter (ND) at 5 mm from the tip of the nipple was measured via ultrasound imaging.

    Time frame: Between the 5th and 15th days after birth.

  5. Nipple diameter (ND) at 10 mm from the tip of the nipple.

    During sucking, while the tongue is positioned both upward and downward, the nipple diameter (ND) at 10 mm from the tip of the nipple was measured via ultrasound imaging.

    Time frame: Between the 5th and 15th days after birth.

  6. Nipple diameter (ND) at 15 mm from the tip of the nipple.

    During sucking, while the tongue is positioned both upward and downward, the nipple diameter (ND) at 15 mm from the tip of the nipple was measured via ultrasound imaging.

    Time frame: Between the 5th and 15th days after birth.

  7. Anterior-tongue height

    During sucking, while the tongue is positioned both upward and downward, the anterior-tongue height (the distance between the dorsal surface of the anterior-tongue and the inferior border of the genioglossus muscle) was measured via ultrasound imaging.

    Time frame: Between the 5th and 15th days after birth.

  8. Mid-tongue height

    During sucking, while the tongue is positioned both upward and downward, the mid-tongue height (the distance between the dorsal surface of the mid-tongue and the inferior border of the genioglossus muscle) was measured via ultrasound imaging.

    Time frame: Between the 5th and 15th days after birth.

  9. LATCH scores

    Breastfeeding was assessed via the LATCH tool. This tool consists of 5 items that score latch, audible swallowing, type of nipple, comfort, and hold (positioning). Each item is evaluated on a scale of 0-2 points. The highest possible total score that can be obtained from the LATCH assessment tool is 10. A high score indicates greater success in breastfeeding.

    Time frame: Between the 5th and 15th days after birth (at the ultrasound appointment)

  10. Maternal nipple pain

    Maternal nipple pain was graded via a numerical rating scale. A score of 0 indicated "absence of pain," and a score of 10 indicated "presence of unbearable pain".

    Time frame: Between the 5th and 15th days after birth (at the ultrasound appointment) and the 1st month after birth (questioned at a telephone interview).

Other outcomes

  1. Maternal age

    Maternal age was recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Maternal chronic diseases

    The medical condition of the mother was recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Maternal medication use

    Presence or absence of medication during pregnancy was recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Consanguineous marriage

    Presence or absence of consanguineous marriage was recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Number of births by mother

    The number of births by the mother was recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Breastfeeding experience

    Presence or absence of breastfeeding experience was recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. Breastfeeding education

    Presence or absence of breastfeeding education was recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Gestational week

    Gestational week was obtained from the birth records.

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Gender

    The Gender of the newborn was obtained from the birth records.

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. Birth weight

    The birth weight (in grams) of the newborn was obtained from the birth records.

    Time frame: Baseline

  11. Mode of delivery

    The mode of delivery (vaginal or cesarean) was obtained from the birth records.

    Time frame: Baseline

  12. Newborns' feeding practices

    Newborns' feeding practices were recorded as exclusive or nonexclusive breastfeeding.

    Time frame: Between the 5th and 15th days after birth (at the ultrasound appointment) and the 1st month after birth (questioned at a telephone interview).

  13. Surgical Intervention (Frenotomy)

    Presence or absence of surgical intervention for the frenulum was recorded.

    Time frame: 1st month after birth (questioned at a telephone interview).

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Ayse Isil Orhan
    Ankara, 06010, Turkey
  • Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University,
    Ankara, 06010, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2022 to primary completion in Dec 2022, 7 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 1, 2025
First posted
Feb 14, 2025
StartActual
May 1, 2022
Primary completionActual
Dec 1, 2022
CompletionActual
Dec 1, 2022
Last update
Feb 14, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06826482
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 14, 2025
Start date
May 1, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2022
Completion
Dec 1, 2022
Last update
Feb 14, 2025

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion