An interventional study of Control (Standard treatment) and Chitosan in Malocclusion, Angle Class I, sponsored by University of Baghdad. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Iraq. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 28 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-12.
Sponsored by University of Baghdad · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The use of orthodontic appliances and equipment has dramatically increased over the past few decades, mainly due to improvements in materials and manufacturing processes that have paved the way for improved treatments .
The preference for aligner treatment and the increase in its prevalence can be attributed to patient demand for "invisible" treatments and the limitations of conventional fixed orthodontics . Direct 3D printing offers the possibility of creating highly precise clear aligners with soft edges, digitally designed and identically reproduced for an entire set of treatment aligners. These provide a better fit, higher efficacy, and reproducibility .
Clear aligner treatment demonstrated promising results in terms of controlling plaque index, gingival health, and the prevalence of white spot lesions. Nevertheless, grooves, ridges, microcracks, and abrasions on the aligner surface provide a prime environment for bacterial adherence and the development of plaque biofilms. Adding chitosan, a minimally toxic agent with antibacterial properties and the ability to reduce enamel demineralization, to 3D-printed aligner resin materials may decrease the incidence of WSLs . Currently, there is limited research on including nanoparticles in aligners' material for microbe inhibition and, to the best of our knowledge, none of the research has assessed and compared the effect of adding chitosan to an aligner's resin.
The use of orthodontic appliances and equipment has dramatically increased over the past few decades, mainly due to improvements in materials and manufacturing processes that have paved the way for improved treatments .
The preference for aligner treatment and the increase in its prevalence can be attributed to patient demand for "invisible" treatments and the limitations of conventional fixed orthodontics. Direct 3D printing offers the possibility of creating highly precise clear aligners with soft edges, digitally designed and identically reproduced for an entire set of treatment aligners. These provide a better fit, higher efficacy, and reproducibility.
Clear aligner treatment demonstrated promising results in terms of controlling plaque index, gingival health, and the prevalence of white spot lesions. Nevertheless, grooves, ridges, microcracks, and abrasions on the aligner surface provide a prime environment for bacterial adherence and the development of plaque biofilms. A combination of mechanical and chemical methods seem to be a successful approach for removing plaque biofilm from aligners whilst preventing pigment adsorption.
Orthodontic appliances change the ecological environment of the oral cavity, resulting in a significant increase in the number of cariogenic bacteria such as Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans). The imbalance in oral homeostasis can lead to enamel demineralization, periodontitis and other bacteria-related adverse effects of orthodontic treatment. According to evidence-based clinical assessments, once enamel demineralization is formed it is difficult to be fully reversed using currently available remineralizing agents. Thus, several antibacterial strategies have been used clinically to prevent enamel demineralization, including antibacterial mouthwashes and toothpastes. However, these conventional interventions are largely dependent on perfect compliance from the patients, which most of the times does not occur.
Chitosan nanoparticles have a wide range of applications and have long been employed with or without other substances and techniques to increase their functionality .
Adding chitosan, a minimally toxic agent with antibacterial properties and the ability to reduce enamel demineralization, to 3D-printed aligner resin materials may decrease the incidence of WSLs . Currently, there is limited research on including nanoparticles in aligners' material for microbe inhibition and, to the best of our knowledge, none of the research has assessed and compared the effect of adding chitosan to an aligner's resin . A recent study carried out by Taher and Rasheed in 2023 added chitosan nanoparticles at different concentrations (2%, 3%, and 5% w/w) to directly 3D-printed clear aligner resin and assessed its anti-biofilm activity (on Streptococcus mutans bacteria categorized as one of the most virulent bacteria to cause enamel lesions), degree of conversion, accuracy, deflection force, and tensile strength. Additionally, cytotoxicity has been assessed using tissue cultures of mice fibroblasts and embryonic cells of chitosan (2%, 3%, and 5% w/w). The results of this essay showed that all used concentrations were non cytotoxic to living cells. It was found that there was a notable reduction in bacterial colonies when the resin was incorporated with 3% and 5% chitosan nanoparticles. No significant changes in the cytotoxicity or accuracy were detected and it was concluded that integrating biocompatible chitosan nanoparticles into the resin can add an anti-biofilm element to an aligner without compromising the material's particular biological, mechanical, and physical qualities at specific concentrations.
As the previous study was carried out in vitro, this study aims at assessing the effect of in vivo aging on the anti-biofilm and anti-microbial activity of chitosan incorporated into directly printed clear aligner resin.
35 studies on the registry are indexed under Malocclusion, Angle Class I; 10 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 32 is close to the median of 32 across 31 interventional studies indexed under Malocclusion, Angle Class I.
Browse Malocclusion, Angle Class I studies →University of Baghdad is the lead sponsor of 170 studies on the registry; 69 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
any criteria not mentioned above
-
control directly printed orthodontic clear aligners without chitosan nanoparticles
Device: Control (Standard treatment)
Directly printed orthodontic clear aligners with chitosan nanoparticles
Device: Chitosan
Directly printed orthodontic clear aligner without any additions
Adding chitosan nanoparticles to directly printed orthodontic clear aligners in vivo to enhance anti- microbial activity against streptococcus mutans.
Antimicrobial properties of chitosan nanoparticles incorporated into directly 3D printed clear orthodontic aligner will be assessed by using antibiofilm assay
The main outcome of this study is yo determine the antimicrobial effect of chitosan nanoparticles directly added to 3D printed clear aligners against Streptococcus mutans. This will be conducted by using antibiofilm activity test at baseline, 1 week, and 2 weeks following wearing conventional and chitosan-incorporated clear aligners. From each device retrieved from the patients at these timepoints, a 5mm diameter disc will be cut from the labial aspect of the devices. These discs will be cultured overnight in a broth containing equal number of S. mutans bacteria. After 24 h, the number of vital bacteria and the biomass will be measured to determine the antibiofilm activity of chitosan-incorporated devices vs control.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Self-reported questionnaire about satisfaction of wearing clear aligner (control and experimental)
To asses perceived patients outcome i.e., degree of satisfaction by using a questionnaire designed for this purpose about wearing both devices (control and experimental). The questionnaire consists of two sections. The first section is dedicated for collecting demographic and lifestyle variables. The second section is designed to assess the degree of satisfaction by answering close-end questions. Each positive response will be scored as "1" while negative response will be scored "0". The sum of these responses will represent the overall satisfaction for each patient.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.