ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06806176Updated Oct 3, 2025

Effectiveness of CAT-GSH for Returning Patients

An interventional study of Cognitive analytic therapy guided self-help (CAT-GSH) and Cognitive behavioural therapy guided self-help (CBT-GSH) in Anxiety and Depression, sponsored by University of Sheffield. Recruiting at 2 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-03.

Primary conditionDepressionRegistry: Anxiety DisordersReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Anxiety Disorders — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Depression
Why
  1. The registry often attaches Anxiety Disorders to studies about something else, and this study's title and listed conditions do not name it.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Depression.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by University of Sheffield · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if cognitive analytic therapy-guided self-help (CAT-GSH) is comparable to cognitive behavioural therapy-guided self-help (CBT-GSH) in terms of whether it is effective and acceptable for people with anxiety or low mood, who are returning to NHS Talking Therapy services for further treatment. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does CAT-GSH work well and feel acceptable for people coming back to the Talking Therapies service, compared to CBT-GSH, when taking their characteristics (like age) into account
  • Does CAT-GSH work well and feel acceptable for people coming back to the Talking Therapies service, compared to those using CBT-GSH for the first time, when taking their characteristics (like age) into account?

Participants will:

  • Choose their preferred treatment
  • Complete 6 sessions of either CAT-GSH or CBT-GSH
  • Sessions will be weekly or bi-weekly
  • Complete routine outcome measures before, during and at the end of therapy
Read the detailed description

A prospective quantitative, quasi-experimental design will be used to address the primary and secondary questions. PWPs will be trained in delivering CAT-GSH. Participants will choose between CAT-GSH and CBT-GSH and be offered a six-session contact of one-to-one GSH. The Talking Therapies service already collects routine outcome measures, which will be collated and analysed.

Procedure/Intervention The Talking Therapies services routinely perform an initial assessment when someone is referred to their services. Potential participants who meet the inclusion criteria will be identified at the assessment stage.

Tameside and Glossop Talking Therapies service procedure:

The assessor will ask if there is potential interest in a study using a screening script; if the person remains interested, the participant information sheet (PIS) and the consent form will be emailed or posted. At least 48 hours will be left to allow the participant to read the information.

The principal investigator will give a follow-up phone call to answer any potential questions, ask for preference on the therapy, and complete the consent form, which will be emailed or posted back to the Talking Therapies service once completed. The completed consent form will be saved in the site's local file and a copy of the form will be sent to the participant. If the person no longer wants to participate at this stage, the service user will receive the treatment as usual.

Leeds Mental Wellbeing Service procedure:

The assessor will ask if there is potential interest in a study using a screening script; if the person remains interested, the potential participant information sheet (PIS) and the consent form will be emailed or posted. The potential participant will be given 7 days to read the information, email the Leeds service with their preferred treatment, and return the signed consent form to the service if the potential participant does not request further information. 14 days will be given if the participant asks for the material to be posted. If the potential participant requests further information, the clinical lead and principal investigator will contact the potential participant to discuss this. The completed consent form will be saved in the site's local file and a copy will be sent to the participant. If the person no longer wants to participate at this stage or has not emailed within 7 days or returned the forms by post within 14 days, the service user will receive the treatment as usual, so there are no delays.

All services procedure:

The Talking Therapies services collect routine outcome measures, demographics and other data as standard. Sessions can take place face-to-face, online, or by telephone. The sessions last 35 minutes, for a total of six sessions. Sessions are carried out weekly or bi-weekly.

The psychological wellbeing practitioner (PWP) will record the third session with the participant, so the research team can perform a randomly selected competency check on the CBT-GSH and CAT-GSH delivered to service users. The recording will be sent to the research team, with no personally identifiable information on the file name. However, due to the nature of recordings, they may contain identifiable information. Participants will be made aware of this in the PIS.

The analysis stage will aim to start in December 2025, to explore the outcome measure data.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anxiety
  • Depression

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cognitive analytic therapy (CAT)
  • Guided self-help
  • NHS Talking Therapies
  • returning patients
  • Anxiety
  • Depression
03

In context

Depression Reclassified

8,577 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,720 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 81 across 7,063 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sheffield is the lead sponsor of 75 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Compared within Depression, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Anxiety Disorders. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Previously received CBT-GSH at same participating NHS Talking Therapies service
  • Presenting with anxiety or depression
  • Deemed suitable for step 2 low-intensity therapy, through assessment by a qualified PWP

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously received high-intensity therapy since receiving CBT-GSH
  • The previous treatment episode was in another NHS Talking Therapies service.
  • Not fluent in English

Individuals who are not fluent in English will be excluded from the study due to not having translated CAT-GSH workbooks available and limited funding to translate any workbooks.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    CBT-GSH arm

    CBT-GSH group

    Behavioral: Cognitive behavioural therapy guided self-help (CBT-GSH)

  • Active comparator
    CAT-GSH arm

    CAT-GSH group

    Behavioral: Cognitive analytic therapy guided self-help (CAT-GSH)

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive analytic therapy guided self-help (CAT-GSH)

    Six session CAT-GSH treatment

  • BehavioralCognitive behavioural therapy guided self-help (CBT-GSH)

    Six session CBT-GSH treatment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite score (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient health Questionaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS))

    Routine outcome measures, Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) collected before, during and after treatment will be combined into composite scores.

    Time frame: From enrolment to the end of treatment after 6 sessions, weekly or bi-weekly. 6-12 weeks.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    Routine outcome measure, collected as part of normal treatment at the NHS Talking Therapy site - Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Collected before, during and after treatment. The PHQ-9 uses a 9-item scale with a total severity score of 0-27. Higher scores indicate greater depression and the clinical cut-off point indicating significant depression is ≥10.

    Time frame: From enrolment to the end of treatment at 6-12 weeks. Sessions weekly or bi-weekly.

  2. Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)

    Routine outcome measure, collected as part of normal treatment at the NHS Talking Therapy site - Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). Collected before, during and after treatment. The GAD-7 uses a 7-item scale with a total severity score ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety and the clinical cut-off indicating significant anxiety is ≥8

    Time frame: From enrolment to the end of treatment at 6-12 weeks. Sessions weekly or bi-weekly.

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Tameside and Glossop NHS Talking Therapies Service
    Ashton-under-Lyne, OL6 7SR, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Leeds Mental Wellbeing Service
    Leeds, LS9 7TA, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Ruby Warren · Contactruby.warren@nhs.net · +44113 843 4388
    • Ruby Warren · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Williams R, Farquharson L, Palmer L, Bassett P, Clarke J, Clark DM, Crawford MJ. Patient preference in psychological treatment and associations with self-reported outcome: national cross-sectional survey in England and Wales. BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jan 15;16:4. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0702-8. PubMed 26768890 ↗
  • Wakefield S, Delgadillo J, Kellett S, White S, Hepple J. The effectiveness of brief cognitive analytic therapy for anxiety and depression: A quasi-experimental case-control study. Br J Clin Psychol. 2021 Jun;60(2):194-211. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12278. Epub 2021 Jan 17. PubMed 33458855 ↗
  • Simmonds-Buckley M, Osivwemu EO, Kellett S, Taylor C. The acceptability of cognitive analytic therapy (CAT): Meta-analysis and benchmarking of treatment refusal and treatment dropout rates. Clin Psychol Rev. 2022 Aug;96:102187. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102187. Epub 2022 Jul 18. PubMed 35914380 ↗
  • Owen K, Laphan A, Gee B, Lince K. Evaluating cognitive analytic therapy within a primary care psychological therapy service. Br J Clin Psychol. 2023 Sep;62(3):663-673. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12430. Epub 2023 Jun 14. PubMed 37317047 ↗
  • Meadows J, Kellett S. Development and Evaluation of Cognitive Analytic Guided Self-Help (CAT-SH) for Use in IAPT Services. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2017 May;45(3):266-284. doi: 10.1017/S1352465816000485. Epub 2017 Mar 22. PubMed 28325165 ↗
  • Lorimer B, Kellett S, Giesemann J, Lutz W, Delgadillo J. An investigation of treatment return after psychological therapy for depression and anxiety. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2024 Mar;52(2):149-162. doi: 10.1017/S1352465823000322. Epub 2023 Aug 11. PubMed 37563726 ↗
  • Kellett S, Simmonds-Buckley M, Limon E, Hague J, Hughes L, Stride C, Millings A. Defining the Assessment and Treatment Competencies to Deliver Low-Intensity Cognitive Behavior Therapy: A Multi-Center Validation Study. Behav Ther. 2021 Jan;52(1):15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 May 20. PubMed 33483113 ↗
  • Hallam C, Simmonds-Buckley M, Kellett S, Greenhill B, Jones A. The acceptability, effectiveness, and durability of cognitive analytic therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Psychother. 2021 Mar;94 Suppl 1:8-35. doi: 10.1111/papt.12286. Epub 2020 Jun 15. PubMed 32543107 ↗
  • Bohnke JR, Lutz W, Delgadillo J. Negative affectivity as a transdiagnostic factor in patients with common mental disorders. J Affect Disord. 2014 Sep;166:270-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.05.023. Epub 2014 May 27. PubMed 25012441 ↗
  • Wray A, Kellett S, Bee C, Smithies J, Aadahl V, Simmonds-Buckley M, McElhatton C. The acceptability of cognitive analytic guided self-help in an Improving Access to Psychological Therapies service. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2022 Sep;50(5):493-507. doi: 10.1017/S1352465822000194. Epub 2022 May 16. PubMed 35575218 ↗
  • Kellett S, Bee C, Smithies J, Aadahl V, Simmonds-Buckley M, Power N, Dugen-Williams C, Fallon N, Delgadillo J. Cognitive-behavioural versus cognitive-analytic guided self-help for mild-to-moderate anxiety: a pragmatic, randomised patient preference trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;223(3):438-445. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2023.78. PubMed 37395600 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Only anonymized data will be shared. Personal data will not be.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: At the end of the study (approximately May 2026), data will be stored on the University of Sheffield's ORDA (online research hub) for 10 years according to the University of Sheffield's retention period.

Access criteria: Information can be requested through ORDA by those who qualify for membership.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 5 months after the start.

Of 3,468 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Depression, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 41. This study's planned 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,566 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 31, 2025
First posted
Feb 3, 2025
StartActual
Jul 30, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 2025
Last update
Oct 3, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06806176
Lead sponsor
University of Sheffield
Collaborators
Catalyse CAT Limited, Tameside and Glossop Talking Therapies service, Leeds Mental Wellbeing service
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 3, 2025
Start date
Jul 30, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 3, 2025

Study contacts

Andrew J Laphan
Contact
alaphan1@sheffield.ac.uk
01142226650
Amrit Sinha
Contact
a.sinha@sheffield.ac.uk
01142226650
Andrew J Laphan
principal investigator · University of Sheffield

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion