ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06797245APPROVEUpdated Oct 27, 2026

APPROVE Trial: Evaluating a Prescription Digital Therapeutic for Treatment of OAB in Women

An interventional study of RiSolve App and AUGS Patient Handouts in Overactive Bladder (OAB), Urinary Urgency and Urinary Urge Incontinence (UUI), sponsored by Medstar Health Research Institute. Active, not recruiting at 10 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 22 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by Medstar Health Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 27, 2026Now Active, not recruitingPrimary completion moved+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
596
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
22 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The APPROVE trial is a multi-centered, randomized controlled trial designed to assess differences in symptom improvement, quality of life, bladder symptoms, satisfaction with treatment and continued treatment efficacy in women with overactive bladder (OAB) randomized to a prescription digital therapeutic (PDTx) app called RiSolve compared to standard behavioral education (handouts).

Read the detailed description

In this trial, we will employ a randomized controlled trial design to determine if women with overactive bladder (OAB) treated with the RiSolve prescription digital therapeutic (PDTx) demonstrate greater improvement in OAB-related health as compared to standard behavioral education with informational handouts. RiSolve is a digital therapeutic device intended to provide behavioral therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for adult women who have been diagnosed with OAB, which includes urinary urgency with or without urge urinary incontinence (UUI), urinary frequency, nocturia, and mixed incontinence with predominant OAB symptoms. RiSolve is indicated as an 8-week treatment to reduce the symptoms of OAB.

For the purposes of this trial, the primary outcome to determine improvement in OAB-related health will be defined as achieving the MID (defined as an improvement of 10 points or more) on the OAB-q SF Symptom Severity subscale after 8 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes will include achieving the MID on the OAB-q SF Health-Related Quality of Life subscale, meeting the patient's acceptable symptoms state (PASS) on the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), and improvements in frequency, nocturia and urge urinary incontinence (UUI) on a 3-day bladder diary and on the ICIQ-FLUTS. Participants will be randomized to either PDTx therapy (active) or standard treatment of behavioral education (control). Participants randomized to control will have the option to crossover to PDTx after the initial 8 weeks of the trial if desired. Participants will continue to be followed and asked about their symptoms at 6 and 12 months.

The impact of this trial has enormous potential to improve treatment of OAB. The ability to offer behavioral therapy via PDTx will reduce patient burden while simultaneously increasing quality of life for women suffering from OAB and decreasing provider burden. The high-quality data from this study will be used to support a marketing application with the FDA through the De Novo pathway for an accessible, low-burden, efficient intervention to help millions of women currently suffering from this burdensome condition.

02

Conditions studied

  • Overactive Bladder (OAB)
  • Urinary Urgency
  • Urinary Urge Incontinence (UUI)
  • Nocturia
  • Urinary Frequency

Keywords

  • Overactive Bladder (OAB)
03

In context

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

858 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive; 127 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 596 is above the median of 70 across 649 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive.

Browse Urinary Bladder, Overactive studies →

Lead sponsor

Medstar Health Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 161 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women ≥ 22 years old
  • Bothersome OAB symptoms (defined as bother rating ≥ 5 on ICIQ-FLUTS question #3b or #9b)
  • English-speaking
  • Willing to forego other treatment outside of medications for the 8-week trial period
  • Use of at least one mobile App

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (defined as QUID stress score > QUID urge score)
  • Voiding dysfunction defined as response ≥ 2 on ICIQ-FLUTS question #7a
  • Bladder pain defined as response ≥ 2 on ICIQ-FLUTS question #4a
  • Use of an OAB medication (anticholinergic or beta-agonist) within the past two weeks
  • Currently using intermittent or indwelling catheter
  • History of bladder/urethral, colon/anal, or cervical cancer
  • Current or prior use of sacral neuromodulation, tibial stimulation or onabotulinum toxin type A intradetrusor injection
  • Currently taking antibiotics/drugs for urinary tract infection\^
  • Currently undergoing or unwilling to forego pelvic floor physical therapy with a physical therapist or prescription device for the 8-week intervention period
  • Planning surgery for pelvic organ prolapse within 12 months of randomization
  • Pelvic surgery within the past 6 months
  • Planning to undergo pessary fitting °

    • Those on antibiotics for urinary tract infection will be eligible for enrollment 2 weeks after completing antibiotic therapy with subjective resolution of UTI symptoms °Will be eligible after completing pessary fitting

https://researchdata.medstar.net/redcap/surveys/?s=MM7WN7EXACX4PNXJ

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
596 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention - RiSolve PDTx App

    Participants randomized to intervention will be given access to the RiSolve PDTx app for 10 weeks after initial activation.

    Device: RiSolve App

  • Active comparator
    Control - Standard Therapy

    Participants randomized to the control will receive a brief explanation of behavioral therapy with details provided in the form educational handouts including the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) "Overactive Bladder" and "Pelvic Floor Muscles and Bladder Training" Patient Fact Sheets.

    Behavioral: AUGS Patient Handouts

Interventions

  • DeviceRiSolve App

    Participants randomized to intervention will be given access to the RiSolve PDTx app for 10 weeks after initial activation.

  • BehavioralAUGS Patient Handouts

    AUGS "Overactive Bladder" and "Pelvic Floor Muscles and Bladder Training" Patient Fact Sheets will be provided and reviewed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overactive Bladder Questionnaire short-form (OAB-q SF)

    The OAB-q SF is utilized to assess the impact of OAB symptoms on the patient's life,35 and has been shown to be responsive to reductions in urinary urgency, frequency and incontinence during anticholinergic therapy.3 The scale ranges from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating worse symptom severity. The MID is defined as a change of 10 points

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. OAB-q SF Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL)

    The OAB-q SF Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) subscale is a13-item health-related quality of life subscale of the OAB-q SF. The scale ranges from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating better quality of life. The MID is defined as a change of 10 points.

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

  2. Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)

    Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) is a single item questionnaire to assess a person's impression of disease severity. For purposes of this trial, it will ask participants to "Check the one number that best describes how your urinary tract condition is now" on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from (1) "normal" to (4) "severe". The PASS threshold PGI-S score is \< 3.

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

  3. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)

    The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a single item questionnaire to assess an individual's impression of change in urinary symptoms. For purposes of this trial the PGI-S has been adapted by removing "taking medication" and it will ask participants to "Check the one number that best describes how your urinary tract condition is now, compared with how it was before you began this study" on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from (1) "very much better" to (7) "very much worse". The PASS threshold PGI-I score is \< 3.

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

  4. 3-Day Bladder Diary

    A 3-day Bladder Diary will be an electronic bladder diary collected over a 3-day (72 hour) period focusing specifically on number of voids per day, number of voids per night, and number of urinary incontinence (UI) episodes and whether these events are associated with urgency.

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

  5. Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID)

    The Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID) is a 6-item UI symptom questionnaire to distinguish stress and urgency UI. The QUID serves both as a diagnostic tool to assess UI type and as a measure of SUI and UUI frequency before and after treatment. Prior research has shown that a cut off QUID stress score ≥ 4 and QUID urge score ≥ 6 identify UI type (SUI, UUI or mixed) accurately in 80% of patients as compared to provider diagnosis.

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

  6. International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-FLUTS)

    The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-FLUTS) is a 12-item questionnaire to evaluate female lower urinary tract symptoms and impact on quality of life derived from the BFLUTS-SF questionnaire. The ICIQ-FLUTS asks each person to rate the frequency of a specific lower urinary tract symptom (such as urgency, frequency, nocturia, nocturnal enuresis, stress incontinence, pain, etc.) on various 5 point scales and then asks the participant to rate the level of bother from that specific symptom on a Likert scale from (0) "not at all" to (10) "a great deal".

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

  7. Short Personal Experience Questionnaire (SPEQ)

    The Short Personal Experience Questionnaire (SPEQ) is a 13-item questionnaire that assesses sexual enjoyment, desire, arousal, orgasm, dyspareunia, sexual activity, sexual partner, and partner limitations. To limit participant burden, the SPEQ has been modified to a shorter 8-item version to include fewer items on partner limitations.

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

  8. Mobile Application Rating Scale: user version (uMARS)

    The Mobile Application Rating Scale: user version (uMARS) is comprised of a 20-item objective quality rating with 4 subscales (engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information quality), and 6-item subjective quality rating. Higher scores are more desirable. Participants randomized to or who crossover to PDTx treatment will be asked to complete the uMARS questionnaire 8 weeks after starting PDTx treatment. A uMARS score of ≥ 3 is considered acceptable.

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

  9. Treatment Satisfaction

    Treatment satisfaction will be assessed by asking participants to "Rate your level of satisfaction with the study treatment" they received on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from (1) "very satisfied" to (5) "very dissatisfied".

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

  10. Treatment accessibility

    Treatment accessibility will be assessed by recording the number of participants who are unable to or have difficulty accessing the App and any phone calls/tech support requests.

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

  11. Treatment adherence

    Treatment adherence for participants receiving PDTx treatment will be assessed via App usage data. For the control group direct questioning will be used to assess treatment adherence (Did you read the leaflet? Answer choices: Yes / No. If yes, how much of it did you read? With answer choices in % categories; If yes, did you return to the leaflet during the 8 weeks to refresh your memory? Answer choices: Yes / No). For those prescribed an anticholinergic or beta-agonist medication we will assess medication compliance through direct patient questioning to assess if the medication was obtained from the pharmacy, how long the medication was taken, any side effects, and, if applicable, the reason for stopping the medication.

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

  12. Other Treatments

    Other treatments will be assessed following the initial 8-week intervention period by querying participants as to whether they have any new conditions or are using or have tried using additional treatments that could affect OAB symptoms. These will include assessing for diagnosis of and treatment for stress urinary incontinence, urinary retention, pelvic organ prolapse, genitourinary syndrome of menopause, vaginal atrophy, pregnancy, sleep apnea, heart failure, and diabetes.

    Time frame: 12 Months

  13. Adverse Events

    Adverse events will be assessed by querying participants regarding any adverse events that may occur throughout the trial

    Time frame: 12 Months

07

Study locations

10 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 May;115(5):1063-1070. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d9d421. No abstract available. PubMed 20410783 ↗
  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30. PubMed 18929686 ↗
  • Rubin D. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1987.
  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O'Neal L, McLeod L, Delacqua G, Delacqua F, Kirby J, Duda SN; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9. PubMed 31078660 ↗
  • Coyne KS, Thompson CL, Lai JS, Sexton CC. An overactive bladder symptom and health-related quality of life short-form: validation of the OAB-q SF. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Mar;34(3):255-63. doi: 10.1002/nau.22559. Epub 2014 Jan 13. PubMed 25783168 ↗
  • Burkett LS, Siddique M, Zeymo A, Brunn EA, Gutman RE, Park AJ, Iglesia CB. Clobetasol Compared With Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser for Lichen Sclerosus: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun 1;137(6):968-978. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004332. PubMed 33957642 ↗
  • Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Wilson H. Development and Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS). JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jun 10;4(2):e72. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5849. PubMed 27287964 ↗
  • Dennerstein L, Lehert P, Dudley E. Short scale to measure female sexuality: adapted from McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire. J Sex Marital Ther. 2001 Jul-Sep;27(4):339-51. doi: 10.1080/009262301317081098. PubMed 11441518 ↗
  • Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003. PubMed 8628042 ↗
  • Brookes ST, Donovan JL, Wright M, Jackson S, Abrams P. A scored form of the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire: data from a randomized controlled trial of surgery for women with stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;191(1):73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12.027. PubMed 15295345 ↗
  • Bradley CS, Rovner ES, Morgan MA, Berlin M, Novi JM, Shea JA, Arya LA. A new questionnaire for urinary incontinence diagnosis in women: development and testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jan;192(1):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.037. PubMed 15672005 ↗
  • Bradley CS, Rahn DD, Nygaard IE, Barber MD, Nager CW, Kenton KS, Siddiqui NY, Abel RB, Spino C, Richter HE. The questionnaire for urinary incontinence diagnosis (QUID): validity and responsiveness to change in women undergoing non-surgical therapies for treatment of stress predominant urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010 Jun;29(5):727-34. doi: 10.1002/nau.20818. PubMed 19787711 ↗
  • Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):98-101. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.379. PubMed 12861145 ↗
  • Coyne K, Revicki D, Hunt T, Corey R, Stewart W, Bentkover J, Kurth H, Abrams P. Psychometric validation of an overactive bladder symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire: the OAB-q. Qual Life Res. 2002 Sep;11(6):563-74. doi: 10.1023/a:1016370925601. PubMed 12206577 ↗
  • Sanderson DJ, Zavez A, Meekins AR, Eddib A, Lee TG, Barber MD, Duecy E. The Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Female Urinary Incontinence. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022 Jan 1;28(1):33-39. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001055. PubMed 34009829 ↗
  • Funada S, Watanabe N, Goto T, Negoro H, Akamatsu S, Uozumi R, Kishimoto S, Ichioka K, Segawa T, Furukawa TA, Ogawa O. Clinical feasibility and acceptability of adding cognitive behavioral therapy to pharmacotherapy for drug-resistant overactive bladder in women: A single-arm pilot study. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2021 Jan;13(1):69-78. doi: 10.1111/luts.12333. Epub 2020 Jul 3. PubMed 32618414 ↗
  • Price JR, Mitchell E, Tidy E, Hunot V. Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD001027. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001027.pub2. PubMed 18646067 ↗
  • Laird KT, Tanner-Smith EE, Russell AC, Hollon SD, Walker LS. Short-term and Long-term Efficacy of Psychological Therapies for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jul;14(7):937-947.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.11.020. Epub 2015 Dec 22. PubMed 26721342 ↗
  • Glombiewski JA, Sawyer AT, Gutermann J, Koenig K, Rief W, Hofmann SG. Psychological treatments for fibromyalgia: a meta-analysis. Pain. 2010 Nov;151(2):280-295. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.06.011. Epub 2010 Aug 19. PubMed 20727679 ↗
  • Luo C, Sanger N, Singhal N, Pattrick K, Shams I, Shahid H, Hoang P, Schmidt J, Lee J, Haber S, Puckering M, Buchanan N, Lee P, Ng K, Sun S, Kheyson S, Chung DC, Sanger S, Thabane L, Samaan Z. A comparison of electronically-delivered and face to face cognitive behavioural therapies in depressive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jun 27;24:100442. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100442. eCollection 2020 Jul. PubMed 32775969 ↗
  • Hanlon I, Hewitt C, Bell K, Phillips A, Mikocka-Walus A. Systematic review with meta-analysis: online psychological interventions for mental and physical health outcomes in gastrointestinal disorders including irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Aug;48(3):244-259. doi: 10.1111/apt.14840. Epub 2018 Jun 14. PubMed 29901820 ↗
  • Etzelmueller A, Vis C, Karyotaki E, Baumeister H, Titov N, Berking M, Cuijpers P, Riper H, Ebert DD. Effects of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Routine Care for Adults in Treatment for Depression and Anxiety: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 31;22(8):e18100. doi: 10.2196/18100. PubMed 32865497 ↗
  • Melotti IGR, Juliato CRT, Tanaka M, Riccetto CLZ. Severe depression and anxiety in women with overactive bladder. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Jan;37(1):223-228. doi: 10.1002/nau.23277. Epub 2017 Apr 13. PubMed 28407347 ↗
  • Melotti IGR, Juliato CRT, Coelho SCA, Lima M, Riccetto CLZ. Is There Any Difference Between Depression and Anxiety in Overactive Bladder According to Sex? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int Neurourol J. 2017 Sep;21(3):204-211. doi: 10.5213/inj.1734890.445. Epub 2017 Sep 12. PubMed 28954462 ↗
  • Lai HH, Shen B, Rawal A, Vetter J. The relationship between depression and overactive bladder/urinary incontinence symptoms in the clinical OAB population. BMC Urol. 2016 Oct 6;16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12894-016-0179-x. PubMed 27716241 ↗
  • Harvey J, Finney S, Stewart L, Gillespie J. The relationship between cognition and sensation in determining when and where to void: the concept of cognitive voiding. BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1756-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11078.x. Epub 2012 May 29. PubMed 22642959 ↗
  • Sooknarine C, Farrell S, Sarma S, Salameh F, Burke N, Staunton B, Carr E, Sexton K, Agnew G, Downey A, D'Arcy F, Cundiff GW. Pilot Study of a Digital Behavioral Therapy for Overactive Bladder in Women. Urogynecology (Phila). 2024 Dec 1;30(12):956-961. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001499. Epub 2024 May 7. PubMed 38465995 ↗
  • Lightner DJ, Gomelsky A, Souter L, Vasavada SP. Diagnosis and Treatment of Overactive Bladder (Non-Neurogenic) in Adults: AUA/SUFU Guideline Amendment 2019. J Urol. 2019 Sep;202(3):558-563. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000309. Epub 2019 Aug 8. PubMed 31039103 ↗
  • Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN; International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4-20. doi: 10.1002/nau.20798. PubMed 19941278 ↗
  • Gormley EA, Lightner DJ, Faraday M, Vasavada SP; American Urological Association; Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline amendment. J Urol. 2015 May;193(5):1572-80. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.087. Epub 2015 Jan 23. PubMed 25623739 ↗
  • Olivera CK, Meriwether K, El-Nashar S, Grimes CL, Chen CC, Orejuela F, Antosh D, Gleason J, Kim-Fine S, Wheeler T, McFadden B, Balk EM, Murphy M; Systematic Review Group for the Society of Gynecological Surgeons. Nonantimuscarinic treatment for overactive bladder: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;215(1):34-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.156. Epub 2016 Feb 4. PubMed 26851599 ↗
  • Hu TW, Wagner TH, Bentkover JD, Leblanc K, Zhou SZ, Hunt T. Costs of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder in the United States: a comparative study. Urology. 2004 Mar;63(3):461-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.10.037. PubMed 15028438 ↗
  • Chermansky CJ, Chancellor MB. Increasing awareness and improving the care of urinary incontinence: highlights from the world health organization 2nd international consultation on incontinence july 1-4, 2001, paris, france. Rev Urol. 2003 Winter;5(1):22-5. No abstract available. PubMed 16985613 ↗
  • Wadensten T, Nystrom E, Nord A, Lindam A, Sjostrom M, Samuelsson E. App-based self-management of urgency and mixed urinary incontinence in women: One-year follow-up. Neurourol Urodyn. 2022 Apr;41(4):945-954. doi: 10.1002/nau.24898. Epub 2022 Mar 9. PubMed 35266189 ↗
  • Liberman JN, Hunt TL, Stewart WF, Wein A, Zhou Z, Herzog AR, Lipton RB, Diokno AC. Health-related quality of life among adults with symptoms of overactive bladder: results from a U.S. community-based survey. Urology. 2001 Jun;57(6):1044-50. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)00986-4. PubMed 11377301 ↗
  • Stewart WF, Van Rooyen JB, Cundiff GW, Abrams P, Herzog AR, Corey R, Hunt TL, Wein AJ. Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States. World J Urol. 2003 May;20(6):327-36. doi: 10.1007/s00345-002-0301-4. Epub 2002 Nov 15. PubMed 12811491 ↗
  • Shamliyan T, Wyman J, Bliss DZ, Kane RL, Wilt TJ. Prevention of urinary and fecal incontinence in adults. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Dec;(161):1-379. PubMed 18457475 ↗
  • Hagglund D, Walker-Engstrom ML, Larsson G, Leppert J. Quality of life and seeking help in women with urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Nov;80(11):1051-5. PubMed 11703207 ↗
  • Coyne KS, Zhou Z, Thompson C, Versi E. The impact on health-related quality of life of stress, urge and mixed urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2003 Nov;92(7):731-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04463.x. PubMed 14616456 ↗
  • Coyne KS, Sexton CC, Irwin DE, Kopp ZS, Kelleher CJ, Milsom I. The impact of overactive bladder, incontinence and other lower urinary tract symptoms on quality of life, work productivity, sexuality and emotional well-being in men and women: results from the EPIC study. BJU Int. 2008 Jun;101(11):1388-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07601.x. PubMed 18454794 ↗
  • Chiaffarino F, Parazzini F, Lavezzari M, Giambanco V; Gruppo Interdisciplinare di Studio Incontinenza Urinaria (GISIU). Impact of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder on quality of life. Eur Urol. 2003 May;43(5):535-8. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00097-6. PubMed 12705999 ↗
  • Abrams P, Kelleher CJ, Kerr LA, Rogers RG. Overactive bladder significantly affects quality of life. Am J Manag Care. 2000 Jul;6(11 Suppl):S580-90. PubMed 11183901 ↗
  • Coyne KS, Matza LS, Thompson CL, Kopp ZS, Khullar V. Determining the importance of change in the overactive bladder questionnaire. J Urol. 2006 Aug;176(2):627-32; discussion 632. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.088. PubMed 16813906 ↗
  • Matza LS, Thompson CL, Krasnow J, Brewster-Jordan J, Zyczynski T, Coyne KS. Test-retest reliability of four questionnaires for patients with overactive bladder: the overactive bladder questionnaire (OAB-q), patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC), urgency questionnaire (UQ), and the primary OAB symptom questionnaire (POSQ). Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(3):215-25. doi: 10.1002/nau.20110. PubMed 15747340 ↗
  • Coyne KS, Matza LS, Thompson CL. The responsiveness of the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q). Qual Life Res. 2005 Apr;14(3):849-55. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-0706-1. PubMed 16022077 ↗
  • Wu EQ, Birnbaum H, Marynchenko M, Mareva M, Williamson T, Mallett D. Employees with overactive bladder: work loss burden. J Occup Environ Med. 2005 May;47(5):439-46. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000161744.21780.c1. PubMed 15891521 ↗
  • Dmochowski RR, Newman DK. Impact of overactive bladder on women in the United States: results of a national survey. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jan;23(1):65-76. doi: 10.1185/030079907X159533. PubMed 17257467 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Participant data will be collected and analyzed as an aggregate for any results.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 20 months after the start.

Of 133 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Urinary Bladder, Overactive, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 40. This study's planned 20 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 174 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 40.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 27, 2026: primary completion Jul 2026 → Nov 2026 and completion Jul 2028 → Oct 2028.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 22, 2025
First posted
Jan 28, 2025
StartActual
Mar 17, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2026was Jul 2026
CompletionEst.
Oct 2028was Jul 2028
Last update
Oct 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Recruiting→Active, not recruiting
changed Oct 27, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 2026→Nov 2026
Oct 27, 2026
Study completion
Jul 2028→Oct 2028
Oct 27, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    Recruiting→Active, not recruiting
    Primary completion Jul 2026→Nov 2026
    Study completion Jul 2028→Oct 2028
    + 3 other changes: verification date, contact details and site details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06797245
Collaborators
Foundation for Female Health Awareness
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 28, 2025
Start date
Mar 17, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion