CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06784414Updated Jan 20, 2025

Analysis of Risk Factors for Recurrence of Periprosthetic Infection in Megaprostheses Implanted for Sarcoma of Bone

An observational study in PJI, sponsored by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna. Completed at 2 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-20.

Sponsored by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
22
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to collect a large and homogeneous case report of periprosthetic infections in megaprostheses in patients with a history of bone sarcoma.

Read the detailed description

The incidence of periprosthetic infections (PJI) is high in megaprostheses (MP), 3-30% after primary surgery, up to 60% after prosthetic revision. Patients with megaprosthesis implanted in a primary sarcoma of bone have an increased risk of infection, compared with joint prostheses implanted on arthrosis, due to several factors, including treatment with chemotherapy, extensive periarticular soft tissue sacrifice, and duration of surgery. PJI of an MP can result in important consequences: prolonged hospitalizations, expensive treatments, multiple surgeries, risk of amputation and reduced quality of life.

Diagnosis and treatment of MP infections are challenging. Surgery is the focus of treatment, and identification of the microorganism responsible for infection is necessary for diagnostic confirmation and to set up targeted antibiotic treatment.

Treatment, similar to standard joint replacement, includes surgical cleaning without implant replacement and complete revision of the prosthesis in one or two stages. Data currently available in the Literature about patients with infection of a megaprosthesis implanted after excision of a bone sarcoma is scarce; in particular, most case series are small and heterogeneous.

The aim of this study is to obtain more information about this condition by collecting a large and homogeneous data of PJI in MP, in order to identify predictive factors in the treatment of PJI.

The treatments to which the patients underwent and thus analyzed for the study are those expected by normal clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • PJI

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • megaprosthesis
03

In context

Recurrence

4,279 studies on the registry are indexed under Recurrence; 988 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 22 is below the median of 200 across 702 observational studies indexed under Recurrence.

Browse Recurrence studies →

Lead sponsor

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna is the lead sponsor of 493 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All participants meeting the inclusion criteria, processed from 2010 to 2020, were included.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with PJI caused by a megaprosthesis, implanted for a primary sarcoma of bone;
  • Age >= 18 years at the time of diagnosis;
  • Megaprosthesis site: proximal humerus, proximal femur, total femur, distal femur, tibia proximal;
  • Prosthetic revision in two stages;
  • Obtaining informed consent for the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Early infection (within 6 weeks after implantation of the prosthesis);
  • Recurrence of infection;
  • Follow-up \< 12 months after prosthetic re-implantation;
  • Reconstruction other than a megaprosthesis (e.g., bone graft, composite prosthesis)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
22 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Identification of predictive factors for infection recurrence in patients with PJI: analysis of demographic, prognostic and treatment data.

    Demographic information on disease definition, prognosis, treatments provided and outcomes will be summarised using descriptive methods. treatments provided and outcomes, will be summarised using descriptive methods. In in particular, categorical variables will be summarised by means of relative frequency estimation and 95% confidence intervals; continuous variables will be summarised by means of mean and standard deviation, median and range. standard deviation, median and interquartile range. Correlations between variables will be investigated: by means of contingency tables and calculation of the chi-square calculation (applying correction for continuity and/or exact test when necessary) for categorical categorical variables; comparison of means (t-test for paired and unpaired data or non-parametric analogues non-parametric when indicated) for variables distributed on an interval scale.

    Time frame: Data covering the period 2010-2020.

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
    Bologna, 40138, Italy
  • A.O.U Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
    Torino, 10126, Italy
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06784414
Lead sponsor
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 20, 2025
Start date
Feb 1, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2023
Completion
Dec 31, 2023
Last update
Jan 20, 2025

Study contacts

Andrea Sambri, MD
principal investigator · IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion