CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06782386Updated Oct 1, 2026

Remote Temperature and Visual Monitoring To Help Manage Diabetic Foot Ulcers

An interventional study of OneStep Foot Scanner in Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), sponsored by Bluedrop Medical Limited. Active, not recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-01.

Sponsored by Bluedrop Medical Limited · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Updated Oct 1, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a prospective, observational investigation evaluating the effectiveness of Remote ThermoVisual Monitoring (RTVM) in the early detection of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in high-risk populations. The primary objective is to compare the incidence of Wagner stage 2 or higher DFUs at the time of presentation between patients using RTVM and a matched control group from a retrospective patient database.

Participants will include adults aged 18 years or older with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus and a history of a plantar DFU that healed within the past five years. The study will enroll approximately 100 participants across up to 30 centers affiliated with SerenaGroup®. The intervention involves daily use of the OneStep Foot Scanner™, which measures temperature and captures visual images of the soles of the feet to detect signs of inflammation or anomalies.

Secondary objectives include evaluating ulcer-free survival, amputation-free survival, time to first evaluation for new DFUs, and healthcare utilization rates. Exploratory endpoints will assess neuropathy-specific quality of life and the costs associated with ulcer and amputation care. Participants will be monitored over a period of 12 months.

Results from this study aim to provide insights into the efficacy of RTVM as a preventative tool for managing diabetic foot health and reducing the burden of DFUs in high-risk populations.

Read the detailed description

This study is a prospective, multicenter, observational investigation designed to assess the utility of Remote ThermoVisual Monitoring (RTVM) using the OneStep Foot Scanner™ in detecting diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) at an earlier stage in high-risk populations. DFUs represent a significant clinical and economic burden, often leading to severe complications, including infections and amputations. Early detection and intervention are critical to reducing morbidity and improving patient outcomes.

The primary objective is to compare the incidence of Wagner stage 2 or higher DFUs at the time of presentation in participants using RTVM to a matched historical control group. The secondary objectives include ulcer-free survival, amputation-free survival, time to first evaluation for new DFUs, and healthcare utilization rates. Exploratory endpoints include assessing neuropathy-specific quality of life and evaluating the economic impact of RTVM on DFU and amputation care costs.

The study will enroll approximately 100 participants aged 18 years or older with a confirmed diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus and a history of plantar DFUs that have healed within the past five years. Eligible participants will be recruited across up to 30 SerenaGroup® clinical sites. Participants will use the OneStep Foot Scanner™ daily to capture thermographic and visual data of the soles of their feet, which will be analyzed to identify signs of inflammation, potential ulceration, or other abnormalities. The data collected will be reviewed periodically by healthcare professionals for signs requiring intervention.

Participants will be followed for a period of 12 months, during which they will undergo regular clinical evaluations and remote monitoring assessments. The study will not only evaluate the effectiveness of RTVM in reducing the severity of DFUs but also explore its impact on healthcare costs, quality of life, and overall disease management strategies.

This study aims to provide critical insights into the feasibility of implementing RTVM as a preventive tool in routine diabetic foot care and its potential role in mitigating the global burden of DFUs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • DFU
  • Remote monitoring
  • Thermovisual monitoring
03

In context

Diabetic Foot

1,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Foot; 222 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 60 across 826 interventional studies indexed under Diabetic Foot.

Browse Diabetic Foot studies →

Lead sponsor

Bluedrop Medical Limited is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female patients 18 years or older
  • Diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • History of a plantar DFU within 5 years of enrollment.
  • Access to a phone on which they can receive study communications.
  • SUBGROUP: a patient with an active Wagner grade 1 DFU may be enrolled if in the opinion of the investigator the wound is sufficiently epithelialized and can withstand the pressure applied during scanning.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Weight, when fully clothed, of greater than 300 kg (\~330 lbs) NOTE: for participants over 150kg the device will need to be used from a seated position
  • Active Charcot arthropathy defined as the phase where the foot is undergoing collapse
  • Active foot infection or gangrene
  • Critical limb threatening ischemia as evidenced by rest pain, or the presence of gangrene on any part of the foot.
  • Any mental health disorder, psychiatric disorder, or alcohol or drug abuse history such that, in the opinion of the investigator, rule the patient is unreliable as a study participant
  • Any travel plans expected to result in an interruption of device use for greater than 30 consecutive days.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Use of device

    This cohort will be recruited to use the OneStep Foot Scanner in their homes everyday for 12 months

    Device: OneStep Foot Scanner

  • No intervention
    Control Group from Retrospective Patient Database

    Patients with a history of previous DFU(s) will be matched with participants in the active arm and analyzed

Interventions

  • DeviceOneStep Foot Scanner

    Daily scans with the OneStep Foot scanner will provide thermal and visual data of the soles of the feet to assist in early identification of risk factors associated with Diabetic Foot Ulcers

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of more severe DFUs presenting

    Incidence of Wagner grade 2 or higher ulcer at the time of first presentation for patients with a history of DFUs that healed in the previous 5 years.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of time to DFU development

    Time to first evaluation in patients with new DFUs in a high-risk population of patients with healed (within 5 years) DFUs

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Number of Patients who Experience Ulcer Free Survival

    Ulcer free survival (of Wagner Grade 2 or higher ulcers), in a high-risk population of patients with recently healed DFUs.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Number of Patients who Experience Amputation Free Survival

    Amputation free survival in a high-risk population of patients with recently healed DFUs

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Resource utilization

    Incidence of inpatient admissions, emergency room visits and outpatient provider encounters in patients with new DFUs in a high-risk population of patients with recently healed DFUs

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Compliance with Recommended Device Use as Measured by Scan Data Collected from the Bluedrop OneStep Foot Scanner

    Adherence with RTVM in participants assigned to use RTVM

    Time frame: 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. PROM

    Survey-ascertained participant reported quality of life measures using the NEUROPATHY-SPECIFIC QUALITY OF LIFE Questionnaire using a Likert scale of 1 to 5 for frequency of symptoms where 1 represents "never" and 5 represents "all the time" - with higher scores signifying a poorer quality of life.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Resource utilization costs

    Costs associated with ulcer and amputation care in a high-risk population of patients with recently healed DFUs

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Three Rivers Wound and Hyperbaric Center
    North Port, Florida 34289, United States
  • SerenaGroup Monroeville
    Monroeville, Pennsylvania 15146, United States
08

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 2026→Jul 2027
Oct 1, 2026
Study completion
Aug 2026→Jul 2027
Oct 1, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 1, 2026
    Primary completion Aug 2026→Jul 2027
    Study completion Aug 2026→Jul 2027
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06782386
Lead sponsor
Bluedrop Medical Limited
Collaborators
Serena Group
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 17, 2025
Start date
Feb 5, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 1, 2026

Study contacts

Thomas Serena
principal investigator · Serena Group

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion