ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06781398Updated Jan 17, 2025

Robotic Surgery in the Treatment of Deep Endometriosis: Da Vinci Vs HUGO RAS Comparison

An observational study in Deep Endometriosis, sponsored by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in Italy. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-17.

Sponsored by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
86
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The aim is to clarify whether both surgical approaches represent, equivalently, a good treatment for the management of patients with deep endometriosis who are candidates for surgery, or whether there are any differences between the two methods, and, if so, how they differ

Read the detailed description

Numerous studies have shown how surgical excision of deep endometriosis nodules improves pain and quality of life. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery has been employed for the treatment of deep endometriosis. While the Da Vinci System is widely used for the surgical treatment of endometriosis, with good results, the available data regarding the benefits of the HUGO RAS System, however, are limited, given the recent introduction of this method in gynecology, and particularly in the treatment of endometriosis. The aim of the study is to investigate whether the robotic surgical approach using HUGO RAS is noninferior to that performed using Da Vinci in terms of operative time (docking + surgical time) in the surgical treatment of patients with endometriosis

02

Conditions studied

  • Deep Endometriosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • endometriosis
  • gynaecology
  • surgery
  • Da Vinci
  • HUGO RAS
03

In context

Endometriosis

925 studies on the registry are indexed under Endometriosis; 264 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 86 is below the median of 125 across 354 observational studies indexed under Endometriosis.

Browse Endometriosis studies →

Lead sponsor

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna is the lead sponsor of 509 studies on the registry; 285 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who are candidates for surgery with minimally invasive approach for endometriosis

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 55 years;
  • Pelvic ultrasound and/or radiologic (MRI/CT scan with rectal insufflation) diagnosis of endometriosis
  • Indication for surgery (symptomatic despite or refractory to medical therapy, and/or with critical bowel stenosis or urinary stenosis, and/or infertile awaiting medically assisted procreation (PMA) treatment or with previous failed assisted fertilization attempts);
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification) class between 1 and 3;
  • Acquisition of consent to undergo surgical treatment;
  • Acquisition of consent for study participation and data processing

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- Past or current diagnosis of gynecologic oncologic pathology.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
86 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The robotic surgical approach using HUGO RAS is noninferior to that performed using Da Vinci in terms of operative time (docking + surgical time) in the surgical treatment of patients with endometriosis

    Compare the two surgical techniques by evaluating the operative time (expressed in minutes), which includes docking and surgical time. Docking is defined as the time required to move the robotic arms into the operative field, place them in their respective port sites, and insert the robotic instruments into the abdomen. Surgical time is from the end of docking to suturing the laparoscopic/laparotomy breaches.

    Time frame: During surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Conversion rate to laparoscopy or laparotomy

    Conversion to laparoscopy or laparotomy, based on intraoperative assessment of the clinical picture

    Time frame: During surgery

  2. Intra-operative and post-operative complication rates; need for complication treatment

    Intraoperative complications (incidental injury to organs and structures, incoercible bleeding) classified by ClassIntra System (iAE); postoperative complications (anemia, postoperative fever, hemoperitoneum, bowel perforation), according to Clavien-Dindo classification; treatment of complications (GRC transfusion, reintervention, interventional procedures)

    Time frame: Perioperative and at 3 months

  3. Ergonomics for the surgeon

    Ergonomics of the two robotic approaches established through the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) system that allows through the compilation of a score, rapid assessment of the load on the neck and upper limb. The risk of work-related disorders is calculated in a score from 1 (low) to 7 (high)

    Time frame: During surgery

  4. Entity of postoperative pain

    Postoperative pain assessed as maximum value recorded by numeric rating scale (NRS), from 0 to 10, corresponding to 'no pain' and 'worst pain imaginable' respectively

    Time frame: Perioperative and at 3 and 12 months

  5. Hospitalization time

    Hospitalization time

    Time frame: From the day of admission to the day of discharge, an average of 1 year

  6. Assessment of pain and quality of life

    Pain assessment and change in quality of life, assessed by administration of NRS scale, from 0 to 10, corresponding to 'no pain' and 'worst pain imaginable' respectively

    Time frame: At 3 and 12 months after surgery

  7. Assessment of pain and quality of life

    Pain assessment and change in quality of life, assessed by administration of quality of life questionnaire (EHP-30, Endometriosis-related health profile), scored from 0 to 100, with 0 being the best outcome and 100 the worst outcome

    Time frame: At 3 and 12 months after surgery

  8. Symptomatological and/or anatomical recurrence

    Clinical or anatomical resumption of disease by gynecological examination, recent pathological history, pelvic ultrasound, and possible radiological methods such as nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (NMR)

    Time frame: At 12 months after surgery

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
    Bologna, Bologna 40138, Italy
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
    Roma, Roma 00168, Italy
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jan 2025; primary completion for Jul 2027, 30 months later.

Of 153 non-industry observational studies under Endometriosis, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 30 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 182 studies reached it within 30 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 3, 2024
First posted
Jan 17, 2025
StartEst.
Jan 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 2027
Last update
Jan 17, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 17, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06781398
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 17, 2025
Start date
Jan 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 17, 2025

Study contacts

Diego Raimondo, MD
Contact
die.raimondo@gmail.com
+393290636618
Pierluigi Celerino, MD
Contact
celerinopierluigi@gmail.com
Diego Raimondo, MD
principal investigator · IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion