CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06779409Updated Jul 4, 2025

Impact of the Wingate Test on Post-activation Potentiation

An interventional study of Back squat and Wingate test in Performance Enhancement and Muscle Activation, sponsored by Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-04.

Sponsored by Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
35
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this trial is to see if using a maximal effort, short cycling test is better at activating muscles to improve vertical jump height compared to a maximal effort back squat. The study looks to answer three questions:

  1. will the Wingate bike test create a different change in counter movement jump height compared to a back squat?
  2. What is the best recovery period after each test where the counter movement jump is the highest?
  3. What person-specific factors predict success of the Wingate bike test as a activation activity for the counter movement jump? Participants will visit the lab 3 times, once to give informed consent and measure their 1 repetition max (RM) back squat, and twice to perform each intervention and measure vertical jump height.
Read the detailed description

Participants will be asked to come to the lab for three visits. On the first visit, they will perform informed consent, have anthropometrics taken, and will provide data to assess weightlifting history and factors that may influence the impact of each intervention. They will perform a 1 repetition max (RM) test for the back squat in order to properly dose the back squat potentiation activity. Visits 2 and 3 will be randomized; one will use the back squat (control) and the other will use the Wingate bike test (experimental) to potentiate vertical jump height as measured by the counter movement jump (CMJ). In each session, a warm up will be performed and the baseline CMJ will be performed. The intervention will be performed, either the 30 second Wingate protocol which is a maximal effort cycling test, or the back squat at a high percent of the 1 RM. The CMJ will be reassessed at 3, 6, and 9 minutes after completed each intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Performance Enhancement
  • Muscle Activation

Keywords

  • post-activation potentiation
  • back squat
  • Wingate test
  • vertical jump
  • power
  • sport performance
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • healthy adult
  • successful completion of the physical activity readiness questionnaire plus
  • at least 1 year of back squat weight training experience

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to back squat at least 1.4 times body weight
  • females with known pregnancy
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
35 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Back squat

    Participants will perform 2 sets of 3 repetitions at 85% of their 1 repetition maximum weight for the back squat

    Other: Back squat

  • Experimental
    Wingate test

    Participants will perform the Wingate bike test, with resistance at 7.5% of body weight, with a maximal effort for 30 seconds.

    Other: Wingate test

Interventions

  • OtherBack squat

    2 sets of 3 repetitions of a back squat, set to 85% of the 1 repetition maximum weight

  • OtherWingate test

    30 second maximal effort cycling test, with resistance at 7.5% bodyweight

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Vertical Jump Height

    Measured with the Counter Movement Jump (CMJ). This measures the vertical distance a participant is able to jump from a standing, stationary position. Video capture and motion analysis software will be used to analyze the jump and determine vertical displacement of a marker placed at the participants sacrum. Vertical jump height will be measured in meters.

    Time frame: Visit 2 (1 week post- enrollment); visit 3 (2 weeks post-enrollment)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Years of resistance training experience

    This factor will be collected to examine its predictive impact on the Wingate test's potentiation effect. The number of years of resistance training each participants has participated in will be collected.

    Time frame: Collected at visit 1, upon enrollment into the study

  2. One-Repetition Maximum Back Squat Strength

    This factor will be collected to examine its predictive impact on the Wingate test's potentiation effect. The 1 repetition maximum weight in kilograms for the back squat exercise will be collected.

    Time frame: Collected at visit 1, upon enrollment into the study

06

Study locations

1 site
  • LSU Health Shreveport School of Allied Health Professions
    Shreveport, Louisiana 71103, United States
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Sirieiro P, Nasser I, Dobbs WC, Willardson JM, Miranda H. The Effect of Set Configuration and Load on Post-Activation Potentiation on Vertical Jump in Athletes. Int J Exerc Sci. 2021 Aug 1;14(4):902-911. doi: 10.70252/CCLW6758. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34567370 ↗
  • Jo E, Judelson DA, Brown LE, Coburn JW, Dabbs NC. Influence of recovery duration after a potentiating stimulus on muscular power in recreationally trained individuals. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Feb;24(2):343-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc22a4. PubMed 20072066 ↗
  • Esformes JI, Bampouras TM. Effect of back squat depth on lower-body postactivation potentiation. J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Nov;27(11):2997-3000. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31828d4465. PubMed 23442291 ↗
  • Lowery RP, Duncan NM, Loenneke JP, Sikorski EM, Naimo MA, Brown LE, Wilson FG, Wilson JM. The effects of potentiating stimuli intensity under varying rest periods on vertical jump performance and power. J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Dec;26(12):3320-5. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318270fc56. PubMed 23007485 ↗
  • McCann MR, Flanagan SP. The effects of exercise selection and rest interval on postactivation potentiation of vertical jump performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 May;24(5):1285-91. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d6867c. PubMed 20393352 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification.

Supporting information: Study protocol

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06779409
Lead sponsor
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 16, 2025
Start date
Jan 14, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 25, 2025
Completion
Apr 25, 2025
Last update
Jul 4, 2025

Study contacts

Erin McCallister, DPT
principal investigator · Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion