CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06777771Updated Jan 16, 2025

Effects of Reformer Pilates in Pregnant Women

An interventional study of Reformer pilates exercises in Pregnancy Related, Pelvic Floor Disorders and Pain, Back, sponsored by Izmir Democracy University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-16.

Sponsored by Izmir Democracy University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2024, registered Dec 2024).
  • Started Feb 2024; still recruiting 2 years 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Pregnancy is known as a period associated with important physiological and psychological changes in women's lives. There is moderately sufficient evidence in the literature to recommend supplementing prenatal physical activity for maternal health benefits. It has been reported that physical exercise by pregnant women in the absence of obstetric contraindications will not pose a risk to the health of the mother and fetus. In the literature, there are no studies examining the effects of reformer pilates on pain, functional capacity, lumbopelvic stabilization, diastasis recti abdominis, abdominal muscle thickness, respiratory functions, pelvic floor dysfunction, urinary incontinence, sexual function, and venous insufficiency in pregnant women. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of reformer pilates on pain, functional capacity, lumbopelvic stabilization, diastasis recti abdominis, abdominal muscle thickness, respiratory functions, pelvic floor dysfunction, urinary incontinence, sexual function, and venous insufficiency in pregnant women.

Read the detailed description

Pregnancy is one of the most serious periods in a woman's life and lasts approximately forty weeks. Many anatomical, physiological, and psychological changes occur in pregnant women. The main reasons for these are hormonal changes, increase in total blood volume, growth of the uterus, and postural changes due to the shift of the body's center of gravity.

Even though the etiology and pathogenesis of low back pain occurring during pregnancy have not been clearly explained, it is assumed to be multifactorial. Low back pain during pregnancy is common and affects approximately half of pregnant women. Additionally, pain may occur in the low back and sacroiliac joints due to postural changes that occur with the growth of the fetus. Low back pain and pelvic girdle pain are among the most common musculoskeletal complaints in pregnant women.

Studies conducted on pregnant women and women in the postpartum period have reported changes in the length, thickness, and separation amount of the abdominal muscles and the morphological features of the rectus abdominis muscle.

The strength and thickness of the pelvic floor muscles may decrease in pregnant women. Pregnancy and birth are major risk factors for urinary incontinence. Additionally, a relationship between pregnancy and sexual dysfunction has been reported in the literature.

To meet the needs of the fetus during pregnancy, changes occur in many organs and systems, as well as changes in the uterus. One of these is the adaptation seen in the respiratory system. Another change is the adaptation in the venous system. Pregnancy is one of the factors that increase the risk of developing venous insufficiency.

Pregnancy is known as a period associated with important physiological and psychological changes in women's lives. Pregnancy and exercise are biological processes. These cause many adaptations in the body, which may be in the same or the opposite direction. There is moderately sufficient evidence in the literature to recommend promoting prenatal physical activity for maternal health benefits.

In the literature, no study has been found investigating the effects of reformer pilates on pain, functional capacity, lumbopelvic stabilization, diastasis recti abdominis, abdominal muscle thickness, respiratory functions, pelvic floor dysfunction, urinary incontinence, sexual function, and venous insufficiency in pregnant women. For this reason, this study aimed to investigate the effects of reformer pilates on pain, functional capacity, lumbopelvic stabilization, diastasis recti abdominis, abdominal muscle thickness, respiratory functions, pelvic floor dysfunction, urinary incontinence, sexual function, and venous insufficiency in pregnant women.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pregnancy Related
  • Pelvic Floor Disorders
  • Pain, Back
  • Pain, Neck
  • Pregnancy, Abdominal

Keywords

  • Pregnancy
  • Exercise
  • Reformer Pilates
  • Pilates
  • Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
  • Lumbopelvic Stabilization
  • Functional Capacity
  • Respiratory Function
  • Abdominal Muscle Thickness
  • Venous Insufficiency
  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Sexual Function
  • Pain
03

In context

Pelvic Floor Disorders

197 studies on the registry are indexed under Pelvic Floor Disorders; 45 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 64 across 136 interventional studies indexed under Pelvic Floor Disorders.

Browse Pelvic Floor Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Izmir Democracy University is the lead sponsor of 73 studies on the registry; 32 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Single pregnancy
  • Primiparous pregnancy
  • Adult pregnant women (between 18-35 years old)
  • Pregnant women whose gestational week is 11-22 weeks
  • Pregnant women with a body mass index \<30
  • Ability to read and write

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multiple pregnancies
  • Having a history of abdominal surgery
  • Having one of the conditions in which exercise is contraindicated, such as heart disease, severe lung disease, continuous bleeding in the second and third trimesters, placenta previa, risk of premature birth, rupture of membranes, preeclampsia, severe anemia
  • Not volunteering to participate in the study
  • Not participating in more than 90% of the training sessions
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Exercise group

    Reformer pilates sessions will be applied to the participants in the exercise group.

    Other: Reformer pilates exercises

  • No intervention
    Control group

    Participants in the control group will be recommended to walk.

Interventions

  • OtherReformer pilates exercises

    The reformer pilates exercises session will start with 5 minutes of warm-up exercises, continue with resistance exercises for 20 minutes, and end with 5 minutes of cool-down exercises. The springs of the reformer pilates device will be adjusted to create mild fatigue in the first week and will be gradually increased to create moderate fatigue in the following weeks. Reformer pilates sessions will consist of 15-20 different exercises with 12-15 repetitions, including all major muscle groups. These sessions will also include exercises that strengthen the pelvic floor muscles. Reformer pilates sessions will be applied twice a week for 6 weeks, a total of 12 sessions. Apart from this, they will be asked to walk for at least 30 minutes a day, at least 3 days a week.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Thickness measurement of the rectus abdominis muscle

    The thickness of the rectus abdominis muscle will be measured approximately 4 cm lateral to the umbilicus using a 2-7 MHz linear probe (Voluson E8, General Electrics, USA) while participants are lying in a supine position. The measurement will be repeated 3 times, and the average will be recorded in millimeters. The measurements to be made with USG will be made unilaterally by a specialist physician during axial imaging.

    Time frame: First evaluation (baseline) and final evaluation (6 weeks after first evaluation)

  2. Thickness measurement of the transversus abdominis muscle

    The thickness of the transversus abdominis muscle will be measured at the intersection point of the umbilicus and axillary line using a 2-7 MHz linear probe (Voluson E8, General Electrics, USA) while participants are lying in a supine position. The measurement will be repeated 3 times, and the average will be recorded in millimeters. The measurement to be made with USG will be made unilaterally by a specialist physician during axial imaging.

    Time frame: First evaluation (baseline) and final evaluation (6 weeks after first evaluation)

  3. Thickness measurement of the external oblique abdominal muscle

    The thickness of the external oblique abdominal muscle will be measured at the intersection point of the umbilicus and axillary line using a 2-7 MHz linear probe (Voluson E8, General Electrics, USA) while participants are lying in a supine position. The measurement will be repeated 3 times, and the average will be recorded in millimeters. The measurement to be made with USG will be made unilaterally by a specialist physician during axial imaging.

    Time frame: First evaluation (baseline) and final evaluation (6 weeks after first evaluation)

  4. Thickness measurement of the internal oblique abdominal muscle

    The thickness of the internal oblique abdominal muscle will be measured at the intersection point of the umbilicus and axillary line using a 2-7 MHz linear probe (Voluson E8, General Electrics, USA) while participants are lying in a supine position. The measurement will be repeated 3 times, and the average will be recorded in millimeters. The measurement to be made with USG will be made unilaterally by a specialist physician during axial imaging.

    Time frame: First evaluation (baseline) and final evaluation (6 weeks after first evaluation)

  5. The forced vital capacity (FVC) value

    The forced vital capacity (FVC) value will be measured with a spirometric test using the Cosmed Omnia microQuark 1.5 (Cosmed, Rome, Italy) device. During the test, participants will be asked to take a deep breath and then release it as much as possible until there is no air left in their lungs. The test will be repeated 3 times. The average of the two best test results will be recorded.

    Time frame: First evaluation (baseline) and final evaluation (6 weeks after first evaluation)

  6. The forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) value

    The forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) value will be measured with a spirometric test using the Cosmed Omnia microQuark 1.5 (Cosmed, Rome, Italy) device. During the test, participants will be asked to take a deep breath and then release it as much as possible until there is no air left in their lungs. The test will be repeated 3 times. The average of the two best test results will be recorded.

    Time frame: First evaluation (baseline) and final evaluation (6 weeks after first evaluation)

  7. The forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1)/the forced vital capacity (FVC) (FEV1/FVC) value

    The forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1)/the forced vital capacity (FVC) (FEV1/FVC) value will be measured with a spirometric test using the Cosmed Omnia microQuark 1.5 (Cosmed, Rome, Italy) device. During the test, participants will be asked to take a deep breath and then release it as much as possible until there is no air left in their lungs. The test will be repeated 3 times. The average of the two best test results will be recorded.

    Time frame: First evaluation (baseline) and final evaluation (6 weeks after first evaluation)

  8. The peak expiratory flow (PEF) value

    The peak expiratory flow (PEF) value will be measured with a spirometric test using the Cosmed Omnia microQuark 1.5 (Cosmed, Rome, Italy) device. During the test, participants will be asked to take a deep breath and then release it as much as possible until there is no air left in their lungs. The test will be repeated 3 times. The average of the two best test results will be recorded.

    Time frame: First evaluation (baseline) and final evaluation (6 weeks after first evaluation)

  9. Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Assessment

    Participants' pelvic floor dysfunction value will be assessed using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PTDE-20). The total score that may be obtained from the PTDE-20 ranges from "0" (best score) to "300" (worst score). High scores indicate higher levels of pelvic floor dysfunction.

    Time frame: First evaluation (baseline) and final evaluation (6 weeks after first evaluation)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neck Pain Assessment

    The presence of neck pain will be recorded as "present" or "absent". In the case of pain, the pain intensity will be measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). In addition, the duration and frequency of pain and activities that reduce or increase pain will be questioned.

    Time frame: First evaluation (baseline) and final evaluation (6 weeks after first evaluation)

  2. Back Pain Assessment

    The presence of back pain will be recorded as "present" or "absent". In the case of pain, the pain intensity will be measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). In addition, the duration and frequency of pain and activities that reduce or increase pain will be questioned.

    Time frame: First evaluation (baseline) and final evaluation (6 weeks after first evaluation)

  3. Low Back Pain Assessment

    The presence of low back pain will be recorded as "present" or "absent". In the case of pain, the pain intensity will be measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). In addition, the duration and frequency of pain and activities that reduce or increase pain will be questioned.

    Time frame: First evaluation (baseline) and final evaluation (6 weeks after first evaluation)

  4. Pelvic Girdle Pain Assessment

    The presence of pelvic girdle pain will be recorded as "present" or "absent". In the case of pain, the intensity of pain in that area will be measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). In addition, the duration and frequency of pain and activities that reduce or increase pain will be questioned.

    Time frame: First evaluation (baseline) and final evaluation (6 weeks after first evaluation)

  5. Functional Capacity Assessment

    The functional capacity level of the participants will be evaluated with the five-repetition sit-to-stand test. Participants will be asked to get up and sit down 5 times as quickly as possible. This test will be applied 2 times and the average value will be taken.

    Time frame: First evaluation (baseline) and final evaluation (6 weeks after first evaluation)

  6. Lumbopelvic Stabilization Assessment

    Participants' lumbopelvic stabilization level will be evaluated in the supine position using a pressure-stabilizing feedback device (Pressure Biofeedback Unit, Chattanooga Group, Hixon, TN, USA). The pressure will be adjusted to 40 mmHg. During the test, the abdominal muscles will contract isometrically to keep the lumbar region and pelvis stable, while the load is gradually added with lower extremity movements so that the pressure remains constant. In this test, which consists of five levels, the load acting on the lumbopelvic region is increased with lower extremity movements while progressing from the first level to the fifth level.

    Time frame: First evaluation (baseline) and final evaluation (6 weeks after first evaluation)

  7. Urinary Incontinence Severity Assessment

    Participants' urinary incontinence severity level will be assessed using the Incontinence Severity Index (ISI). A score between 1 and 12 is taken from the ISI. High scores indicate higher urinary incontinence severity.

    Time frame: First evaluation (baseline) and final evaluation (6 weeks after first evaluation)

  8. Sexual Function Assessment

    Participants' sexual function level will be assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). The highest score that may be obtained from the FSFI is 36 and the lowest score is 2. If the score is above 26.5, it means that the sexual function is normal. Values below 26.5 indicate sexual dysfunction.

    Time frame: First evaluation (baseline) and final evaluation (6 weeks after first evaluation)

  9. Diastasis Recti Abdominis Assessment

    Participants will be placed in the supine position. The practitioner's fingers will be vertically on the linea alba. The participant will be asked to raise their head and shoulders off the ground while extending their arms forward. During the measurement, the amount of separation of the two parts of the rectus abdominis muscle will be recorded as the centimeter value of the fingers between the two parts of this muscle. This measurement will be made from the umbilicus, 8-10 cm below and above the umbilicus along the linea alba.

    Time frame: First evaluation (baseline) and final evaluation (6 weeks after first evaluation)

  10. Venous Insufficiency Assessment

    Participants' venous insufficiency status will be evaluated with the clinical classification subheading of the CEAP classification.

    Time frame: First evaluation (baseline) and final evaluation (6 weeks after first evaluation)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bilchinsky T, Tene L, Kalichman L. Pilates exercises during pregnancy: A narrative review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024 Oct;40:1146-1152. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.07.038. Epub 2024 Jul 18. PubMed 39593426 ↗
  • Ferraz VS, Peixoto C, Ferreira Resstel AP, Cerqueira de Paula YT, Gomes de Souza Pegorare AB. Effect of the pilates method on pain and quality of life in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2023 Jul;35:220-227. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.04.076. Epub 2023 May 3. PubMed 37330773 ↗
  • Mazzarino M, Kerr D, Morris ME. Feasibility of pilates for pregnant women: A randomised trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2022 Oct;32:207-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.05.001. Epub 2022 May 8. PubMed 36180151 ↗
  • Von Aarburg N, Veit-Rubin N, Boulvain M, Bertuit J, Simonson C, Desseauve D. Physical activity and urinary incontinence during pregnancy and postpartum: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Dec;267:262-268. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Nov 16. PubMed 34839247 ↗
  • Chan CWH, Au Yeung E, Law BMH. Effectiveness of Physical Activity Interventions on Pregnancy-Related Outcomes among Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 23;16(10):1840. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101840. PubMed 31126153 ↗
  • Rodriguez-Diaz L, Ruiz-Frutos C, Vazquez-Lara JM, Ramirez-Rodrigo J, Villaverde-Gutierrez C, Torres-Luque G. Effectiveness of a physical activity programme based on the Pilates method in pregnancy and labour. Enferm Clin. 2017 Sep-Oct;27(5):271-277. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jul 6. English, Spanish. PubMed 28689647 ↗
  • Benjamin DR, van de Water AT, Peiris CL. Effects of exercise on diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle in the antenatal and postnatal periods: a systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2014 Mar;100(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Oct 5. PubMed 24268942 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06777771
Lead sponsor
Izmir Democracy University
Responsible party
Özlem Çınar Özdemir (Assoc. Prof., Izmir Democracy University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 16, 2025
Start date
Feb 6, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 16, 2025

Study contacts

Özlem Çinar Özdemir, Prof.Dr.
Contact
ozlemcinarozdemir@gmail.com
+90 232 299 0733
Kübra Özonay, PhD student
Contact
kubrakaradeniz@gmail.com
+90 232 299 0733
Özlem Çinar Özdemir, Prof.Dr.
study director · Izmir Democracy University
Kübra Özonay, PhD student
principal investigator · Izmir Democracy University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion