CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06774755PLAST-CHESTUpdated Jan 14, 2025

Reconstructions of Chest Wall Defects: a Retrospective Study

An observational study in Chest Wall Deformity, sponsored by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-14.

Sponsored by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2023; still recruiting 3 years 2 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients requiring thoracic reconstruction often suffer from numerous comorbidities, such as obesity, diabetes, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases. The clinical picture of these patients must be carefully stabilized in the preoperative period since the listed diseases are associated with a poor reconstructive outcome. Furthermore, it is necessary to preoperatively determine the spirometric characteristics in cases where the intervention may alter the respiratory dynamics to evaluate the patient's ability to tolerate the procedure. The primary objective of the study is to identify the best diagnostic-therapeutic approach in cases of complex chest wall defects, retrospectively evaluating the outcomes and therapeutic choices implemented, through a reassessment of the interventions performed and the clinical progress of patients undergoing complex thoracic and sternal reconstruction interventions managed in a multidisciplinary and non-multidisciplinary manner

Read the detailed description

Currently there are no univocal universally accepted guidelines regarding the intervention to be performed in case of complex chest wall reconstructions or for the treatment of sternal wound dehiscences. Different options are described, both for the demolition phase and for the reconstructive phase in the thoracic and sternal area. The choice of one method rather than the other is currently largely based on the experience and preference of the specific working group. The importance of the study lies in the attempt to analyze the choices made in the diagnostic and therapeutic phase (demolitive, reconstructive, pharmacological) on patients treated at the AOU Sant'Orsola (now IRCCS) in past years. The secondary objective of the study is to improve the multidisciplinary management of patients who are candidates for complex chest reconstructions.

In particular, the drafting of a multidisciplinary therapeutic protocol that uses algorithms to optimize the choice of surgical procedure and medical therapy in terms of resolution of the problem, hospitalization times, and patient quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chest Wall Deformity
03

In context

Congenital Abnormalities

980 studies on the registry are indexed under Congenital Abnormalities; 177 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 153 across 446 observational studies indexed under Congenital Abnormalities.

Browse Congenital Abnormalities studies →

Lead sponsor

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna is the lead sponsor of 493 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be counted, starting from January 1, 2010 to January 1, 2023.

It is estimated that approximately 100 patients will meet the inclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients undergoing sternal or thoracic reconstruction in collaboration or not with the Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Unit
  • Obtaining informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Technical Success

    Thechnical success is evaluated by duration of surgery, complications and need for reoperation, and hospitalization time

    Time frame: From the first patient enrolled, up to the 100th patient

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • IRCCS AOU di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola
    Bologna, 40138, Italy
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06774755
Lead sponsor
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 14, 2025
Start date
Aug 2, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 14, 2025

Study contacts

Marco Pignatti, MD
Contact
marco.pignatti@unibo.it
+390512143614
Marco Pignatti, MD
principal investigator · IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion