An observational study in Panic Disorder, sponsored by Kangbuk Samsung Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-30.
Sponsored by Kangbuk Samsung Hospital · Observational
The purpose of this study is to build a comprehensive brain and behavioral dataset on anxiety disorders and identify clinical factors related to treatment response and prognosis in patients with anxiety disorders. By conducting an integrated analysis of clinical features (phenotypes), comorbid conditions, virtual reality (VR)-based behavioral data, electroencephalogram (EEG) data, and MRI-based data in patients undergoing treatment for anxiety disorders and healthy controls, this study aims to enhance the understanding of the pathophysiology of anxiety disorders and establish a foundation for precision medicine.
Anxiety disorders significantly impair quality of life by inducing irrational fear and apprehension even in everyday situations. Over the past few years, the prevalence of anxiety disorders and associated medical expenses have surged, escalating the societal and economic burden. However, the current diagnostic system, DSM-5, relies on symptom-based approaches, which often lead to heterogeneity within the same diagnostic category. This limitation hinders the accurate prediction of treatment response and the design of optimal therapeutic strategies. To address these issues, the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) proposed the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). RDoC is a multidimensional framework that integrates behavioral, psychological, and neurological data to facilitate the development of treatment strategies rooted in pathophysiology. Nonetheless, the acquisition of objective and reliable assessment data remains a challenge due to the inherent characteristics of mental disorders.
Virtual reality (VR) technology has emerged as a promising solution to overcome these limitations. VR enables the creation of immersive 3D environments that can elicit anxiety-related behaviors and precisely evaluate them in controlled settings. It also allows data collection in scenarios that closely resemble real-life situations while offering advantages such as repeatability and ease of use. Combining behavioral data collected in VR environments with EEG data can provide a more detailed understanding of the neurophysiological representations underlying anxiety behaviors. EEG, as a biomarker reflecting neural activity in real time, facilitates intuitive and effective analyses. Moreover, MRI-based brain imaging plays a critical role in identifying structural and functional connectivity differences between anxiety disorder patients and healthy controls. It offers crucial insights into the biomarkers that predict treatment outcomes and prognosis.
By integrating these data, this study seeks to uncover the key factors influencing treatment response and prognosis in patients with anxiety disorders.
[ Observational Parameters, Clinical and Laboratory Assessments ]
Participants in the anxiety behavior group will undergo four visits (initial evaluation, 2-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up), while the healthy control group will attend two visits (initial evaluation and 12-month follow-up). As the evaluations at 2 and 12 months consist solely of basic clinical assessments, they may be conducted via remote methods, such as telephone interviews or online surveys (e.g., Google Forms).
Initial Evaluation:
The initial evaluation includes approximately one hour of clinical and psychiatric symptom evaluations, a 30-minute virtual reality-based behavioral assessment, and a 40-minute brain imaging session.
Clinical assessment:
Includes the assessment of sociodemographic factors (e.g., gender, age, education level, marital status, occupation, alcohol and smoking habits, height, and weight) and anxiety disorder-related medical history (e.g., symptom patterns and duration, psychiatric treatment history, and family history).
Evaluation of anxiety symptoms and associated psychiatric conditions:
Utilizes various standardized scales and questionnaires, such as PDSS, LSAS, GAD, DASS, IUS, ASI, BAS, PANAS, neurocognitive tests, SSQ, and STRAIN.
Virtual Reality-Based Behavioral Assessment:
Gathers biometric signals and EEG data in response to stimuli presented in virtual environments.
Conducted using a 3.0T Philips Ingenia CX scanner, acquiring T1-weighted 3D coronal structural images, resting-state functional MRI, and diffusion-weighted images.
Follow-Up Assessments:
Participants in the anxiety behavior group will undergo assessments of four measures - PDSS, LSAS, GAD, and DASS - at 2 and 12 months. At 6 months, they will undergo assessments covering (2) the evaluation of anxiety symptoms and associated psychiatric characteristics, (3) virtual reality-based behavioral assessments, and (4) brain MRI, as conducted at baseline.
Healthy control participants will undergo the same four assessments (PDSS, LSAS, GAD, DASS) evaluating anxiety symptoms and associated psychiatric characteristics at 12 months at the Department of Psychiatry of our institution.
At 12 months, both the anxiety behavior group and the healthy control group will additionally complete the collection of clinical evaluation items (1), excluding sex and age.
[ Data Analysis and Statistical Methods ] The results of the initial evaluation will be used to develop a three-group classification model (healthy controls vs. response vs. no-response) based on clinical evaluation outcomes at 2, 6, and 12 months. Participants will be categorized into remission and no-remission groups based on a ≥40% reduction in the PDSS score at the 2, 6, and 12 months follow-up assessments, allowing for a detailed understanding of the treatment effects over time.
Additionally, a regression model will be constructed to analyze the magnitude of changes in clinical evaluation outcomes.
This study will test various machine learning models, including classification methods like Dummy, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, and Boosting models (eXtreme Gradient Boosting, CatBoost), using k-fold cross-validation to evaluate performance through accuracy, balanced accuracy, and F1 scores. Regression models, including Dummy Regressor, Linear Regression, Support Vector Regression, Multilayer Perceptron, and Bayesian Regression, will be assessed using Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and R² scores.
The pathophysiology of anxiety disorder will be explored using resting-state functional brain MRI data, with cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of anxiety behavior groups and healthy controls. Network analysis will be conducted to identify significant brain connections, with false discovery rate (FDR) correction applied to control for multiple comparisons.
270 studies on the registry are indexed under Panic Disorder; 37 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 185 is close to the median of 200 across 50 observational studies indexed under Panic Disorder.
Browse Panic Disorder studies →Kangbuk Samsung Hospital is the lead sponsor of 63 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
The study population consists of the anxiety behavior group and the healthy control group.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Anxiety Behavior Group
Healthy Control Group
Exclusion Criteria:
Anxiety Behavior Group
Healthy Control Group
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
DSM diagnostic criteria
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Participants diagnosed with an anxiety disorder based on DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, evaluated by a board-certified psychiatrist. The principal investigator, a board-certified psychiatrist, will conduct the following diagnostic assessments and differential diagnoses to screen eligible participants according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Anxiety disorders will be diagnosed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders, Clinical Version (SCID-5-CV; First et al., 2016), and other major psychiatric conditions will be ruled out using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI; Lecrubier et al., 1997). Participants will undergo four visits (initial evaluation, 2-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up).
Diagnostic Test: Psychiatric scale assessments, VR-Based Behavioral Assessment, Brain MRI
Individuals who report no psychiatric symptoms and are not taking any psychotropic medications. Participants will undergo two visits (initial evaluation and 12-month follow-up).
Diagnostic Test: Psychiatric scale assessments, VR-Based Behavioral Assessment, Brain MRI
This study is a minimal-risk study involving non-invasive, non-pharmacological interventions. Participants will continue receiving their usual medication or counseling treatments as part of their routine care during the study. When participants come to the hospital for assessments, they will engage in clinical assessments and complete questionnaires over a period of 1-2 hours, undergo MRI scans, and participate in virtual environment-based behavioral assessments. They will have the option to take breaks during the assessments and can withdraw from the study at any time without providing a reason.
Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS)
The PDSS (Panic Disorder Severity Scale) is a tool used to assess the severity of panic disorder symptoms. It consists of 7 items that measure the frequency, intensity, and impact of panic attacks on daily life. The scale uses a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from "Not at all" (0 points) to "Severely" (4 points). The total score ranges from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating more frequent and intense panic attacks. Participants will be classified into remission and no-remission groups based on a ≥40% reduction in the PDSS score at the 2-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up assessments.
Time frame: At the initial, 2-month, 6-month, and 12-month time points
7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD)
The GAD-7 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) is a tool used to assess the severity of generalized anxiety disorder symptoms. It consists of 7 items that measure the frequency and intensity of anxiety-related symptoms. The scale uses a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from "Not at all" (0 points) to "Nearly every day" (3 points). The total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety symptoms. A higher score suggests a worse outcome, meaning more frequent and intense anxiety.
Time frame: At the initial, 2-month, 6-month, and 12-month time points
Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (DASS)
The DASS-21 (Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21) is a psychological tool developed by Henry and Crawford to assess the severity of depression, anxiety, and stress. It consists of 21 items, with 7 items for each symptom. The scale uses a 4-point Likert scale ranging from "Did not apply at all" (0 points) to "Applied very much or most of the time" (3 points). The depression, anxiety, and stress scores each range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Depression severity is categorized as Normal (0-4), Mild Depression (5-6), Moderate Depression (7-10), Severe Depression (11-13), and Very Severe Depression (≥14). Anxiety and stress are similarly assessed, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Time frame: At the initial, 2-month, 6-month, and 12-month time points
Liebowits Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS)
The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) is a tool used to assess the severity of social anxiety disorder symptoms, consisting of 24 items divided into two sections: 13 items related to fear and 11 items related to avoidance in social situations. Each item is rated using a 4-point Likert scale: for fear, the scale ranges from 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Severely), and for avoidance, it ranges from 0 (Never) to 3 (Often). The total score ranges from 0 to 144, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The score interpretation is as follows: 0-29 indicates no social anxiety, 30-49 represents mild social anxiety, 50-64 is moderate social anxiety, 65-79 is marked social anxiety, 80-94 is severe social anxiety, and ≥95 signifies very severe social anxiety.
Time frame: At the initial, 2-month, 6-month, and 12-month time points
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital