ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06772376Updated Mar 31, 2025

SERS Sensor Based on CHA Reaction for EGFR Mutation Typing in Advanced Lung Cancer

An observational study in Lung Cancer in Normal and Malignant Tumors, sponsored by Fuzhou General Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-31.

Sponsored by Fuzhou General Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Summary:This study is a prospective, multicenter clinical study. In previous studies, we successfully constructed a CHA reaction-mediated self-calibrated SERS biosensor for the detection of EGFR mutation typing (Del-19, T790M, L858R) in lung cancer patients, and verified that the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the SERS biosensor exceeded 95% in a small sample of 32 patients. In order to obtain the highest level of clinical evidence and truly achieve clinical transformation, this prospective, multicenter clinical study aims to verify the analytical efficiency of the SERS biosensor for EGFR mutation typing in patients with advanced lung cancer.

Purpose:This prospective, multicenter clinical study aims to verify the analytical efficacy of the previously constructed CHA reaction-mediated self-calibrated SERS biosensor in EGFR mutation typing in patients with advanced lung cancer.

Research subjects: The patients enrolled in this project are confirmed to be advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Enrollment will be completed in 25 centers and the enrollment will be competitive.

Research location: 900th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force Research intervention: None Study duration: Patients will be enrolled from June 2024 to June 2025. Subject participation time: Telephone follow-up will be conducted every three months until the end of the study.

Read the detailed description

With the continuous development of medical technology, especially molecular biology technology, targeted therapy for lung cancer has made rapid progress, and the prognosis of targeted therapy has been significantly improved compared with chemotherapy. In clinical practice, molecular typing of EGFR mutations is conducive to timely and optimal tumor treatment. At present, common detection methods include Sanger sequencing, next-generation sequencing (NGS) and RT-PCR, and most of their samples are from tumor tissues. However, the defects of tissue samples such as small quantity, long detection cycle, heterogeneity and invasiveness have brought challenges to the application of these methods. Therefore, in order to overcome the many limitations faced in detecting gene mutations in tumor tissues, it is of great significance to seek feasible alternatives that are easy to obtain and low intrusiveness for EGFR mutation screening. Previous reports have shown that clinical serum circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) retains relatively complete genetic information, and EGFR mutations in tumor cells can be reflected in ctDNA in real time. In blood, the detection of ctDNA has unique advantages, such as high timeliness, low false positives and high specificity. Therefore, with blood as an ideal substitute, low-invasive ctDNA detection can become an effective tool for liquid biopsy. Unfortunately, there is no standardized method to detect EGFR mutations in blood samples. Common methods for detecting ctDNA include NGS, mutation amplification retardation system (ARMS) and digital PCR. However, these methods have disadvantages such as complex operation, long time, high cost, low sensitivity and poor specificity. Therefore, a new method for rapid and sensitive ctDNA typing detection is urgently needed.

SERS has become one of the most promising tools in biomedical analysis due to its excellent optical properties. However, since the copy number of mutant ctDNA in blood is only 1% of wild-type DNA, traditional SERS technology cannot meet the strict conditions for ultrasensitive detection. Catalytic hairpin assembly (CHA) is a typical isothermal enzyme-free signal amplification strategy. In order to further improve the analytical ability of the detection platform for low-abundance ctDNA, we combined CHA and SERS as a biosensor constructed as a dual signal amplification strategy to improve the analytical performance of the detection platform for EGFR in serum. In our previous study, we successfully constructed a CHA reaction-mediated self-calibrated SERS biosensor for EGFR mutation typing (Del-19, T790M, L858R) in lung cancer patients, and verified the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the SERS biosensor in a small sample of 32 patients to be over 95%. In order to obtain the highest level of clinical evidence and truly achieve clinical transformation, this prospective, multicenter clinical study aims to verify the analytical efficiency of the SERS biosensor for EGFR mutation typing in advanced lung cancer patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Cancer in Normal and Malignant Tumors

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • SERS
  • CHA
  • EGFR
  • advanced lung cancer
03

In context

Neoplasms

10,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,324 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 200 across 2,638 observational studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Fuzhou General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 40 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients diagnosed with NSCLC by histological pathology and confirmed to be in advanced stage by clinical staging.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Participants with Lung cancer meeting the criteria of TNM (Ninth Edition);
  2. Participants are willing to participate in this study and follow the research plan;
  3. Participants or legally authorized representatives can give written approved by the Ethics Review Committee that manages the website;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with other active malignant tumors;
  2. Patients with missing baseline clinical data;
  3. Patients with severe underlying lung diseases (such as bronchiectasis, bronchial asthma or , etc.), or those with a history of occupational or environmental exposure to dust, mines or asbestos;
  4. Participants who do not cooperate or refuse to participate in clinical trials at a later stage.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients diagnosed with advanced stage NSCLC by pathology

    The study was conducted in 25 centers across the country, recruiting 200 patients with advanced NSCLC with different confirmed EGFR mutation types (Del-19, L858R, T790M, and no gene mutation).

    Diagnostic Test: SERS sensor based on CHA reaction

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testSERS sensor based on CHA reaction

    1. Screening interested participants should sign the appropriate informed consent (ICF) prior to completion any study procedures. 2. The investigator will review symptoms, risk factors, and other non-invasive inclusion and exclusion criteria. 3. The following is the general sequence of events during the 3 months evaluation period: 4. Completion of baseline procedures Participants were assessed for 3 months and completed all safety monitoring.

    Also known as: NGS, RT-PCR

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. NGS or RT-PCR

    NGS or RT-PCR for EGFR mutation types

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Diagnostic accuracy

    Determine the EGFR mutation type of cancer patients enrolled through the RAMAN intelligent diagnostic system

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. SERS(Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy) result

    SERS sensor based on CHA reaction for EGFR mutation types

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Time to RAMAN diagnosis

    The time to perform RAMAN testing and obtain diagnostic results after obtaining serum

    Time frame: up to 30 days

  3. Safety assessment Results

    AEs and SAEs through Day 30

    Time frame: up to 30 days

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for May 2026; primary completion for Jun 2026, 1 month later.

Of 1,098 non-industry observational studies under Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 61 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 227. This study's planned 1 month is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,246 studies reached it within 58 months; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 210.

Neoplasms covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 3, 2025
First posted
Jan 13, 2025
StartEst.
May 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2026
Last update
Mar 31, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 31, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06772376
Lead sponsor
Fuzhou General Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 13, 2025
Start date
May 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 31, 2025

Study contacts

Zongyang Yu, Ph.D
Contact
yuzy527@sina.com
13509327806

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion