An interventional study of Protein A immunoadsorption and intravenous methylprednisolone in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders, sponsored by Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-30.
Sponsored by Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
To clarify the efficacy and safety of protein A immunoadsorption therapy for acute exacerbations of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders(NMOSD), we designed a multicenter, open-label, superiority randomized controlled clinical trial, planning to enroll 144 patients with NMOSD. We plan to treat patients with acute NMOSD using protein A immunoadsorption combined with high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone, and compare this with treatment using high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone alone. The aim is to observe the impact and safety of protein A immunoadsorption on the treatment efficacy for these patients experiencing acute exacerbations of NMOSD, ultimately providing more comprehensive clinical evidence to support treatment protocols for the acute phase of NMOSD.
162 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuromyelitis Optica; 72 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 144 is above the median of 25 across 97 interventional studies indexed under Neuromyelitis Optica.
Browse Neuromyelitis Optica studies →Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University is the lead sponsor of 130 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
The inclusion criteria for the study are as follows:
Exclusion Criteria:
The experimental group was treated with a combination of protein A immunoadsorption and intravenous methylprednisolone. The methylprednisolone was administered following a regimen of 1g for 5 days, 0.5g for 3 days, 0.25g for 2 days, and 0.12g for 1 day. Protein A immunoadsorption was conducted every other day, unless a physician determined that the patient's condition was unsuitable for treatment, in which case treatment was administered according to medical advice. A total of 5 treatments were given, with each session involving the regeneration of plasma at 1 to 3 times the plasma volume. Sequentially, the patients in this group were uniformly administered oral immunosuppressants, specifically azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).
Device: Protein A immunoadsorption
The control group was treated with intravenous methylprednisolone, following a regimen of 1g for 5 days, 0.5g for 3 days, 0.25g for 2 days, and 0.12g for 1 day.Sequentially, the patients in this group were uniformly administered oral immunosuppressants, specifically azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).
Drug: intravenous methylprednisolone
The experimental group was treated with a combination of protein A immunoadsorption and intravenous methylprednisolone. The methylprednisolone was administered following a regimen of 1g for 5 days, 0.5g for 3 days, 0.25g for 2 days, and 0.12g for 1 day. Protein A immunoadsorption was conducted every other day, unless a physician determined that the patient's condition was unsuitable for treatment, in which case treatment was administered according to medical advice. A total of 5 treatments were given, with each session involving the regeneration of plasma at 1 to 3 times the plasma volume.
The control group was treated with intravenous methylprednisolone, following a regimen of 1g for 5 days, 0.5g for 3 days, 0.25g for 2 days, and 0.12g for 1 day.
To assess the effectiveness of the treatment, the change in the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score is evaluated one month after the start of treatment compared to the baseline. The baseline is defined as the patient's condition before
To assess the effectiveness of the treatment, the change in the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score is evaluated one month after the start of treatment compared to the baseline. The baseline is defined as the patient's condition before treatment began, or if the patient had not yet reached a plateau during the initial treatment phase and continued to worsen during hospitalization, the most severe stage during the current hospitalization is used as the baseline.The EDSS is a scale used for the objective and repeatable quantification of disability in patients, with scores ranging from 0 to 10. A score of 0 indicates normal function, while a score of 10 indicates death. An increase in the EDSS score reflects worsening symptoms.The method of evaluation involves calculating the EDSS score difference as follows: EDSS Score Difference = EDSS Score (Baseline) - EDSS Score (1 Month After Treatment Start).
Time frame: Evaluation timing includes from the screening period to the baseline and the EDSS score assessment one month after starting treatment.
Plan to share: No
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University