ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06761287OPALUpdated May 30, 2025

Optimizing Patient Selection for Surgery Using Pathologic Analysis Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

An interventional study of Endoscopic resection and Short interval restaging in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (LARC), sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre. Recruiting at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-30.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This interventional, non-randomized, prospective trial aims to evaluate the role of endoscopic resection following neoadjuvant treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Phase I focuses on assessing the feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection of residual scar or superficial residual neoplastic tissue following neoadjuvant treatment.

Phase II explores the potential of this approach to guide patient selection for total mesorectal excision and to serve as a definitive treatment option for those with limited residual disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (LARC)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • locally advanced rectal cancer
  • neoadjuvant
  • endoscopic resection
  • endoscopic submucosal dissection
  • endoscopic intermuscular dissection
  • feasibility
  • safety
03

In context

Rectal Neoplasms

2,400 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectal Neoplasms; 587 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 65 across 1,751 interventional studies indexed under Rectal Neoplasms.

Browse Rectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre is the lead sponsor of 78 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years old
  • Signed
  • Patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer showing complete or near-complete clinical response after therapy without evidence of invasive disease (>T2) or locoregional invasion on magnetic resonance imaging and without any signs of disease on a computerized tomography scan.
  • Patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer showing incomplete response with presence of superficial residual lesions, without invasive features on endoscopic evaluation, without evidence of invasive disease (>T2) or locoregional invasion on magnetic resonance imaging and without any signs of metastatic disease on a computerized tomography scan.
  • Without previous medical history of rectal cancer or rectal surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous medical history of rectal cancer
  • Previous rectal surgery
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Complete clinical response

    Defined as the presence of residual clear scar seen on endoscopic examination, without evidence of invasive disease (\>T2) or locoregional invasion on magnetic resonance imaging and without any signs of metastatic disease on a computerized tomography scan.

    Procedure: Endoscopic resection

  • Experimental
    Near complete clinical response

    Defined as the presence of irregular mucosa or small mucosal nodules or superficial ulceration or persisting erythema of the scar seen on endoscopic examination, without evidence of invasive disease (\>T2) or locoregional invasion on magnetic resonance imaging and without any signs of metastatic disease on a computerized tomography scan.

    Procedure: Endoscopic resection · Behavioral: Short interval restaging · Procedure: Total mesorectal excision

  • Experimental
    Incomplete response with presence of superficial residual tissue

    Defined as the presence of superficial residual tissue without features of deep invasion seen on endoscopic examination, without evidence of invasive disease (\>T2) or locoregional invasion on magnetic resonance imaging and without any signs of metastatic disease on a computerized tomography scan.

    Procedure: Endoscopic resection · Behavioral: Short interval restaging · Procedure: Total mesorectal excision

  • Active comparator
    No significant response

    Persistant local signs of malignancy

    Procedure: Total mesorectal excision

Interventions

  • ProcedureEndoscopic resection

    Eligible patients will undergo endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or endoscopic intermuscular dissection (EID) after two to eight weeks of nCRT completion, depending on the used neo-adjuvant regimen. Procedures will be performed using the GIF EZ-1500 endoscope (Olympus America, Center Valley, PA, USA) and an electrosurgical unit (VIO 300 D; Erbe, Germany) to power the electrosurgical knife (1.5-mm DualKnife J, Olympus America). For mucosal incision, Endocut or Drycut mode will be used, while Precise, Swift or Spray Coagulation modes will support submucosal dissection and hemostasis. An initial submucosal lift will be created by Glycéol Gel injection. The ERBE Flushing Pump (Erbe, Germany) will supply further submucosal lift during dissection through foot pedal-controlled, pressurized injections of methylene blue and saline solution delivered via the DualKnife J's ceramic-tipped tubing.

  • BehavioralShort interval restaging

    Close follow-up and endoscopic re-evaluation four to eight weeks after the initial evaluation\*. \*Defined as the first endoscopic evaluation after completion of the neoadjuvant treatment

  • ProcedureTotal mesorectal excision

    This technique consists of the surgical complete removal of the rectum, together with the surrounding mesorectum lymphovascular fatty tissue (mesorectum).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of Endoscopic Resection

    Feasibility of the endoscopic resection technique in the context of locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy including radio-chemotherapy. This will be assessed by the curative, en-bloc, and R0 resection rates.

    Time frame: From the endoscopic procedure date to the date of reported pathology results, estimated to a maximum of 15 days

  2. Disease Recurrence

    This will be assessed by the rate of local or distant recurrences and the need of salvage surgery within 1, 3 and 5 years following the neoadjuvant treatment and endoscopic resection.

    Time frame: From the endoscopic procedure date until 5 years after the completion of the neoadjuvant therapy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Complete endoscopic resection rate

    This is defined as the absence of residual visible tissue after endoscopic resection

    Time frame: The day of the endoscopic procedure

  2. En-bloc endoscopic resection rate

    This is defined as a single piece endoscopic resection, with clear margins

    Time frame: The day of the endoscopic procedure

  3. Incidence of procedure-related technical complications (Safety of the technique)

    This will be defined as any complication occuring during the performance of the endoscopic procedure, such as muscle galling, rectal muscle perforation, minor or major bleeding, anesthesia-related adverse events, endoscopic material defect

    Time frame: The day of the endoscopic procedure

  4. Incidence of early procedure-related adverse events

    This will be assessed by evaluating the incidence of procedure-related adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) within 30 days post-procedure. This includes bleeding rates, perforation rates, infection rates among other complications.

    Time frame: Starting the next day following the endoscopic procedure until 30 days after the procedure

  5. Incidence of late procedure-related adverse events (Long-term safety of the procedure)

    This will be assessed by evaluating the incidence of late procedure-related complications within 1, 3 and 5 years after the procedure. This includes delayed haemorrhage, delayed perforation, stenosis, stricture, infection and local pain among other complications

    Time frame: From the endoscopic procedure date until 5 years after the procedure date

  6. Endoscopic tumor characteristics

    This will be assessed by the correlation between endoscopic tumor characteristics and the rates of recurrence and salvage surgery. Endoscopic tumor characteristics include the presence of a non-lifting sign, muscle retraction sign, fibrosis, and the description of vessels density (low/moderate/high)

    Time frame: From the endoscopic procedure date until 5 years after the procedure date

  7. Pathologic tumor characteristics

    This will be assessed by the correlation between residual tumor characteristics (e.g. resected specimen surface, the presence of residual tumor, tumor differentiation, margin status, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion (PNI), fibrosis degree, tumor budding) and the rates of recurrence and salvage surgery

    Time frame: From the endoscopic procedure date until 5 years after the completion of the neoadjuvant therapy

  8. Pathological response

    This will be assessed by the correlation between the degree of pathological response (e.g., complete, partial, or poor response) and the rates of recurrence and salvage surgery

    Time frame: From the endoscopic procedure date until 5 years after the completion of the neoadjuvant therapy

  9. Molecular biomarkers

    This will be assessed by evaluating molecular biomarkers such as Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) on the resected specimen, and correlating these findings with the rates of recurrence and salvage surgery

    Time frame: From the pathologic report date until 5 years after the endoscopic procedure date

  10. Survival Outcomes

    Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 1, 3 and 5 years.

    Time frame: From the endoscopic procedure date until 5 years after the completion of the neoadjuvant therapy

Other outcomes

  1. Procedure Duration

    The average time taken to perform the endoscopic resection, measured in minutes and reported by the endoscopist

    Time frame: The day of the endoscopic procedure

  2. Length of Hospital Stay

    Number of days patients are hospitalized post-procedure

    Time frame: From the endoscopic procedure date to the date of the patient's discharge from the hospital, up to 30 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06761287
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre
Responsible party
Mariana Figueiredo (Medical Doctor (Gastroenterology, Therapeutic Endoscopy and Digestive Oncology), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 7, 2025
Start date
Mar 28, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2030 (estimated)
Last update
May 30, 2025

Study contacts

Mariana Figueiredo
Contact
mariana.figueiredo@stpierre-bru.be
+32 23533332
Amélie Deleporte
Contact
amelie.deleporte@stpierre-bru.be
+32 25354144

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion