ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06759064IPIZAUpdated Nov 19, 2025

Intraperitoneal Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Zoledronic Acids for Gastric Cancer Malignant Ascites

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of zoledronic acid plus Sintilimab intraperitoneal injection in Cancer of Stomach, Adenocarcinoma and Ascites, Malignant, sponsored by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-19.

Sponsored by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years 1 month later.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal injection of immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with zoledronic acid for the treatment of malignant ascites in gastric cancer.

This study is a phase Ib/II clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal injection of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with zoledronic acid in the treatment of malignant ascites in gastric cancer, which consists of two phases, firstly, the phase Ib safety study, which adopts the '3+3' drug-escalation experimental design, and after determining the safe and tolerable dose, it will proceed to the second part of the phase II efficacy study. The Phase II study was designed by Simon's two-stage approach to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with zoledronic acid in the treatment of malignant ascites in gastric cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer of Stomach, Adenocarcinoma
  • Ascites, Malignant

Keywords

  • gastric cancer
  • malignant ascites
  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors
  • zoledronic acid
  • intraperitoneal injection
03

In context

Stomach Neoplasms

3,399 studies on the registry are indexed under Stomach Neoplasms; 992 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 66 across 2,499 interventional studies indexed under Stomach Neoplasms.

Browse Stomach Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University is the lead sponsor of 310 studies on the registry; 188 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Gastric adenocarcinoma diagnosed pathologically;
  • Malignant ascites confirmed by ascites cytology;
  • Presence of ascites confirmed by CT with ascites graded as 2nd and 3rd degree (EASL guidelines and ICA consensus);
  • Those aged 18-75 years;
  • Patients who had not undergone local administration of drugs in the abdominal cavity and systemic immunotherapy within the previous 4 weeks;
  • Vital signs are stable, score (≥70), and expected survival time is >3 months;
  • Normal bone marrow haematopoietic function, blood routine: HGB ≥90g/L, WBC ≥2.5×10\^9/L (NEU ≥1.5×10\^9/L), ≥90×10\^9/L;
  • Normal coagulation function without bleeding tendency ( of prothrombinogen INR\<1.5);
  • Liver function: total ≤1.5 times the (ULN); and ALT ≤2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) (or ≤5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) if the abnormalities are mainly due to tumour infiltration);
  • Renal function: Cr ≤1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or ≥60mL/min.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-malignant ascites (e.g., portal hypertension ascites or infected ascites);
  • Presence of to immunotherapy (including long-term hormone use, history of radiation pneumonitis, radiation hepatitis, radiation enteritis, etc.);
  • Combination of other serious cardiopulmonary diseases that affect the treatment, etc;
  • Patients with extensive abdominal adhesions; encapsulated peritoneal fluid; history of intestinal obstruction; and malignant patients with extensive distant in the terminal stage;
  • Women who are breastfeeding, pregnant, or preparing for pregnancy;
  • Patients with plasma albumin (ALB) \<30 g/L and severe hypoproteinemia;
  • Patients with known to components of the test drug or its analogues;
  • Patients with other severe, acute or chronic diseases that may interfere with the interpretation of the study results and who, in the judgement of the investigator, are unsuitable for participation in the clinical trial;
  • Patients with cognitive dysfunction, or poor treatment compliance as judged by the investigator;
  • Participants in other clinical trials within 4 weeks;
  • Combination of other ;
  • Those who, in the opinion of the investigator, are not suitable for participation in the clinical trial.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    zoledronic acid plus Sintilimab intraperitoneal injection therapy arm

    patients will receive zoledronic acid 0.5-1mg plus Sintilimab 1.0mg/kg intraperitoneal injection

    Drug: zoledronic acid plus Sintilimab intraperitoneal injection

Interventions

  • Drugzoledronic acid plus Sintilimab intraperitoneal injection

    At D-5\~D-1, drain the ascites by placing a tube in the abdominal cavity first, try to drain the ascites as much as possible according to the clinical routine, and record the amount of drainage.D1, D8, D15, D22 start the first immunocheckpoint inhibitor combined with zoledronic acid treatment, try to drain the ascites first, calculate the amount of drugs according to the patient's body weight, and then dissolve the corresponding dosage of immunocheckpoint inhibitor and zoledronic acid in 100 ml of saline and inject them into the abdominal cavity respectively, and then inject another 100 ml of saline according to the patient's tolerance. The corresponding dose of immune checkpoint inhibitor and zoledronic acid was dissolved in 100 ml of saline and injected into the abdominal cavity.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) or maximal tolerance dose (MTD) in the Phase Ib stage

    Side effects of drug or treatment that are serious enough (e. g. ≥Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity according to CTCAE 5.0 in ≥1/3) to prevent an increase in dose or level of that treatment. The MTD is defined as the previous dose level.

    Time frame: 28 days after the last treatment

  2. Objective response rate

    Complete remission (CR): complete resolution of ascites and maintained for more than 4 weeks; complete disappearance of all target lesions; Partial remission (PR): the amount of CT-measured ascites decreased by more than 50% compared to pretreatment and the amount of ascites withdrawn again was less than 1/2 of the previous withdrawal and was maintained for more than 4 weeks; the sum of the diameters of all measurable target lesions was ≥30% below baseline; Objective Response Rate(ORR) = CR + PR

    Time frame: 4 weeks after last treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rates of Adverse events according to CTCAE 5.0 in overall subjects

    Adverse events were graded and recorded according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0. A general physical examination, measurement of vital signs, laboratory safety evaluation, and documentation of relevant adverse events were performed at each visit during the treatment period.

    Time frame: 3 months after the last treatment

  2. Time for ascites control

    If PD was judged and ascites was not re-punctured and drained, the time of this follow-up visit was used as the time of ascites control; if the patient had undergone puncture and drainage prior to the follow-up visit due to intolerance of ascites symptoms, the time of re-puncture was used as the time of ascites control.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Immune cell changes

    Immune cell changes in ascites

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  4. Quality of Life Assessment

    A quality of life score (QOL) for oncology patients was used. The quality of life score (QOL) of oncology patients contains 12 dimensions, including appetite, spirit, sleep, fatigue, pain, family understanding and cooperation, colleagues' understanding and cooperation (including leadership), own knowledge of cancer, attitude towards treatment, daily life, side effects of treatment, and facial expression, with the highest score of 5 and the lowest score of 1 for each dimension. Quality of life grading: Quality of life is scored out of 60, with 51-60 for good, 41-50 for better, 31-40 for average, 21-30 for poor, and \<20 for very poor quality of life.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 19, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06759064
Responsible party
Lian Liu, MD, PHD (Professor, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 6, 2025
Start date
Sep 12, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 19, 2025

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion