CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06757933Updated Jan 3, 2025

Comparison Of Spencer Technique And Isotonic Exercise In Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis

An interventional study of The Spencer technique and isotonic workouts in Adhesive Capsulitis, Shoulder, sponsored by Superior University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-03.

Sponsored by Superior University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2024, registered Dec 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study examines the efficacy of two forms of therapy for Adhesive Capsulitis, a condition characterized by stiffness, pain, and limited mobility in the shoulder joint. It is also commonly known as "Frozen Shoulder".

Read the detailed description

Patients between the ages of 30 and 55 were randomly assigned to one of two groups for the trial held at the Saleem Free Hospital Okara and Dar-ul-Shifa Hospital. Group 2 engaged in isotonic exercises that emphasized concentric and eccentric motions of forward flexion and extension, whereas Group 1 was given the Spencer approach, which involved seven different movements. A goniometer and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale were used to measure the range of motion and pain. SPSS 20 was used to analyze the data and assess how well the treatments worked. The findings provided light on how well manual therapy and exercise compare in terms of reducing pain and increasing shoulder movement in people with adhesive capsulitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Adhesive Capsulitis, Shoulder

Browse trials for

03

In context

Bursitis

411 studies on the registry are indexed under Bursitis; 113 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is above the median of 45 across 371 interventional studies indexed under Bursitis.

Browse Bursitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Superior University is the lead sponsor of 242 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Both genders aged 30-55 years
  • Unilateral Adhesive Capsulitis
  • Pain lasting for more than one month
  • Capsular pattern of motion restriction
  • Diabetic patients were included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Participants with rotator cuff tear
  • Rheumatoid and gouty arthritis
  • Tumors of the shoulder region
  • Peripheral nerve injuries
  • Shoulder girdle fracture and dislocation
  • History of shoulder surgery were excluded.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Interventional group I

    Combination Product: The Spencer technique

  • Experimental
    Interventional group II

    Combination Product: isotonic workouts

Interventions

  • Combination productThe Spencer technique

    The Spencer technique, which consists of seven different manual movements intended to increase shoulder mobility and lessen pain, was used to treat the participants in this group. The method seeks to improve blood flow, loosen up the shoulder joint and soft tissues, and reduce any tightness or impingement that is causing pain in the sub-acromial area. By re-establishing appropriate shoulder function and movement patterns, the Spencer approach is commonly used to treat disorders including adhesive capsulitis.

  • Combination productisotonic workouts

    This group's members engaged in isotonic workouts that emphasized forward flexion and extension motions. Both concentric (shortening the muscle) and eccentric (lengthening the muscle) motions were used in these exercises. These exercises were designed to increase shoulder range of motion and strengthen the rotator cuff muscles. People with Adhesive Capsulitis may have less pain and have better shoulder function if they perform isotonic workouts, which increase muscular strength and stability.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    (NPRS) was used to measure the subjects' level of pain. This scale helps measure the amount of pain alleviation attained with each intervention by allowing participants to rank their discomfort from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).

    Time frame: 12 Months

  2. goniometer

    A goniometer, which measures the angle of joint movement, was used to measure the shoulder's range of motion (ROM). Improvements in shoulder mobility, which is frequently limited in adhesive capsulitis, were assessed with the aid of this assessment.

    Time frame: 12 Months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dr. Saleem Memorial Free Hospital Address: College road, Depalpur Rd, adjacent baldia hall, Okara
    Okāra, Punjab, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06757933
Lead sponsor
Superior University
Responsible party
Muhammad Naveed Babur (Principal Investigator, Superior University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 3, 2025
Start date
Feb 15, 2024
Primary completion
May 25, 2024
Completion
Mar 2, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 3, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion