CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06743958Prehab4KidsUpdated Aug 18, 2026

Prehabilitation in Childhood Soft Tissue or Bone Sarcomas

An interventional study of Exercise intervention in Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Lower Extremity, Bone Tumor of the Lower Extremity and Childhood and Adolescent Cancer, sponsored by Technical University of Munich. Active, not recruiting at 2 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-18.

Sponsored by Technical University of Munich · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
6 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to investigate the feasibility of a prehabilitative training intervention. The intervention includes specific strength and balance exercises during neoadjuvant chemotherapy with children and adolescents diagnosed with soft tissue or bone tumor in the lower extremity. This explorative approach of prehabilitation might help to reduce muscle and bone weakening and associated functional limitations during and after acute therapy. By designing this study like a controlled clinical trials, the investigators will also gather preliminary data on the intervention's potential effects in enhancing/on the pre-operative condition. The goal is to improve post-operative outcome and rehabilitation processes in children and adolescents diagnosed with soft tissue or bone sarcoma of the lower extremity.

Read the detailed description

Soft tissue and bone sarcomas of the lower extremity pose significant challenges for affected individuals, often associated with considerable burden. Chemotherapy, load restrictions, and surgery frequently result in long-term physical limitations, causing structural and functional deterioration. In childhood and adolescence, these challenges are particularly pronounced, as they affect physiological development, resilience, and autonomy. Although movement promotion and therapeutic programs are designed to address these deficits, they are typically implemented post-operatively and during follow-up care. The benefit of implementing a specific program before the operative therapy remains elusive. The presented study explores the feasibility of a supervised prehabilitative training intervention and gather preliminary data on its potential effects in enhancing the pre-operative condition. The goal is to improve post-operative outcome and rehabilitation in children and adolescents diagnosed with soft tissue or bone sarcoma of the lower extremity.

This bicentric feasibility study, designed as a controlled clinical trial, enrolls all children and adolescents aged 6-18 years who are newly diagnosed with primary osteosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, or rhabdomyosarcoma of the lower extremity. Based on the study site, participants are allocated to either the intervention group (IG) or control group (CG), with a target sample size of 16-18. The intervention consists of specific strength and balance training sessions during neoadjuvant therapy, conducted at least twice a week for a minimum of 30 minutes per session. The CG does not receive any training intervention. The study has been consented by the local ethics committee.

The primary endpoint is the proof of feasibility of the intervention, assessed via descriptive analysis of recruitment rate, acceptance, data quality, practicability, and safety (adverse events). The secondary endpoint is the demonstration of the efficacy of the intervention comparing structural and functional measurements intra-individually and between groups at four timepoints: within ten days post-diagnosis, pre-operatively (post-intervention), at the end of therapy, and at 1-year follow-up. The measurements include psoas muscle area, body composition, strength, mobility, balance ability, gait analysis, two questionnaires on physical activity and quality of life, and quantitative measures of the clinical course during treatment (days of hospitalization, infection rates, etc.).

This study is designed to evaluate the feasibility of a specific prehabilitative training intervention in children and adolescents with soft tissue or bone sarcoma of the lower extremity. Additionally, preliminary data on the effects of this training are collected, aiming to mitigate muscle mass loss, support physiological body composition, and improve functional outcomes such as balance, gait, and physical activity. Enhancing everyday functionality and fostering a sense of autonomy can significantly improve the quality of life in this population, underscoring the importance of investigating and promoting such interventions in this underrepresented patient group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Lower Extremity
  • Bone Tumor of the Lower Extremity
  • Childhood and Adolescent Cancer

Keywords

  • prehabilitation
  • bone tumor
  • soft tissue sarcoma
  • exercise intervention
  • childhood cancer
  • functional outcomes
03

In context

Bone Neoplasms

322 studies on the registry are indexed under Bone Neoplasms; 81 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 16 is below the median of 50 across 218 interventional studies indexed under Bone Neoplasms.

Browse Bone Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Technical University of Munich is the lead sponsor of 315 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of a bone tumor or soft tissue sarcoma of the lower extremity
  • Diagnosed less than 10 days ago, confirmed through biopsy
  • Age Range of 6 to 18 years
  • Treatment will be conducted at one of the two designated study sites

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical contraindications for the implementation of the intervention and measurements, in consultation with the treating physicians (e.g., acute risk of bleeding or fractures, pain, infection, nausea, dizziness, lack of orthopedic clearance for weight-bearing in the tumor region, other acute orthopedic limitations unrelated to the underlying condition, etc.)
  • Language barriers that prevent understanding of the instructions for study participation
  • Cognitive impairment or developmental delay that hinders comprehension of the instructions in the testing situation, thereby preventing standardized diagnostic data collection and intervention
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
16 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    Specific strength and balance training during neoadjuvant chemotherapy

    Other: Exercise intervention

  • No intervention
    Control group

Interventions

  • OtherExercise intervention

    Specific strength and balance training intervention during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, twice per week for 30 min, progression according to individual status

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility Criteria 1 - Recruitment Rate

    The number of children and adolescents diagnosed with bone and soft tissue sarcoma of the lower extremity who agree to participate compared to the total number approached for this study.

    Time frame: At enrollment

  2. Feasibility Criteria 2 - Acceptance

    Number of performed exercise sessions during intervention period compared to intended sessions and number of performed measurements and compared to intended measurements.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months following end of therapy

  3. Feasibility Criteria 3 - Data Quality

    Number of evaluable exercise documentation data and measurement data.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months following end of therapy

  4. Feasibility Criteria 4 - Practicability

    Difference between scheduled and required time frame for the exercise sessions and measurements.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months following end of therapy

  5. Feasibility Criteria 5 - Participants' Feedback

    Feedback questionnaire with multiple choice options and free text answers.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months following end of therapy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total psoas muscle area

    Total psoas muscle area at lumbal level (L4) analyzed via MRI or PET CT

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months following end of therapy

  2. Fat-free mass

    The weight of all body components excluding fat, measured in kilograms, using bioimpedance analysis. Outcome measures 7.-11. will be combined to report body composition.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months following end of therapy

  3. Fat mass

    Total body fat weight, measured in kilograms, assessed via bioimpedance analysis. Outcome measures 7.-11. will be combined to report body composition.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months after end of therapy

  4. Total body water

    The proportion of total body water in kg, expressed as percentage, measured through bioimpedance analysis. Outcome measures 7.-11. will be combined to report body composition.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months after end of therapy

  5. Body cell mass

    The mass of metabolically active cells in the body, measured in kilograms, via bioimpedance analysis. Outcome measures 7.-11. will be combined to report body composition.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months after end of therapy

  6. Phase angle

    An indicator of cellular health and membrane integrity, measured in degrees using bioimpedance analysis. Outcome measures 7.-11. will be combined to report body composition.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months after end of therapy

  7. Muscle strength

    Overall muscle strength measured by hand-grip dynamometry measured in kilograms. Reference values enable comparison with healthy children and adolescents. Higher scores imply increased muscle strength.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months following end of therapy.

  8. Range of motion of the adjacent joints

    Range of motion of the adjacent joints measured with an analog goniometer in degrees. Higher numbers of degrees imply better range of motion.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months following end of therapy

  9. Gait analysis

    Gait analysis measured with a force plate to analyze how pressure is distributed during stance phases of walking (vertical ground reaction force during loading response, mid stance, terminal stance, toe off).

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months following end of therapy

  10. Path length

    The total distance traveled by the center of pressure during balance assessment, measured in centimeters using a force plate. Outcome measures 15.-18. will be combined to report balance ability.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months after end of therapy

  11. Mean velocity

    The average speed of center of pressure shifts during balance assessment, measured in meters per second with a force plate. Outcome measures 15.-18. will be combined to report balance ability.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months after end of therapy

  12. Sway angle

    The angular deviation of the center of pressure from a neutral position during balance tasks, measured in degrees using a force plate. Outcome measures 15.-18. will be combined to report balance ability.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months after end of therapy

  13. Equlibrium score

    Calculated from the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral projection of the 90% Standard Ellipse and estimated height of center of gravity during balance tasks in percentage using a force plate. Outcome measures 15.-18. will be combined to report balance ability.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months after end of therapy

  14. Level of physical activity

    Level of physical activity before, during and following therapy measured with the standardized ActiOn questionnaire. This tool reports individual physical activity levels and enables evaluation of meeting physical activity recommendations for children and adolescents.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months following end of therapy

  15. Quality of life

    Quality of life during and following therapy measured with the standardized and validated KINDL questionnaire. This tool enables evaluation of quality of life compared to reference values of healthy children and adolescents. Higher scores imply higher self-reported quality of life.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months following end of therapy

  16. Quantitative measures of clinical course during treatment

    Quantitative measures of clinical course during treatment (days of hospitalization, infection rates, days between surgery and start of adjuvant chemotherapy, units of physiotherapy) documented via analog and digital clinical record. This information is individual and not comparable to any reference values, however, provides important information regarding medical treatment and recovery process.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months following end of therapy

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Technical University of Munich, Germany; TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Pediatrics. German Center for Child and Adolescent Health (DZKJ), partner site Munich
    Munich, Bavaria 80804, Germany
  • Dr. von Haunersches Kinderspital
    Munich, 80337, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Winter CC, Muller C, Hardes J, Gosheger G, Boos J, Rosenbaum D. The effect of individualized exercise interventions during treatment in pediatric patients with a malignant bone tumor. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jun;21(6):1629-36. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1707-1. Epub 2013 Jan 5. PubMed 23292667 ↗
  • Runco DV, Zimmers TA, Bonetto A. The urgent need to improve childhood cancer cachexia. Trends Cancer. 2022 Dec;8(12):976-979. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Aug 3. PubMed 35931609 ↗
  • Pilz F, Vill K, Rawer R, Bonfert M, Tacke M, Heussinger N, Muller-Felber W, Blaschek A. Mechanography in children: pediatric references in postural control. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2022 Dec 1;22(4):431-454. PubMed 36458382 ↗
  • Lurz E, Patel H, Lebovic G, Quammie C, Woolfson JP, Perez M, Ricciuto A, Wales PW, Kamath BM, Chavhan GB, Juni P, Ng VL. Paediatric reference values for total psoas muscle area. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Apr;11(2):405-414. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12514. Epub 2020 Jan 9. PubMed 31920002 ↗
  • Gotte M, Gauss G, Dirksen U, Driever PH, Basu O, Baumann FT, Wiskemann J, Boos J, Kesting SV. Multidisciplinary Network ActiveOncoKids guidelines for providing movement and exercise in pediatric oncology: Consensus-based recommendations. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Nov;69(11):e29953. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29953. Epub 2022 Sep 8. PubMed 36073842 ↗
  • Gauss G, Beller R, Boos J, Daggelmann J, Stalf H, Wiskemann J, Gotte M. Adverse Events During Supervised Exercise Interventions in Pediatric Oncology-A Nationwide Survey. Front Pediatr. 2021 Aug 19;9:682496. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.682496. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34490156 ↗
  • Garcia MB, Ness KK, Schadler KL. Exercise and Physical Activity in Patients with Osteosarcoma and Survivors. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1257:193-207. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-43032-0_16. PubMed 32483741 ↗
  • Furtado S, Errington L, Godfrey A, Rochester L, Gerrand C. Objective clinical measurement of physical functioning after treatment for lower extremity sarcoma - A systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;43(6):968-993. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 14. PubMed 27836415 ↗
  • Ehrhardt MJ, Leerink JM, Mulder RL, Mavinkurve-Groothuis A, Kok W, Nohria A, Nathan PC, Merkx R, de Baat E, Asogwa OA, Skinner R, Wallace H, Lieke Feijen EAM, de Ville de Goyet M, Prasad M, Bardi E, Pavasovic V, van der Pal H, Fresneau B, Demoor-Goldschmidt C, Hennewig U, Steinberger J, Plummer C, Chen MH, Teske AJ, Haddy N, van Dalen EC, Constine LS, Chow EJ, Levitt G, Hudson MM, Kremer LCM, Armenian SH. Systematic review and updated recommendations for cardiomyopathy surveillance for survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Mar;24(3):e108-e120. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00012-8. Epub 2023 Feb 14. PubMed 37052966 ↗
  • Bhagat A, Kleinerman ES. Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity: Causes, Mechanisms, and Prevention. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1257:181-192. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-43032-0_15. PubMed 32483740 ↗
  • Basteck S, Guder WK, Dirksen U, Krombholz A, Streitburger A, Reinhardt D, Gotte M. Effects of an Exercise Intervention on Gait Function in Young Survivors of Osteosarcoma with Megaendoprosthesis of the Lower Extremity-Results from the Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial proGAIT. Curr Oncol. 2022 Oct 14;29(10):7754-7767. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29100613. PubMed 36290890 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06743958
Lead sponsor
Technical University of Munich
Collaborators
Dr. von Haunersches Children's Medical Hospital, University of Munich, Germany
Responsible party
Sabine Kesting (Head of Pediatric Exercise Oncology Working Group, Technical University of Munich) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 20, 2024
Start date
Feb 20, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 18, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion