ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06740812BARF RCTUpdated Jun 29, 2026

Broadening Antiemetics Research by Comparing the Effectiveness of Fosaprepitant and Metoclopramide

A Phase 4 interventional study of Fosaprepitant for Injection and Metoclopramide Injection in Nausea and Vomiting, Nausea and Vomiting, sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-29.

Sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
212
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study team proposes a double-blind, comparative effectiveness, randomized controlled trial (RCT) to address the following goal: to determine the relative efficacy and adverse event profile of fosaprepitant compared to the standard of care antiemetic metoclopramide. Fosaprepitant and its active metabolite aprepitant are a relatively new class of antiemetic that exclusively acts in the central nervous system by blocking neurokinin (NK-1) which is a key signaling molecule in the centrally mediated aspects of the vomiting reflex. Currently, fosaprepitant and aprepitant both have only two United Stated Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) approved indications for nausea and vomiting: chemotherapy-induced and postoperative. Neurokinin inhibitors are highly effective and generally well-tolerated. Therefore, this class of medication may be a more appropriate medication for the millions of patients with nausea and vomiting that seek care in emergency departments (EDs). Intravenous fosaprepitant is converted to the active metabolite aprepitant on the order of minutes and is significantly cheaper to procure at this time.

Read the detailed description

Nausea and vomiting (NV) are common and interrelated conditions. Approximately 50% of adults experience nausea in a given year while 30% of adults experience vomiting over the same period. Of this population of symptomatic individuals with NV, 25% of patients seek care in any healthcare delivery setting. Health Care Utilization Project (HCUP) data indicates that nearly 9.0 million patients seek care for NV in EDs each year in the United States.

Antiemetics are used to treat NV. Antiemetics currently utilized in the emergency department setting for NV do not always work on the first dose and have a plethora of side effects because of their peripheral mechanism of action outside of the vomiting reflex pathway in the central nervous system. These medications include ondansetron, promethazine, metoclopramide, olanzapine, haloperidol. Chief among these side effects is alteration of an aspect cardiac electrical signaling called the QT segment which represents the duration of ventricular contraction and relaxation. The QT segment is prolonged with commonly used antiemetics which can often be a prelude to cardiac dysrhythmias that are associated with mortality. As a result, patients with NV often have long length-of-stay (LOS) involving supportive care with intravenous fluids or empiric treatment with medications that can potentiate development of cardiac dysrhythmias. This is a problem in busy emergency departments (EDs) struggling to accelerate patient throughput in order to appropriately keep up with patient volume in an under-supplied hospital bed environment nationally.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nausea and Vomiting
  • Nausea
  • Vomiting

Keywords

  • Signs and Symptoms, Digestive
  • Antiemetics
  • Autonomic Agents
  • Peripheral Nervous System Agents
  • Physiological Effects of Drugs
  • Gastrointestinal Agents
  • Antipruritics
  • Dermatologic Agents
  • Neurotransmitter Agents
  • Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
  • Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists
  • Fosaprepitant
  • Aprepitant
  • Dopamine Receptor Antagonist
  • Randomized Control Trial
  • Metoclopramide
  • Adults
03

In context

Nausea

644 studies on the registry are indexed under Nausea; 85 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 212 is above the median of 96 across 544 interventional studies indexed under Nausea.

Browse Nausea studies →

Lead sponsor

Montefiore Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 416 studies on the registry; 69 are open to participants now.

Of its 87 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 76 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults at least 18 years old
  • Present to ED for treatment of Nausea and/or vomiting as defined by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) or identified by treating clinician

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy, desiring pregnancy, or lactating
  • Antiemetic use or intravenous fluids prior to presenting to ED for evaluation and management
  • Bradycardia (\< 60 bpm heart rate)
  • Prolonged (greater than 490ms)
  • Not conversant in English or Spanish
  • Altered mental status
  • Dementia
  • Lack of phone for follow-up communication
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
212 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Investigational Intervention

    Fosaprepitant

    Drug: Fosaprepitant for Injection

  • Active comparator
    Standard-of-Care Intervention

    Metoclopramide

    Drug: Metoclopramide Injection

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sustained Nausea and Vomiting (NV) Relief

    The primary efficacy outcome for this study will be sustained relief from NV at 2 hours following medication administration. Sustained relief from NV will be determined by the intensity of nausea reported by patients following administration of antiemetic. Intensity of nausea will be reported as either "None", "Mild", "Moderate" or "Severe." The number/percentage of patients reporting each degree of nausea intensity at 2 hours will be summarized by study arm. Sustained relief of NV requires a patient to present with a nausea intensity of either "Severe" or "Moderate," which is then reduced by treatment to at least "Mild" or None," within 2 hours of medication administration without the use of any rescue medication. Patients who do not report an initial nausea intensity of either "Severe" or "Moderate" will not be assessed as they are not eligible for the study.

    Time frame: 2 hours (assessed at the 2-hour mark after administration of the intervention)

  2. Development of New Symptom

    The primary tolerability outcome for this study will be the onset of any new symptoms within 2 hours after medication administration. Onset of symptoms will be assessed by asking patients if they developed any new symptoms after administration of the investigational medication. Symptoms will be elicited using an open-ended format. Patients who confirmed that they had experienced new symptoms will be asked to grade the severity of the new symptom(s) using the descriptors "Mild", "Moderate", or "Severe". The frequency and intensity of new symptoms will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.

    Time frame: 2 hours (assessed at the 2-hour mark after administration of the intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sustained NV Relief

    Sustained relief from NV will be determined by the intensity of nausea reported by patients following administration of antiemetic. Intensity of nausea will be reported as either "None", "Mild", "Moderate" or "Severe." The number/percentage of patients reporting each degree of nausea intensity at 24 hours will be summarized by study arm. Sustained relief of NV requires a patient to present with a nausea intensity of either "Severe" or "Moderate," which is then reduced by treatment to at least "Mild" or "None," within 2 hours of medication administration AND maintained at "Mild" or "None" level for the entire 24-hour period following medication administration, without the use of rescue medication.

    Time frame: 24 hours following medication administration

  2. NV Relief

    Relief of NV over time will be determined by the intensity of nausea reported by patients following administration of antiemetic. Intensity of nausea will be reported as either "None", "Mild", "Moderate" or "Severe" and assessed every 15 minutes during the first 2 hours, then every hour after that up to 24 hours. The number/percentage of patients reporting each degree of nausea intensity at each timepoint will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. Sustained relief of NV requires a patient to present with an initial nausea intensity of either "Severe" or "Moderate" and assessments will only be made in patients who did not need rescue medication.

    Time frame: 24 hours (measured every 15 minutes for the first 2 hours, then hourly after that until final disposition; reassessed at 24 hours)

  3. NV Freedom

    Freedom from NV over time will be determined by the intensity of nausea reported by patients following administration of antiemetic. Intensity of nausea will initially be reported as either "None", "Mild", "Moderate" or "Severe" and assessed every 15 minutes during the first 2 hours, then every hour after that up to 24 hours. The number/percentage of patients reporting a nausea intensity of "None" will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. Sustained freedom from NV requires a patient to present with an initial nausea intensity of either "Severe" or "Moderate" and assessments will only be made in patients who did not receive rescue medication.

    Time frame: 24 hours (measured every 15 minutes for the first 2 hours, then hourly after that until final disposition; reassessed at 24 hours)

  4. Sustained NV Freedom

    Sustained NV Freedom will be determined by the intensity of nausea reported by patients following administration of antiemetic. Intensity of nausea will initially be reported as either "None", "Mild", "Moderate" or "Severe." The number/percentage of patients reporting a nausea intensity of "None" will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. Sustained NV Freedom requires a patient to present with a nausea intensity of either "Severe" or "Moderate," which is then reduced by treatment to "None" within 2 hours of medication administration AND maintained at the same ("None") level for the entire 24-hour period following medication administration, without the use of rescue medication.

    Time frame: 24 hours following medication administration

  5. Medication Preference

    Patient preference for receiving the same antiemetic medication as was administered during the study in the event of a subsequent episode of NV will be assessed during a follow-up phone call. Patients will be asked, "The next time you come to the ED for treatment of nausea and vomiting, do you want to receive the same medication again?" Patients will select from the following responses ("Yes," "No," or "Not sure"). Patient responses will be summarized and reported by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  6. Duration of ED Stay

    Mean duration of ED stay, defined as the interval of time from initial presentation in ED to disposition, will be determined. ED durations will be summarized and reported by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. Prolonged LOS is generally associated with increased treatment complications and less favorable outcomes.

    Time frame: Initial presentation to disposition, approximately 4 hours

Other outcomes

  1. Severity of Nausea

    Severity of nausea will be evaluated based on responses to a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = no nausea, 100 = worst nausea possible). Mean scores will be summarized and reported by study arm. Higher scores are associated with increased severity of nausea.

    Time frame: 24 hours (measured every 15 minutes for the first 2 hours, then hourly after that until disposition; reassessed at 24 hours)

  2. QTc Interval (QT interval corrected for heart rate)

    Mean QTc durations, as calculated from electrocardiogram (ECG) readings administered prior to receiving intervention, and at disposition, will be determined. Mean QTc durations will be summarized by study arm. Prolonged QT interval is commonly associated with antiemetics and can often be a prelude to cardiac dysrhythmias associated with mortality.

    Time frame: Prior to Intervention and at disposition, approximately 2 hours

  3. Need for rescue antiemetic medication

    The need for rescue antiemetic medication during the study will be assessed using a binary outcome (i.e., "Yes: or "No") to summarize whether additional dosing of antiemetic medication to treat nausea was needed. Results will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.

    Time frame: 2 hours (assessed at the 2-hour mark after administration of the intervention)

  4. Vomiting Episodes

    The mean number of vomiting episodes per patient over the past 24 hours will be assessed and summarized by study arm.

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours

  5. Hospitalization

    The percentage of patients who required hospitalization within 24 hours due to NV symptoms will be determined and summarized by study arm. Hospitalizations are associated with increased complications and less favorable outcomes.

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours

  6. Need for Fluid Treatment

    The percentage of patients treated with intravenous (IV) fluids will be determined and summarized by study arm. The need for IV fluids is associated with increased supportive care, increased hospital LOS and less favorable outcomes.

    Time frame: 4 hours

  7. Mean Fluid Volume

    For patients requiring IV fluids, the mean per patient volume of IV fluids administered will be summarized and reported by study arm. The need for, and increased volumes of, IV fluids is associated with increased supportive care, increased hospital LOS and less favorable outcomes.

    Time frame: 4 hours

  8. Revisit Rate to Emergency Department

    For purposes of this study, revisit rate will be defined as the number/percentage of participants requiring a revisit to the ED for additional evaluation and management of NV. Results will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. More frequent revisit rates are associated with increased complications and less favorable outcomes.

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mechanisms and Control of Emesis: A Satellite Symposium of the European Neuroscience Association: Proceedings of an International Meeting Held in Marseille (France), 4-7 September 1992. John Libbey Eurotext
  • Singh P, Yoon SS, Kuo B. Nausea: a review of pathophysiology and therapeutics. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;9(1):98-112. doi: 10.1177/1756283X15618131. PubMed 26770271 ↗
  • Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006 Feb-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK52651/ PubMed 21413206 ↗
  • Pourmand A, Mazer-Amirshahi M, Chistov S, Sabha Y, Vukomanovic D, Almulhim M. Emergency department approach to QTc prolongation. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;35(12):1928-1933. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.08.044. Epub 2017 Aug 24. PubMed 28855066 ↗
  • Franklin BJ, Vakili S, Huckman RS, Hosein S, Falk N, Cheng K, Murray M, Harris S, Morris CA, Goralnick E. The Inpatient Discharge Lounge as a Potential Mechanism to Mitigate Emergency Department Boarding and Crowding. Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Jun;75(6):704-714. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.12.002. Epub 2020 Jan 23. PubMed 31983501 ↗
  • Aapro M, Carides A, Rapoport BL, Schmoll HJ, Zhang L, Warr D. Aprepitant and fosaprepitant: a 10-year review of efficacy and safety. Oncologist. 2015 Apr;20(4):450-8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0229. Epub 2015 Mar 20. PubMed 25795636 ↗
  • Langford P, Chrisp P. Fosaprepitant and aprepitant: an update of the evidence for their place in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Core Evid. 2010 Oct 21;5:77-90. doi: 10.2147/ce.s6012. PubMed 21042544 ↗
  • Furyk JS, Meek RA, Egerton-Warburton D. Drugs for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in adults in the emergency department setting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 28;2015(9):CD010106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010106.pub2. PubMed 26411330 ↗
  • Yang Y, Yang N, Wu L, Ouyang Q, Fang J, Li J, Liao W, Cai K, Huang J, Li J, Zhang Y, Wang X, Zhang H, Xu N, Zhao Q, Hu X, Li W, Zhong W, Zhong D, Cheng G, Ye S, Zhong M, Wang D, Liu H, Zheng J, Liu X, Xu H, Zhang L. Safety and efficacy of aprepitant as mono and combination therapy for the prevention of emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: post-marketing surveillance in China. Chin Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct;9(5):68. doi: 10.21037/cco-20-160. PubMed 33161724 ↗
  • Braude D, Soliz T, Crandall C, Hendey G, Andrews J, Weichenthal L. Antiemetics in the ED: a randomized controlled trial comparing 3 common agents. Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Mar;24(2):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.08.017. PubMed 16490647 ↗
  • Cham S, Basire M, Kelly AM. Intermediate dose metoclopramide is not more effective than standard dose metoclopramide for patients who present to the emergency department with nausea and vomiting: a pilot study. Emerg Med Australas. 2004 Jun;16(3):208-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2004.00588.x. PubMed 15228463 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Sep 2027, 9 months later.

Of 27 phase 4 interventional studies under Nausea, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 24. This study's planned 9 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 14, 2024
First posted
Dec 18, 2024
StartEst.
Dec 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2027
CompletionEst.
Sep 2027
Last update
Jun 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06740812
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 18, 2024
Start date
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 29, 2026

Study contacts

Mustfa K Manzur, MD MPH MS
Contact
mmanzur@montefiore.org
718-920-6626
Benjamin Friedman, MD
principal investigator · Montefiore Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Fosaprepitant

Start the discussion